Comments by "" (@seablock) on "Top Rank Boxing" channel.

  1.  @ch_raney8801  Canelo is one of the most boring fighters out there. Even against opponents he's sabotaged and weakened he goes the distance with. With a proper opponent who is active and has momentum, Canelo loses and looks basic. Navarette fights complete bums. He even needed a corrupt ref to bail him out against one after he got dropped hard by him. Check him out using the ring as well where you called others as "Running" when they did likewise. Anyone looks good against bums. Lara, the guy who was too scared to throw punches when Leigh Wood was closer to his best and not inactive? You thought that was an exciting performance getting dominated and not throwing punches? What. Valdez "Ran" did he not against Berchelt? Did he not hold an awful lot against Navarette as well? More hypocrisy. Felix is a complete bum. Against that Irish bum he was moving off the back foot. Again, a "Runner" according to you. Lopez was hitting air and gloves the vast majority of the time against Warrington. He was moving on the back foot and held on for most of the second half of the fight. You're contradicting yourself and being a hypocrite. Pretending these fighters weren't using the ring and holding is straight lying. Show me where Warrington kept headbutting Lopez like you claim? They both threw at the same time and their heads clashed. No one was at fault. We can go over the fight if you like. Tell me the round and time on the clock and i'll happily justify my position. When someone holds onto you and bends down all the time, you're going to try and get them off you with punches that will hit them behind the head every now and then. That's the fault of the one holding on for dear life. You do know we beat Americans and Mexicans the vast majority of the time we fight don't you? I'll correct you there too if you want. None of them wins will be against inactive opponents like they have over us. Ask yourself why they're the only wins you have over us? Huh? Americans and Mexicans refuse to fight on a level playing field because they know they'll lose the fight otherwise. Just check out all their results to see. Didn't Fury show enough power when knocking Wilder out twice? AJ, Cordina, Wood, Joyce and the likes, have no power? What? Sorry, but that's nonsense.
    1
  2.  @ch_raney8801  Now i'm going to address the "Suck" comment. Canelo loses to anyone world class who is active, has momentum, and allowed a full training camp. Navarrette has a loss to a tomato can. Lara has losses to tomato cans and Wood. He only won against Warrington and Wood the first as they were inactive fighters whilst he was fighting regularly. Lopez has lost to tomato cans and couldn't even beat a damaged Warrington. He got a gift. He couldn't even beat Joet as i had it a draw. Valdez is coming off 3 lopsided defeats in his last 4 fights. Felix couldn't even beat an inactive McKenna coming from a defeat whilst he was active and coming from wins. McKenna is old and shop-worn and isn't even close to being at world level. He's a low level fighter at the end of his career. But he still beat that bum handily. But yet you think these fighters don't suck? Haha. Thanks for the laugh. Tyson Fury is better than all of these no-marks. Yet Josh Taylor is the only one who is decent from the UK. Would that be the Josh Taylor who was dominated by the Brit Jack Catterall? How can Taylor be the only decent one when losing in one sided fashion against Catterall? It doesn't make any sense. Nothing you wrote does. But i'm going to enjoy proving you wrong on all the other points too. You'll deflect then run away. Trust me.
    1
  3.  @ch_raney8801  You've just written another load of nonsense. You answered no questions. I'll stick to one or two points at a time to shut this down. Name every British fighter who was inactive due to, as you say, "Recovering from beat downs from American and Mexican fighters"? Name every UK vs UK match up on DAZN as you seem to think they put nothing on but these kind of fights. Brits fight international opponents nearly every single time. But you claim otherwise. Well, list all of them then.
    1
  4.  @ch_raney8801  Have you run away? I told you you would didn't i. The predictability of it is outright laughable.
