Comments by "" (@gcart7675) on "Fleccas Talks" channel.

  1.  @Jamie_Ray12  uhh what?
    1
  2.  @lordofcheeseballs  thats not the only thing different about it but you have a point its just their emotions that they argue with not facts and reasoning so theyll never see the light arguing logic with them
    1
  3.  @johnycakes6613  just cause some people got hurt a few times cause of some idiot that did that doesnt mean no one should be able to again its like punishing everyone with the second amendment by not allowing certain weapons for everyone or even no weapons at all cause some idiot killed a bunch of innocent people or even one innocent person you cant punish everyone for the actions of a few you punish those who cause something bad if they cause something bad
    1
  4.  @Timenaught  it definately is the truth
    1
  5.  @TheNajSD  k bud whatever you say 🤦🏻‍♂️
    1
  6.  @TheNajSD  no thats the comment i make when pretty much if not everything you said is wrong and you wont admit it
    1
  7.  @josephcremeans  and so we can limit their power cause if we're armed and willing to use it then they dont have any power over us they want all guns/weapons "banned" not just whatever the best weapon we have now is that they havent took yet
    1
  8.  @TheSchmed  dont even joke about that we dont need more idiots believing this bullcrap
    1
  9.  @ascarmen42  but they dont care about that they argue with feelings and emotions instead of facts and reasoning so theyll never see the light
    1
  10.  @KingdomOfApple  and alot more useful than bolt actions or pump actions etc like that for the purpose we should be using them and actually alot better weapons for: fighting tyranny like when they try to take our guns/weapons
    1
  11.  @TheSchmed  id rather not he hit at all if youre gonna say something like that the point is they arent supposed to be alllowed to take any of our guns/weapons regaurdless of what they are
    1
  12.  @lueysixty-six7300  the main reason you cant take guns/weapons is the second amendment but it does no good to have if we dont fight back physically to keep it like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  13.  @lueysixty-six7300  wow 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  14.  @josephcremeans  k whatever you say grammar nazi
    1
  15.  @reaperox_  they do no damage to people wearing modern body armor maybe to a completely unarmored target they could so a good amount of damage but even then its still not as much as a modern firearm take a .50 bmg for example they can blow off an entire limg and the temperary wound cavities they leave are bigger than the body theyd be going into so if you got shot in the arm say goodbye to that arm or even a smaller caliber like a .308 can do massive damage way more than a musket hit the heart or vital organs and its gonna mess you up really bad or anywhere actually for that matter but modern day armor makes even the newer guns pretty weak in conparison soft body armor today would stop pretty much all if not all blackpowder threats other than like explosive ammo from a huge black powder gun like a cannon and maybe even stop that if its just the shrapnel youd have to get a direct hit on a person even with a blackpowder explosive cannon ball to have an effective hit we have to have the modern stuff to fight the government with cause i assure you they wont be using outdated gear like we would have if we allow then to tell us what we can and cabt have weaponwise which is why the second amendment was written in the first place but if we dont use it as intended to fight back physically theb it does no good to say we have it cause tyrabts dont care unless made to by force
    1
  16.  @ryanwaller4670  it still would be if modern armor even soft armor wouldnt stop it any armored targets that are in the military make black powder/muskets/cannons etc thats blackpowder useless thats why they dont even regulate them as firearms cause they know you couldnt hurt or kill anyone in the military with thise unless theyre completely unarmored or have a spot where theyre completely unarmored but they wont be unarmored cause theyre the military thats kinda their job to be armed amd armored and fight
    1
  17.  @shrillcrayfish6168  no just no i know its a joke but thats definately not what they intended with the second amendment and i also know we dont need more idiots believing that kinda bullcrap
    1
  18.  @reaperox_  not today they wouldnt theyd more than likely take you to jail for having the weapons than congradulate you for defending yourself from the bad guys
    1
  19.  @71duece56  im glad you said "by that logic" even though theres no logic at all trying to argue that when they just say "press" and not "certain types of press" or anything else that could limit what you can do with press
    1
