Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder" channel.

@CybershamanX DURING THE PRIMARY, moron, Sanders REPEATEDLY trashed NOT ONLY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, but also Clinton with REPUBLICAN SMEARS that were ALL ALONG FALSE. Ask yourself, Mr. Amnesia: is it COINCIDEMCE, that the two men who elected the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine BOTH ended up in charge of Sanders' and Trumps campaign? That that Ukraine election included computer hacking? That at the beginning of the primary, the Sanders campaign hacked the DNC -- which forced the resignation of that campaign manager? That of all the candidates during the 2016 campaign, only two had not "suporters" but "fans" -- Sanders and Trump? Starry-eyed "fans" belong in ENTERTAINMENT, not in life-or-death politics. IS it COINCIDENCE that Sanders stoiod shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns? AFTER losing the primary, Sanders DID NOT WITHDRAW -- there was all the LYING about "thuimb on the scale": FOOL: elections are conducted by STATE GOV'TS, NOT by the parties. And EVERY candidate -- INCLUDING SANDERS -- MONITORS the primary process FIRST-HAND, from beginning to end. So: NO "RIGGING". Instead, he CONTINUED to trash the Party, and Clinton, with the "thumb on the scale LIE -- which can ony be believed by the know-it-all Sanders' "fans" who are IGNORANT of how primaries and elections are conducted, or the deliberately dishonest. All of that high profile NOISE negates any of his capaigning "for" Clinton AFTER all his trashings of her. "Shaman"? In other words, you live in a world of speculation without too much concern with facts. Facts are stubborn things. So is REALITY: with Republican gerrymandering protected by the Supreme Court from Federal intervention, Republican voter-purgings, and Republican invitations to foreign powers to subvert the election, the Democrats need as many votes as they can get. Republicans who don't want a repeat of Trump will vote for Trump before they'd vote for a Socialist. Trump would slap Sanders dizzy; he'd be destroyed in a week. That is especially underscored when Sanders' writings, when he was in his 30s, about young children and sex are blasted all over the media. You don't know Sanders. What you "know" is what you read into his old-school Socialist slogans. Those slogans didn't work in the "radical" 1960s: they got NIXONG elected. They are all sizzle, no substance. Last but not least -- in addition to the fact that Sanders voted to PROTECT the gun industry -- a top priority of the extremist RIGHT-wing anti-"Socialist" domestic terrorist organization NRA, yet another collaborator with Putin -- during his twenty-five years in Congress, Sanders passed three bills, two of those renaming post offices. That HISTORY is the result of the fact that he is a know-it-all; he is inflexible; he is "my way or the highway" no compromise. In some, entirely ineffective in getting ANY of his SLOGANS enacted into law because he REFUSES to compromise. The legislative process is DEMOCRATIC: it is debate, negotation, compromise, arriving at a majority consensus. Do you ACTUALLY believe that, being wholly ineffective while IN the legislative process, he'd be actually effective from OUTSIDE the legislative process? Old maxim: "The president PROPOSES, the congress DISPOSES." Instead of denying and "forgetting" the vindictive prick that Sanders was during the 2016 primary, WAKE UP: he is the far-Left -- "Progressivism" is to his RIGHT -- equivalent to extreme right-wing demoaguge Trump.
1
However small the margin in Iowa, Buttigieg edged Sanders. So Sanders is lying. And the largest gain in New Hamshire is by Buttigieg. So Sanders is trying to shout down the facts.
1
Luis Monsanto When were you born? Yesterday? You're a Sanders 'fan" who believes everyone is corrupt -- except Sanders and his "fans". The only way you get away with yourself with that is to ignore your corruption be flatly ignoring the facts, or indulging a false amnesia: Is it a coincidence that the two partners -- one being Paul Manafort -- who elected the corrupt pro-Russian president of Ukraine -- ended up running the campaigns of Sanders and Trump? Were you paying attention, or are you deliberately ignoring the fact that early in the 2016 capaign, the Sanders campaign was caught hacking the DNC -- which forced his Manafort-partner/campaign manager to resign? Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Is it a coincidence that the only two candidates who have "fans" -- which are about ENTERTAINMENT -- instead of supporters -- POLITICs is NOT ENTERTAINMENT; it is LIFE-AND-DEATH -- are Sanders and Trump? If Sanders is the nominee, Trump will slap him dizzy. He'd be destroyed in a week, esepcially when his writings, when in his THIRTIES, about young children and sex are blasted across the media. The far-Left and Sanders were talking the same old-school Socialist rehetoic, and engaging in their political disruptions in the 1960s and into the 1970s. They ALIENATED those we needed to elect McGovern -- the working and middle clases -- who was not far-LEFT. Nixon won 49 states. I was there. Were your PARENTS born yet?