    1
  5.  AlexWilliamson-ld3zn  1) I don't put forward false information. I leave that to the likes of you. I said Brits have the greatest historical resume for overseas wins , which is a fact. Look at the wins these fighters have over fighters from the country they're fighting in... Ted "Kid" Lewis Jack "Kid" Berg Freddie Welsh Lennox Lewis Nigel Benn Jimmy McLarnin Charley White Matt Wells I don't need to give any more names as this will be enough. There's a lot more fighters with overseas wins, but these fighters travelled repeatedly and therefore have enough to prove my point. If not, give the country with more overseas wins? 2) Fury is an Englishman born and raised in England. His family go back 100's of years in England. His Mother was from Northern Ireland, but those in Northern Ireland are British too. Same thing with Calzaghe. He is Welsh, but Wales is part of Great Britain. Not only do you need to up your boxing education, you need to up your education on Geography as well. The UK consists of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. All of these are British. That's like saying no one is American or Mexican unless they're native. When looking at the fighters throughout history, that would be nearly all of them. 3) I don't include wins/losses over shot fighters or those who have been weakened so their opponent can gain an advantage. Wins over the likes of a shot Brook or Khan for Crawford stand to reason as wins over shot fighters are easy to come by. When travelling, as it's much harder for the shot fighter than if they were at home. 4) Brits beat Americans and Mexicans the vast majority of the time they fight. Brits don't need to go after inactive fighters, drain them or use other methods to weaken them before fighting them. That would be humiliating. Wouldn't it? But if you think otherwise, list all the wins these two countries have over Brits, and i'll further educate you on the facts like i already have done.
    1
  6. ​@lliamson-ld3zn What's wrong, can't you find a nation who has more overseas victories than the UK? I thought it was false in what i said? You've gone awfully quiet. What happened to telling me where you're from? You're not insecure are you? You said you're from the nation who has the Heavyweight champion. But you're not a Brit or Ukrainian. I reckon you're either Mexican or Irish. Come on, don't be shy.
    1
  7.  AlexWilliamson-ld3zn  You are paying attention to me though by the fact you've replied here. That's not even including the other replies that were in fact false information to what i said. Make sure you can back up your comments in future. Being clueless is not a good look. You are definitely Irish or Mexican though. Without a shadow of a doubt.
    1
  8.  AlexWilliamson-ld3zn  *Too When you make a comment, you're supposed to back it up. You actually thought what you said to be true. Only when you were corrected did you want to pretend you didn't mean it. Still have no wish to tell me where you're from? Are you that embarrassed?
    1
  9.  AlexWilliamson-ld3zn  Yes, it looked like you were too busy making money when you made all your comments. Problem is, it was funny money. Then you woke up and had your cornflakes. We're not debating. A debate is when two or more people discuss a subject where knowledge is exchanged. You could never be accused of having knowledge, so take it easy. Stay away from sugar as well. It will rot your teeth. Kid.
    1
  10.  AlexWilliamson-ld3zn  I'm not the one who needs to do that. Just read all your comments where you tried to claim you were trolling. That's when somebody needs to get a life.
    1
  11. You mean the robbery and corruption he was dealt in the Franco fight? Franco didn't win in any way.
    1
  12.  @montbrink4700  What, like all the other robberies throughout history where the American got the robbery decision? Look at those supposed "Record books". Incompetence would mean the decision being pretty split on who gets it. But guess what, the American gets it every time. Every time. The only other nation to get all the robberies is Mexico. How many fights can you name where an American or Mexican won a fight but got robbed outside of Pacquiao vs Marquez 3? There's a mass of history to choose from as well. But it's all the same. It goes to these two and these two only.
    1
  13.  @montbrink4700  I'm not the one who is biased here. Golovkin won as the vast majority agree. Hell, even his corrupt judges could only give him a draw. Does that alone not tell you anything. But i know why you want to claim Canelo wins as you're trying to make Floyd look better. If you think running around the ring in the first fight is "Boxing beautifully", then good look to you. Canelo doesn't box like that and it showed, as he's not very good on the backfoot. He lost the fight. I know how to score. I don't care for your agenda.
    1
  14.  @johnny_truth  Give me exclusives to Loma in being babied and spoiled that Americans and Mexicans don't have against them? Hell, look at how extreme Lopez is. But that's typical for Americans. Nearly all of them behave like that. But Loma? No, you're just projecting and slandering as per usual. The fact you think Lopez destroyed him in what should have been a draw tells me all i need to know about you. The only one who got a bit beat up in that fight was Lopez. Lopez landed a couple more punches to win his rounds in a cautious manner. Then look at the rounds Loma won and see a huge difference. Had Salido had points taken for the mass of low blows he dished out, Loma would have won the fight. The ref did not do his job properly. Then you add in the fact Salido weight cheated by coming into the fight way over the limit to give him an advantage. To think it was the other way round in that Loma was babied is pure crazy.
