Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Knowledgia"
channel.
-
83
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mattysti947 It's like teaching History to a donkey. A coward one no less
1) No matter what they referred themselves as, they were not Romans, not since 900 AD. Otherwise so are Turks
2) Yes they did. By 800/900 AD they spoke Greek and Latin was not used even in public administration. And contrary to Italy their culture was a mixture of Slavs, Turks and Greek, 3)Italy kept being Latin, the few Germanics were absorbed by Romans and became Romans themselves
4) the concept of cultural nation existed and Italy was one, Italy was indipendent since 1100 at least, chasing out HRE and will remain so fo 400 years. Contrary to Byzantium who lost itself to Turk
5) Roman heritage is real for Italy, the blood is the sane and the culture at national and regional level was always Roman.
I know it anger you, everyone wants to claim such great heritage, like the Greek one. Only Italy can claim them both.
Now go studying.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@skiteufr French mock others to forget of their ineptitude to win anything.
French was defeated, well, so did Italy. And yes, France, the actual France who collaborated with nazi, declared war to the allies. But it is something French do great, just not as great as surrendering. Italy, on other hand, never did switch sides
Ps: ever heard of Rome empire, Venice, Genoa, Pisa? Italy has a great military History
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1