Comments by "Zasz" (@Z4r4sz) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

  1. James is a person who likes to control both sides of a conversation and still loses the argument.
    629
  2. As expected from a cult.
    51
  3.  @isaacw8503  "It’s the overwhelming opinion of academia that claims are evidence." After centuries of establishing reasonable standards in academia, they suddenly abandoned reason and became as gullible as the average theist... So says some random nobody on youtube at least. So it must be true! Seriously, rather than presenting evidence theists love to debate what should count as evidence because we all know theists dont actually have any evidence.
    20
  4. McLoser started his tirades and rants on twitter, posting screenshots of you and said "you cannot concede the presence of any weaknesses in, or evidence against, your own position". He even owns himself because he is so incredibly oblivious.
    18
  5.  @Actias1974  Because creationists are in a cult. The leaders of a cult are always right and any criticism of the cult is persecution and nobody is more right than the cult leader.
    17
  6. The end is so epic. McLoser controls both sides of the conversation (on twitter, with himself) but still loses the argument :D
    15
  7. I checked out the paper referenced at 1:08:34 and they added a disclaimer: "The Journal of Theoretical Biology and its co-Chief Editors do not endorse in any way the ideology of nor reasoning behind the concept of intelligent design. Since the publication of the paper it has now become evident that the authors are connected to a creationist group (although their addresses are given on the paper as departments in bona fide universities). We were unaware of this fact while the paper was being reviewed. Moreover, the keywords “intelligent design” were added by the authors after the review process during the proofing stage and we were unaware of this action by the authors. We have removed these from the online version of this paper. We believe that intelligent design is not in any way a suitable topic for the Journal of Theoretical Biology."
    15
  8.  @davidbutler1857  They also do this with Mary Schweitzers Paper on "soft tissue in dinosaur fossils". They conveniently leave out the fragment part and pretend they found steaks.
    14
  9.  @familyshield6405  James is a liar. There is no sugar coating that. Its what creationists do. But somehow you had to make it about Dave... Maybe watch the debate for the first time before you lie about it. Because I watched it and he did show ALOT of material.
    10
  10. Thats hilarious :D
    9
  11. Yes, the mindset is very important.
    7
  12. I got alcohol poisoning after his intro...
    7
  13. I did a quick search here on youtube. He called in the atheist experience back when Tracy was still active. He posted the segment where he got spanked by Tracy and his own followers tell him he shouldnt have done that because he looks so bad :D
    7
  14. Today McLoser linked to another biologist in his latest blog and sold him as an evolutionary biologist. It literally takes seconds to look that guy up to learn he studies plants. Thats a pretty dumb lie I say. Thats the kind of person McLoser is.
    7
  15. Calling anyone in the creationist a liar or clueless isnt an insult. Its literally their doctrine to lie and pretending to know everything about everything.
    6
  16. "In my original video I caught him saying something unbelievably stupid." That narrows it down :D
    5
  17. Creationists want the attention through debates, pretending there is a controversy when they share the stage with an actual scientist or someone qualified to talk about the topics creationists misrepresent. They are like trolls. Dont feed them in the public.
    5
  18. I wouldnt say tour and meyer have no clue. They have been at this crap for decades. Its more likely they cant keep their lies straight anymore.
    5
  19. Because that costs money and they rather keep it by lying to their gullible audience who dont care to ask for any applications.
    5
  20. "I just watched the debate with Dr. Tour. You tried to tarnish his character." If you believe tour didnt do that by his pathetic performance alone then you either havent watched it or you are just another dum tour zealot. "Fact #1 no scientist is even remotely close to creating any type of life in a lab." If life cant be created then it debunks creationism, not science. "The way chemists talk you would think they can resurrect the dead." Actually that what theists always claim, not scientists. Ever heard of jesus? "Mean while they cannot even keep a simple cell alive." Because cells arent supposed to stay outside the body. "They do not even know what is lost when a cell dies." Umm... When a cell dies... then a cell is lost. This is rocket science for you? "I would call you a science troll but imp sounds more fitting." With that much projecting you should have an imax rating. Dumbass.
    4
  21. "The main point here (I think anyway) is how exactly life started from nonlife. We don't know." And then creationists say "god did it", pretending to know because they read it in a book with talking snakes and donkeys. Its one of the many fallacies creationists use. Actually creationists use all of them. One was even coined because of the bullshit creationists say. The christian faith fallacy and Hoyle's fallacy.
