Comments by "Javier Pacheco" (@javierpacheco8234) on "Paul Joseph Watson" channel.

  1. Me as a person who loves architecture. They treat architecture as if it has to be new and trendy and different but have forgotten that architecture is a place where humans should feel happy looking at it inside and outside. That is something Modern architecture does not show.
    91
  2. I miss sir Roger Scruton, he talked brilliantly about how the world accepted ugliness and forgot about beauty.
    23
  3. He's right all this architecture is just monolithic and unattractive. Old architecture was great architecture.
    18
  4.  @blackbeardless  it's great because that architecture was made of more natural materials, they last longer, they aren't all crazy shapes like some architecture that they are doing now. It has ornamentation and has color and there are different shapes that are in proportion. Look at gothic, roman, all the other styles that came previous to modern architecture, they are interesting becuase they have interesting things to look at, when I see modern architecture they are all squares, no proportion, and weirdly placed and no craftsmanship which means those houses don't have those additional features and kind of makes a house look boring and simple, no creativity. Modern likes to use white, gray, or black in their structures. There was so much great architecture from the past and other people thought it would be better in the future, but now we have this. All glass, all concrete, steel but there isn't that character that a traditional style gives. That's why I think traditional architecture is better.There warm, have color, ornament,craftsmanship. It makes a house look beautiful and they should bring it back or at least make some effort.
    18
  5. I kinda agree with pjw whether you like it or not, modern contemporary architecture is not creating uniqueness. It is creating a dystopia society full of artificiality.
    8
  6.  @Sam_T2000  i don't think ugly buildings shouldn't even be built becuase they are a waste of precious land. I believe something that is well designed should be built and put into this land, and not a crazy ugly looking structure. I prefer good architecture to be built instead of ugly architecture which in today's society and most architects admire and make that ugly and similar style. Modern style looks good for stadiums and airports, but the rest no it doesn't. They are fractlated, disproportioned and expensive and overall mundane. With our technology advances, we forgot about our uniquenesses which is our traditional styles and now all over the world it's the same architecture built everywhere which is modern architecture also known as the international style.
    7
  7.  @blackbeardless  it looks like you don't know well about why modern architecture isn't a unique style at all, they all are just squares of glass and steel and many new of these rooms are the same. If they really did follow symmetry and proportion like a classical style which had rules and those rules give comfort to a human beings needs and are also aesthitically pleasing for everyone to look and walk into. If the modern style truly got inspiration from a traditional form, then they will follow some of it's rules but like this styles doesn't have rules then it's just confusion what you are designing and aren't following the rules. Modern architecture is a complete mess! Right now, it doesn't have any symbolism to anything and only cares about how crazy it looks and are more expensive sometimes than a traditional .their architecture doesn't care about relating to the community or surroundings. Also if you know the history of how modern architecture came to be then you will see that it was founded by anti-traditional ideas that wanted a architecture that doesn't care about looks and care about what it does. Traditional architects care about both in their design in which they are beautiful inside and outside. Modern doesn't care about those ideas they care about their ideas to be called what is now modern architecture and their affects have taken many cities to be ugly and indoctrinated many people's minds to believe that this is the future of architecture which is very one sided and rejects the other styles that came to be which were unique and different based on the country that they live in and how they were made. Early modernism was great because they followed traditional methods,, it's just that other architects and other ideas came to development and never put control and later people got inspiration from that and these monster buildings started to be made and lost architecture is still being made. I used to be a huge modern fan back when I was little but now that I learned more and read history then I realized that their movement caused hurt to the other styles and that isn't fair to call the other styles useless like my teachers said because they were from the past becuase this is how beautiful architecture was made and now in this world we call ugly things beautiful. Architects, people are lost and forgotten those little things that matter and give character to architecture like they did before. That's why I don't like modern architecture too much, they are bland, monolithic, and doesn't relate to surroundings. It's this cyber and futuristic architecture that make us in our heads think this is the future of architecture when it's not and it could use other styles as well.
    7
  8. People wanted modernity then that's what happens, especially in architecture, where all cities unfortunately will look the same.
