Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

  1. Mainstream media isn't picking a candidate. That's why they are news, but you are not.
    1
  2.  @GOCRAZY3  "Manufacturing Consent" is nothing new. Moreover, when the consent is to the FACTS, the "manufacturing" is constructive. One can be swallowed by media, one can reject -- and bash it -- altogther, or one can learn to distingusih between reporter and facts, and facts and opinion, and facts and propaganda. Yeah: I know it's "hip" for the naive to mistake cynicism for sophistication, and tus to fall into the trap of knowing it all, which latter is not possible. .
    1
  3. Sam Seder -- another miseducated-about-the-realities-of-the-1960s self-appointed pseudo-pundit pseudo-expert. Gad I am so tired or the boggings down in useless hypotheticals in which the FAR-Left so specializes -- while getting NOTHING DONE, which is ALWAYS SOMEONE ELSE'S fault.
    1
  4.  @daddyaf945  I've been at this for more than 50 years. The vast majority of voters are MODERATE -- er, to quote Sanders "fans, "centrists," which to them is ubiquitous with the word "corrupt". They don't know what they are talking about, though they sure are full of themselves with kowing it all. It's oh-so-easy to spin pie-in-the-sky fantasies when reality is unknown and rejected. It isn't that complicated an equation, suggested "solutions" which do not exist IN REALITY notwithstanding: With Republican gerrymandering -- the Supreme Court held that the Federal gov't can't interene, which removes the Federal gov't from enforcing civil rights against state abrogation of them -- Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, and TONS more money than the Democrats have, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. But Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump willl vote for Trump before they'll vote for a Socialist. Further: Sanders "fans" are jabbering "oligarphs" as concerns Bloomberg. First, Bloomberg didn't inherit his wealth. Second, he has been a Democrat and a Republican becuase he isn't an ideologue. Third, he didn't run for office in 2017-18, but he did fund Democratic camapgins around the country, and that helped the Democrats win the House. And he has siad: if not the nominee, he will be putting his money into the campaign ANYWAY in suport of Democrats and against Republicans/Trump. The vast majority is moderate. What they want -- I don't think Buttigieg is the key -- is young and moderate. Sure, they are currently divided between voting for issues, and focusing on the most important issue: getting Trum[p and his openly criminal enterprise out of office. Hopefully that will increasingly shift to focusing entirely on the latter. Bloomberg recognizes the danger, the threat, to the rule of law that is the Trump-Barr alliance. That is paramount above all else.
    1
  5.  @inquisitive.lurker  Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And that he is leading is because young political newbies have their heads up his ass, and it causes them selective amnesia. Is it a coincidence that Manafort and his partner, who worked to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, ended up running both the Trump and Sanders campaigns? In that election Manafort engaged in computer hacking. Shortly into the primary, Sanders' campaign was caught hacking the DNC, and his Manafort-partner campaign manager forced to resign. But let's keep it simple: the vast najority will not elect a Socialist, especially when his history is blasted across the media. He'd be destroyed in a week.
    1
  6. @Salmon I didn't say anything about fiscal conservatives. Where did you get the idea that "centrists" are ipso facto "fiscal conservatives"? Seder, I listened to you and Garfalo on "Air America"t talk about the 1960s. I was there, you were not: you didn't know then what you were talking about, and you dom't know today. I've been politically aware and active for longer than you've been alive; Sanders is talking the same failed far-LEFT folderol that failed THEN. Wake up: Barr just established DOJ "policy" to "investigate" anyone who appears to be a political threat to Trump. While Treasury/Bar are withholding Trump's tax information from Congress, and rguing in court -- next step the SC -- that the demand for Trump's tax returns is "uncontitutional," immediately after the "acquittal" vote, two Republican Senators requested Hunter Biden's tax information from Treasury, and it was immediately provided to them. And you continue to talk ideological claptrap, and push the other vindictive prick, Sanders. Ask yourself if it is a coincidence that both Trump and Sanders' campaign managers were the same two people -- one of them Manafort -- who worked together in Ukriane electing the corrupt pro-Russian president who was subsequently pushed out by the Ukrainian people. And at the beginning of the 2016 primary, the Sanders campaign got caught hacking the DNC, and the campaign manager was forced to resign. Yeah, I know: you're "anti"-corruption -- depending on whose.
