Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. It’s easy to see why China has so few friends. It has territorial disputes with nearly all its neighbors. And if China thinks that Russia will stand up for it, they’re sadly mistaken. Just look at how Russia helped India when Indian and Chinese troops were at each other’s throats not long ago.
    19
  2. Sorry, but one Su-57 aircraft doesn’t make it operational. It hasn’t even shown the ability to shoot its guns or air to air missiles from an internal bay in flight. And so far it hasn’t shown anything impressive when it comes to maneuverability.
    8
  3.  @MarcG7424  Who says it’s incapable of dogfighting? Google Pilots Say F-35 Superior Within Visual Range: Dogfight Criticisms Laid To Rest. It has a number of advantages. With its stealth, it can go into the dogfight in an advantageous position. Its ordnance being stored internally and near the center of the fuselage gives it better turning ability and the ability to recover from high-bleed turns more quickly than legacy aircraft. It’s engine is also very powerful. That’s why when you see it performing a high-g instant turn its ass doesn’t drag. It can recover very quickly, which is an essential trait needed for close combat.
    5
  4. The Su-57 doesn’t have a chance. The Raptor has been in service for decades and has its bugs worked out. The Su-57 has not shown anything impressive with its supposed great maneuverability, and the fact that Russia has never put any fighter service in service with AESA, while the F-22’s AESA radar is 4th gen, plus the fact that the USA has been using stealth aircraft for over four decades gives the F-22 a huge advantage. Not just the F-22’s technology, but with the experience how the Raptor has already been used. Thefact that the F-22 has flown many missions and participated in many exercises, while the Su-57 has had just one production aircraft built, the Su is significantly behind.
    5
  5. Man, I hope they don’t go to war. I am so tired of seeing all the death and destruction around the world.
    4
  6. Qatar’s wealth helps it purchase some of the very best weapons systems. Having the F-15, Rafale and Rafale gives them a potent air force. For such a small country they have a big punch.
    3
  7. Good luck to Russia to make any more of these missiles. The Ukrainian military examined a Russian Kh-101 cruise missile and found at least 35 US-made microchips inside. With the sanctions in place Russia has lost access to these microchips. And before Russian trolls say that they can get them from China, that’s not the case. China uses US software to make its microchips. If the Chinese violate the export control rules that prohibit the sale of microchips to Russia, the Chinese will only be hurting themselves, which they’re not going to risk.
    3
  8. Why are you comparing it to a carrier? US cruisers and destroyers can perform independently as well. A carrier can also defend itself and project a lot of power.
    3
  9. Is that why the F-35 is in such high demand? I guess you should tell all the clients that you know more than they do and they’re all making a big mistake. It’s accomplishing feats not seen by other aircraft. For instance, it linked to a HIMARS to strike a naval target. Its AI automatically tracks, detects, and targets each foe, shares this info with other assets in the field, determines the probability of kill for each, and also determines the best targeting solution. Its sensor fusion and situational awareness are unmatched. Furthermore, since its ordnance is stored internally that means less wing and drag weight, which also reduces its RCS, gives it greater agility and fuel efficiency.
    3
  10. Without the aid from the United States, Ukraine would have lost by now, so yes much of it is game changing. For instance, Russia in the beginning was taking huge amounts of land. Once the HIMARS entered the battlefield, the situation entirely changed. The same goes with Bradleys, Javelins, Stingers, etc. Without them Russia would have achieved much more and in a shorter time period.
    2
  11.  @boboboy8189  Russia doesn’t have the same manufacturing capabilities to build high tech equipment on mass scale efficiently. Plus, Russia is over twenty years behind in this field, and it’s demonstrated a dependence on western technology for its high tech equipment. From its T-90 using French optics, to nearly every missile, EW system, attack helicopters, all using US made microchips, the Russian land have shown that they are dependent on western goods. Put it this way, in the MMRCA tender, India’s Air Chief said that the US had the best weapons, radars and systems, and the US wasn’t even offering its best. On the other hand, Russia’s Mig-35 failed primarily because of two reasons, its radar, which failed to reach desired acquisition ranges, and its engines.
