Comments by "No Name" (@NoName-hg6cc) on "Knowledgia" channel.

  1.  @HIMLIVETH  Then why did Ethiopia never beat Italy and lost all cities?🤣🤣🤣 Moved the capital? To London?😆😆😆 Again, Italy beat AND CONTROLLED Ethiopia. GO STUDY History, not propaganda
    1
  2.  @HIMLIVETH  Exactly, you are the one believing fake news. You need to read and educate yourself in History, you LOST, and grammar
    1
  3. Like 'muricans got theirs despite their arrogance and bravado against people in pajamas
    1
  4. They had weapons, unlike Zulu
    1
  5.  @ዮስ  Pushed back, LOL. You were mostly losing even without Italian army using gas
    1
  6.  @ዮስ  Actually, before that offensive was over Italian pushed back in the East, no gas needed
    1
  7.  @ዮስ  From East as well. Ethiopia never really stopped the Italian army, even without mustard gas
    1
  8.  @ዮስ  No, the army of the North stopped the offensive momentarily in the North, but Italians were advancing in the East, without gas, there was no need there nor in the North
    1
  9.  @ዮስ  It was a minor setback, Badoglio was winning before using gas , in the East the offensive NEVER stopped and no gas was used
    1
  10.  @ዮስ  Italians didn't need gas, it quickened things but Italians were winning without it and Ethiopia was pacified by 1937
    1
  11. in 1400 tercios weren't there
    1
  12. War ended in 1936, Italy won
    1
  13. It was about everything EXCEPT religion
    1
  14.  @Elle-oh2bw  Traitor? He is Eritrean, not Ethiopian
    1
  15. Spain wasn't there in late 1400
    1
  16.  @dopeman1356  Italy won two wars against Ethiopia and didn't lose one
    1
  17. Ethiopia lost in 1936
    1
  18. This is before, 15th-14th century
    1
  19.  @alekord15  They didnt control Italy yet
    1
  20. Nope
    1
  21. You mean 2nd win of Italians on the Ethiopian
    1
  22.  @enricomanno8434  Not really. In 1922 they went to power with violence. Then in 1924 an election took place and they won. About the war, maybe, but he surely wasn't against wars, he made Italy take part in two before WWII
    1
  23. It didn't
    1
  24. Not as much as English or Americans did in their wars
    1
  25.  @mattysti947  Italy as a nation was formed possibly after Ostrogoths invasion, not by division from the Frankish empire though
    1
  26.  @mattysti947  It did. It was different, more culture oriented, but it existed. Longobards and Ostrogoths were absorbed by Roman population to for Modern Italy
    1
  27.  @mattysti947  Byzantines were Romans until they weren't and became more Greek. Italy is still culturally descendant of Romans and was born as a nation in the Middle Ages. Modern Italy was born in 1800 like modern France, uk, Germany and...every modern nation
    1
  28.  @mattysti947  2) the concept of a nation as a culture existed at least in Italy which is, by all means, the true descendant of Rome, culturally at least
    1
  29.  @mattysti947  No, Byzantium ceased to e when it adopted Greek culture. Longobards were absorbed by the Roman population, Byzantium became Slav,,Greek and then Turk. Trust me, there us no other descendant of Romans than Italy, one of the anciest Europeans nations, born in Middle Age
    1
  30.  @mattysti947  Well you didn't say something nice when you say it's like talking to a wall. However I'll try to avoid phrases like that one from now on. 1) Western Roman Empire was Roman. So was Eastern...until it wasn't. 2) You think Byzantine empire was? Lol. No country or people are homogenous and yet, despite many difference, Italians were and are pretty similar and 3) kept Roman culture even in Middle Age
    1
  31.  @mattysti947  4) The Italian states were part of one cultural group. Called Italy 5) no, it's not. Starting with the dialects and the national language itself, to eating and other habits there are more similarities than differences. And all of those are part of the inheritance of Rome. France is more Germanic. Spain and Portugal are close to the Germanic but they are related to Romans too so yes, they can be considered heirs of Romans, though Italy is the closer to Ancient Rome
    1
  32.  @mattysti947  1) Even before it fell 2) Not even its core was, it was slav-greek 3) I already explained it to you
    1
  33.  @mattysti947  No, Italy was mostly homogenous BEFORE. Again, more than BYZANTINE empire 5) no, beside some regional specific food every food has similar aspect, same for wines, and it was also in Middle Ages. Culture is very similar as well No, most Europeans came from the Germanic invaders, they kept some of Latin culture but not as much as Italy. Spain is very much more Germanic and Arabic than Italy, they were invaded first by Vandals then became Arabic for centuries Italian dialects are more similar than Spanish or French are to Italians. Byzantine is a mixture of Greek, Slavs, Turks and Germanic influences
    1
  34.  @mattysti947  4)No, Italy was mostly homogenous culturally BEFORE, despisome differences Again, more than BYZANTINE empire 5)Beside some regional specific food every food has similar aspect, same for wines, and it was also in Middle Ages. Culture is very similar as well No, most Europeans came from the Germanic, they kept some of Latin culture but not as much as Italy. Spain is very much more Germanic and Arabic than Italy, they were invaded first by Vandals then became Arabic for centuries. There us nothing wrong in that, just they ain't close to Romans Italian dialects are more similar than Spanish or French are to Italians. Byzantine is a mixture of Greek, Slavs, Turks and Germanic influences
    1
  35.  @mattysti947  4) It is and it was, if we are talking about 100% similar not even France or England are. Byzantium lasted 1000 years and wasn't homogenous 5) Western Europe has some Latin but no one has as much as Italy
    1
  36.  @mattysti947  4) England is not homogenous( Yorkshire, Cornwall, Northumbria). Byzantium in 1453 controlled only the capital and its territory which was not homogeneous. By 900 AD Greek culture replaced Latin 5) YES
    1
  37.  @mattysti947  Even those territories were not that homogeneous
    1
  38.  @diegorodrigovelasquezmeniz8026  Nope. The Italian nation is far more ancient
    1
  39. Because they are a bunch of treacherous scared pussies
    1
  40. Say it right: the ousting of Moscow puppet propped Russia to send military troops without insignia to provoke unrest and claim those regions for Russia
    1
  41. You mean Italians: no it is not
    1
  42.  @ebrah892  No, Ethiopia had huge help but to not avail
    1
  43.  @nicolas.p331  It did
    1
  44. Blood, genocide and iron fist
    1
  45.  @catadoxas  Not all SSR. Ukraine would hav6been fine. What you call division was stealing
    1
  46.  @vapingcat5406  AHAHAH Italians kicked your ass in Libya and no, we didn't change side. You wouldn't have gone beyond Otranto
    1
  47.  @TheIceman567  It was a colony but still....
    1
  48.  @BuiltSimilarG  OP and glorious....they did lost to Yankees. And those lost Canada. Strong maybe, but not OP
    1
  49.  @TheIceman567  Again, it was a colony but it was Canada
    1
  50.  @TheIceman567  My country? Beside, it was called Canada already
    1