Comments by "" (@Crashed131963) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

  1.  @hubdimention6966  Lookup "US oil import countries" The US does not get much oil from the Middle East anymore. Canada is their biggest supplier followed by Mexico.
    1
  2. Agreed Then Moscow and Berlin would be added to Hiroshima and Nagasaki for a B-29 Visit in 1945. http://www.dannen.com/decision/bomb-rate.html
    1
  3.  @operator9858  When the US invades a country they make sure they have control of the syk and the other side has to hide during the day .
    1
  4.  @Игорьсуздальский  Because in a war the goal is to take over the enemy's homeland . 400,000 untouched German soldiers in Norway surrendered at soon as Berlin fell and surrendered . Same would have happened to far off Japanese troops in Asia after Mainland Japan was nuked and surrendered .
    1
  5.  @thelabour9752  The US lost 6000 troops killing those 21,000 Japanese troops. The Russians in ww2 lost 10 million troops killing 5 million German troops . The Russians lost 160,000 troops killing 26,000 finlander troops. Russians are brave fighters not good or smart fighters.
    1
  6. True. The US is the only country that can shut down world shipping to any country if it wants in peacetime . During a major war between two superpowers it will just be a nuclear exchange that ends the world in a afternoon.
    1
  7. Nuclear superpower only. Russia has less than half the population of the US and a GDP just above Spain. Who's kidding who.
    1
  8.  @burung81  Larger GDP was why the US out produced every country in WW2. Larger population is why Russia lost 22 million more people than Germany in WW2 yet still outnumbered Germany in manpower.
    1
  9. Usually Israel beats many muslims countries at once not one at a time.
    1
  10. Go into a war not trying ,is a bad plan. Russia's military is untrained conscripes and under funded. Russia only had a GDP above Spain before the war and is now below Spain. Russian troops will not even get paid soon.
    1
  11. Not really. The US would still have produced weapons in mass numbers but just supplied them to Britain, Canada and Russia.
    1
  12.  @suedetree970  Yes they would use nukes on a country that can not retaliate with their own. Are you serious?.
    1
  13.  @tritium1998  We like products made by cheap $4 an hour labour made out of Natural Resources. Name a Natural Resource North America does not already have and needs to import? With 1.4 billion people China needs imports just to stay functional and feed itself. China and America are the same size landmass which has a better chance at the resource long game. A country providing for 327 million people or a country providing for 1.4 billion people? China has more cars on the road than the US has people , it's a disaster waiting to happen.
    1
  14.  @exstazius  Russia had a higher population than Germany , today 147 million Russia would face a EU with 700 million and a economy ten times the size, if nukes were not invented.
    1
  15.  @marrvynswillames4975  Russia had not Navy to do D-Day type landings. The US did all the fighting to get japan on its knees they sure will not share with a new comer. FDR planned to maybe but not Truman.
    1
  16. Same reason we held off D-Day until the very end , to allow Stalin and Hitler to bleed each other out for as long as possible.
    1
  17. Weapons are one thing the US still makes at home.
    1
  18. It is hard to parade 18 Ohio class boomer subs with 24 × Trident I C4 SLBM with up to 8 MIRVed 100 ktTNT W76 nuclear warheads each, range 4,000 nmi (7,400 km; 4,600 mi) down the street.
    1
  19.  @vuktodic1356  British sonar and radar was so good by 1943 it was suicidal to be in a U-boat. When a RAF pilot was shot down and bailed out over England he was back in the air , while the enemy pilots were POWs and gone for good.
    1
  20.  @vuktodic1356  Russia and Germany had no heavy 4 engine long range bombers that could reach the western ports. The British would stop making bomber and just make many more fighters instead.
    1
  21.  @vuktodic1356  Bombing is slow. Germany highest war production numbers were in early 1944 even with 1000 bomber streams raids starting in 1943. The US would have eventually joined the war even if Japan didn't attack.
    1
  22. In the long game the US has the same land mass as China but not 1.4 billion people using up the resources at a crazy rate. The US has a better future outlook.
    1
  23. Stalin put puppet communist Governments in all eastern Europe after his so called liberations.
    1
  24. A Ohio class launching its 24 Nuclear ICBMs each with multiple warheads from below the Ocean Surface are not easily stopped. If you stop 90% of the delivery the remaining 10% can take out 5 major cities. You better have 100% results 100% of the time with that laser.
    1
  25. How do they beat North America? The US navy from 1944 was larger than the rest of the world navies put together same with their air force , then the US builds the A-Bomb.