    2
  12.  @definitelyfrank9341  Not at all. Your logic is that the US tech will just remain stagnant while Russia’s improves, which isn’t realistic at all. US ships have undergone major upgrades, and unlike Russia the US is very good at mass producing high tech equipment on mass scale efficiently. Russia’s not a technological leader. Why is this so hard for you to comprehend?
    2
  13. I guess you better tell all the countries that are buying the F-35 that they are all making a big mistake, and that you know better than their experts.
    2
  14.  @RoyBrown777  I never heard that it was the entire carrier group, just the carrier. Why do you think the US requested the Gotland to stay in the US for two additional years? To train against and learn how to defend against subs like it.
    2
  15.  @carlos8040ca Keep dreaming. Russia’s losses are significantly higher. It’s gotten so bad that Russia uses Chinese made golf carts on the front.
    2
  16. You fell for Russian propaganda. There was no Su-57 kill. Do a little research and you’ll find that Russia has not provided any evidence of it, and it can’t even tell when or where it happened.
    1
  17. Russia didn’t intercept 💩. It’s hilarious how Russia always claims to intercept the missiles and yet the “debris” keeps managing to hit the targets.
    1
  18.  @paulscountry456  Russia said it would win in three days. 😂
    1
  19. 😂The Su-35 was cut like butter in exercises in Egypt and China. It’s antiquated PESA radar is easily jammed rendering the aircraft blind.
    1
  20. The one countries that are allies of Russia are Iran and North Korea. That should tell you he Russia is perceived worldwide.
    1
  21. LOL, the Su-35 would get its ass kicked, just like it did in exercises in Egypt and China. Look into why Egypt cancelled its remaining order for the Su-35, and instead bought an additional 100 Rafales.
    1
  22.  @boboboy8189  If you’re referring to the Red Flag exercise in Alaska, the US pilots had different recollections of events. The Eurofighters also flew clean to enhance their performance, which isn’t very realistic of real combat. You add some ordnance to its wings and its agility, speed and ability to recover from high-g turns is limited. Plus, the F-22 carries the Luneburg Lens in exercises. It’s a radar reflector that lets the opposing side know its position. Without it the fights would be extremely one sided as the F-22 would be in a favorable fighting position for every encounter. Plus, don’t forget in exercises in UAE the Eurofighter got slaughtered by French Rafales, while the F-22s came out undefeated. What is most impressive about it was that the Raptor pilots were all rookies having less than 100 hours in the aircraft. A US pilot discusses the exercise in a YouTube video called F-22 Undefeated at Al Dhafra, if you’re interested.
    1
  23.  @Mamaro105  Liar. The F-22 has never faced the Su-30, and in exercises at Red Flag Nellis the F-15 won every time. The fact that you have to lie tells me that you already know yourself that you’re wrong.
    1
  24.  @theprotagonist8755  Thank you. Nah, just an aviation enthusiast.
    1
  25. 😂The U.S. has provided less than 5% of its annual defense budget to help Ukraine, with much of the equipment from old stockpiles. The ATACMS was planned for demolition as its a 30 year old missile that’s getting replaced. Russia’s taken huge losses both in manpower and equipment.
    1
  26.  @Манлетопия I have two houses in the U.S. Why don’t you look at the standard of living in Russia. It’s easy to use why Ukraine wants nothing to be like Russia. Other than Moscow and Saint Petersburg, Russia is a third world 💩 hole.
    1
  27. Countries only join NATO out of fear of Russia. Russia keeps very well that NATO isn’t going to invade Russia. Russia has practically removed all of its forces from its border with Finland and moved them to fight in Ukraine.
    1
  28. 😂 Yeah right. That’s why Ukraine still holds control of Russian land, and it’s why Russia’s troops are using vehicles, golf carts, motorcycles, scooters and even bicycles on the front. Ukraine has shown the world that Russia is weak.
