Comments by "Zasz" (@Z4r4sz) on "Professor Dave Explains"
channel.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"it's sad how people use the Bible to deceive people telling them things that is not in the Bible"
Thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people.
"there are some brothers that they are scientists and admit that the Bible is the word of God"
No, they work in completely unrelated fields that have nothing to do with the claims in the bible. There is a an engineer at NASA who believes the earth is less than 10.000 years old. Its just his opinion, not scientific fact.
"in the bronze age when the book of Job was written God explain ..."
Uhm... no. A book CLAIMS someone else alledgedly states something. Big difference.
"the Bible says that the earth is floating in space"
Which is false. The earth doesnt float or hang. Its tethered to the gravity of our sun which is moving around the center of the galaxy.
"it explains the water cycle"
Not accurately.
"explains the core of the earth"
Not really.
"It's crazy how some people use the Bible for their own good not to help others"
Like I said, thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people.
"The reason why God put those things on the Bible"
The book was literally written by ignorant, goat humpers in the middle eastern desert who split into three groups because they disagreed on what to write down after they made it up. I expect a god to write a much better book.
"science will develop for us to prove later that the Bible is Fact"
Then come back when science actually did that because so far it doesnt.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheMilitantMazdakite Are you suggesting only atheists are debunking claims about christian mythology? Cant hindus, muslims, jews, pastafarians, satanists and my grandmothers dog do that too?
"What evidence have you that religion is a "lie"?"
Which one? Christianity, islam, judaism, hinduism, moronism, scientology?
Are you specifically talking about the iron age myths about a cosmic wizzard wearing a meat suit after giving birth to himself, unicorns, talking snakes and empty promises of living on after death which in itself is a contradiction in terms ? Yeah, those are obvious lies promoted by delusional people and grifters who exploit delusional people like you.
People dont need to disprove whats obviously false. People need to back up claims. No supporting evidence, dismissed. Thats how we deal with every claim. Including religious claims. Otherwise Im claiming you love to diddle children and wait for you to provide evidence to the contrary. Be glad logic doesnt work that way.
"Yeah, but you can have Christianity without creationism."
Except without creationism one of the pillars of christianity vanishes which makes it difficult to make sense of the rest that is based on it. You would have to make shit up ontop of the made up shit that you want to exclude. Without creationism you dont get adam & eve and without them you dont get original sin or a need for jesus. And without salvation the entire religion just crumbles beyond its pile of garbage that it already is.
"Christopher Hitchens is the imperialist propagandist I refer to."
Today the term imperialism is commonly used in international propaganda to denounce and discredit an opponent's foreign policy. International organizations, including the United Nations, attempt to maintain peace using measures such as collective security arrangements and aid to developing countries.
Your claim just doesnt make any sense.
"Also, the people cheering him burning in hell were BASED!"
The words are english but there is no meaning. Literally.
"Would you condemn people for cheering on Joseph Goebbels burning in hell?"
Hmm, would people who dont believe in an afterlife cheer about events in the afterlife... Hmmmmm. Lets have a think over that. A LOOOONG THINK!
Dude, just stop. The discovery morons wont suck your dick for simping here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jdos5643 In no reality in the infinate multiverse is what you said correct.
"atheists are Adamant about calling theories facts in science"
It literally takes seconds to look up the term "scientific theory" to learn that theories are the highest form of knowledge in science, explaining the facts. FUCKING SECONDS!
Atomic theory, theory of matter and energy, cell theory, germ theory, theory of plate tectonics, theory of evolution, theory of quantum mechanics, theory of relativity, theory of light energy, theory of electromagnetism, theory of radioactivity, theory of molecular bonds, theory of homeostasis, theory of gravity, etc..
Evolution is a scientific theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome.
"If you cannot explain the Big Bang theory and I quote you it’s a “mystery” then neither can or should you call it a fact"
Whats with this obsession about the big bang? I didnt call it a fact. Its not an actual scientific theory. Every scientist knows that. Its just that over time the name stuck with it. Yet every scientist understands the difference between it being a hypothesis that we might never elevate to the level of a scientific theory but it still has valid evidence supporting it partially. Like a few other hypothesises about the origin of the universe.
And even if scientists knew absolutely nothing about the origin of the universe, theists like you or those pretending to be scientists have done nothing to prove that a god exists or was involved in any event.
"the Big Bang was Invented by a Christian ironic how atheist hold It as a fact and still call it an Unexplainable mystery lol how contradicting is that?"
A scientist who happened to be a christian had a hypothesis, it got investigated for decades, turned out we found supporting evidence, turns out people talk about it... Somehow thats contradicting. Thats fucking stupid.
"And if you admit that the universe is too vast to comprehend? Then why be so quick to dismiss the only plausible explanation that God did it?"
Ah, yes. The feuerstein fallacy. God might exist outside our knowledge but we have no way to investigate therefor god is an acceptable explaination. Somehow...
You have not provided anything that convinces any rational person that your god exists, that he has powers or that he used his powers to do anything. Theists always fail at the first challenge. Thats why I dismiss the god claims.
"You admit to not knowing 90% percent of what’s out here yet deny a God or creator."
Yes, because you dont know either. Because its an argument from ignorance fallacy. Or in your terms "we dont know how it happened therefor god". Every other type of theist could bring the same claim about their god and nobody could falsify it. Its completely useless.
"When setting God aside as the only source for the universe you then accept the belief in a magic box..."
Except natural forces have literally nothing in common with magic. You promote magic, not me.
"And if you don’t know as you just admitted then why are you giving your invalid input?"
Not knowing about the origin doesnt invalidate my opinion on the topic of your imaginary friend. Especially since your nonsense claims are filled with fallacies.
"with your comment you just demonstrated you have no intellectual integrity"
Admitting to not know an answer instead of making shit up is by definition intellectual integrity. Which is the opposite of what you are doing because you pretend to be better educated than any scientist.
"All you have proven is the opposite or pure dishonesty."
Thats called projecting. Evidently.
"You said and I quote you you don’t know or care a $h@ about the topic. Yeah you said it all."*
Because the origin of the universe doesnt tell you anything about the topic of the video. Context is important. For me at least.
"Btw, I don’t use such language in my vocabulary because that’s not what my professors taught as part of curriculum…."
Of course not. All those fallacies, false accusations, projecting, lies, being a douche is totally not such language. /s
"and there you are still proving yourself a coward who deletes his comments because you have nothing factual to say or even defend your false beliefs."
You literally responded to my comments that I havent deleted, I defended my position and now you lie about both. But keep pretending you loser are a scientist. Someday someone might be dumb enough to fall for it.
PATHETIC!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1