Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1. I think John is doing a really important service to us all by being transparent about how his content is adjusted to suit these authoritarian guidelines. Hopefully enough viewers care that it puts pressure on the platform to reconsider what they're doing.
    429
  2. I can tell this is really wearing on John's heart. Our systems are in severe need of fixing but tries to hide its flaws. John's voice is the beacon of light we all need right now. Stay strong!
    284
  3. The best part of the interview is Musk showing what true leadership is about. He took on Twitter, not because it would be profitable or enjoyable, but because it needed to be done. He enters the interview in casual clothes and happy to talk about anything. He has no fear because he has clear conscience and nothing to hide.
    192
  4. Agreed. An investigation is needed into what Swindon did differently in order to avoid excess cases of myocarditis despite Covid-19.
    50
  5. Small correction: the pressure is not dependent on syringe diameter. Pressure in: pressure out. But the chamber-to-syringe area ratio amplifies the force at the expense of flow. See Bernoulli's theorem.
    48
  6. Based on how they acted during Covid, I wouldn't trust them with my dog.
    39
  7. As far as I know, Klaus Schwab had little direct involvement in this atrocity. But he played a significant role in setting up the system that generated this mess. If anything good comes of this tragedy it is to demonstrate the corruption and dysfunction of "stakeholder capitalism", the system he pushes to replace democracy.
    16
  8. Hold my beer /RFK Jr
    10
  9. Happy to hear "excess deaths" being recommended as a measure of covid's impact. That was my first impulse in 2020 to check whether it was real or mass hysteria. I quickly discovered that deaths (in Sweden) were way over projections from recent years and correlated well with number of confirmed covid cases. After that, all discussions about potential over-attribution of covid as cause of death seemed secondary.
    8
  10. Given that the protein comes out of solution when cooled to room temperature makes me fear what exposure to cold would do. Take care people, stay warm!
    7
  11. Surely there is a correlation between CO2 and temperature. The question is which is driving the other. I think the argument is that the record suggests temperature rise tends to precede rise in CO2, indicating temperature drives CO2 and not so much the reverse.
    7
  12. Oftentimes he is the only voice.
    6
  13. I trusted my gut instinct but ultimately yielded in order to be allowed to travel. Luckily I was not injured, at least yet.
    6
  14. The Swedish minister of healthcare was asked about this. He forwarded the question to the "social minister". The response was that the questions were based on false premises which have been "circulating online". The minister claimed that WHO has not proposed any changes themselves, but changes are being discussed by member nations. He claimed that since negotiations are still ongoing, there is nothing concrete to criticize. He also claimed that WHO can never force Sweden to do anything, because it is Sweden who is responsible for ratification.
    6
  15.  @6789uiop  True, viscous fluids do not obey Bernoulli's theorem due to energy losses.
    6
  16. I strongly suspect processed oils and additives has a significant effect on gut health. I feel so much better eating unprocessed foods.
    4
  17. The fact that governments signed agreements to take full legal responsibility in case of any adverse effects does not help. It seems they really hate to admit how thoroughly bamboozled they were by pharmaceutical companies.
    3
  18. Facebook has gone from selling ads to companies to selling social engineering to governments. This is seriously troubling.
    3
  19. I love John's sarcastic humor.
    3
  20. Data presented by John suggests (as far as I understand) that vaccination considerably reduces risk of severe illness from infection and slightly reduces risk of transmission. However, considering the risk of severe illness is much lower for certain demographics and that vaccination does not add immunity after natural infection, vaccination should not be applied indiscriminately.
    3
  21. It is important. It transforms. It reinforces. It is the next thing. It is a continuation of success. It leads to better health. ... They can not be more vague.
    2
  22. Especially considering he's an entrepreneur and not an expert on the issues he offers his advice.
    2
  23. Ultra-processed seed oils are bad indeed, but just you wait until meat has been fully replaced by ultra-processed insect matter.