    1
  29.  @jonesmorendik  Russia is advancing very slowly, and in the process is losing hundreds of thousands of men. Russia’s three day SMO is now a three year war, and Russia hasn’t achieved any of its objectives.
    1
  30.  @jonesmorendik  Just curious why you haven’t joined the SMO? Russia is low on men, and it’s offering huge amounts of money for men who sign up.
    1
  31.  @jonesmorendik  Obviously better than Russian men as far fewer Ukrainian men are dying than the Russians.
    1
  32. Well, of course the first weapon is a hypersonic missile, and it’s only shown in animation. Russia is known for talking a lot of hype so until it’s actually shown there’s no reason for me to believe it. The S-400 has already been defeated in Syria where it has no kills and only looks good on paper. Show me any Russian SAM that has ever intercepted a ballistic or cruise missile. US intercepts are found here on YouTube in many videos, but you can’t find one Russian SAM doing it. The T-14 has no combat experience and looks good on paper. I remember when the T-72 was at one time said to be the best around, and even old M-60 tanks defeated them in the Iraq war.
    1
  33. It’s far better than Russia’s!
    1
  34. @RESCUESOULTVThe last time the US fought against Russia was in Syria. Russia’s Wagner group got bombed for four hours straight, and guess what Russia’s Su-35s did at a nearby base? Nothing. They were too scared to engage the US aircraft because they knew F-22s were flying cover.
    1
  35.  @supernatural_forces Very funny. Russia’s air defenses have failed repeatedly to protect strategic targets in Ukraine. And despite what this video infers,Russia has struggled to intercept the 30 year old ATACMS. It’s been successful several times in striking the S-400, which is supposedly supposed to be able to defeat it. Russia’s hypersonic missiles aren’t truly hypersonic by today’s definition because they aren’t maneuverable, which means their flight path can be predicted and they can be intercepted.
    1
  36.  @setajucizbun7073 Wow, just one F-117 was shown down in it 30 years. It happens on the 4th night of the war, and not another one was shot down. It was shot down due to human error of flying a predictable flight path four nights straight. It’s not that hard to shoot down when you know where and when it will fly over.
    1
  37.  @ssaini5028 Russia and China’s fighters pale in comparison to US fighters. Unlike the F-22 and F-35, neither the Su-57 or J-20 have flown deep strike missions. Russia’s aircraft have not avoided NATO radars. Russia is afraid to use its fighters anywhere near Ukrainian strongholds. What’s hilarious is that Russia thinks little of the J-29, and China thinks the same of the Su-57.
    1
  38.  @RealKull Keep dreaming. The Su-35 is just a modified Su-27, and it still flies with vintage PESA radar. If Russia’s S-400 struggled to take out f-22s and F-35s flying deep strike missiles in Syria, Russia’s Su-35 doesn’t stand a chance. You won’t find one credible source that agrees with you. It’s all talk, just like the Russian military.
    1
  39.  @ssaini5028 The Houthis attacked a Russian ship and Russia could not do anything about it. Russia just lost in Syria too. And how many months have gone by where Russia still can’t remove Ukraine’s forces out of Kursk?
    1
  40.  @hopetonedwards3038 You’re funny considering in its 40 or so years a MiG -29 has never shot down a western fighter, and yet it’s been shot down numerous times.
    1
  41.  @setajucizbun7073  Who cares. Just one was shot down. US commanders even admitted screwing up. The F-117 flew the same flight path four nights straight and at the same time at night. Not another one was shot down despite flying hundreds of more deep strike missions. In its 30 year career only one was shot down despite flying thousands of sorties. Look at how many Russian aircraft have gotten shot down in Ukraine alone. Hundreds! Russia’s the one many decades behind. Even the F-117 has a smaller radar cross section than the SU-57. It’s Russia that has the long history of copying from the west, not vice versa.
    1
  42.  @setajucizbun7073  It sure did. The F-117 flew the same path and at the same time at night four nights straight. US commanders admitted messing up. It’s Russia that is many decades behind. The F-117 first flew around 40 years ago, and Russia’s Su-57 still has a larger RCS. What was the “bunch” of other aircraft? What one F-16? lol
    1
  43.  @setajucizbun7073  Search “Available data suggests the Yemeni group has been going after vessels carrying Russian cargo, particularly if an operator's ships have visited Israeli ports.”
