Comments by "Zasz" (@Z4r4sz) on "Professor Dave Explains" channel.

One Minute in and the theist invokes hitler, stalin, mao and pot. Instantly exposing to have no clue about history, no clue how he implies every modern atheist is like hitler, stalin, mao and pot... somehow. Why? They never explain. Because they cant. It makes them look dumb to try. So pretending nobody ever expects them to explain seems to be the better option. Which still makes them look dumb because they have no clue what they are talking about or implying. Which is normal behavior for theists especially hardcore creationists at the discovery institute who are obsessed with debunking science they learned to understand and then deny to be factual. Which invalidates their degrees and their opinions. One can only loath these dumbfucks.These idiots have nothing but they are obsessed with criticizing anyone who points out that they have nothing for their own position-
2
@simongiles9749 Are you refering to plagiarism ? Its a serious offense in my country amongst academics and can lead to your dr title revoked.
1
@simongiles9749 I dont see anything wrong with using your own previous work to build into current work. As long as both are peer reviewed. If the first isnt then the second has an obvious flaw. Using the work of others that show your work has merrit isnt a problem either. As long as you credit them.
1
Its interesting how he claims he isnt anti-evolution and accepts evolution as fact but then pulls out all creationist claims to make the case evolution isnt a thing.
1
"it's sad how people use the Bible to deceive people telling them things that is not in the Bible" Thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people. "there are some brothers that they are scientists and admit that the Bible is the word of God" No, they work in completely unrelated fields that have nothing to do with the claims in the bible. There is a an engineer at NASA who believes the earth is less than 10.000 years old. Its just his opinion, not scientific fact. "in the bronze age when the book of Job was written God explain ..." Uhm... no. A book CLAIMS someone else alledgedly states something. Big difference. "the Bible says that the earth is floating in space" Which is false. The earth doesnt float or hang. Its tethered to the gravity of our sun which is moving around the center of the galaxy. "it explains the water cycle" Not accurately. "explains the core of the earth" Not really. "It's crazy how some people use the Bible for their own good not to help others" Like I said, thats literally the purpose of christianity. To lie, steal, indoctrinate, deceive up to killing people. "The reason why God put those things on the Bible" The book was literally written by ignorant, goat humpers in the middle eastern desert who split into three groups because they disagreed on what to write down after they made it up. I expect a god to write a much better book. "science will develop for us to prove later that the Bible is Fact" Then come back when science actually did that because so far it doesnt.
1
Dont be afraid of liars. Creationists have an overinflated ego that can appear intimidating but only if you let them. Remember they are deceptive, even when it comes to their overconfidence. A few specific questions are enough to reduce them to flea size. Like "what applications came from creationism/intelligent design research?" and they are instantly squirming and lying because there are no applications from pseudoscience and scientific fraud.
1
@CherryGS Lets hope so.
1
Just skip the intro and go right into open conversation. Skip a Q&A too. Just talk. This "I want time to talk" is just an attempt to preach or gish gallop in Tours side because we all know he loves to gish gallop to waste time that we wont get back to adress all his ignorant points. The idea to dictate what material can be discussed is just absurd. Tour wants to control this debate so hard because we all know he doesnt know enough about the topic to handle the papers he constantly misrepresents and lies about. This is already a trainwreck. Imagine the fallout after the debate if its anything like the video and emails. If creationists are capable of embarassment they distance themselves from tour after this disaster thats coming.
1
One thing I disagree with. Its probably just splitting hairs but words have no meaning, they have usage.
1
Like Tour, Cameron is one of the dumbest and most dishonest apologists. No suprise he is a big fan of Craig, the guy who defended the slaughter of children in the name of his imaginary friend.
1
@paulthompson9668 "I'll pray for you", Christianese for "fuck you".
1
Never do a livestream or public debate with a creationist. It makes them appear they are on the same level as actual scientists so their gullible flock is convinced there is a controversy.
1
Unfortunately too few indoctrinated theists are reconnected with reality through such videos. But its still great to watch and even learn something new. Even though I never get a degree in biology :D Society doesnt punish these science deniers. Universities dont revoke the titles they earned only to go 90° to pretend everything they learned is based on lies. Youtube freely lets them promote pseudoscience. In the end they all benefit financially from this giant fraud. Some of those creationist organisations pay taxes, youtube makes huge profits through ads because these creationist channels are so popular, universities profit because getting a degree isnt cheap. It only frustrates me even more that the universities that wasted so much time to teach them the science and dont have rules to revoke their degrees. Degree revocation is extremely rare, and almost always involves some major, willful misconduct such as plagiarizing long sections or falsifying data. I guess being a fraudster on youtube doesnt count as falsifying data while having a fake science journal like the discovery institute, institute for creation research, creation research society, (C)answers in genesis and too many others who pretend to do scientific research but failing to follow basic science standards. Its criminal!
