Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
MSNBC didn't conduct the primary, moron. The DNC did not run the primary, moron. EVERY candidate, INCLUDING SANDERS, directly monitors election processes, from beginning to end. So, no, moron: Sanders is not a "victim".
In 2016, Sanders "fans" were whining because in some states there are primaries, rather than caucuses Now they are not whining that the problem is caucuses, but instead its the mainstream media. If it isn't a far-LEFT ideological freak-show fulminating pie-in-the-sky speculations and bogus conspiracy theories, then Sanders "fans" will attack -- not because the mainstream media is biased, but becuase they don't like the FACTS being reported. What they WANT is far-LEFT division and domonizing.
Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Blowing Iowa out of proportion with stupid conspirabunk based upon not knowing how -- thanks to Sanders misinformation -- elections ACTUALLY work helps Trump. Is that what you want?
3
-
3
-
3
-
I thank this doctor: his is the most up-to-date, accurate, and comprehensive statement of the reality I've heard. And he's correct that there are two known strains of the virus.
Where I am the local medical facility is setting up, in a school cafeteria, a testing location for the larger community. (That has been urged by both state and city gov't.) At this point, though, it is -- properly -- for those on the front lines, and those who meet the stringency of the "criteria". Ultimately, there should be no "criteria"; everyone who wants should be able to be tested.
And there's this:
Rachel Maddow reported on a small town in Italy -- 3,300 -- that tested EVERYONE. The infected were quarantined, and the spread of the virus STOPPED IN ITS TRACKS.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Spork Spatula IN FACT various candidates' supporters DID switch camps in order to make one or another candidate viable -- there were INTERVIEWS with some of them. So, no: the media isn't lying; you just don't like the FACTS being reported.
Stating these FACTS about Sanders is only "attack" by the corrupt Sanders' "fans" who HATE THESE FACTS:
1. Sanders 2016 campaign manager -- who was forced to resign when the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC -- was a partner of Paul manafort, and both worked in Ukraine to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president.
Is it a coincidence that they became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns?
2. During the 2016 primary, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns.
Clinton released 30 years of hers and Bills the day she announced her candidacy. And no one had to ask her to do so.
What was Sanders hiding?
3. Sanders, the far-Left "Socialist" voted to PROTECT the gun industry --- which was a top priority of the far-RIGHT ANTI-"Socialist domestic terrorist organization NRA.
4. Only two candidates during the 2016 campaign had "fans" -- which is from ENTERTAINMENT; all others, recognizing that politics is not entertainment, had supporters.
Go ahead: call me names for not suffering the corruption of selective amnesia, calling Sanders critics names because you can't defend him against the facts, practiced by Sanders' "fans".
FACE REALITY:
With Republican gerrymandering -- affirmed by the Supreme Court, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreignpowers to subvert the election, Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. In addition, his "fan" "base" that smears Democrats -- which helps Trump -- and name-calls and insults those who state the facts about Sanders is not a successful means to persuade voters to vote for Sanders.
FACE REALITY: Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And Sanders' writings, from when he was in his 30s, about young children and sex would be blasted all over the media.
And what about his writings asserting that sex prevents cancer? Are there women stupid enough to fall for that pick-up line?
I've been active in politics for more than 60 years. Older people tend to know stuff that young people haven't learned yet. You obviously haven't learned that insulting people and calling them names isn't a way to make friends or win support for your candidate. So you fall for Sanders' Politics of Paranoia -- he's a millionaire with power; he is NOT a "victim" -- and attack anyone who states the facts about Sanders in effort to keep yourself blind to themm. And that, your behavior, is CORRUPT.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Another Constitutional illiterate.
1. The ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time. That includes ALL FOUR of the "Militia Clauses" -- the Second Amendment being the foruth.
2. The Constitution is the supreme Law of the Land. That means that the Militia is UNDER the law, in keeping with the Founders concern that the military power -- there was ONLY the Militia -- ALWAYS be subordinate to and governed by the civil power -- the GOV'T. It is ALWAYS to be REGULATED UNDER AND BY the rule of law -- not the enemy of it. It's even addressed in the Declaration of Independence as a grievance against England:
"He [i.e., King George III] has affected to render the Military indepdent of and superior to the Civil Power."
The Founders are against you. Ask yourself: how do you defend the Constitution by opposing it?
The commander-in-chief of the states' Militia are the states' GOVERNORS. When Federalized, the Coammnder-in-Chief of the Militia" is the PRESIDENT.
3. The first Militia Clause defines the Constitutional purposes of the Militia: law enforcement, SUPPRESSION OF INSURRECTIONS, and repeling invasions.
4. The seonde Militia Clause stipulates that CONGRESS shall organize, ARM, and discipline the Militia. And both in keeping with the Supremacy Clause, and that Clause, the states' Militia, even when NOT Federalized, is regulated BY CONGRESS.
