Comments by "Rick74" (@rick7424) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. I know right? It could be argued America failed to create a prosperous democracy but it is not an outright defeat in any sense.
    2
  2. Lol. You have nothing.
    2
  3. Perun did a video on this.
    2
  4. ​​ @baneofbanes  In that he is a Western guy who agrees with Putin. As per the wiki: "Macgregor appeared on Russian state-owned network RT where he called for the annexation of the Donbas and said residents of the region "are in fact Russians, not Ukrainians, and at the same time, you have Ukrainians in the west and in the north, who are not Russians"" He is also a racist liar: "In 2019, he argued for the myth that there were more White, mostly Irish "slaves" than African slaves in America in the late 1700s."
    2
  5. I believe the Oryx website already has that covered.
    2
  6. Yes it did
    2
  7. "My source is I made it the f*ck up."
    2
  8. He did not say that. In fact he predicted the rate of attrition would not mean critical depletion until 2026 to 2027.
    2
  9. Why? Oh wait, I can see your subscription to right wing channels siding with Russia.
    2
  10. Lol. You have no argument. You even refuse to engage with the content of the video because you can't.
    2
  11. Tell me you hate people more intelligent than you without telling me you have an inferiority complex.
    2
  12.  @madkoala2130  Imagine performing so badly that NATO has lost zero soldiers after 2.5 years of combat.
    2
  13. I seriously appreciate the time and dedication this took. Excellent methodology and reflection on the margin of error and what variables remain unknown.
    2
  14. *they're
    2
  15. That is a blatant lie.
    2
  16. Becuase NATO has an air doctrine rather than an artillery focused doctrine.
    2
  17. This is a legitimate topic of discussion. What are you on about.
    2
  18. This coming from a Vatnik?
    2
  19. No?
    2
  20. Blatant anti-semite on a video having nothing to do with Judaism or Israel.
    2
  21. "This sattelite imagery and all those pictures if oryx are fake!" What did Orwell write agsin? "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
    2
  22. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  23. So you are just throwing away the lives of your own soldiers because you can't be bothered? That is some terrible propaganda.
    2
  24. The fact that you won't admit they lost outright is undermining your credibility.
    2
  25.  @arthurgeorge5474  That is not the defnition of lost. Phyrric victories are a thing. Nobody argues that Nazi Germany won WWII because they killed more Soviets.
    2
  26. You have no argument which is why you do not engage with the video.
    2
  27. You Americans have a delusional comprehension of other cultures. Instead you project your own culture onto others. Untrained, uncoordinated civilians with a pistol won't do much.
    2
  28. Strawman fallacy. He never said this. He is caculating the rate of attrition with verifiable satellite images with a margin of error.
    2
  29. Source: "Prigozhin's ghost told me so in a dream."
    2
  30. Russia invaded Ukraine, not the other way around.
    2
  31. No. You couldn't invade North Vietnam, because that would mean a Chinese incursion.
    2
  32. Oh look, it is the guy with empty statements that has no counterargument to the actual content of the video.​ @Jean-Seb 
    2
  33. They cannot match their losses.
    2
  34. You either don't understand stealth or purposefully misrepresent it. Also: If stealth is not worth it why is Russia trying to produce stealth jets?
    2
  35. ​ @Jean-Seb  This channel never said that.
    2
  36. I have no idea what you are talking about
    2
  37. It's gdp as percentage of the world is shrinking. It is a regional power, not a world power.
    2
  38. "Many sources" is not citation. That would not have passed in high school.
    2
  39. No? It is an analysis based on satellite footage and military reports.
    2
  40. ​ @DefNotCriss Well, it is not outlandish. It is certainly laughable though, if you catch my meaning.
    2
  41. You neither understand logistics or the concept of training. You are a Russian, that's for sure.
    2
  42. Then why has the battle for Bakhmut lasted longer than the battle for Stalingrad
    2
  43. Comment section full of Russia simps.
    2
  44. No u. 😊
    2
  45. -He uses Oryx, not Ukrainian claims. -Russia is not recieving thousands of new artillery pieces. Not from its allies or its own industry.
    2
  46. Attacked by Ukraine?
    2
  47. You don't know what air superiority means. 😅
    2
  48. We don't have to prove a negative mate.
    2
  49. You providing zero arguments for your conclusion or just making up figures makes your opinion pretty useless.
    2
  50. You have no actual argument. This channel has used visually confirmed losses. Maybe YOU should check them out.
    2