Comments by "" (@seablock) on "Top Rank Boxing" channel.

  1. 7
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. 3
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35.  @sAMMYsILVER.  More deflection i see. Don't worry, i'll do the work for you... Charlo should not be WBC middleweight champion as he hasn't defended in 2 years. It's why he isn't listed in the top 10. The real champion of the WBC is Adames. No one other than Jack Catterall should hold any titles at LightWelter as he beat the undisputed champion in Josh Taylor but was ripped off due to Toprank promoting the event. It was a lopsided win so it isn't even up for debate. Therefore, Teo, Haney and Rolly are not real champions. Hell, Rolly shouldn't have the WBA on account of him getting dominated by Barroso but getting ripped off due to the usual corruption. Not even Teo should hold a title on account of losing last time out. But you should know all about corruption and who benefits from it all the time. No one should hold any world titles at Lightweight as Lomachenko beat Haney for the undisputed title. But he too was ripped off of a win that anyone who watched who is honest, knows he won. Lamont Roach did not beat Garcia for the WBA Super Featherweight title. Garcia too was ripped off. The US therefore has only 5 champions. They are Jesse Rodriguez, Terrence Crawford, Boots Ennis, Jermell Charlo and O'Shaquie Foster. Now, do you need me to do Mexico as well so i can correct you there too? Maybe then you'll list all these world class wins without any funny business being attached. But i can see why you're insecure as i said. I know the truth. By the way, do you think a country with a lot more people than other nations should be judged without per capita being involved to get a correct reading? That would make no sense and be mathematically incorrect. Could you imagine how many champions other nations would have if they had the numbers the US does? It would be a mismatch. So, when i say the US isn't in the top 3. I mean it. As in factually. With all the logic attached to justify that comment.
    2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2