    4
  22. I tried addons that are supposed to block results I specify but they all stopped working and google or other search engines dont offer a blocker themselves. I totally get your frustration.
    4
  23. As far as debates go, this wasnt very good. I can imagine Dave absolutely hates Tour because Tour has a loooooooong history of lying about pretty much everything like every creationist. But Tour has no clue about basic conversations. Im glad Tour embaressed his discovery institute. Too bad creationists cant experience shame. Im sure they will twist this into a victory to their gullible cultists. I`ll wait for a more detailed review to clear up the questions about the papers presented.
    4
  24. Hitler wrote a book where he constantly invoked christianity and publically promoted christianity. He published his own version of the bible, made a deal with churches (who supported his policies) and had his soldiers wear belt buckles with "god with us" written on them. Doesnt get more religious than that.
    4
  25. Its odd, isnt it? These people dedicate decades of their time to obsess over evolution in the most simple terms, try to discredit it by lying, write useless books to be sold on amazon, copy the format of actual science journals to pretend to offer science... and then write they dont deny what they oppose? It doesnt make sense.
    4
  26. Doesnt sound creepy at all...
    4
  27. Apparently anyone can get such credentials in the US. I mean, when Kent Hovind can get them, anyone can. But the language they use proves they never really studied on the level of actual academy.
    3
  28. Are there any non-embarassments in the creationist community?
    3
  29. Im in germany too and I can say you are full of shit. " I don't know how USA was in the pandemic, but germany got like a kind of dictatorship in the pandemic:" First lie. Except the entire country missed the dictatorship but only the uneducated conspiracy nutjobs noticed it. So weird. "- doubts about the need of lockdowns? censored, laughed at or named conspiracy - anyway that they never helped like propagandised!" Second lie. Uneducated morons pretending to know even remotely as much about how to handle a pandemic or how viruses work were laughed at. For good reasons. Nobody censored you from embarassing yourself but many people didnt want to listen to unhinged rants like yours every day. "- the ministry for health (and propaganda)? RKI (a big health institute in germany), not the ministry in the government" Third lie. The Robert Koch Institute is the central institution of the Federal Government in the field of disease surveillance and prevention. "- laws for lockdowns and relaxations? given by the RKI, not the ministry in the government, the ministry in the government was only about to accept them and set them to laws" Fourth lie. See above. "- vaccinations? sure they're "voluntarily" - just get a vaccination and you keep all fundamental rights" Fifth lie. Nobody lost any rights. Not one! But private stores and companies have health regulations like dont walk without shoes into our store, dont bring deadly & easily transmitted diseased into our stores, dont walk in naked, dont touch open food when you arent buying it, wear a mask when working with spray paint, wear a helmet on a construction site and so on. Not one right lost. "- effects of lockdowns and relaxations? "Sure they helped and were needed" - f... off that they never effected like propagandated: If lockdowns would help, the infections would go down, if relaxations were so harmful the infections would go up -> the reality showed the opposites!" Sixth lie. You have no clue how a pandemic works or how viruses spread. "- the damage of the vaccines? people have massive vaccine damages that often ruin their lifes, but they must sue to get a little tiny bit of money for it!" Seventh lie. A tiny minority has side effects due to unforseen circumstances regarding individual physiology. This is very much known about every vaccine and pill people take. "- proven false propaganda by the RKI and the government themselves:" By clowns like you? Yeah, right. "-> "the vaccines aren't harmful at all"" Overwhelmingly they arent. You would know if you understood anything about minorities with rare conditions. "-> "the vaccinations won't be mandatory"" Correct. Nobody got forced to take one. The last time it was mandatory was when smallpox still existed. You know, before it got eradicated by vaccines. Companies just decided its safer to vaccinate their employees to prevent infecting customers because thats very bad for business. You dont want to follow safety guidelines? Pack your things and fuck off. "-> "there will be only 1 vaccination and then it will be over"" I doubt anyone at the RKI ever said that. But you wont provide a source of course. And even the followup vaccines were still not forced. "-> "we have working vaccines" - the reality: the known vaccines only help to get better through if you've Covid but they never ever protect against it!" Because thats exactly how vaccines work! There is no magical shield against these things. You get it and you either have antibodies or you dont. Vaccines provide the antibodies. Thats how it always has been. "-> "no fundamental rights will be restricted"" None were restricted. What was restriced was the way people interact in stores and in crowded places like concerts, large indoor events which all got canceled until the regulations how to go on came out. Nobody was forced to stay at home. People who got diagnosed with covid were sent home and told its safer to stay there to not infect others. And the reasonable people stayed home. But no rights were restricted. You are a liar. The american, science denying, conspiracy nutjob, shoe sized IQ crowd has the same list of bullshit.
