Comments by "Marc Joly" (@emjizone) on "The Russian Dude"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
3:34 Very interesting: see the "HEAT" and "DM 702" writings on this shell ? It's not any kind of shell.
It's very probably a special anti-armor shell featuring the "Suchzünder-Munition für die Artillerie" or "SMArt" system, specially designed to detect vehicles like tanks while in flight and to pierce them with plasma.
This round is very similar in use and effect to the french BoNuS 155mm round proved to be used agains Russian tanks coming to attack Vuhledar (if you can remember this disaster for the Russian forces), but it use a different in-flight stabilisation method.
One single round of these can destroy two moving tanks in one single artillery shot , at first shot, without any calibration fire, and from above, so the tank crew has no way to see it coming. At first, the survivors believed they ran on mines, and could not understand how mines could be placed so quickly just after their very efficient deminer worked. But in fact, they where under the fire of what is consider to be an actual high-precision artillery strike in western Europe.
There is no way a tank crew can fire back at artillery at this range, and the mobile artillery can just as well be on the move again before the shell even finish striking.
This shell can do nothing agains infantry, but it sure get rid of tanks, and fast.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
12:57
It is a bad idea to trade the tranquility of Ukraine for Crimea :
- The exit of Crimea from the Ukrainian territory can only be done by free democratic way , by expression of all the people concerned, without coercion and whose validity is guaranteed by the freedom of observation, which has never happened. To negotiate otherwise would be a disregard of the will of the people, and more generally a worldwide encouragement to dictatorship.
- Crimea would continue to be a forward military base for Russia's future re-invasion of the rest of Ukraine and for its blockade by sea , while Putin would not be quite defeated politically. In other words, Ukrainians would still be threatened , and would therefore have gained only a very temporary reprieve.
- Such an agreement would not be renegotiable in case of new treason by the Russian government, and would constitute a kind of jurisprudence in favor of any aggressor, to the detriment of world peace.
The return of Crimea to Ukraine and its future protection against forced military conquests is not to be considered as a bargaining chip with a terrorist, but a decision of international justice , and should therefore not be negotiable once taken.
Mr. Putin's personal feelings are internal Russian affairs and should be settled by Russia alone. However, moved and in solidarity, the other nations remain of course free to offer Russia psychological or psychiatric services if needed to get through this crisis.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1