Comments by "You\x27re boring me now" (@You.are.boring.me.now2024) on "Chris At Speakers Corner" channel.

  1.  @uthman2281  You are clearly not that bright, I am not one who clubs baby seals, enjoy your ignorance.
    1
  2.  @uthman2281  Your Quran makes the claim and the evidence has been presented only you are too ignorant or dishonest to address it, that's your problem, in my eyes the Quran is garbage, not even a good read.
    1
  3.  @AlonzoHarris235  Go away troll!
    1
  4. Do you believe it is a genuine "gospel" about your "Isa ibn Maryam"?
    1
  5.  @adamraj8517  It contradicts your Quran on who is "the messiah" , so is your Quran wrong?
    1
  6. It is the "that was with them" at the time of Muhammad that is relevant, it could speaking smurfs and the scripture that 7th century smurfs had, of course smurfs were actually Muslims.
    1
  7. The belief in multiple divine beings and a divine/human redeemer were not unknown to pre "Christian" Isrealites (see Alan F Segal & Daniel Boyarin) Boyarin states in his book The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ states that the only radical thing about Christianity was that Jesus was this divine/human redeemer. There was a range of religious beliefs among early Jews/Christians and these were debated for generations, a chap called prof Jim Papandrea explains this as 'heresy' forcing 'orthodoxy' to define itself, which is what happened at the council of Nicaea. You share the ignorance of your apologists or maybe you are just parroting them. Don't bother asking me to explain or defend the doctrine of the trinity, as an agnostic/atheist I do not believe any of the so called "Abrahamic" faiths. ***To the YT trust and safety team*** Before threatening account closure for the umpteenth time can you please check whether anything I have said is factually incorrect, not supported by Islamic sources or not a direct response to hateful and/or abusive comments by the person who reported me or the person who made the original comment , and it would be nice if you actually identified exactly what was supposedly hateful and why. Due to the preponderance of false flagging from a very specific group of people I will be wording my comments very carefully to avoid it, your “community guidelines” and willingness to appease are being weaponised to prevent any criticism of/response to the dishonest and often abhorrent views being expressed by some on your platform.
    1
  8.  @Always-S17  You said no such thing , you said Jews totally rejected the idea of a divine human, you are parroting an ignorant script!
    1
  9. And your evidence is ?
    1
  10.  @hhussain9293  So nothing but the standard ignorant Muslim script? OK , got it!
    1
  11. I think you should check with your GP in case you are a (censored for YT, enter your own pejorative) ***Note to the YT trust and safety team and only the YT team*** Before putting me on “the naughty step” again and threatening account closure for the umpteenth time can you please check whether anything I have said is factually incorrect, not supported by Islamic sources or a direct response to hateful and/or abusive comments by the person who reported me or the person who made the original comment, and it would be nice if you actually identified exactly what was supposedly hateful and why by responding to my feedback, feedback that you request. Due to the preponderance of false flagging from a very specific group of people I will be wording my comments very carefully to avoid it, your “community guidelines” and willingness to appease are being weaponised to prevent any criticism of/response to the dishonest and often abhorrent views being expressed by some on your platform.
    1
  12. YT are being a bit pathetic with their censoring of late. Farid needs only to respond, whatever he says will be good enough for his little fanboys.
    1
  13. I have no idea , who keeps track and has the figures ?
    1
  14. You've never actually read anything by Marijn van Putten have you? "There are about 60 locations in the Quran, where these regional codices have a slightly different consonantal skeleton . The way that these variants are distributed form a perfect, uncontaminated, stemma (Cook 2004). When such regional difference in consonantal skeleton appears, it is consistently followed closely by the readers of these different regions. For example, the Syrian codex exclusively has Q اٮحٮكم 7:141 whereas the other codices have اٮحٮٮكم . This is reflected in the readings where the Syrian reader Ibn ʕāmir reads ʔanǧā-kum,whereas all other readers read ʔanǧaynā-kum (Ibn al-Ǧazarī §3137). Likewise, the Medinan and Syrian codices have Q ٮرٮدد 5:54 where the Basran and Kufan codices have ٮرٮد ; the Syrian Ibn ʕāmir, and the two Medinans Nāfiʕ and ʔabū Ǧaʕfar read this word as yartadid where the other readers read yartadda (Ibn al-Ǧazarī §2989). The agreement of the readings with the rasm cannot be explained by an intentional accommodation of the rasm to already existing local oral traditions.Had this been the case, we would be unable to explain how the Syrian muṣḥaf shares all variants with the Medinan codex and not a single one with the Basran and Kufan codex, etc. So, whatever oral tradition existed was evidently subjected to a requirement to agree with the rasm rather than the rasm being updated to match the regional qirāʔāt . It is for these reasons that we must think of the Quranic reading traditions as being just that, primarily readings of the rasm. " (pages 52/55 Quranic Arabic From its Hijazi Origins to its Classical Reading Traditions - Marijn van Putten
    1
  15. Under the heading of "Reading or Recitation" Marijn van Putten states "The agreement of the readings with the rasm cannot be explained by an intentional accommodation of the rasm to already existing local oral traditions. Had this been the case, we would be unable to explain how the Syrian muṣḥaf shares all variants with the Medinan codex and not a single one with the Basran and Kufan codex, etc. So, whatever oral tradition existed was evidently subjected to a requirement to agree with the rasm rather than the rasm being updated to match the regional qirāʔāt . It is for these reasons that we must think of the Quranic reading traditions as being just that, primarily readings of the rasm. " So DOD all you really needed was a defective consonantal text that could be and was read in a multitude of different ways, you can download his book for free, that can be your second book.