In the event you do know, Congress MAKES THE LAWS, which are REGULATION.
All the jabber about Militia you are spouting is directly from law-illiterate anti-American RIGHT-wing crackpots. "Heller" is the outlier: there has never been an "individual right" in the Second Amendment as ratified. The ONLY "individual right" DEBATED by the first Congress that WROTE it was the right to be EXEMPT from Militia DUTY. That was DROPPED prior to ratification of that Militia Clause.
There's a lot of irresponsible loose talk from the law-illiterate, and other law-illiterate fools reach for that anti-American gibberish as a fantasy "solution" to the anti-Americanism.
1
-
1
-
@tedtrash But we shouldn't call Sanders' "fans," such as yourself, for being a hypocrite on the point.
1. Sanders, who claims to be a Leftist, voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a top priority for the extreme RIGHT-wing domestic terrorist organization NRA.
2. I used to listen to Sanders every Sunday on "Air America," and liked everything he said. Then I saw him campaign in 2016, beginning with his promise to destroy the Democratic -- not the Republican -- Party. And once granted his "request" to run as a Democrat, he continued to trash the Party, his campaign was caught hacking the DNC, and he continually smeared Clinton with Republican/RIGHT-wing lies.
Clinton did not respond in kind because she -- being, unlike Sanders, politically savvy -- didn't want to alienate Sanders voters.
In sum, he showed himself to be a vindictive prick -- and he and his CORRUPT "fans' show that they are the flip side of the Trump coin. Sanders/Trump "fans" -- "fans" are of entertainment, not of the serious matter of politics -- are identical in more than one way:
A. Criticize the candidate, the "fans" attack the critic -- which is not a defense of the candidate.
B. Attack and smear others -- then when called on it for the CORRUPTION it is, proffer the two-year-olds' non-"argument, "They did it first!"
Sanders is wealthy -- but to Sanders "fans" everyone who is wealthy is therefore a "corporatist" and therefore "corrupt" -- the sole exception being sloganizer Saint Sanders.
3. During the 2016 campaign, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. And now he is again standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump by refusing to release his medial records.
4. During his twenty-five years in Congress, Sanders was totally ineffective as a legislature because he REJECTS the democratic process, which IS the legislative process: debate, negotiate, COMPROMISE, achieve a majority consensus.. And you believe the absurd fantasy that he would "change the world" from OUTSIDE the Congress.
Reason is not your strong point. Neither are ethics or morality -- adhering to the facts, and reason -- a concern for you. There are two forms of lying:
A. Commission. Telling a known falsehood. Sanders and his "fans" do so constantly. Sanders' current claim to have opposed the Iraq invasion is a misrepresentation of the facts
B. Omission. Withholding a known truth. Sanders is refusing to release his medical records? So much for "transparency".
You're either a Russian troll or bot, a Trump supporter, or a person so politically naive that you've fallen for old-hat pie-in-the-sky Socialist slogans. FACE REALITY:
Since at latest WWII, the US population has been indoctrinated since earliest childhood to fear and hate Communism/Socialism, which in their minds is such as USSR, North Korea, and Cuba. Were sanders the nominee, the ads against him would include VIDEOS of him praising Communist/Socialist Castro, and praising Communist/Socialist Sandinistas against the United States.
With Republican gerrymandering (protected by the Supreme Court), Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will nonetheless vote for him again before they'd ever vote for a Socialist.
Joy Read is not lying; she is reporting FACTS that you don't like. And that is YOUR corruption, which is identical to Trump's and his moronic MAGAots: LIE by calling FACTS you don't like "lies". Sanders is no less a demagogue than Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Let's dishonestly change the subjet -- that's the typical practice of Sanders "fans"; it is DISHNOEST, and that is CORRUPT.
Sanders is a vindictive prick, as he SHOWED in 2016 by, first, promising to DESTROY the Democratic -- NOT REPUBLICAN -- Party. Then, when the Party graciously allowed him to run as a Democrat -- he STILL not a registered Democrat -- he CONTINUED to trash the Party, and contiuously smeared Clinton with REPUBLICN/RIGHT-wing LIES.
The Vermont Democratic Party has supported Sanders -- INCLUDING WITH CASH -- thoughout his career. And how does he show his gratitude? By insulting, smearing, and attacking the DEMOCRATIC PARY -- and the Democratic VOTERS.
And let's not forget: Devine and Manafort were PARTNERS in Ukraine, helping elet the CORRUPT PRO-Russian president. Next, out of nowhere, Devine and Manafort became -- coincidentally? -- managers of the Sanders and Trump campaigns. Then, shortly thereafter, the SANDERS campaign was CAUGHT hacking the DNC -- and Devine was forced to resign.
Can you say CORRUPTION?
And throughout the campaign, Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with TRUMP with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Let's be HONEST on the point: when Clinton announced her candidacy, she AT THE SAME TIME released THIRTY YEARS of tax returns.