    6
  9.  @Sam_T2000  yeah but not getting rid of the look and style that our traditional styles give. Just by observation, older cities have more diversity in design and geometry. Now we have more identical designs that are similarly being built everywhere in the world. Thats becuase of the loss of meaning and importance of building in a style that will make your city unique but not the same which in today's era is.
    6
  10.  @blackbeardless  yeah but modern architecture, there is no symbolism, yeah they are different shapes but don't really symbolize anything. It's not like an old style which has proportions and symmetry. This new type of architecture there is none of that. It's just big scary squares all over the place or weird forms that look like sci fi. Just the fact that some architect got inspiration from crumbling a piece of paper and calling that architecture just shows how architects and the way architecture is portrayed now has lost their minds and do not respect how previous education of architecture was not valuable. My own teachers say that old architecture is not valuable, when it is and it's 100 times better than what modern is and this ego is destroying the uniqueness of cities. I know contemporary architecture, I know other styles too. It's just It's not the same becuase modern architecture doesn't symbolize anything and they are all bland, no symmetry, no proportions. Less space. The beginnings of modern architecture was correct but now it's lost and keeps creating lost architecture which sucks.
    6
  11.  @blackbeardless  no you're wrong they use less durable materials that won't last so long becuase they are cheap and manufactured fast. They would last up to 60 years and they start to become bad and deteriorate. While traditional architecture used real natural materials that could last more than 100 years.
    5
  12.  @blackbeardless  Google lies sometimes they are not credible 100 percent it's better to know by books and real results and as well as history.
    5
  13. Thank God. 🙏
    5
  14. Then become an architect and design something beautiful. Why expect others to do it?
    4
  15. True.
    4
  16.  @blackbeardless  I do know them, and what I told you is the history of how it came to be and how it doesn't follow traditional styles no more.
    4
  17.  @blackbeardless  we should build traditional architecture becuase they are made of natural materials, they are sustainable too, they have proportions, all the requirements can fit in a traditional style as well and they are beautiful too.
    4
  18.  @blackbeardless  stone, wood, a more natural cement instead of those prefabricated ones, more natural materials.
    4
  19.  @blackbeardless  that began in the 1800's and skyscrapers used steel to make them taller.
    4
  20. We should support and talk on the internet that modern architecture isn't great architecture. Traditional and Vernacular architecture should come back again and be built again becuase this architecture doesn't care about its looks and that's ruining cities. It does matter, beautiful architecture matters and some people don't see that. With all this technology it is more easy to create this architecture than in the past. I really do hope it comes back.
    4
  21. You're not alone, I'm in the same boat as you, it's because in school we follow the concept of abstraction which produces this ugly and crazy looking architecture.
    3
  22.  @Chinoiserie9839  I'm happy that little by little people are starting to care about traditional architecture.
    3
  23. Most architects don't think about aesthitics no more becuase teachers say it is not important. But it is important so students are not allowed to make structures beautiful, and most modern architects and it's followers say that architecture and beauty is subjective but no it's not. Modern architecture is the worst architecture that us in this era has to experience.
    3
  24.  @jenniferskweter  I know, why are people calling unnatractive architecture beautiful it's like people can't understand what's beautiful no more.
    3
  25. Don't worry notre dame will be rebuilt the way it was thank God there are people who respect tradition and history. Modernists do not care but themselves thats why there architecture sucks.
    3
  26. The media is biased and it's sad 😢
    3
  27.  @blackbeardless  nope because this is the truth and the truth is always something we don't want to hear beacuase it hurts. For you, your argument would be that modern architecture is good and to a person who doesn't like modern to you is either considered to be an ignorant or dumb person when they're not, they just have different likings. I already told why I don't like it and I hope in the future it can be brought back or used in some sort of new way.