  20.  @chuckaddison5134  and it didnt do a thing to stop bad guys from getting them cause theyll just make them or steal them or buy them from someone else who doesnt follow the "laws" that they "pass" against them and also you can still get black powder firearms through the mail if theyre "not readily convertable to smokeless powder" cause they dont regulate those like firearms (yet anyway cause i know they want to "ban" all guns/weapons they just havent gotten to that yet) im not saying thats any type of advantage or getting around anything cause it isnt like i said they havent gotten around to "banning" it yet theyre taking it slow and demonizing the best thing we have at the time then wheb they get people on board with that then they mobe on to the next thing and then the next until we have nothing left to fight back with and we're really close to that already since we keep just caving and going by the more and more new "laws" they keep "passing" instead of fighting back physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  21.  @knightatthecrossroads222  it is their minds like you said it may not be evil intents in all their minds wven if what theyre doing is evil the people in charge convince them that its for a good cause even when it isnt always like in nazi germany or any of the communist countries did and then slaughtered millions of their own innocents cause they were led to beliebe that if they gave up their weapons theyd be safer and that the government would protect them when they did the exact opposite and killed them thats whats happening here and therell be another holocaust but here in america if we dont start fighting back physiclly like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  22.  The Gallows  theyr brainwashed into thinking the cops/military will protect them and like you said that the government wont become corrupt or the outsiders wont invade and all that orher bullcrap they constanly push on us until we cave like we have been for about a century now if not more with their so called "laws" they "pass" instead of using the second amendment like you said to be able to effectively fight them back with all the weapons they have
    1
  23.  @Stellar-Cowboy  uhh what?
    1
  24.  @vanad1um665  unless used in a war but if youre going by that definition a knife would be so i definately wouldnt go by that logic thats just an "excuse" for them to "ban" them they know theyre not "weapons of war" thats just what thy want you and all the stupid people they preach to to believe so youll be on their side about "banning them" even the actual weapons they use we should be able to have cause of the second amendment
    1
  25.  @vanad1um665  its not intimindating to anyone who knows anyrhing about them or that theyre just inanimate objects tha can do nothing without an outside force and how are what color or what its made of scary? that makes no sense whatsoever only idiots like i said are scared of them for those reasons a gun is a tool and can be used for good or bad it depends on whos pulling the trigger not what type of gun it is no gun is good or evil the person behind it is good or evil
    1
  26.  @vanad1um665  acyually they would cause their enemies would have full autos most likely and its not a higher fire rate its a different fore mode that allows you to shoot faster than you could with a semiauto with full auto or burst fire modes theres a reason they dont use semiautos other than in "dmrs" or "sniper" rifles
    1
  27. @Doodle Flop its not meant to be logical cause if it was tey wouldnt "ban" anything or want it "banned" cause of the second amendment they want to be able to control you completely and they cant do that if youre armed as well as the military and willing to use it thats the whole point of the second amendment but it doesnt work if we just keep caving to their new "laws" instead of physically fighting to be ale to keep our rights
    1
  28.  @adamjbaker5582  the stupid people do the smart people should be fighting all this bullcrap physically like the whole point if the second amendment is in the forst place cause tyrants arent gonna be made to care unless we do (again the whole point of the second amendment)
    1
  29.  @df9679  they dont understand that cause they dont argue with logic and reasoning they argue with emotions and feelings theyll never see the light
    1
  30.  @vanad1um665  wow youre an idiot if we went by the second amendment instead of their bulcrap they call "laws" then wed still have all that stuff and even if we dont wars arent always won by superior technology alone look at nazi germany for example they had alot of more advanced stuff than the allies and russia and japan etc but they had so many people to fight against and so little resources that they couldnt sustain fighting against them through the whole war
    1
  31.  @hardbumpy8400  theres not too much difference in the two like you said theyre the same gun but with different firemodes or if you mean ar-10s or higher or lower calibers then the only change is the size to accomadate a bigger caliber i undeestand the terms being different for the different modes or calibers or whatever but it really isnt that much difference not saying we shouldbt be able to have them we definately should but thats why and how they confuse people into wanting to "ban" them cause they look and can function pretty similar to the actual ones they use same fire rate even if you put a bumpfire stock or something else to make it be able to shoot that fast and again im not for "banning" any weapon for any reason im just saying thats how they confuse the stupid people they preach to into thinking theyd be "banning" something they arent so theyd be in board with it
    1
  32.  @hardbumpy8400  it already is just a modification just like the m4 or ar-10 or any other variant of an ar-15 same basic parts but one just has some added to add a different fire mode or modes or the caliber changes
    1