    1
  7.  @chrishakala528  With Republican gerrymandering -- protected by the Suprme Court -- Republican voter-purgings, Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, and Barr's new "policy" of "investigating" any viable political threat to Trump, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist.
    1
  8.  @garyatkins7142  And the bi-partisan House bills focused on protecting the election are characterized by McConnell as "Socialist".
    1
  9. @Salmon I have no idea what "media" you're consuming that declares unnamed Democrats as being "corrupt" because "centrist," which automagically makes them "fiscal conservatives". And probably "oligarchs" -- but "certainly" an "oligarch" if wealthy -- one of the far-Left's new buzzwords. I've been politically aware and active for more than 50 years. I've heard all the divisive labelling and name-calling -- from the far-LEFT also -- especially during the 1960s. All the ideological jabbering is willful blindness. It is fingers in the ears. It is ignoring immediate reality by indulging in exuberant speculations. No matter the Democrat, the Republicans will smear them as "Socialist" becuase associated with Sanders. McConnell labels the bi-partisan election protection bills "Socialist" as excuse to ignore them. Yes: the vast majority are moderates, who the far-LEFT doesn't like, so they smear them as equivalent of the dirty word "centrist". Lebels, labels, labels; name-calling, name-calling, name-calling; childishness deluding itself that it is politically astute. So busy smearing the middle they haven't time to pay attention in real-time to what the Republicans -- and Barr -- are doing.
    1
  10. At its peak in Italy, the lethality was 12 per cent.
    1
  11.  @toddinthemiddle  So you're a short-witted sociopath.
    1
  12. Corporate media FOX is worried about being sued becuase of deaths resulting from its disinformation. A number of doctors should be at least as worried -- they haven't the deep pockets for legal defense that FOX does.
    1
  13. Seder's politics of paranoia has become audial. Here's hearing things. And he is hardly in the position to talk about "balance".
    1
  14. 1. Let's ONLY talk to people who agree with us -- it retains all that smug feel-good fantasy. 2. Let's NEVER talk to those who hold different views -- because in that is the danger of LEARNING AND GROWING.
    1
  15. Because he knows several facts that the know-it-all Sanders "fans" ignore: 1. With Republican gerrymandering, Republican voter-prugings, and Republican invitation to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. 2. The vast majority is moderate. Centrist. 3. Attacking Democrats helps Trump. Period. Full stop.
    1
  16. Seder: you weren't even a spark in your fathers eye while Carville was winning elections. And not talking about being Socialist WILL NOT stop the Republicans from calling Democrats Socialist. Sanders appeals to a specific crowd -- not to the broad electorate: young political know-it-all newbies. Carville's mistake was getting Bill Blinton elected twice. Medicare for All is "incredibly popular" with those with whom it is "incredibly popular". Get it through your inflated self-importance: you are NOT the majority. Yes, there is a center. And the vast majority is centrist. Condescendingly insulting the majority is stupid. Carville is correct. You, Seder, and your fellow know-it-alls, are not going to "direct' anything, except into the far-LEFT ditch. Trump would slap Sanders dizzy. And how much did Sanders accomplish by being stubbornly anti-compromise for his twenty-five years in Congress? He was totally ineffective. Sanders would be slapped into dizzy befuddlement by Trump. And Sanders IS NOT going to "refashion" the electorate. Unless, of course, he is the other side of the same coin as Trump: a far-LEFT dictator.
    1
  17. You aren't a Republican, but you do believe the illusion. Face reality: with Republican gerrymandering, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign subversion of the election, the Democrats need all the votes they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist,. And Sanders' writings, when in his 30s. about young children and sex will be all over the media. If nomiinated he'd be destroyed in a week. And if not nominated we'll likely hear the same excuse about "cheating" -- leaving out the fact that his first campaign manager was forced to resign when it was revealed that his -- Sanders' -- campaign hacked the DNC at the beginning of the primary. And then stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Yeah, I know: let's bury the facts about Sanders behind attacks on those who have the temerity to not forget the facts about him, and -- worse -- state them publicly. Let's, in short, be as corrupt as Trump's "fans".