    2
  24. I came to a scary realization. Excess deaths are based on extrapolation from pre-pandemic levels. There are limits to how long it is valid to extrapolate from those levels to estimate excess deaths in the now. If debate about excess deaths is suppressed long enough, it will no longer be possible to estimate excess deaths with any reasonable certainty, to the benefit of everyone who seek to dismiss it. At least this is what I fear.
    2
  25. UK ONS saves thousands of lives with the stroke of a pen.
    2
  26. Deadpan delivery seems appropriate considering the matter.
    2
  27. No, we don't know the cause of the observed excess deaths, which is why this is extremely important to study and discuss publicly right now.
    2
  28. Thanks for the helpful comment!
    2
  29. Sadly, this problem is nowadays quite general for academia. We need a global academic revolution.
    2
  30. @Memphis2010GFC  Fair point. But may be worth checking out Ian Plimer's book he refers to. He's a professor of geology, which seems more relevant.
    2
  31. Is it only me or does John's voice seem a bit higher pitch than usual in this video?
    2
  32. Reinvestment of pandemic profits into increased capture of decision making and regulatory institutions.... how incredibly predictable.
    2
  33. I watched the Unheard interview of Dawkins. It was thoroughly frustrating to hear him so ignorant and apologetic. Strange of an evolutionary biologist to not have payed closer attention during a pandemic.
    1
  34. Great! I was curious about a follow-up on this.
    1
  35. What a clear account of what's wrong with WHO.
    1
  36. While you had pericarditis after Covid the infection, this study says Covid is very unlikely to have caused it.
    1
  37.  @LumocolorARTnr1319  I know, I did this in 2020. I looked at curve of weekly deaths compared to last 5 years. It went way up during spring, coinciding with rise in reported covid cases.
    1
  38. I've never seen anyone soldier on with such persistence.
    1
  39. What an unfortunate surname. I bet no one cracks jokes around Professor David.
    1
  40.  @JohnHughes2002  How do you know this?
    1
  41.  @ecopeacechristian-linda7239  Damn it.
    1
  42. Great news! :)
    1
  43. 40 IU = 1 μg
    1
  44. Vitamin D is so important to human health that Africans migrating north turned white. Let that sink in.
    1
  45. Isn't it a stretch to say that depression being unrelated to depression means that raising the serotonin level isn't helping against depression? It seems to me the simplest explanation would be that while low serotonin isn't causing depression, raising it does help prevent it.
    1
  46. Pharmaceutical companies shift all responsibility to governments, then pay their salaries to close the loop. Perfect way to avoid responsibility.
    1
  47. If you want to know more about Google's and Facebook's overreach, listen to Prof Robert Epstein: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7qT_38iRSc
    1
  48. Statistics Sweden finally (2 days ago) released monthly deaths for 2022. 3.5% more died in 2022 than average for period 2000-2017. This is the worst of the last five years besides 2020: +0.8% (2018), -3.0% (2019), +7.3 (2020), +0.5 (2021) 19% more died in December 2022 than average December for 2000-2017. This is almost as bad as December 2020: +23%
    1
  49. We need to lock down and mobilize big pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccine against famine.
    1
  50. So let me get this straight. They developed deadly and infectious viruses abroad, avoiding law and regulation. A virus leaked and spread. Rather than blowing the alarm, they suppressed information and work out a plan to manufacture a story about natural origin. They then placed the head of the unlawful research lab as the main communicator about the pandemic he caused. They rally pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines. Upon realizing that the virus isn't as deadly as first thought, they deploy a global fear campaign to ensure demand. They make shady deals with politicians to buy vaccines before proper testing on humans. They suppressed the notion that none of the vaccines turn were effective at preventing infection nor at reducing transmission. They also suppressed that several vaccines have dangerous side effects. They also suppressed knowledge about role of natural immunity. They urge everyone to wear masks which turned out to be useless. They leveraged violation of fundamental rights and freedoms to force people to vaccinate. They force vaccines on children, all while aware of side effects and how harmless the virus is for the young and healthy. Etc. Etc. Etc. You couldn't make this up!
    1