General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Stephen47 22
HistoryLegends
comments
Comments by "Stephen47 22" (@Stephen-bq4nq) on "HistoryLegends" channel.
Previous
7
Next
...
All
@bulldog6545 great cope🤡
1
@Chrrono yeah Wagner f..ked around with the Americans in Syria and found out😂
1
@jeffrutledge1789 you don't know what the casualty ratio is
1
@Chrrono The US didn't need anyone telling them where Wagner was the US already had them under observation. The US military could wipe Wagner out like a insect
1
@Chrrono The hobos were hiding amoung civilians in Afghanistan and they also had safe haven in Pakistan there was no way they could be destroyed. Wagner f..ked around and found out in Syria and they only faced a small amount of US firepower. They never went near US forces again.
1
@Chrrono saying dude makes you sound like a five year old. Joe Biden ordered the withdrawal so the US left Afghanistan the soldiers in the ground had no say in the issue or how it was conducted. You keep fighting on the internet for the Russian murders in Ukraine.🤡
1
@denisdenisov7623 yeah they were slaughtered the Russian leadership treat them as meat they send them in with no regard for their survival
1
@Deus-Gratia great cope. Russian soldiers have spoken about how their wounded were left where they feel. The Russians don't give a damn about their soldiers throughout their history they've conducted themselves the same way
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 Russia didn't shoot down all Ukraine's planes they're still flying. Mud had always been part of war there are times the ground is firm and the weather clear when offensives take place and times the weather conditions are no good and the combat dies down for a while. The Americans alone have a lot of artillery way more than Ukraine has and the Russians can't defeat the Ukrainian artillery
1
@inf3rnis984 what BS Ukraine doesn't use human wave attacks they can't afford to
1
@inf3rnis984 Ukraine doesn't use human wave attacks a human wave is when you send forward large numbers of infantry just charging at the enemy. The Ukrainian have been sending soldiers forward in smaller groups with armoured vehicles further back to avoid the minefields and provide overwatch with their long range cannon. Casualties are heavy on both sides the Russians tried an attack yesterday they had air support and still got a beating. One foreign Legion unit of around 30 men got ambushed and suffered 80% casualties that hasn't been happening to the foreign Legion across the whole unit.
1
@inf3rnis984 No that entire reply was me debunking the garbage you've been spewing
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 Ukraine still has plenty of artillery and the Russian units have been complaining that the Ukranian have more effective counter battery fire
1
@javylopez2513 they are training the Ukrainian in how to use the weapon systems they've been given. They also trained in basic weapon safety,first aid,clearing buildings and basic infantry manoeuvre. These Ukrainian soldiers are getting about 5 weeks training and they're off to the front
1
@southpole4776 they applied western doctrine but didn't have the equipment to apply it
1
@DobromirManchev the western doctrine is combined arms warfare which has existed since the last year of world war one
1
@maxdoom3521 NATO tactics is combined arms warfare which has been around since 1918 and history has shown it doesn't suck
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 The Russian military is full of conscripts as well both sides have taken heavy losses. Both sides also have a cadre of experienced fighters
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 why do you think the Russians had to do more troop mobilisation it's because they've suffered heavy casualties they been doing a lot of the attacking in the war which meant the Russians were out in the open. A lot of the Russian conscripts may have prior military service that doesn't mean they have prior combat experience.
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 The Ukrainian units have performed very well with the equipment they have. They have limited numbers of mine clearance vehicles and no air support which makes getting forward extremely difficult but they still made life very difficult for the Russians which is evidenced by the fact the Russians had to move their airborne reserve to the area to strengthen the line
1
@southpole4776 Russia and China does have the equipment to sustain a war with NATO no nation is equipped at the moment for a long drawn out war just as so many nations weren't prepared for world war two. Talking about optics the Russians were supposed to be the second best army in the world and they got shown up in Ukraine. The special military operation has been a disaster if Russia was facing the full force of NATO they would already have been pushed out of Ukraine.
1
@southpole4776 your deluded the Russian military has shown itself to be substandard. They engaged in a conventional war with a country they out number 4-1. They had a 10-1 advantage in airpower and couldn't even defeat the Ukranian Airforce. Their Navy has been embarrassed by a country that doesn't even have a navy. The Russian logistics is a joke.
1
@MrTitnik NATO tactics are combined arms warfare which has been used successfully since 1918 by multiple nations. The tactics are suited to the warfare and terrain you see in Ukraine the problem for Ukraine is they don't have the equipment to implement the tactics
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 they still have jets but they have to use them carefully because they've been out numbered 10-1 in the air from the start of the war.