1
I read about an egypt writer, dont remember his profession, used two obelisks very far apart to calculate the curviture of the earth. Back then they were still building the pyramids.
1
@TheCadman069 How do you get from "they are breathing the same air from the same trees like everyone on this planet" to "they are artificial creations of someones imaginary friend" ???
1
Its easy. One side has applications for their claims and the other does not. The one with no applications can be disgarded as pseudoscience.
1
Dave, you ended too soon at 33:10. The last sentence is supposed to imply the DI could be shut down at any moment by... someone... because they write this stuff which they sell as "the truth" and the powers that be obviously supress "the truth" from christian propaganda organisations.
1
Counter-comment.
1
The problem is his flock is even dumber to notice.
1
Usual kruger-dunning-effect victims have 0% clue and 100% confidence. And then there is Jamar. He is his own level of stupid. What a failure.
1
"My salvation is not dependent on my goodness at all." *Kent Hovind Q&A - Tardigrades Rewrite Evolution Theory - UFOs, Holiness, Youtube (November 28, 2015)
1
There are decent religions who arent theistic. So a total ban would send the wrong message. But I have zero opposition towards a ban on every theistic religion because they are always lies, inodctrination, obsession with control & money and more lies.
1
Christians appeal to einsteins opinion to make the argument that if one of the most famous scientists in the past believes something that defies reality, then its a good reason to do it too. Which is just an appeal to authority fallacy. Every fallacy is an argument for gods. And all arguments for gods are logical fallacies.
1
@pjaworek6793 Christians, and theists in general, dont care about such facts. Most dont even know because they only parrot what they heard from grifting pedo clergy in church or apologists.
1
Creationists are obsessed with critics because its usually the overwhelming amount of content they produce on youtube and their websites. Dealing with critics instead of naming a single application for their crap. Its more of a hating than research because they dont actually do research. They just post pictures of them in labcoats but no video of sitting in a lab and working. They lie about everything.
1
@SkipSpotter Im not sure exactly. I cant link it because youtube deletes such comments. But you can search for the headline and should find it easily: "Scientists create matter from nothing in groundbreaking experiment"
1
Because people like kent are narcisists who get off from behavior like this and get followers who worship him for it.
1
@TheMilitantMazdakite Are you suggesting only atheists are debunking claims about christian mythology? Cant hindus, muslims, jews, pastafarians, satanists and my grandmothers dog do that too? "What evidence have you that religion is a "lie"?" Which one? Christianity, islam, judaism, hinduism, moronism, scientology? Are you specifically talking about the iron age myths about a cosmic wizzard wearing a meat suit after giving birth to himself, unicorns, talking snakes and empty promises of living on after death which in itself is a contradiction in terms ? Yeah, those are obvious lies promoted by delusional people and grifters who exploit delusional people like you. People dont need to disprove whats obviously false. People need to back up claims. No supporting evidence, dismissed. Thats how we deal with every claim. Including religious claims. Otherwise Im claiming you love to diddle children and wait for you to provide evidence to the contrary. Be glad logic doesnt work that way. "Yeah, but you can have Christianity without creationism." Except without creationism one of the pillars of christianity vanishes which makes it difficult to make sense of the rest that is based on it. You would have to make shit up ontop of the made up shit that you want to exclude. Without creationism you dont get adam & eve and without them you dont get original sin or a need for jesus. And without salvation the entire religion just crumbles beyond its pile of garbage that it already is. "Christopher Hitchens is the imperialist propagandist I refer to." Today the term imperialism is commonly used in international propaganda to denounce and discredit an opponent's foreign policy. International organizations, including the United Nations, attempt to maintain peace using measures such as collective security arrangements and aid to developing countries. Your claim just doesnt make any sense. "Also, the people cheering him burning in hell were BASED!" The words are english but there is no meaning. Literally. "Would you condemn people for cheering on Joseph Goebbels burning in hell?" Hmm, would people who dont believe in an afterlife cheer about events in the afterlife... Hmmmmm. Lets have a think over that. A LOOOONG THINK! Dude, just stop. The discovery morons wont suck your dick for simping here.
