Comments by "AWResistance" (@AlanWattResistance) on "Channel 4 News"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
***** The problem is that women are only ever given one option, that's the problem with this corrupted system, therefore we have to go to the streets, it's the only way to break the narrative.
Public spaces are an open forum, we have to deal with situations outside of our control, and we often get spoken too by people we do not know, this is the reality of living in a free society; but in a free society, anyone can refuse to participate in public conversation or discourse, but you do not have the right not to be approached for conversation or discourse. Harrassment is persistant and unwanted attention, something which protesters do not engage in, many do not even approach people for conversation, they merely protest something they strongly disgaree with, which again, is commonplace within a free society.
You do not have the right not to be talked too in public, sorry.
1
-
***** I operate from a place of love, from your worldview it may seem like hatred, but i actually do care about unborn babies, not because i hate women or their choices, but because i have a deep love for all people, especially the most vunerable, those without a choice; the unborn.
And there are many doctors and nurses that disagree with abortion, but people like you want them to be silenced, "the only option should be abortion, and you better not disagree with us", so who is disgusting here? me or you?
1
-
Val Nenuial So why are drugs illegal? if no one is allowed a say on what other people do with their own bodies, then all drugs should be legalised and no one should ever judge a person for freely choosing to take drugs. The same thing can apply to firearms ownership, the government or anyone else shouldn't deny me my right to own any firearm i choose to purchase. Both of these are restricted to a certain extent, and for right reasons, and so should abortion, it should be restricted only for cases of rape or when the Mother's life is at stake.
"Every woman has the right to chose!!!" Yet every woman hasn't a right to take drugs or own a handgun (in the UK). Also if it's "her body her choice", then what stopping the woman abortion the baby one week before it's due? AHHH, so women don't control their own bodies afterall, because if she aborted one week before due date, she'd be charged with murder. Your Libetarian philosophy is starting to crumble.
No child has to die needlessly, adoption should always be the first option for a pregnant woman, giving women that option is not "bigoted", it's common sense.
1
-
Val Nenuial When does the growing baby magically become a human child? Where is this magical line where one second it's a fetus without natural rights, and another second, a human child with natural rights? Who made up this arbitrary rule?
How can you possibly deny anyone the right to a firearm? even if that person may take a human life? Abortion actively takes a human life, a human baby's life is at stake; abortion, like gun ownership should never be a closed off topic, which you people would like. It's far easier to justify unrestricted gun ownership than abortion, and that says a lot.
Again, if it's "her body, her choice" then why can't she reject the pregnancy one week before it's due? You know it's bullshit, therefore "her body, her choice" is bullshit, it's not an argument.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1