    1
  18. What WOULD have heepened is that Sanders would have been hit with his WRITINGS from when he was in his THRITIES about how women's orgasms prevewnt cancer, and sexs and young children. The FAR-Left IGNORING his sleazy history is INTELLECTUALLY DISHONEST. And THAT is CORRUPTION. The same goes for Sanders' FALSE claim to be "anti-establishment" -- when in fact as a member of Congress for THIRTY YEARS makes him quintessentially. And the younger political newbies WILL change their bahivors when reality hits them upside the head. And let's hear it from Cenk, whose poltics were roundly REJECTED, as were Sanders', by the ACTUAL VOTERS. And let's hear more from the FAR-Left white folks who deign to speak on relaities for people of color, becuase they know so much about it from direct esperience.
    1
  19. Sam: Your focus on the ISSUE is productive. But eliminate the MAYBES -- we get enough of that "suggestiveness" from both Far-Left and Far-Right conspiracybunkers. We DON'T need more of the same SOCIALLY CORROSIVE POISON. The FACTS are out there to ELIMINATE the guess-work, the maybes, the speculations. But you'll have to trust the MAINSTREAM -- PROFESSIONAL -- media, which means STOPPING the channeling of Far-Left pro-Sanders/anti-Biden/anti-Democrats bullshit propaganda. It the VAST MAJORITY of Democrtic VOTERS who have REJECTED Sanders and CHOSEN Biden. That is NOT "billionaires" and "elites".
    1
  20. It is a form of voter suppression, in this instance called HOLOCAUST.
    1
  21.  @crackaassedcracka  I thought you were protesting in DEFENSE of freedom of speech. But -- no: exactly llike the far-RIGHT, you are OPPOSED to the expression of views of which you disapprove. and you call OTHERS "corrupt"!?
    1
  22.  @c.l.freeman7654  Personal attack noted. Sanders and Trump "fans" are identical: they attack the critic -- which is not a defense of their candidate. It's just plain stupid. And it ALIENATES those you CLAIM to want to PERSUADE. I'm not at all "crying" about criticizing ANY candidates. What I oppose, punk, is the LYING BY AND AGAINST those you ASSHOLES DON'T KNOW, and are too damned stupid to have the sense to know what you're talking about. You're full of shit and bullshit slogans and buzzwords.
    1
  23.  @Gweezy12  Coincidence that corrupt Paul Manafort and Devne worked together to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine, and then, out of nowhere, became managers of both Sanders and Trump campaigns? No leaps in logic in tht question, child. But let's ask you another relevant question: How do you think the non-Sanders "base" will react to Trump campaign ads with VIDEO of Sanders praising Communist Castro, and Communist Sandinistas against the United States? Believe they'll wait in line for the polls to open so they can vote for the Socialist? Now is not the time to "experiment -- we've already seen what happened with the Ttump experiment, pulled off by the totally politically ignorant.
    1
  24.  @hexstan179  I don't pick sides on that one -- or on being all caught up in claptrap ideological starightjackets. It isn't either or -- that isn't how REALITY works; it's BOTH far-KLeft and -Right. Peopkle don't adore politicians unless they are FOOLISH -- a central clue for which is their calling themselves "Fans," as if the politician is an entertainment celebrity. Politics is a whole different realm than entertainment. If Sanders "fans" haven't leaned the dangerous mistake of the pot luck politics of electing an extremist to "blow up" -- or "burn down" the system, then they haven't learned the meaning of responsibility of citizenship in a democracy. The cure for one extreme is not to revert to the other extreme; that sort of "politics" is only safely reserved for confinees in rubber rooms.
    1
  25.  @crackaassedcracka  Your anti-American CORRUPTION is showing.
