Comments by "bj0rn" (@TheLivirus) on "Dr. John Campbell" channel.

  1.  @PIANOSEEDS  No need. If anything, that was a distasteful pun on my part.
    1
  2. Jesus Christ, I don't think anyone can watch this and not be seriously concerned.
    1
  3. I just finished listening to Michael Osterholm on JRE. He made many claims that seem to contradict data shown on this channel. 1: there are no deaths from myocarditis related to vaccination. 2: natural immunity "adds" to vaccination-induced immunity. 3: surge in Israel was among non-vaccinated. Would be interesting to have John Campbell comment on the interview.
    1
  4. WHO was only partially funded by nations, the rest funded privately, e.g. by Bill Gates' GAVI. Avoiding private interests in the organization would be a good reason not to pay as little as possible to a world health body.
    1
  5. So that was depressing. Corruption is vast.
    1
  6. 15:50 When you can't disagree verbally nor in text.
    1
  7. A colleague of mine claimed that I need to take vitamin D in the form of oil capsules, and that cheap chewing pills are "useless". Sitting now at home doing "internet research" I cannot find any support for his claim. The cheap pills I'm having specify "cholecalciferol" which seems to correspond to vitamin D3: the substance produced in the skin upon UV exposure. Any idea if there's anything to what he's saying?
    1
  8. There seems to be a significant risk that our supposed crisis of misinformation is misinformation.
    1
  9. I'm searching for information about Sweden's response to the amendment. All I was able to find was the document "Strategy for Sweden's cooperation with WHO 2021-2025" which offered some hopeful words: "WHO’s funding model remains a weakness. The fixed income provided by membership fees is a small proportion of the budget and the organisation continues to be dependent on a small number of major donors." "For Sweden, the funding of the organisation is a priority issue." "Sweden will improve strategic governance capability in WHO’s governing bodies by requiring regular, transparent, clear and appropriate monitoring and feedback of the organisation’s work at all three levels." "Sweden will endeavour to ensure that governance of WHO is effective and results-based by requiring accountability and transparency (Outcome 9, Outcome 10)."
    1
  10. Don't worry, they have made a risk-benefit analysis, and it showed that they run a large risk of making hundreds of billions in case of a leak.
    1
  11. Strangely, my stomach gets chaotic from potato crisps, but is absolutely fine from french fries. Must be some additives.
    1
  12. I'm open minded, but David say so many mindboggling things that my mind goes into defense. I can sense that John shares this feeling.
    1
  13. This is how trust in institutions is restored, not through censor.
    1
  14. Vitamin D is so important to human health that it turned africans white.
    1
  15.  @mugogrog  You draw the line where think it is, based on your personal priorities and best available data. In my opinion.
    1
  16. The hate of the global elite for Musk is compelling evidence that the war on CO2 is the means to global governance and not the other way around. The same probably goes for the war on viral disease. It's just an excuse to transfer power from nations to an unelected global bureaucracy.
    1
  17. To "move at the speed of science" sounds like patiently waiting for the scientific process to clarify crucial facts. Funny that she used this expression to justify the opposite.
    1
  18. When a government official says a decision is science based, nowadays, I don't expect much more realism than a movie based on a true story.
    1
  19.  @timglover7226  I wouldn't read that much into the title. A lot of skills transfer well to climate science: math, statistics, chemistry, scientific principles, the study of a complex system, etc. As long as he has looked carefully at the data, the methods, the arguments, etc. I don't think he should necessary stay strictly within his field. But the way he dismissed the correlation between CO2 and temperature it seems he didn't really look that deep into it.
    1
  20. I don't understand how big pharma manage to have their hands around everyone's testicles. What stops all of these people, across the globe, from expressing their independent thoughts?
    1
  21. I don't want to be rude, but I think his contribution is distilling and summarising, not providing details. The details are in the papers that most of us are not able to comprehend.
    1
  22.  @truthjustice5144  Can you back up your assertions?
    1
  23. What John fails to describe is, if we eradicate deficiency diseases and leverage our immune system to its fullest, how will pharmaceutical companies maintain and expand their profit?
    1
  24. I dropped by John Campbell's page on wikipedia. Almost every paragraph dismisses him. The only thing positive said about him is: "In August 2020, UNICEF's regional office for Europe and Central Asia cited his YouTube channel as an excellent example of how experts might engage with social media to combat misinformation,[16] citing a March 2020 briefing by Social Science in Humanitarian Action.[17]" But only as part of the narrative that he was sane before but has now gone bonkers. I've been quite trusting of the self-correcting nature of Wikipedia until recently. There seems to have been a radical attempt to cease control of information on all electronic media the last few years. It's terrifying.
    1
  25. Denmark has my affections.
    1
  26. They keep getting caught doing exactly what they accuse their enemies of.
    1