Comments by "Guy Who Likes Ecclesiastes" (@EcclesiastesLiker-py5ts) on "Based Camp with Simone & Malcolm Collins"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh boy... we're all going to have some real wacky dreams tonight. As for me, I used to have a lot of nightmares, then I got really, really Christian, and now I have things that should be nightmares but I'm totally unconcerned. Like, recently I dreamt I was in the bottom of a tower where I had been taken on a historical tour, there were recurring blackouts, and during each blackout a demonic red face appeared and each time drew closer to us, but I was totally unconcerned because I knew I was a Christian zealot and didn't need to fear demons, but I was on the tour with a black grey person, who was an unbeliever, and they wouldn't leave quickly and were just standing in the door, so I was worried about the grey person. That sort of thing is pretty common, though some are very complex and have a pretty reasonable narrative.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PanopticonMind in this case, that's missing the point. It's not nessercerily that evolution is flawed, so we should believe in God, it's more that evolutionnis so wildly improbable that you would need a probalistic notable for it to happen. At that point, whether it's evolution or another method, it looks like it shouldn't happen but did. Until we can empirically prove abiogenesis, we can'tknow whether it's possible, but we do know that if it is it probabalistically shouldn't be.
No matter how many layers deep you go as regards causes, you end up at the same place, things are either contingent or non contingent, you can't have only contingent things, so there must be a non contingent thing on which others are contingent, and since the world is ordered not random, that contingency appears designed. That's the meat of the question.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1