    1
  26.  Ken Hudson  Your CORRUPTION is showing.
    1
  27.  @calmingwaves3134  In view of the fact that you reject my word, do that research for yourself. If you've not seen the VIDEOS of Sanders raising Communists/Socialists Castro and the Sandinistas, then you don't know your candidate. Isn't the ultimate stupidity to vote for a candidate about whom you are deliberately ignorant?
    1
  28.  @xiquotic1711  Your CORRUPTION is showing with the childish name-calling. As ever, the wealthy and powerful Saint Sanders is the paranoid victim. Learn how to grow up; then grow up. The Trump Criminal Enterprise is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER -- so let's attack DEMOCRATS.
    1
  29. One owns coyright in one's emails. But "Twitter" works by re-"Tweeting," so that would likely be viewed by the courts as an exception, perhaps "fair use"; else the "Twitter" platform would be illegal, but ruling so would interfere with "commerce" -- making money -- so that wouldn't be a likely outcome of such a suit.
    1
  30. When you smear Democrats you vote for TRUMP. Yeah, you believe destroying the country -- the Constitution and rule of law -- will be grat fun! "Revolution, baby!" Let's not talk about bloodbath.
    1
  31. You omit the fact that Sanders is attacking the Democratic Party.  Is that so you can pretend it's "unfair" (whine, whine, whine) that the Democratic Party responds in kind?Sanders attacked the Democratic Party even after it allowed him to run as a Democrat.  I assume his "fans" consider that the behavior of a "class act": as a guest in a neighbor's house, shit on the living room rug and demand praise for the achievement.
    1
  32. @Athena Chan 2003 Trump isn't anything; he has no actual position except his racism and vindictiveness. His "policies" are far-RIGHT. Sanders is the mirror image on the far-LEFT, except that he is all over the place with his attacks. And his votes: the vote to PROTECT the gun industry was central to the agenda of the extreme RIGHT-wing domestic terrorist organization NRA, which, as we know, laundered Russian money into REPUBLICAN politics. So tell us: was Sanders' vote to protect the gun industry -- tough shit for Newtown, El Paso, etc., etc., etc -- "Socialist"? Or did it feed the anti-American far-RIGHT gun loons who back . . . TRUMP? Those are hard questions which must be answered. But instead of confronting them head-on, Sanders' cult avoids them -- no defense -- and attacks his critics.
    1
  33.  @skwisgaar451  Not if we ignore the mainstream media because it doesn't preach Sanders 24/7. Wake up: by attacking the Democratic Party AGAIN -- the largest block of Liberal/Progressive/Left voters -- he is being divisive AGAIN. And what do his "defenders" do? They run with and enhance the divisiveness. The Republicans needn't do anything to divide-and=-conquer the Democrats: Sanders, and his cult followers, -- who are exultant in the fantasy that they know it all -- will do it for them. I saw exactly the same thing on the Left during the 1960s. And what happened to the Left? After the the US was withdrawn from Vietnam, it collapsed because it didn't have a new enemy to oppose. One's view must be based not on externals. One must have an informed moral compass. While I was the only one I knew during high school who was vocal against US involvement in Vietnam, 99 per cent of my peers were either wrapped up in TeeVee as their only source of information, or hanging out on the street corner complaining of being bored, and name-calling me for my position. The reason I knew US involvement in Vietnam was a fraud was because I READ HISTORY, centrally the anti-imperialism of REPUBLICAN Mark Twain. Vietnam was a repeat of the US's actions in the Philippines during the late 19th century. And why did McGovern lose? Not because he was far-Left -- he was not. And far-Left had even less a chance than he. Because Nixon talked of "peace with honor" vis-a-vis Vietnam. I knew there was no honor about any of it -- that the US was involved violated the Geneva Conventions. Sanders is a one-note song; and te only song most of his supporters have ever heard and listened to. He tells you to reject all other views -- AND YOU SHEEPISHLY OBEY THAT ORDER. So you smear imaginary "corporatists/centrists" because you know nothing of the gradations and greys. To hear the media -- including mainstream -- tell it, there are only "Left and Right". The political spectrum has many more degrees than that. And they aren't only Left-Centrist-Right. Liberals are Left of center, but to the Right of Progressive. and the Left, so-called, is to the LEFT of Progressive. The Left that is Sanders has ALWAYS DEMANDED that they get ALL of what they want NOW! And that's why they've never got it: the REFUSE to compromise in order to get AT LEAST SOME of what they want. Social Security is the perfect example: when first enacted it was not extended to African-Americans. Why? Because it needed the votes of Southern racists to pass. It was later AMENDED to correct that defect. The same is true of the Affordable Care Act: it is a BEGINNING, not the whole of what can be built on it. DEAL WITH IT: INCREMENTALISM is how DEMOCRATIC legislative process WORKS. One gets what one can -- compromise gets the votes of those opposed -- and then builds on it. Want "it" ALL NOW? Then prepare to be frustrated, because that ain't gonna happen.