1
A creationist who poses with his degree but cant tell the difference between darwinism and evolution or constantly claims "darwinists cant explain X" is obviously and evidently lying, making their degrees worthless because they learned this stuff to aquire their degrees. They know they are lying. We know they are lying. Actual scientists know they are lying. But they say it anyway to their gullible flock who have no clue whats what.
1
Funny thing is, creationists are such a fringe group that the majority of scientists arent even aware they exist. Thats how irrelevant creationists are in science.
1
@AkrozeSmash But all creationists lie and pretend to be educated or better educated than the entire scientific community. Each and every one of them is a fraudulent liar and they lie to gullible people every day. Its what pseudoscience does. Its no different with flat earthers and chemtrailers. And all of them promote a grand conspiracy against their delusions.
1
@jdos5643 Quote from his about page: "I received a BA in chemistry from Carleton College, and performed graduate studies in both synthetic organic chemistry and science education at Cal State Northridge, receiving an MA in the latter. Prior to this I taught for about a decade in various high school and undergraduate settings, specializing in organic chemistry but also teaching general chemistry, physics, and biology." "he’s a fraud and he’s been exposed on his channel" Source: Your ass.
1
@jdos5643 "you can brag about your said “qualifications”" I never mentioned my qualifications. I quoted Dave's. Hence the "quote" before the quote. "Start with the origins of the universe…..can you provide the facts please?" You want me, a random person on the internet, to give you a detailed explaination of one of the biggest mysteries in science because we have little to no access to the rest of the universe to investigate an event thats long past, to some delusional little shit who believes he knows more than any scientist alive and dead... in a youtube comment section... Seriously? The short answer is: I dont know. The long answer is: I dont know because I have no access to tools to investigate and I dont really give a shit about the topic. But me not knowing doesnt automatically mean your delusional claim that your imaginary, magical friend poofed everything into existance because an iron age book with talk snakes says so which you believe without question. "or are you going to coward and delete your comment like many unqualified evolutionist do?…." Unlike you I have nothing to be ashamed of nor reason to delete my comments because unlike you I have a sense of credibility and intellectual integrity. You think someone has an evidence based answer? Go to them. Ask them to show you their nobel prize. Then beg them to explain reality to a worm like you.
1
@jdos5643 In no reality in the infinate multiverse is what you said correct. "atheists are Adamant about calling theories facts in science" It literally takes seconds to look up the term "scientific theory" to learn that theories are the highest form of knowledge in science, explaining the facts. FUCKING SECONDS! Atomic theory, theory of matter and energy, cell theory, germ theory, theory of plate tectonics, theory of evolution, theory of quantum mechanics, theory of relativity, theory of light energy, theory of electromagnetism, theory of radioactivity, theory of molecular bonds, theory of homeostasis, theory of gravity, etc.. Evolution is a scientific theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. "If you cannot explain the Big Bang theory and I quote you it’s a “mystery” then neither can or should you call it a fact" Whats with this obsession about the big bang? I didnt call it a fact. Its not an actual scientific theory. Every scientist knows that. Its just that over time the name stuck with it. Yet every scientist understands the difference between it being a hypothesis that we might never elevate to the level of a scientific theory but it still has valid evidence supporting it partially. Like a few other hypothesises about the origin of the universe. And even if scientists knew absolutely nothing about the origin of the universe, theists like you or those pretending to be scientists have done nothing to prove that a god exists or was involved in any event. "the Big Bang was Invented by a Christian ironic how atheist hold It as a fact and still call it an Unexplainable mystery lol how contradicting is that?" A scientist who happened to be a christian had a hypothesis, it got investigated for decades, turned out we found supporting evidence, turns out people talk about it... Somehow thats contradicting. Thats fucking stupid. "And if you admit that the universe is too vast to comprehend? Then why be so quick to dismiss the only plausible explanation that God did it?" Ah, yes. The feuerstein fallacy. God might exist outside our knowledge but we have no way to investigate therefor god is an acceptable explaination. Somehow... You have not provided anything that convinces any rational person that your god exists, that he has powers or that he used his powers to do anything. Theists always fail at the first challenge. Thats why I dismiss the god claims. "You admit to not knowing 90% percent of what’s out here yet deny a God or creator." Yes, because you dont know either. Because its an argument from ignorance fallacy. Or in your terms "we dont know how it happened therefor god". Every other type of theist could bring the same claim about their god and nobody could falsify it. Its completely useless. "When setting God aside as the only source for the universe you then accept the belief in a magic box..." Except natural forces have literally nothing in common with magic. You promote magic, not me. "And if you don’t know as you just admitted then why are you giving your invalid input?" Not knowing about the origin doesnt invalidate my opinion on the topic of your imaginary friend. Especially since your nonsense claims are filled with fallacies. "with your comment you just demonstrated you have no intellectual integrity" Admitting to not know an answer instead of making shit up is by definition intellectual integrity. Which is the opposite of what you are doing because you pretend to be better educated than any scientist. "All you have proven is the opposite or pure dishonesty." Thats called projecting. Evidently. "You said and I quote you you don’t know or care a $h@ about the topic. Yeah you said it all."* Because the origin of the universe doesnt tell you anything about the topic of the video. Context is important. For me at least. "Btw, I don’t use such language in my vocabulary because that’s not what my professors taught as part of curriculum…." Of course not. All those fallacies, false accusations, projecting, lies, being a douche is totally not such language. /s "and there you are still proving yourself a coward who deletes his comments because you have nothing factual to say or even defend your false beliefs." You literally responded to my comments that I havent deleted, I defended my position and now you lie about both. But keep pretending you loser are a scientist. Someday someone might be dumb enough to fall for it. PATHETIC!
