Comments by "3namechangezalowd Evry90dayzlernmor" (@3namechangezalowdevry90day7) on "MSNBC" channel.

  1.  @Wi-Fi-El  FALSE! Doctors know the difference between a live and a dead baby and there are exceptions for "life of the mother" even if the baby is alive.
    1
  2.  @AstraCielo  STOP LYING NOW! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
    1
  3.  @leaann6445  FALSE. REMOVAL OF A DECEASED BABY IS NOT PREVENTED BY THE LAW.
    1
  4.  @KimHutchinson-qx4gh  You can stop using these tragedies as "doorstops" for abortion on demand because there's NOTHING in the law against removing a dead child! A doctor who didn't would be sued for malpractice!
    1
  5.  @amberscoutstarwatcher THERE ARE LIFE OF THE MOTHER EXCEPTIONS IN THE LAWS ALREADY! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
    1
  6. Saving babies is cruel. Ignorance is Strength. 2024 is 1984.
    1
  7.  @Slim333yBoi  None of the "quality" or "rights" or "resources " matter if you're dead.
    1
  8.  @Slim333yBoi  We need a right to life amendment. Because without life "resources" don't matter.
    1
  9. Pack of trendy truisms. Reminds me of "Freakanomics".
    1
  10.  @CBlargh  You can't really make that "reproductive slavery" argument unless the mother was forcibly impregnated in the first place.
    1
  11.  @CBlargh  They should ban surrogate motherhood. It's another way for poor women to become w horse.
    1
  12.  @kgs2280  Yes, but exceptions for r@p€ ALREADY EXIST, so what's the point of arguing when you already got your way? Is it that you NEED these cases of abuse to exist so you can use them as "doorstops" so you can keep abortion on demand for any reason?
    1
  13.  @Did.a_flip  Yes, in that specific type of case you could argue that. But exceptions ALREADY EXIST.
    1
  14.  @meredithheath5272  Where are you guys going with this "eminent domain" argument? If CPS took your baby, NO, you don't get paid.
    1
  15.  @kgs2280  The point is, such cases of abuse shouldn't be used for "doorstops" to keep abortion on demand legal.
    1
  16.  @CBlargh  Exceptions in the law for cases if abuse already exist. Stop using these cases as "doorstops" to justify abortion on demand.
    1
  17.  @CBlargh  You don't get to "just change your mind" and quit taking care of your kid! This is a person, not a job. You have to raise the kid or legally give it up for adoption if you can't do so.
    1
  18.  @user-ii3vn8tn3q  Pregnancy is not a disorder.
    1
  19. Stop your propaganda shell- games, labelling DELIBERATE killing of a baby "reproductive care", same as removal of a dead one!! Where are these imaginary people that are in favor of leaving a dead fetus inside a woman so she goes septic? This is the FIRST WORLD! We have fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds that show the baby's heartbeat and we are not morons! Do you think burying a person that's ALIVE is the same as burying a dead person? Do you get the difference between ALIVE and DEAD? Then stop your play-acting like removing a dead baby, is the same as killing and removing a live one!
    1
  20.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  Do you know what the NUMBER ONE pre-birth defect babies are killed for is? Lack of a pp! We saw it in rural China during the one-child policy, NINE males born for every female! So-called "women's rights"! Rights don't matter too much if you're dead!
    1
  21. @enravotaboyadjiev7466  Do you know what the NUMBER ONE pre-birth defect babies are killed for is? Lack of a pp! We saw it in rural China during the one-child policy, NINE males born for every female! So-called "women's rights"! Rights don't matter too much if you're dead!
    1
  22.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  Stop your propaganda shell- games, labelling DELIBERATE killing of a baby "reproductive care", same as removal of a dead one!! Where are these imaginary people that are in favor of leaving a dead fetus inside a woman so she goes septic? This is the FIRST WORLD! We have fetal heart monitors and ultrasounds that show the baby's heartbeat and we are not morons! Do you think burying a person that's ALIVE is the same as burying a dead person? Do you get the difference between ALIVE and DEAD? Then stop your play-acting like removing a dead baby, is the same as killing and removing a live one!
    1
  23.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  No! Stop using these cases as "doorstops" so you can have abortion on demand ( for any or no reason).
    1
  24.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  "Women would be forced by law to carry dead babies" is fake propaganda!  The law does not apply to babies that are dead already or to the removal of uterine polyps! This is the first world and we have ultrasounds and fetal heart monitors and endoscopes. They can tell whether a baby is dead or not! The monitor data in the patient's chart is a matter of LEGAL RECORD, as are the mother's vital signs and lab work which will show if she is going septic! Any OB/GYN who claims they were "scared of the law" is covering up malpractice.
    1
  25.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  They go to the Doctor Who kills TARD|S
    1
  26.  @enravotaboyadjiev7466  STOP LYING NOW! THERE'S NOTHING IN THESE LAWS AGAINST REMOVING A DEAD CHILD! AN MD WHO DIDN'T WOULD BE SUED FOR MALPRACTICE!
    1
  27. @airenmarie1250  If doctors are committing malpractice, that's up to the State Medical Board. This is a first world country with fetal heart monitors, ultrasounds and labs. There are life of the mother provisions in all these laws.
    1
  28. ​ @Sundae_Times Amendments are part of the Constitution.
    1
  29. Amendments are part of the Constitution.
    1
  30.  @kgs2280  Orwell just flipped the digits of the year he wrote the book. No particular significance to 1948/1984. Orwell was a Socialist disillusioned with Socialism.
    1
  31.  @Missy-Missy1111  Orwell's Animal Farm is a fable about a Socialist revolution gone wrong.
    1
  32.  @sumiland6445  Well, they need data if they want to see what's causing the miscarriages.
    1
  33.  @kimvarki  Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
    1
  34. @kimvarki  Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
    1
  35. Yes, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
    1
  36.  @kimvarki   @kimvarki  Yes, Orwell was a S0CIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH S0CIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
    1
  37. Orwell was a S0CIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH S0CIALISM! Haven't you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals.
    1
  38. 1984's author, Orwell was a SOCIALIST DISILLUSIONED WITH SOCIALISM! Have you read his other book, Animal Farm? The animals start off taking over a farm and getting rid of a cruel farmer.. they start off with "Animalism" a creed that all animals are equal. Eventually, the pigs start acting more and more human and change things to " some animals are more equal than others"! By the end, the pigs are walking on their hind legs and selling off the other animals to be butchered.
    1
  39.  @kimvarki 1) Orwell
    1
  40.  @kimvarki  2)was
    1
  41.  @kimvarki  3) disillusioned
    1
  42.  @kimvarki  4)with
    1
  43.  @kimvarki  5)Socialism!
    1
  44.  @kimvarki  6)Read
    1
  45.  @kimvarki  7)Animal
    1
  46.  @kimvarki  8) Farm!
    1
  47. Just reverse engineering to figure out what the "bad word" that's getting my reply removed for Thought Crime is! 😂
    1
  48. Looks like the thoughtcrime word of the day is 7) "any mall" ,as in "the any mall kingdom" ! Read Orwell's book Any mall Farm which is about a revolution gone wrong!
    1
  49.  @kimvarki  Orwell's famous book "Any mall" Farm is about a left revolution that becomes corrupt! There's a cartoon and a movie if you don't want to read it.
    1
  50.  @kimvarki  "Any Mall" Farm is about the Russian revolution. He knew mankind was corrupt and Socialism didn't always lead to Democracy.
    1