    1
  34.  @skwisgaar451  His campaign of 2016. He promised to destroy the Democratic (why not the Republican?) Party. Then, when he was allowed to run as a Democrat, he continued to trash the Party, and smeared Clinton with RIGHT-wing lies. He caused CHAOS because that's all the moron can do to attract attention to himself, and then he can spew his old-school "Socialist" slogans to "the [faceless] masses". And the political newbies -- his "fans"; it's all about entertainment; nothing serious about life and death politics -- swallow that pie-in-the-sky without question. The Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'll vote for a Socialist. They have SAID so. And his cult of support is a MINORITY who declare themselves to be OUTSIDE the mainstream. Whereas the mainstream is the MAJORITY. Democracy is MAJORITY rule. Sanders is again showing himself to be hateful and vindictive, the "Left"'s version of Trump.
    1
  35.  @rolandshelley5165  The difference is, child, that I include FACTS. Sanders "fans" name-call and smear -- and are all bent out of shape about ALLEGED corruption of so-called UNNAMED Democrats, without a SHREd OF EVIDENCE -- but not a PEEP about the OPENLY CRIMINAL Trump. Sanders, ALLEGED far-Left, attacks his nearest allies, the Democratic Party -- but not the Republican Party. Why is that? And what in hell are "Ukraine Bernie supporters? Don't you MEAN RUSSIAN -- who SUPPORTED Sanders during 2016? Putin is playing both extremes -- extremism is STUPID -- against the STABLE middle, and Sanders' "fans" are following that scam like good little sheep. So long as one hates unnamed so-called "centrist" Democrats for UNEVIDENCED "corruption," all is good.
    1
  36.  Walter Newsom  Yes, he smeared Clinton with REPUBLICAN LIES. Your wilful amnesia is on you. Clinton released a documentary about Sanders? Ooooh! -- that's a no-no! -- only demagogue Sanders is allowed to do that! Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a TOP PRIORITY of the far-RIGHT ANTI-"Socialist" NRA. Defend THAT, pseudo-LEFTIST. Oh -- okay -- he was just pandering to get the votes of anti-American gun-nuts; nothing deceptive or corrupt in that . . .
    1
  37.  Walter Newsom  There seems to be a political faction who is experiencing a plague of amnesia about the 2016 primary, and the afflicted are all coincidentally Sanders "fans". AFTER he LOST the DEMOCRATIC Party primary to the ACTUAL Democrat, he did not withdraw, which was the adult thing to do. Instead he CONTINUED to trash the Party and Clinton. Oh, and don't bother to remember that he stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial LYING about releasing his tax returns. And is it a coincidence that Paul Manafort, who worked together in Ukraine to elect the corrupt pro-Russian president, showed up in charge of the Sanders and Trump campaigns? Have you also "put out of mind" Sanders' writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex? And what about those asserting that sex prevents cancer? Would any intelligent woman fall for that pick-up line?
    1
  38. Seder is a "master" at rejecting wisdom. Do you know why the draft applies to young men? Because the young men are untested, uninformed, and therefore easily coerced into being "patriotic" -- "thinking" with their emotions. Those who KNOW HISTORY, and are seasoned, tend to know better.