1
Grifters who take money from thousands of gullible people dont deserve any courtesy. They deserve all the shit and namecalling that flies their way.
1
Those divers who can hold their breath for that long also dont live very long. Their average lifetime is between 20-30.
1
" Key question that was never answered, "why does that prove common ancestors, and not common designer" " Natural processes that make life possible to emerge and a magical, invisible, undetectable designer who creates life artificially without leaving a shred of evidence for his existance and work are a contradiction. You cant have both. There, easily answered.
1
This obsession to attack darwin to claim modern biology hasnt made any progress in biology, microbiology, genetics, paleontology and other fields is as dumb as attacking the wright brothers to make the case that modern planes dont exist. We clearly made progress in 150 years. Well, not clearly to morons who deny science.
1
If he gave you 3k bucks (in whatever currency) then he must have made or will make much more from his gullible cultists in some way. He gave it away so easily which is another red flag.
1
Its the job of everyone working at a creationist organisation and ministry to defend the indefensible, to be ignorant and to exploit the even more ignorant and gullible.
1
@NcxX-c8f They all have their own speciality of being terrible people Hovind is just a clown with youtube viewers, the DI has lots of useless books on amazon for profit, ken ham tells people never to trust scientist, the institute for creation research is similar... They all are more obsessed with attacking anyone who isnt gullible like them and doesnt believe in fairytales. They have nothing for their own alledged position but hot air. They are all frauds. Its criminal what they are doing and its criminal they are allowed to exploit people with bullshit.
1
He obviously is talking about the overwhelming majority of countries where its not allowed to drive on the left side. One country is not the example here.
1
One would think after decades of selecting quotes and data from biologists, creationists would have the equivalent of a full education in evolutionary biology. But they still lie about it. these people know they are lying. Because they are christians. Christians always lie. They have to.
1
Theists, not all religious people. There are religious people who dont have a reputation of lying. Theists have one. All of them. Big difference.
1
"When that day comes when you find out that there is a God" Which means nobody alive is justified to believe this god exists, dumbass.
1
@damonm3 Its because they are grifters. Anyone who gets degrees only to deny what they learned to get those degrees to lie for a living to gullible & ignorant people is a fraud. The fact that they copy the format of science journals to publish their blog posts reviewed by each other to pretend to offer valid science supports this. Lying, deceiving and exploiting are the true creationist "values" after all. Because every creationist has to lie to defend creationism. These people cant even admit to be wrong about anything. About changing minds, ken hams organisation has a statement of faith one has to sign before working even as a janitor there. Thats how fanatical creationists are. Flat earthers never get this kind of grift going yet they offer the same kind of pseudoscience and arguments and no research.
1
At 12:40 I was really wondering if these frauds ever listen to their own or just lie because it sells their books or they are just stupid. During the kitzmiller trial they used a mouse trap to claim "remove one part and its useless therefor irreducible complexity is a thing". Then comes the actual scientist, removes one part and uses it as a tie clip to illustrate that by removing one part it simply changes instead of becoming useless. Now the discovery institute is still using the same lie as always, pretending nobody can see the kitzmiller trial or read the countless counterarguments with illustrations. And they still throw a fit when someone calls them frauds. Shameless frauds as always.
1