    1
  26.  @VoidSpace9  He had videos showing the Russian army getting deep into Europe. They can even get by the Ukraine who is not even in Nato.
    1
  27.  @VoidSpace9  Sorry , western Europe I meant.
    1
  28. I think we call those guided missiles. Pilotless kamikazes but faster , more accurate and with a nuclear bomb load.
    1
  29. The US was in a league of its own in manufacturing . On its own the US could out produce the Russians and Germans combined. https://military.wikia.org/wiki/Military_production_during_World_War_II Then The A-Bomb would still get built in 1945. British Sonar and radar was so advanced in 1943 it made being in a U-boat suicidal , u-boats could not even surface at night. Britain would never get invaded and B-29 with A-Bombs would flatten Germany .
    1
  30. The US has 18 Ohio class boomer subs with 24 × Trident I C4 SLBM with up to 8 MIRVed 100 ktTNT W76 nuclear warheads each, range 4,000 nmi (7,400 km; 4,600 mi) THE END
    1
  31. True Twain ,Japan and South Korea . Try and sink those careers.
    1
  32.  @sticksnstones5407  Putin was better off not doing anything when we though the Russian military was professional not scared conscripts. Disband Nato and just pay the Ukraine to keep Russia out of Western Europe.
    1
  33.  @aproxy7263  If the capital is not taken after 4 weeks they are losing. The US took Baghdad in 3 weeks and IRAQ had a larger military than Ukraine. Iraq was on the other side of the planet not right next door like Canada or Mexico.
    1
  34. The US still out produced Russia and Germany combined. The UK match Germany ,so the allies would still win the numbers games even without nukes.
    1
  35. The US had 40 million more people than Germany and 4 times Germany's industrial capacity. The Germans beating Russia or not would not matter. The A-Bomb was coming in 1945 no matter what Germany did right.
    1
  36.  @adamzahariuk9496  Why not stay out of the war and just sell arms to all sides if money was just the issue?
    1
  37. Go on a vacation with US dollars or Chinese money (Forget what it's called) and see which they want .
    1
  38. True. Even the CCP rebels and Chinese government stopped fighting and fought together when Japan invaded in 1937.
    1
  39.  @jedaye47  I think people who want to divide a country they live in are called rebels. The Southern States tried that in the US from 1860-1864.
    1
  40.  @jedaye47  The simple fact is if you want to be a Russian move to Russia. Many Mexican live in Texas and Texas once belonged to Mexico. The Mexicans living in Texas have no say about Texas re-joining Mexico even if they were the vast majority. Same with Russians living in Ukraine.
    1
  41.  @ketelin4285  What we are seeing is Russia stuff does not work as advertised.. I think plenty of ICBM warheads will get through the paper tiger.
    1
  42.  @ketelin4285  Even China by not voting is in a way saying they do not support Putin's war. China's businesses plan that has been working great for them relies on world order.
    1
  43. Many A-Bombs were planed for 1945 http://www.dannen.com/decision/bomb-rate.html Also the Allies did not lose 11 million troops like Russia and untouched France would be back in the war. The Allied had many more planes and better planes as well , and shorter supply line from France.
    1
  44. A so called superpower who cant take a poor country right next door after a year is not fooling anyone anymore. Russia needs to buy weapons from 3rd world North Korea and Iran now.
    1
  45. In a Major War they will be using Dump ICBMs warheads that take out cities anywhere on the planet. The war will be over in hours with everyone losing. China ,Russia,USA, EU in a war with each other are not using conventional weapons. Those are made for conflicts not a real War.
    1
  46. After Russians showing , the west may disband Nato as overkill.
    1
  47. @Ze TheGame Because any kind of nuclear attack on Nato would be responded by a ICBM nuclear attack by Nato Limited nuclear war is like getting a girl limited pregnant. Nuclear is a "On" or "Off" switch there is no inbetween. Why waste money on small nuclear artillery shell?
    1
  48. @Ze TheGame If one side hit the other side with even tactical nukes you better bit it will get hit back with whatever kind of nuke they have,
    1
  49. India is a Hindu Country they hate muslims that's why Indian muslims and hindus split India in 1948 and made muslim Pakistan. Hindus and Muslims could not live together. Turkey is muslim.
    1
  50. You can read it for yourselves . https://www.quora.com/Why-did-more-Muslims-die-than-Hindus-during-the-partition-of-India Definitly no love lose between Hindus and Muslims during the Inia partistion of 1947.
    1