1
Lets PRESSURE people, and pretend it's about "vuluntarism"/"freedom". Let's be frank: let's BULLY. Clue: the "infrastructure" already exists: it is called the system; it is called "the establishment". You don't make change by throwing mud-bombs at it from the outside. And to make change from within, one must ACTUALLY BELIEVE in DEMOCRACY, which requires COMPROMISE. But thanks for writing off the "Boomers" -- most other cultures recognize that the elders are the repository of WISDOM. But who needs "wisdom" is the "post-truth" generation. Let's resort to barbarism.
1
@sheraldhill2728 Sanders is still ilving in the 1960s with a far-Left that no longer exists, except in the un- and mal-informed fantasies of hormonal teenagers who in fact don't know what they "missed" because they weren't there. It wasn't all sex, drugs, and rock & roll; it was also Vietnam and people being killed. It was Nixon prolonging the war, because the far Left ALIENATED those who would otherwise have stopped him. There is no yearning for a time of major assassinations of hope and progress. And these morons are smearing Barak Obama as if he were "status quo". They have no understanding of how radical it was that he was elected -- comfortably, and twice. So they fall for the nostalgia of old-hat pie-in-the-sky slogans from a man who was wholly ineffective during his twenty-five years in Congress. And they believe he is going to accomplish now what he hasn't accomplished during more than twenty-five years? How politically naive are his "fans"? -- it's all about celebrity and entertainment. They attack unamed so-called "centrist" Democrats, without a shred of EVIDENCE, for being "corrupt -- but not a peep about Trump and his OPEN criminality. There's a corruption in that that Sanders' "fans" are ignoring in themselves.
1
False. the term "Moderates" or "centrists" encompass a range of positions, both Left of Center and Right of center.And FDR was a centrist. Eleanor was the Progressive. And Sanders is to the LEFT of Progressive. The difference? Progressives actually get things done -- see "New Deal"; Social Security; Medicaid and Medicare; Leftists pass three bills in twenty-five years.
1
There are a few Leftists. But what was the Left -- the "New Left" -- of the 60s collapsed when it o longer had an enemy to blackguard. The Sanders Left and the Trump Right both rely on smearing others, in place of offering something positive, constructive, and VIABLE.
1
Sanders hasn't criticized Israel? Are they slamming Sanders because he's a Jew? Or are they slamming him for his pie-in-the-sky sloganized politics?
1
You ean you share the ideology of the "dissector". That is not to be confused with being in touch with reality.
1
In a democracy, majproty rules. The Senate is controlled by the Republicans. Anyone who blames the Democrats for their obstruction is an asshole. Got that, Sam? -- ASSHOLE.
1
He has a better idea than you, Mr. Bias.
1
@xXRickTrolledXx Barney Franks described a Committee hearing in which Sanders offered an amendment -- and then the Democrats on the Committee had to rescue his amendment FROM HIM, because he so alienated potential support for it. Likr it or not, Hillary Clinton worked with him, and said that no one likes him. He is demanding, inflexible, and uncompromising. Not only is that antithetical to democracy, it is being totally ineffective. The FACT: he passed THREE bills in TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, two of those renaming post offices. Hillary Clinton accomplished volumes more during her 8 years in the Senate. And then there's another essay he wrote, while in his 30, in which he claims that sex prevents cancer. One would have to be an exceedingly stupid woman to fall for a pick-up line that bizarre. What will you do if he's the nominee, and the essay/s he wrote, while in his 30s, about young children and sex are blasted all over the media? Will you blame someone else for it?
1
@Cussy69_420 Hillary Clinton accomplished a pages-long list of legislation for families and children What sort of people tear down the accomplished? Ask that question of yourself.
1
your real name is "Pretzel". That makes no sense =-- but it does alienate potential Sanders votes by smearing them -- which smearing is corruption per se. The only fear is that if Sanders is the nominee, he will LOSE. And in fact he'd be destroyed in a week. Especially when his writings, when in his 30s, about young children and sex, are published everywhere. Go ahead: lie by omission by ignoring those facts. Lying being, of course, corruption. Sanders is a demagogue identical to Trump. And Sanders' "fans" are as much a cult as Trump's "fans".
1
Sam: you are not qualified to assess others cognitive functioning. And if you were, it would be UNETHICAL to attempt to do so across the Internet.
1
That's how cults work: there is only ONE Dear Leader. Everyone else is "corrupt". Wake up: you aren't opposed to corruption; you are opposed to only the "corrutpion" constantly ALLEGED by Sanders. you are all FOR Sanders' corruption.
1