    1
  15.  @montbrink4700  You're one of the few to think that. Not even Canelo's judges did. That tells you everything you need to know. Have you found any fights were the robbery was against the American? Then rest my case. You didn't answer why you think getting dropped twice would automatically win you the fight over 12 rounds? Winning 2 rounds with a KD in each would get you 4 points. That leaves 10 rounds left to play with and 10 points on offer if they're 10-9 rounds.
    1
  16.  @TBE99  Loma hasn't even faced Conceicao. You're just making things up in your head. Teo didn't beat Loma, it was a draw. But if you look at the rounds each of them won in that fight, only one of them came under the description of "Getting whooped" and it wasn't Loma. Loma beat Haney. That's why he was rattled in the corner and in his interview. Salido came in well overweight and hit low all night without any points taken. Had they been, Loma would have won the fight. Loma beat Ortiz after being out for some time due to the war. The only one here showing a bias where skin colour is concerned and getting privilege, is black Americans. Just look at all the robberies you have committed against overseas fighters. It's disgusting. As is your clear racism.
    1
  17. At getting gifts. At getting inactive opponents. Absolutely. But in no other area, that's for sure.
    1
  18. Andy is in fact, English. Born and raised. He didn't move to Ireland until he was 14.
    1
  19. No, he really didn't. Even Ford knew he lost. He wasn't active enough.
    1
  20.  @jimbfrysanchez2367  That wasn't Conceicao being hurt. That was Conceicao being tired. There's a huge difference.
    1
  21.  @Tonybalboni  I don't think Leo is some scrub. But he certainly isn't world class. You have to beat world class opponents to prove that. Leo hasn't come close. Same with Lopez. He really lost against a damaged Warrington who had him holding on for dear life and rocking him in the second half. He really drew with a way past his best Joet but got a horribly wide UD. Joet at no point in his prime was he world level. Let alone the pointy he fought him. He beat a damaged Conlan who wasn't the same after the Wood fight. So seriously, who has Lopez beaten? Absolutely no one.
    1
  22.  @decidingpaper6324  Apart from one head clash, what did Warrington do? In the second half, Lopez was holding a lot which is against the rules. Do it here and there. That's fine. But if it's excessive, then it's not.
    1
  23.  @decidingpaper6324  The back of the head shots were due to Lopez holding all the time. Warrington was trying to get him off. If you don't want to risk getting hit there, don't hold so much and it won't happen. The head clashes come from both stepping in and letting their hands go. With the activity Warrington has by throwing in combinations all the time, that unfortunately will tend to happen here and there. He's not intentionally headbutting opponents.
    1
  24.  @decidingpaper6324  Show me anywhere in the fight where Warrington hit Lopez behind the back of the head without him holding on first? When an opponent clinches you, many fighters will look for short head shots. But the one holding will look to turn their head away from them and show the back of their head. There was one head clash with Kiko. But his face looked like that due to Warrington landing a load of punches to the face. Warrington throws a lot. It will tend to happen. Every single clash of heads with Lara was in fact down to Lara overthrowing with his shots, missing, then falling in with his head. Go and watch it again. Trust me. He did the same with Wood in both fights. His complaining was just trying to get the ref on side and not get a point deduction. But that was all him.
    1
  25.  @decidingpaper6324  I did say it only happened once in the Lopez fight. But you can clearly see that it was accidental with Warrington throwing the overhand right and their heads slightly clashing. With any elbows being used, that will again to try and get Lopez from clinching him. Loads of fighters do it to try and get their opponent off them. You're not allowed to excessively clinch. I think you may have a different highlights on the Kiko fight. Nothing happens on both time-stamps you put. Are you watching the DAZN highlights?
    1
  26.  @decidingpaper6324  At 2:07 they're standing at a distance from each other. Then at 2:08, Josh lands a jab. By the time 2:40 comes up, Kiko is already on the canvas after being dropped a few seconds earlier.
    1
  27.  @decidingpaper6324  I'm watching the DAZN highlight. There's the full fight and a highlight from DAZN. The highlight i'm watching has 14:32 run time on the Youtube video. I don't see any more video's from DAZN other than those two.
