Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Brian Tyler Cohen"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DannaMcAllister Redo your math.
And, yes: that's the idea: each state administers all the elections that occur in their state. They have the authority in law, beginning with the US Constitution, and their state constitution and laws, to determine who is eligible to be on their ballot.
None of that is rocket science.
And if a state determines that a potential candidate -- regardless the office for which the candidate aims -- is ineligible to be on the ballot in that state, that's how it goes.
It is not a rare occurrence. And not all legitimate presidential candidates always get on the ballot in all states for reasons other than being a criminal insurrectionist. Typically its because they didn't get enough signatures, as state law may require, to meet the minimum threshold to qualify to be on the ballot.
It isn't actually that big a deal -- except that multi--multi-billionaire, constantly drunk on whine, falsely claims to be a "victim". Most people in the US can't afford lawyers to vindicate their rights; but Trump, who has stadiums full of lawyers, is a "victim"!?
Stop listening to MAGA -- they are as uneducated and clueless about everything -- especially how elections actually work. And they lie about everything because that's how they live their lives. And that's why they are suckers for constant lying con-man and career felon Trump.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DavidWolfer I doubt you're able to predict the future as to what will happen if Trump continues to violate the gag order. There is a cell in the courthouse for housing the contemptuous.
AGAIN -- in this is part of PUBLIC EDUCATION, for those WILLING to LEARN -- the first two gag orders, one of which included significant fines, were showing the PUBLIC that law applies even to bloviating criminals. Marchan's gag order, modeled on the first two, which were upheld on appeal, is -- based on that PUBLIC EDUCATION -- incremental, as they always are. But Marchan BEGAN by pointing to the possible penalties, INCLUDING INCARCERATION. When asked if he understood, Trump said, "Yes."
This also includes the threat of incarceration, but in such a way that it has Trump's attention -- after that decision was given him, and the court broke for lunch, Trump SAID NOTHING to the media.
He may do it again -- he's probably contemplating that which has always been his campaign: name-calling, smears, and attacking others and inciting threats against them -- but THIS time it got through to him.
As for jail: the judge can decide that Trump, regardless the verdict in the trial, be jailed for contempt AFTER the trial is concluded.
1