    1
  44. @ Hahaha Liar. Everything you wrote is a lie. Very few radars have been destroyed, and the ones that have been were by drones. Russia has not shot down any F-16s with its Su-57 or Su-35. What is your source RT, Pravda? Very few HIMARS have been destroyed, and no very few if any Patriot systems have been destroyed. The HIMARS and Patriot launchers have been destroyed by the Iskander, not Russian aircraft. Russia’s and Chinese fighters wouldn’t stand a chance against western fighters, and no Congress did not say the F-35 is a failure. If that was the case why would over a thousand be built, and there’s a huge backlog for more of them? And yet another lie about simulations.
    1
  45.  @ssaini5028  Literally everything you wrote is a lie. Not one thing is true. What a sad world you must live in to make up that kind of nonsense. You have verifiable sources to back up your claims? Of course not, you’re lying. Prove me wrong by putting in quotes and name credible sources. You can’t and you know it. Russia couldn’t even stop Wagner group from heading towards Moscow, and Putin had to flee. And you think Russia can beat the U.S.? With just a few thousand troops Ukraine was able to invade the Kursk region, and still Russia today hasn’t been able to remove them. Russia’s army is even using golf carts, scooters and bicycles on the front. Haha hahahaha Russia’s Black Sea fleet has gone into hiding against a country without a navy, and you think Russia can beat the U.S. Navy. Hahaha. Russia’s air force can’t even achieve air superiority over Ukraine’s vintage and small Air Force. Russia doesn’t have a chance against the US. Ukraine wasn’t even a top twenty military force at the start of the war, and Russia is still suffering humiliating losses. The US is Ukraine’s largest donor, and it provides Ukraine with less than 5% of its annual military budget, and much of the equipment is old that is sitting and collecting dust. Nobody respects the Russian military anymore. China’s own military admits that their lack of experience would be hard to overcome to beat the U.S. If China was so sure that it could beat the U.S., it would have invaded Taiwan by now, which is right next to China while the USA would have to travel many thousands of miles/kilometers.
    1
  46.  @ssaini5028  How many lies are you going to tell? Nothing you say is true. Russia doesn’t even have the capability to defend ships in the Red Sea from the Houthis. No US ships have been hit. Two destroyers were attacked with cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, drones, etc., and every one of them either missed or it was shot down. You have verifiable proof that the US warships were hit? Of course not because it didn’t happen. Kursk is not a failed operation. It shows how weak Russia is to allow very few troops to take so much territory in such a short time. And Ukraine did it with equipment that is from old western reserves. The fact that you have to lie so much tells me that you know yourself that you’re wrong. Nobody is going to trust you or take your words seriously. You make outlandish statements and expect people to be gullible enough to believe them. I don’t have time for dishonest people like you. I wish you the best of luck because no one is going to ever trust you unless you learn how to be honest. Bye.
    1
  47.  @ssaini5028  Not a single word you said wrote is true. Prove me wrong by providing credible sources, and cite in quotes the text that backs your claims. I don’t have time to address each and every ridiculous comment of yours. It’s pathetic that you actually think that people are going to believe such nonsense.
    1
  48.  @ssaini5028  Russia doesn’t even have the capability to defend shipping lanes in the Red Sea. You’re a joke. I’m not going to waste any more time on you.
    1
  49. It’s Russia that doesn’t have real hyperspace missiles. The ones that they claimed to have are easily getting shot down. The US has had for decades hypersonic missiles going all the way back to the GAM-87 Skybolt in the 1950s.
    1
  50.  @DrDupor  LOL, that only happened because of poor mission planning of flying a predictable flight path every night. We’ve seen in Ukraine how poorly Russian SAMs have done. They repeatedly fail to protect strategic targets, I,e. bridges, ammo dumps, command centers, SAM sites, barracks, air fields, naval bases, etc.
    1