    1
  39. Attacking the Democrats helps Trump. Sanders made the same mistake in 2016. Or perhaps the results are what he wanted: a permanent Republican mnajority, as Karl Rove said is the goal.
    1
  40. If Sanders is the nominee, he will be destroyed in a week -- especially when his writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex are flooding the public media.
    1
  41. Dr. Fauci said: there's no SCIENCE in your information. Anecdotes are not SCIENCE. "I sutbbed my big toe, and it made me the greatest singer in history" is anecdote; both may have happened, but there is no proof that the toe-stubbing improved the singing..
    1
  42. Sanders: "Bloomberg is trying to buy the election." In fact, the Sanders campaign is trying to BUY the election the same way as Bloomberg: POLITICAL ADS THAT COST MONEY. Trump and Sanders are identical in playing the Politics of Paranoia -- they are wealthy and powerful "victims". Whine, whine, whine.
    1
  43. He isn't ignorant of the facts. What he is doing is acting within his area of expertise: as a career criminal. He knows what he's doing; he doesn't mind being thought "ignorant," because that grants him an "innocence" he doesn't deserve. It is letting him off the hook, just as calling him "malignant narcisist," even if true, gives him an excuse.
    1
  44. You are NOT going to replace with Joe Manchin with an Elizabeth Warren. "Rigitity"? Ever consider that the VOTERS -- who you cintinue to omit from your equation -- elect their chosen candidates? What are you doing about, as example, Southern racism, and the inability -- therefore -- of more centrist -- leave out FAR-Left -- Liberal candidates to get elected? Instead to attack the DNC -- not the racism, about which you all or so expert by ignoring your own -- is about as stupid as it gets. It is fundamentally ignorant of how elections actually work -- Sanders NOT being a source of the FACTS on that issue.
    1
  45. The "Democratic Establishment" is the vast majority of DEMOCRATS. Telling them to "Go to hell," Bernie, will not wing their votes. But you don't care about their votes; you figure you can get elected by a minority the way Trump did. Is Russia backing YOU this time? During his twenty-five years in Congress Sanders was totally ineffective at legislating. As for the presidency: "The president proposes, the Congress disposes." So Sanders calls people names -- and that appeals to whom? The intelligent? The mature?
    1
  46. He should be charged with practicing medicine without a license. And for those he has killed by doing so. Then there's "Dr. Oz" -- who has a name like "Oz" if not an acid head?
    1
  47. He should be charged with practicing medicine without a license. It isn't being "botched": Trump is acting within his area of competence: that of career criminal.
    1
  48. The media doesn't exist to "represent" you. It exists to report the facts -- regardless whether you like the facts. Sanders is a fraud: compare his rhetoric with his BEHAVIOR.
    1
  49. Seder doesn't have a clue beoynd his proud malconstrued knowledge of the 1960s Left. Bloomberg didn't run for office in 2017-18; instead he funded Democratic campaigns and helpd yake back the House. Bloomberg isn't an ideologue. No: ALL did not line up against FDR. And smearing Democrats -- as all the Sanders "fans" are doing -- helps TRUMP, who will slap Sanders dizzy.
    1
  50. Sanders "fans" are, in a word, stupid. They know it all, just like Sanders, and just like Trump. So smear Democrats and help Trump. "The fact of the matter is," Seder, that Bloomberg spent much money supporting DEMOCRATIC candidates, which is how the Democrats took the House. He has also siad: that if not the nominee, he will continue to fund DEMOCRATS and work with his money to DEFEAT TRUMP. How is smearing an ALLY different than Trump smearing the Bidens, or Ukraine? Yeah, I know: you hate those about whom you actually know nothing true -- Clinton, Biden -- and do the opposite with Sanders. Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a TOP PRIORITY of the extremist right-wing ANTI-"Soclaist"/ANTI-American domestic terrorist organization NRA. That's your boy, who claims to be a LEFTIST. Paul Manafort and his partner helped elect the pcorrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine who was subsequently pushed out by the Ukrainian people. Manafort and his partner next became the managers of the Trump and Sanders campaings. Coincidence? Are you so pro-Sanders/Trump that you're also pro-Russian?
    1