    1
  28.  @decidingpaper6324  Strange. I don't see another highlight other than the one with the run time i gave. Are you in the UK? Maybe if you're somewhere else you get a different video? give me the round and the time on the DAZN clock for the time stamps.
    1
  29.  @decidingpaper6324  That makes sense then. We get different video's based on which country we're in. In the first one, Kiko's right hand pushes Warrington's head down with the force a bit and he springs up with his own shot. I don't see that being reckless. On the second one, if you slow the video down, you see the head doesn't make contact with Kiko. It just looks like it does because it comes close. The edit you made for 2:48 of round 1 is just Warrington landing a jab. Their heads are even close enough to clash.
    1
  30.  @decidingpaper6324  True, they do happen often. But it's just the fact he throws loads of shots that increases the chances of that happening. I don't even think he could limit what he throws at this point as it's far too ingrained now.
    1
  31.  @deansworld2591  You could have been in the very ring they were fighting in. It still means you can't score a fight. Either that or you're justifying another gift over there to go with the many thousands and thousands that happen to overseas fighters. This is twice now Sandy has won over there and had her titles stolen.
    1
  32.  @deansworld2591  Yes. They are wrong if they had Mayer winning. But why wouldn't they support their fighter winning over an overseas opponent? You bet for Ryan to win? You're not very clued up are you. When i saw Ryan was the favourite, i knew how the cards were going to be so i bet big on Mayer. The predictable happened like it always does. Especially on TopRank. It was free money. Wait, Ryan was the gassed one? You're getting everything the other way round. With everything. I think YOU need to watch it again. Most of Mayer's combo's actually hit gloves, whereas most of Ryan's hit Mayer clean in the face. Mayer was getting rocked in most rounds with constant clean punches. Can you find the full fight on here? I can. I'll happily go through every round with you and see what answers you have to my questions. I'll back everything i've said up. The thing is, the predictable will happen without fail. But let's see. You may shock me.
    1
  33.  @deansworld2591  I asked you if you can get the whole fight on here and we'll go through it. In fact, anywhere you can get the full fight is fine by me. So?
    1
  34.  @AndresAndres-q5h  Why would i go over just 2 rounds? Let's go over the whole 10 rounds. They're only 2 minute rounds. Can you get the full fight on here? You don't think many of Mayer's shots were hitting gloves? If you go through the fight with me, i'll happily show you all the times it happened. As well as the amount of times Sandy was hitting Mayer at will with hard clean shots. Sandy did throw from too far out at times. But nowhere near to as many times as Mayer hit gloves.
    1
  35.  @deansworld2591  I asked if you had access to the full fight so we can go over it? So?
    1
  36.  @AndresAndres-q5h  What??? It's like me saying "Sandy won because Mayer needed rounds 5 and 9. Let's go over just those 2 rounds to prove Sandy won the fight". LOL. Mayer landed a few light uppercuts on the inside. Sandy was hitting her constantly from that position. It's why Mayer kept on holding all the time. If you refuse to go over the fight and prove it like i can, then you have no faith in your argument. We can even get the exact amount of punches landed by either side and not use the fraudulent TopRank compubox. We can use evidence for who had the better of it from whichever range. It's all there on video.
    1
  37.  @AndresAndres-q5h  Mayer landed mostly with the hooks. Her 1 2's weren't landing much at all. Go over the fight with me and i'll be able to prove it.
    1
  38.  @AndresAndres-q5h  Are you going to go over the fight or what? I'm waiting. We can then break the rounds down and see what is what. But you don't seem to want to do that. You can't believe i gave Sandy those rounds? I haven't even given you the rounds i scored to Sandy. LOL. You're seeing many things that are not even there.
    1
  39.  @lollololololololololololo  Do you know there shouldn't be any Mexicans holding world titles? It's true.
    1
  40.  @johnny_truth  How does Loma only win two rounds when he won the fight? Lie all you want about the mass corruption in the US, but it's happening all over the place. Loma, like so many who win in the US, was robbed. Guess who gets all the decisions in robberies? They come from two countries only.