    3
  30. Because they want to waste money, people and resources with fake technologies while companies make big money with fake technologies. Or some similar bullshit.
    3
  31. "nihilistic wordview of materialism and atheism"... Seriously? How did that buffoon aquire his degrees? Or did he only dust off the objects on display in his previous line of work? That guy is certainly not a scientist now if he ever was one. He has no clue and lies so obviously its cringy. But thats probably the reason he got hired. Creationists are so pathetic and greedy.
    3
  32. That was enough word salad to end world hunger. Literally.
    3
  33. But wait! There's more! A term specifically invented for people like Tour is "fractal wrongness". When his entire statement is as wrong as every individual part of it. Or the other way around.
    3
  34. A scientific law is a basic principle, generalization, regularity or rule that holds true universally under particular conditions. A scientific theory is a body of data.
    3
  35. Every theistic argument is a logical fallacy.
    3
  36. People shouldnt debate creationists. It gives creationist followers the impression there are two equal sides to these topics which creationists exploit to further mislead their gullible followers.
    3
  37.  @DP-ot6zf  Corrected by a creationist? Yeah, right :D
    2
  38. Even when all of meyers bullshit is wrong about the cambrian explosion, he disproves EVERYTHING he promotes and preaches when he talks about prehistoric events that contradict his creation myth or young earth creationism. He is literally too stupid to lie without contradicting his own bullshit. Creationists at their best.
    2
  39. "I'm certain your incapable of reasoning" Its "you're". genius. Actually using insults properly is a sign of intelligence. Just like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8AX7QN68bw
    2
  40. He works for an organisation that has the goal to infiltrate school boards and the education system. Also known as wedge strategy and project blitz.
    2
  41.  @michaelcrossley4716  To be fair, it was uploaded on other channels days ago.
    2
  42. I havent met a creationist who showed signes of shame. Im sure its part of their character to not feel shame anymore for their ridiculous beliefs.
    2
  43. Whining in several videos and lying all the time is what some loser who tries to stay relevant to keep his grift going is exactly what I expect from religious apologists. They have no shame nor do they feel guilty for milking their gullible fans for money. Its almost criminal.
    2
  44. "a guy as qualified as Dr. Tour" Creationists like MISTER tour aquire degrees only to preach pseudoscience that goes against everything they learned which makes their degrees worthless. They just get the degrees to fool gullible people like you. And it works! Thats how fraudsters work. They have absolutely no research outside their useless books on amazon.
    2
  45. Actually just last week scientists created matter from nothing. So creationists should finally stop claiming its not possible. "If we look at the question of who created human life" Why does it have to be a who? Why cant it be a what?
    2
  46. Except gods are not as demonstrable as dropping a pen to prove gravity exists. Dropping a pen, ironically ken does this, proves gravity. Nothing proves any god.
    2
  47. I always say creationists get degrees and then turn around to promote something that goes against everything they have learned to aquire those degrees. Its like getting a degree in geology and then promoting a flat earth. It invalidates their degree and opinion.
    2
  48. All you have to do is challenge James to present research from his group, the discovery institute, that passed peer review and is used anywhere in science. He wont because everything he does at the discovery institute is lying. Its literally his job to lie. His gullible audience doesnt care about that and is too stupid to fact check anything. They never wonder why creationism or the current rebranded version sprinkled with science terms intelligent design is only propaganda. There is no use for it anywhere, there are no applications, there is no advancement in any field because of it. Its the definition of pseudoscience. You dont really have to debunk him. All you have to do is challenge him, sit back and wait. His silence will be deafening.
    2
  49. "Actually, Giordano Bruno was sent to the stake by John Calvin, the very Calvin in Calvinism. For once, he was not burnt by the Catholic Church" Actually he embraced Calvinism. He was tried for heresy by the Roman Inquisition on charges of denial of several core Catholic doctrines. The Inquisition found him guilty, and he was burned alive at the stake in Rome's Campo de' Fiori in 1600.
    2
  50. Yeah, why not believe in fairytales, myths and reality defying claims ... Insane, isnt it?
    2