    1
  16.  @oneandtruth  Listen to a more intelligent Muslim on the topic search YT for "EP 137: Revisiting the Corrupted Bible Argument | Dr. Ali Ataie" , you won't find the full episode because the Muslims deleted it but you will find the interesting parts saved by "Christians".
    1
  17. Public conversion is a very Islamic thing, Muslims turning to any other religion tend to keep it quiet, any idea why?
    1
  18. What about the topic ?
    1
  19.  @B.Y.A  So nothing on the topic then, just the usual empty rhetoric? Got it!
    1
  20.  @B.Y.A  Still nothing on the topic then? Got it!
    1
  21.  @B.Y.A  Still nothing !
    1
  22.  @B.Y.A  I'm agnostic/atheist and pig is lovely ! Save your ignorant and well worn troll script for somebody else!
    1
  23.  @B.Y.A  ps Convenient for your quasi historical "prophet" that Camel suddenly became permissible having also been forbidden in Deuteronomy 14 but typically you chose to ignore that bit or you have never actually read it, of course your quasi historical "prophet" gave credit to your one dimensional caricature of the Biblical Jesus in a very conveniently vague passage of the Quran (3:50)(the Quran is a masterpiece in vagueness). Interestingly 3:49 is a story taken from Christian apocrypha , a book which depicts the infact "Jesus" and an angry and vindictive child who kills others and it also has a variant reading which, although not a particularly serious one, does demonstrate that there are different wordings.
    1
  24.  @B.Y.A  Troll with an ignorant script ! (you of course).
    1
  25. Why proud ?
    1
  26.  @Egyptian_muslim_1  "3 dead triune God"? Who exactly "worships" such a "God" and why are you "proud"?
    1
  27.  @Egyptian_muslim_1  I'm agnostic/atheist, so what/who are you speaking about? And why are you "proud" to have been born into a "faith"?
    1
  28.  @Egyptian_muslim_1  I guess you have no idea why you are proud !
    1
  29.  @Egyptian_muslim_1  "Why you refuse to talk my comments" You are not speaking English ! Why are you proud to be born into a religion?
    1
  30.  @Egyptian_muslim_1  Nor do I ! So why are you proud ??
    1
  31. It's not a contradiction , it is an exception to the rule , the Muslim view is that the scripture given to the Jews and Christians was revealed by "Allah" and that the original followers of "Christ" were Muslims following Islam , that it was the trinitarians who eventually claimed orthodoxy and strayed away from the Islamic "Christ" is not relevant, they were still people who had been given the scripture even if they do not follow it correctly. The verses that talk of "three" are not addressing the trinity , they are appear to be speaking to a tri-theistic group and according to the like of Peter Von Sivers are a monophysite polemic. Early Islam was a totally different beast to the "Islam" that coalesced in the 9th century.
    1
  32.  @adamraj8517  Shabir Ally is in the same position as the rest of you, none of you have any evidence for these alternate books, certainly not that Jews and Christians had in the 7th century, he is basically saying that the Quran in a bit vague. The council of Nicaea had nothing to do with the Biblical canon and no books were burned, unlike with traditional account of the canonisation of your Quran where the source material was ordered to be burnt.
    1
  33.  @adamraj8517  Dr Ali Attie has an interesting take on the topic, he also mentions the "Gospel of Barnabas" , this episode has now been removed from "The Mad Mamluks" channel probably due to the push back from their audience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_IWwFysqIM
    1
  34. If they are stupid enough to give their money to this grifter, more fool them!
    1
  35. Ex Met police officer who last served in Westminster, yes they are , politically corrupt to the core.
    1
  36. Fastest breeding "religion" with the fastest growing apostasy rates according to the likes of "Mufti" Menk!
    1
  37. Or even a real dude!
    1
  38. The usual ignorant and lazy Muslim copy/paste post, I wish I had a £1 coin every time you idiots post this!
    1