    1
  41.  @cartiershades3392  Why would Loma need to KO or knock down his opponent to win a fight? Did Haney do any of that? Then by your "Logic", he didn't win did he? You're a hypocrite who doesn't think in a rational manner. Do you know what a strawman argument is? You're doing nothing but. Loma supposedly lost because he knocked Nakatani out but didn't do likewise to Haney? Great logic. Makes perfect sense that. Loma controlled the vast majority of the fight in offence and defence. He made Haney miss an awful lot. That's why Haney said what he did in the corner and why he was so rattled in his interview after the fight. It was corruption like it always is in the US. Only Americans and Mexicans get robberies in your country for obvious reasons. It's why you couldn't give a list of Americans and Mexicans winning a fight but getting robbed on the cards against an overseas fighter. The robberies only go one way.
    1
  42.  @SiLoMixMaster  It's a shock when there ISN'T a robbery over there with an overseas fighter. Just in the last 12 months there's been a heap of them. It's the way they are. They stack the deck against you, but if you manage to come out with the win, even if it's clear, they still rip you off with the judges. It's a disgrace.
    1
  43.  @30Boxing  Well considering the circumstances of only having 1 round in 19 months, i wouldn't be surprised. Had it been a level playing field however, Ramirez would get a sound beating.
    1
  44.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  Canelo is a fraud who is the most corrupt in world boxing. Don't even pretend there isn't a mass of corruption and cheating with Mexican and American fighters. Canelo himself has already failed two drug tests and had 3 robberies to go alongside his sabotaging opponents to make sure they're at their worst when he takes them on. Navarette has only ever fought one world level fighter in Dogboe. Lets see what happens when he fights world level fighters. He had a struggle last time out with a bum. Who the hell is Ray Martinez? Ruiz is actually the one who gets beat. AJ came into the fight with something clearly wrong with him. He went for the finish stupidly while standing square on and swinging with the shorter fighter with the faster hands. You saw why you don't do that when you're the height of AJ. But he just wanted to get the fight over with. You saw Ruiz get dominated and outclassed when AJ was right in the rematch. But you clowns call anyone using any kind of movement as "Running" to excuse the loss, but praise Mexicans when they do it themselves. Look at Sanchez and that grotesquely overrated bum Ricardo Lopez amongst others. Plus, Ruiz is American, not Mexican.
    1
  45.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  I think you mean to say that you haver nothing in reply. Plus, the comment about Saunders was posted 6 months ago. But you think i'm still going on about it? Now that is sad.
    1
  46.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  I can see by the lack of knowledge on your part that you're lost. Don't worry though, you're in good company. Most Mexicans are just as lost as you.
    1
  47.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  You lot love having people's comments removed don't you? You extremists have weaponised the report button. Sad, sad people. You may want to look at the word "Gringo" to see the irony in your comments. You extremist. Now lets see if you have this comment deleted too.
    1
  48.  @antoniosarmientoluna6497  The argument was already won. The fact you get comments deleted shows who the sad little man is. You're the one who called non Mexicans "Gringo", not me. And yes, Mexicans and Americans get robberies all the time. That is just a fact. To deny it is nothing but more delusion. Don't get involved in anything you can't back up. You just end up looking silly and entitled.
    1
  49.  @axelnajera6887  Mexicans are on top? No they're not. Berchelt got destroyed by a fighter moving up. Munguia was beaten by a journeyman in Hogan but got the gift. Does nothing but duck the top fighters and fights bums. Estrada was well beaten by the smaller and past prime Gonzales, but got the usual robbery Mexicant's get. Canelo is out there doing everything he can to disadvantage his opponents like the punk he clearly is. And the rest are, what? Who have you got? Who have they beaten?
    1
  50.  @mastifaelieo1880  You mean the Ramirez fight in which they actually tried to rip Taylor off in? Did you not see the ref give all that time for Ramirez after the KD's to recover? That's corruption. Then when Taylor had beaten Ramirez clearly by winning 9 of the 12 rounds, they then only give it to Taylor by 2 points. So yeah, they did everything they could to rip Taylor off. Would that be the Salido who also did one of the many things Mexicans use to cheat their opponent and gain advantage by coming in way over weight? He ended up coming into the ring as a Welterweight. Salido should have had points deducted. Had it been the other way round with you witnessing a Mexican on the road getting obviously robbed, you'd be singing a different tune. The amount of corruption in favour of Mexicans is disgusting. Trying to defend it shows you have zero honour and no integrity to speak of.
    1