Comments by "Thetequilashooter1" (@Thetequilashooter1) on "Военное телевидение"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@deanzaZZR Well, it’s either wrong or you misunderstood it. There are scores of websites that discuss both the land and maritime disputes. Here’s an excerpt from one of them. China has also been involved with several land disputes with its neighbouring countries and recent times have witnessed an escalation of attack by China.
India: India and China clashed violently at the Galwan Valley in Eastern Ladakh on 15 June, which is part of the disputed Aksai Chin region. The clash left 20 Indian soldiers dead and several injured. The PLA also reportedly suffered casualties.
China has also staked claim on parts of Arunachal Pradesh.
Nepal: China has a long-standing dispute over parts of Nepal that it claims are Tibet. In June, China annexed Rui village in Nepal, claiming it as part of Tibet.
Bhutan: It also claims to own a large chunk of eastern Bhutan including areas like Cherkip Gompa, Dho, Dungmar and Gesur. On 5 July, China stated that it has a border dispute with Bhutan, for the first time since 1986.
Laos: The communist country also alleges that it owns large parts of Laos on historical precedent dating back to the Yuan Dynasty.
Mongolia: Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region within Mongolia, has also been involved in a territorial dispute with China but the last border flare-up between the two regions was in 2015.
Myanmar: China and Myanmar share a 2,185-km-long border based on a 1960 agreement. However, two weeks ago, Myanmar accused China of creating trouble on the border and instigating terror groups.
Tibet: Perhaps China’s most decisive land dispute is the one with Tibet. In 1950, China enforced a long-held claim on the Himalayan country and incorporated it with its own territory. Tibet’s spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and his followers were forced to flee to India, where they have set up a government in exile.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@j4genius961 Of course not. Ukraine has asked for and received some of the more advanced technology, like Patriot missiles, NLAWS, etc., but the western countries aren’t going to hurt their own defenses by giving Ukraine their best fighters, tanks, armored vehicles, etc., especially equipment that Russia can examine and steal technology. For instance, the Bradleys that Ukraine is using is decades old technology, and yet it’s still doing exceptionally well on the battlefield. There’s also a huge cost factor. Newer equipment costs a lot more than the older equipment that is just collecting dust. Ukraine doesn’t have much of anything on its own so larger quantities must be provided. I am sure that Ukraine would prefer to have 3-4 Bradleys versus one brand new one coming off the assembly line.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1