  33.  @willard6612  im for guns/weapons and im sure theres more than two even if its very few more than two but yeah alot of people here are total idiots and dont know a thing about guns/weapons or the second amendment and why it was written and all that stuff
    1
  34.  @Jpizzle_x  you can do that in real life too and they mean like actual weapons they use in war like the ones they choose to use not just ones that anyone picks up to use im not for them or whatever im just saying what they mean and you cant really use that definition when talking about our rights to guns/weapons cause the second amendment just says "arms" (which just means weapons not certain kinds")
    1
  35.  @reaperox_  wow youre an idiot yes maybe on completely unarmored targets but even soft body armor today makes them completely useless on any modern battlefield youd need like a direct hit from an explsive cannon ball even on a human to have any effect with a blackpowder style weapon theyre not gonna be unarmored nowadays or at least bot completely unarmored theres only non vital spots that will be open more than likely also at range even with a rifled musket they have way better guns that way outrange and out damage them so youd get sniped before you could even get close enough to accurately shoot them with a musket thats the most retarded argument ive ever heard
    1
  36.  @LadyMaria_AstralClocktower  wow youre an idiot
    1
  37.  @reaperox_  thats one military the other ones arent that stupid or there arent too many that are and id say when they start getting totally demolished in any wars theyd start issuing them unless like i said theyre that stupid not to issue armor at that point
    1
  38.  @shrillcrayfish6168  and like i said its not just cause they believe what they believe its cause of the decisions they make because of what they believ and of youre making them believe that then thats making them do things like want to "ban" our weapons all of them and they have been doing that because we havent been fighting back against them physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place and just cave to what they want its alot more serious than that and we cant "just live how we want and do what we want" unless we do physicaly fight against them because they believe that crap and they have police officers and military who will enforce those beliefs on us again like i said if we dont fight physically like the second amendment intends
    1
  39.  @shrillcrayfish6168  also im not the one being a dick here im trying to show the importance of what im saying and it isnt just calling them stuff cause i dont like what they say or whatever those are those ideals if they try to do that stuff
    1
  40.  @LadyMaria_AstralClocktower  what you said 🤦🏻‍♂️😒😑
    1
  41.  @LadyMaria_AstralClocktower  im not gonna read back through the comments but whatever it was was stupid
    1
  42.  @nathanbryant53  theres never a time when that was all that existed and even if it was it doesnt change how they wrote the second amendment to say "arms" which just means weapons and not just cetain ones so even if that was the case they still dont have any kind of argument for "banning" any weapon for any reason
    1
  43.  @boostio4619  doesnt matter wither way cause the second amendment just says "arms" which means weapons and not just certain ones
    1
  44.  @Jamie_Ray12  just cause they didnt use it to help before now doesnt mean they wont ever have to or cant or something wont happen that they do have to idiot its an in case type thing not like every day youre going to need it and you cant plan for when you need it cause you dont know whats going to happen every single day thats why you carry it all the time
    1
  45.  @John5.56  and type of gun its fired from and of they have armor or not and a distance away they are theres a ton of different factors that make them powerful or not
    1
  46.  @peterwelch5691  theyre just at that point right now they want to "ban" all guns/weapons to be honest its just a slow boiling frog situation they try demonizing one thong at a time until nothings left (if we keep allowing it i mean by going by the "laws" they "pass" and not fighting those more and more "laws" they "pass" physically like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place)
    1
  47.  @Jack-vt1yv  a little correction most of them are the ones in the government hust mislead them by saying stupid stiff cause they know they can cause the stupid people dont know any better and it looks better on them when they have a bunch of people supporting them to the stupid people so they get more stupid people and they get police who will enforce whatever so called "laws" they "pass" just cause theyre paid to do it not cause its their actual job they should be doing and we havent been fighting it physically to keep our rights like the whole point of the second amendment is in the first place
    1
  48.  @John5.56  not neccsarily if that bullet is made of softer materials like lead only it wont penetrate as well and will break up with so much speed there way more variables than speed that accounts for the power of the round
    1
  49.  @noahbreece5643  id rather not be shot at all but muskets wouldnt do crap to days armor even soft body armor plus theyre not as accurate as todays and dont have as much range or power theres no way you could argue for muskets being in any way better than modern weapons we should have wverything they have and no weapons "banned" for any reason cause if the second amendment
    1
  50.  @TheNajSD  k whatever you say idiot
    1