Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. @Anton Taylor Nyet Vladimir!
    2
  2. You did not engage anything in the video.
    2
  3. It isn't.
    2
  4. Was the Gulf War on paper to?
    2
  5. "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." Satellite photos do not care about your propaganda
    2
  6. Strawman argument.
    2
  7. You did not watch the video
    2
  8. And a poor tank will not be able to generate nearly close to the same amount of offensive capability.
    2
  9. That is a load of BS as every non-Russian analyst will tell you.
    2
  10. Nice try Dimitri
    2
  11. ???
    2
  12. No?
    2
  13. He has photographic evidence, so yes.
    2
  14. That's... that's what the video was about...
    2
  15. ​ @maxinfly That never happened. You are using Russian disinformation talking points about the supposed banning of Russian.
    2
  16. Found the Vatnik. Russia has 150k+ cassualties. Norway's estimate is 180,000 cassualties. That of the US is 200,000. The BBC estimated 190,000 cassualties. How little you care for the lives of your own countrymen.
    2
  17. 1. The war is only 2.5 years old. That is some amazing math you got there. 2. I do not care what others think or say. Engage the methodology of the video. 3. Satellite images do not care about what you believe.
    2
  18. Gross simplifications. This isn't about you.
    2
  19. Last I checked NATO has not deployed combat troops in Ukraine mate.
    2
  20. Source: the Russian Ministry of defense. Their source: trust me bro (No footage found.)
    2
  21. Promised? Predictions are not promises and countries adapt based on predictions.
    2
  22. All professional estimates have the figure at at least 150,000+ cassualties two months ago.
    2
  23. ​ @baneofbanes  The funniest part is this same 18k deaths was claimed last month, so vatniks are pretending nobody died last in over a months wirth of fighting. They are lying so blatantly
    2
  24. Baseless conjecture.
    2
  25. Obvious bot is obvious.
    2
  26. You are correct. He should have said "The US, other NATO members and other countries..."
    2
  27. ​ @yahaaghtv  The USSR and China supported, funded, equiped and trained the NVA during the Vietnam war.
    2
  28. Are you in the anger stage of grieving?
    2
  29. No? He looks at the data and gives updates.
    2
  30. ​​ @davidrossa4125 no, he made an estimate after over a year of attrition that if the rate of attrition kept up Russia would run out of stored equipment by 2026. That was based on Oryx and satellite imagery.
    2
  31. Didn't the USSR lose in Afghanistan? Was this question not about conventional wars?
    2
  32. No, there isn't any footage of the Su-57 in Ukraine.
    2
  33. The middle ground between the truth and bullshit is not neutrality. It is still just bullshit
    2
  34. No, a good investigation.
    2
  35. That is largely about ammunition, not artillery systems.
    2
  36. ​​ @SimoN-vf8ps  You pride yourself in the death of Russian servicemen. Nobody hates Russians as much as Putin supporters.
    2
  37. That is a broken window falalcy.
    2
  38.  @drdzdd  You could not grasp the concept of conventional war if you were given an officers manual.
    2
  39. Russia already does that, considering Assad did commit atrocities including the systematic killing of political prisoner.
    2
  40. Oryx disagrees and they have photograohic evidence
    2
  41. Lol. You have no counterargument to anything shown.
    2
  42. ​ @LoveHammerMan  they have captured theoretically, metaphorically and metaphysically. They just have not captured it physically and effectively.
    2
  43.  @georgejohnson5478  Was the name John Johnson taken as a fake name? Stop using the Capslock Vatnik.
    2
  44. ​ @schmitty5461  It disproves the propaganda he listens to.
    2
  45. What bias? Prove it.
    2
  46. I think you have a fair point, in this case. Objectivity means no namecalling. If one wishes to point at the various war crimes commited, do it. But using the name of a fantasy race as an insult is just weird.
    2
  47. ​ @evilleader1991  Your name checks out
    2
  48. The Soviet Union lost Afghanistan. Can we talk about that?
    2
  49. He has already said you cannot draw that conclusion...
    2
  50. Yes, so in reality it couldn't. Because those considerations exist constantly.
    2