    3
  28.  @connormay896  but it is true, not everything has to be modern. In some sort of way traditional architecture represents some distinctions from places. You know you are in Europe when you see it's gothic churches and castles, you know you are in Asia when you see its temples and palaces, or India with the Taj mahal. All these great cities that came from the past create different settings around the world which gives it's distinction and originality and represents its culture and its tradition. Now when it comes to Modern architecture it doesn't represent that. It is an architecture that has no style that connects to a country or it's culture or tradition. Traditional architecture used materials from its surroundings while modern uses cheaper and more risky materials that are not sustainable for a structure. They deteriorate to fast and with time become ugly. I do read books about architecture and still am learning but, when you start making everywhere modern then you are creating a city that looks the same. Not saying that ban modern architecture becuase it is useful for a world right now, but also learn what makes a city unique. It's not about how many cool buildings it has, it's about what the city offers too and take into consideration that good architecture creates good cities and happier people to live in.
    3
  29.  @Frups12345678  you're just a modern fanboy, you won't understand traditional architecture and it's beauty if you only like modern architecture. I used to like it becuase I was gullible like most people are but now that I learned more of architecture, and The history of modern architecture I learned that this movement is a disgusting, they indoctrinated architecture education with their radical ideas and many people with time forgot about beauty standards and followed that radical movemrnt. Beauty was never subjective, in this world subjective doesn't work or exist becuase most people follow the popular and not the unpopular. This is real, people will follow what's trending so they can fit in. Ugliness is popular and Beauty is ignored or not appreciated today. But one day traditional and Beauty will come back.
    3
  30. Louis sullivan is the man who said form follows function, he actually made beautiful buildings but people didn't understand what he said becuase he cared about aesthitics and the purpose of the buildings. But people and architects don't understand it truly well, they only think about the function but ornament and proportion matters. You should look up at his documentary. Architecture today doesn't have character.
    3
  31. when we get older and these modern architects die we will bring back the great architecture back.
    2
  32. Yes I agree and I also agree that the cathedral should rebuild its spire the way it was. I believe that some things should stay the same and not be changed. Old should stay with old and new should stay with new.
    2
  33. Beauty and ornament and beautiful patterns and proportionality in architecture should come back. Yes aesthtics do matter to making a good neighborhood. Makes me sad that many stupid people love ugly modern architecture or abnormal futuristic architecture which looks depressing. I want to become an architect but most students follow the indoctrination of modern architecture and later are forced to like it which is sad too.
    2
  34. Yes it reminded me of DVD'S all mixed up and piled up in the table. It is a mess.
    2
  35. That's what's happening to me right now.
    2
  36. I agree modern architecture is ass it's so unpleasing. Architects these days are fucking retards they are so brainwashed and delusional.
    2
  37. Students are brainwashed by our modern Architect teachers, the past is not cared no more in architecture school, they just celebrate individualism and being crazy when beauty and symmetry and the past styles are banned to be used. It is a disgusting socialist cult that continues to grow in power. I'm studying architecture and hate it there, just wish to finish school and then create my own firm to promote the styles.
    2
  38. I'll get a sledgehammer and break all these shits.
    2
  39.  @jaroslavkusl.1049  well ok but that doesn't work when you see everywhere modern architecture, it really is creating ugliness into our cities.
    2
  40. Muslims will think in their head, Catch that Pokemon!
    2
  41. People who like modern architecture and don't like pjw.
    2
  42. I agree I'm a hispanic and I never liked liberalism, conservatism gives a person a simpler life and respects the rules and values that the country made and offers. Liberalism to me is radicalism and I don't like that.
    2
  43. They are disgusting people who don't care about the community and what they build.
    2
  44.  @Chewychaca  the style is deconstructivist architecture
    1
  45.  @Chewychaca  Disney concert hall is part of the deconstructivist style which frank gehry uses. I like that building but the other ones he designed are just bad.
    1
  46. Keep admiring old/ traditional architecture and reject modern becuase modern are killers to beauty. That's why their architecture has no feeling and you're confused and lost.
    1
  47.  @tsnovak20  if it was architecture school don't listen to them because I've been in that situation as well. Teachers don't support tradition, they support modernism.
    1
  48. Your not old bro your classic. Also a art deco fan here and in the future let's bring it back.
    1
  49.  @lemonlemon7272  we are the minority, to make you feel that there is hope, you should check out the Channel called the Aesthetic city. They are promoting classical and traditional Architecture.
    1
  50. I agree, I'm studying architecture and they make me do the same thing. You're not alone in that problem where they make you design ugly architecture.
    1