This time around Sandes is standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump by refusing to release his medical records. What is he hiding? Not the fact that he considers himself to be superior to everyone else -- an arrogance identical with Trump's.
Sanders smeared the hell out of Clinton over the "Crime Bill". But at the time Clinton was the First lady, while Sanders was in the Congress, where HE voted FOR the "Crime Bill". Other than being TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE during his TWENTY-FIVE YEARS in Congress -- he got NONE of his yapping of passe pie-in-the-sky enacted into LAW -- and that is becuase he REJECTS DEMOCRACY. The legislative process is quintessentially DEMOCRACY, and therefore INCLUSIVE, and therefore by NATURE INCREMENTAL. It is based on debate, negotiation, COMPROMISE, in order to arrive at MAJORITY CONSENSUS. Sanders REFUSES to COMPROMISE, because he's ALWAYS RIGHT and NEVER WRONG. And his ANTi-democratic "My way or the hghway" got the proper response from his colleagues: "TAKE A HIKE".
What else has Sanders 'accomplished"? He voted AGAINST the "Brady Bill" FIVE TIMES. He voted to PROTECT the gun industry. Those were TOP PRIORITIES of the extremist RIGHT-wing ANTI-Socialist NRA.
But let's not look beyond Sanders' passe pie-in-the-sky rhetoric -- else one see who he actually is: a vindictve prick and liar. Trmp would slap him dizzy, and bury him under the stench of his own baggage -- VIDEOS of his praising Communist/Socialist Castro and the Sandinistas; writings, while in his THIRTIES, about sex and very young children.
Newbies to politics tend to FAIL to respect wisdom -- if they even recognize it: ACTIONS speak louders than words. All you pay attention to is WORDS -- Sanders is not saying anything that is NEW; he's been jabbering the same things during his entire career -- and getting NONE of it enacted into LAW. And you believe he could get that done, for the first time, from OUTSIDE the Congress, where the laws are made? If you believe that, you define yourslef: political newbie. Yes -- you believe you know it all; but it's the VOTERS who are driving the primary elections, not those Sanders instructs you to HATE based upon HORSESHIT.
Last but not least: you are no different than Trump MAGAots: criticize the candidate, you attack the critic -- which is NOT a defense of the candidate. But it is DISHONEST, and therefore it is CORRUPT.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@speks36 If Sanders is the nomine, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week.
Learn some HISTORY:
Since at latest the end of WWII, the US population has been indoctrinated, since earliest childhood, to hate and fear Communism/Socialism. Sanders cannot overcome that fact; and if he is the nominee, you'll see a flood of ads with VIDEO of Sanders PRAISING Communist/Socialist Castro, and PRAISING the Communist/Socialist Sandinistas against the United States.
Trump is a clear and present danger RIGHT NOW AND GOING FORWARD. You are swallowing and regurgitating pioe-in-the-sky FANTASIES that are NOT going to happen in the face of the CLEAR AND PRESNT Trump and Republican threat to the Constitution. to the rule of law. This is not a time to smear eveyone else as corrupt as a True Believer in -- take your pick -- Sanders or Trump.
Like it or not, the mainstream is the MAJORITY. As are Trump's "fans," you are kissing the ass of a wholly INEFFECTIVE extremist. The MAINSTREAM WILL NOT vote for a Socialist (oh -- he's now a DEMOCRATIC Socialist? why is he using dodgy language?).
Now do your usual: attack and smear -- without a shred of evidence -- the Sanders critics -- EXACTLY the sasme as Trump "fans" do. Or learn to THINK, LOOK BEYOND the rhetoric to who and what is behind it. INFORM YOURSELF of the FULL history, notonly that fed you by the far-LEFT. Your faction got NIXON elected. And the origins of the poison now facing us was NIXON.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Certain classes of people" -- Seder is projecting.
Yes, moron: VIDEOS of Sanders PRAISING Communist/Socialist Cuba, and of his praising the Communist/Socialist Sandinistas WILL RESONATE WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Sanders: stop the self-indulgent ego-tripping: your read of history is self-serving crap. You don't know the 1960s; you don't know the 1950s; those who grew up during the eras -- Matthews, myself, DO know them.
But let's ONLY preach to the choir -- maintain that fantasy contact high.
Let's NOT talk to those who hold different views -- that runs the risk of LEARNING.
And no, Seder, that was not the issue with Castro. And after Castro eliminated the problem -- the "elites" -- he became a dictator.
No, Seder, it is not nuts: the far-RIGHT under Trump is favor its own criminals, and promising to prosecute its political opponents. The only difference between that authoritarianism and far-Left totalitarianism are the spellings.
The majority is against Sanders, Seder. I knew Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, you did not: they were assholes, not to be role models.
Yeah -- no recollection, and knowledge of history, no awareness of the necessity to KNOW HISTORY, as legitimate alternative to pot-fueled ideological claptrap fantasies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1