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 yes the Russians have suffered heavy losses you're just lying to yourself. The Ukrainian soldiers in the field aren't deserting they're fighting hard and that's why Russia is struggling to gain more ground. If the Ukrainian military was as unwilling as you claim that wouldn't be the case
1
@nebulongalaxus7212 The Russians have been forcing people to report for conscription and conscription depots have been fire bombed. Men from both countries have fled overseas to avoid conscription this is a real war with real consequences not a movie
1
@Bam230lpl the situation is no different for Russia both sides have had to bring in a lot of replacements
1
@Bam230lpl The Russians can't get forward whenever they attack they take big losses in men and vehicles. They losing more armoured vehicles and artillery pieces per day than they can build. The reality is Russia is bogged down in Ukraine with no end in sight. The Ukrainian can fight in a conventional way but also gave the ability to transition to an insurgency which will suffer less casualties and be cheaper to supply long term. They have anti tank systems that can destroy any Russian armoured vehicle and they can destroy them with FVP drones that cost $500. They also have excellent snipers and as long as the Russians are in Ukraine they going to keep dying and the financial bill will keep increasing. The problem for Putin is when he has to start conscripting soldiers from the major cities these are men with good lives who don't want to die in Ukraine they won't go willingly. The cold hard reality of the war is if the Russians can't break the will of the Ukrainian people to resist Russia is going to lose the war
1
@Cccp731 your comment is so childish it's your mother that should be embarassed
1
@inf3rnis984 They gained more than a village and the Russians suffered heavy casualties as well they had to commit their airborne reserve to the area. The southern flank of Bakmut is also under pressure and it's going to give way at some point the Russians are going to have to abandon it. The Ukrainian also have got across the river further south which could pay off in a big way next year. The war is not over
1
@inf3rnis984 I didn't exaggerate anything they captured several villages in the south and they did get across the river and are enlarging the area they control there. They also captured villages south of bakmut. Russian casualties were heavy you don't commit the last of your airborne reserve to an area unless you're under severe pressure. The only one coping is you
1
@inf3rnis984 I'm not triggered you commented to me talking shit and I replied. The Ukrainian wanted to get to Tokmac and didn't make it because of the minefields and the Russians are running into the same problems. The Russians deployed their airborne reserve because they were under severe pressure you can't explain that away. The gains in the south getting over the river and on the flank south of bakmut can be built on in future operations. Keep coping 🤡🤡 and enjoy the link. https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxA8boDUjkAT2atD3vlxHAEqEtLKE1EQPa?si=FLUO15ZvPP56NhbK
1
@inf3rnis984 The Ukrainian don't use Human wave attacks they were sending men forward in small groups to attack the trenches with armoured vehicles staying back to provide fire support while avoiding the minefields. If Russian casualties weren't heavy they wouldn't have committed their reserve you need to stop lying to yourself about that. https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxA8boDUjkAT2atD3vlxHAEqEtLKE1EQPa?si=FLUO15ZvPP56NhbK
1
@arthurhenare3016 Bullshit
1
History legends you must not have noticed the special military operation is a complete failure you 🤡🤡
1
@henkschrader4513 you don't know how many soldiers Ukraine last so stop throwing numbers
1
@comradekenobi6908 No not NATO supporters Ukraine supporters
1
The Russians expected a repeat of taking Crimea . Lmao
1
@moisiewe plenty of them are still in Ukraine and fighting well and I saw a video the other day of English speaking foreign legion fighting near Bakmut
1
@Michael-eh9hy no when they go over there and find out what a cluster f..k it is with no support and I'm not talking about airpower a lot of them weren't even given decent rifles
1
@mrclean29 Vietnam could never be won because the US policy was to not put ground forces into North Vietnam which made it a holding action and nothing more you simply can't win a war doing that
1
@zafir7007 They left Afghanistan after 20 years because they had done all they could do there.the Taliban wouldn't engage in pitched battles where they could be destroyed and they had safe haven in Pakistan. The US had a government I'm place and for their best to train the Afghan army to defend the country when they left but the reality was 75-80% of the Afghan military were illiterate drug users and it made the whole effort hopeless. The Taliban just avoided major confrontations and used time as a weapon waiting the US out. The Afghan do it with everyone who goes to Afghanistan
1
@SpeCifiC0507 The Taliban weren't goat herders. They have years of experience fighting and are familiar with their terrain. They used classic insurgency tactics conducting hit and run attacks mainly IED and small arms fire then fleeing avoiding direct confrontation so they don't get destroyed. They used time as a weapon basing themselves in Pakistan where they couldn't be touched and just waited the US out. America couldn't stay there for ever at some point they had to leave and the Taliban knew it
1
@SpeCifiC0507 who else would have won in Vietnam or Afghanistan?. The answer is no one they weren't conflicts that could be won.
1
@bigdarshan they weren't rag tag insurgents they were organised and very skilled with IED that could penetrate the armour of any vehicle
1
@Ahmet Akgun yes but they deployed more than 20% of their ground force. The one million man russian military includes the air force and navy
1
@mrclean29 No the US didn't lose the Korean war the communist forces were pushed out of South Korea which was the original goal of the operation.
1
@zafir7007 Biden pulled out the way he did for political reasons he didn't give a damn about Afghanistan he said so 10 years earlier
1
@SpeCifiC0507 I don't make excuses I state facts which are known to anyone who bothered to study the Vietnam war. The only way the war could be won was to go to Hanoi and take out the regime but the US wasn't prepared to put ground forces into North Vietnam. At that point the war was nothing but a holding action that simply couldn't be won long term because the US couldn't stay there forever they were operating on a limited timeline and it was the same situation in Afghanistan. In Afghanistan the Taliban were able to base themselves in Pakistan where they couldn't be touched by US forces and they just waited the US out. The success or failure or both the Vietnam and Afghanistan operations was going to come down to the US being able to train up an effective army to protect the country when US forces left and in neither operation were they able to do so. The US public decided the Vietnam war wasn't worth it so the politicians walked away from the war and stopped supplying the south with ammunition so when the north attacked in 1975 the south collapsed. In Afghanistan 75-80% of the Afghan soldiers were drug users and illiterate building an effective army from that quality of manpower was impossible so the failure of the operation in Afghanistan was inevitable. The vietnamese forces were not just a bunch of rice farmers they had their conventional military and then they had the Viet Cong guerillas. The north Vietnamese conventional forces were well equipped with the latest Russian equipment on the ground and in the air. They had tanks artillery and modern surface-to-air missile systems from Russia and they also had a small air force equipped with MIGs from Russia.
1
@olsiontoska9520 you don't know what losses the sides are taking
1
Previous
7
Next
...
All