Comments by "Rahere" (@JelMain) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 12 MPs have complained to him so far. Illegal is illegal, and those who condone it are accomplice in what amounts to treason. Given crimes have certainly been committed, and the excuses are specious, in an attempt to hang on to power, the next question to arise is when the law on treason is to be updated, because it is functionally feudal and does not represent the nature of power in the UK today. Tony Benn's Five Questions applied to Her Majesty open some useful doors. What Power have you got? That defined in the Bill of Rights 1689, restricted to constitutional enactment of Parliamentary legislation, in the interests of the people of the UK, on a non-partisan basis. From whom do you have it? The Parliament of the UK For what do you use it? The benefit of the people of the UK To whom are you accountable? The Privy Council The last question is impertinent The Prime Minister is elected by his Party and holds tenure at the behest of the 1922 Committee, Mr Speaker (insofar as suspension could produce a Recall vote, and also the inability to undertake statutory duties) and the Courts, as an MP, and the Party by virtue of their constituents' vote. That in turn details the reply to the first question, and is further elaborated in the different oaths of office of Her Majesty, any Regents, Privy Counsellors, and MPs. The feudal sense of Treason, which includes mention of the Chancellor from the days when that function was charged with the work now entrusted to the Prime Minister, is therefore well out of date, per Human Rights legislation. Yet behaviour in subversion of the Constitution, or Felony Treasons, are also needful.
    1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. And that was entirely the responsibility of the big companies in the music industry. I was Program Controller of a leading University Radio Station in 1977 when we received a letter from the A&R teams telling us they were withdrawing all support from concept rock and would only support punk and hip-hop. That was partly driven by the economic crisis which destroyed the Labour Government, but not entirely: it was also pure greed, as the performers in those sectors would work for nothing. The degeneration is led by the same scene today. I've just looked at the deaths in the teenage community in London this year, and they're mostly in our local drill war here in North London. The OBF-Greens dispute is well documented, and a lot of it's between the adolescents trying to make a name for themselves on the International scene. It's drug-driven urban terrorism. You can be very certain the community's going to sort this. It's wrong to call it an ethnic issue, this young lady was from a faith community which is making a difference. I've worked with some (Cleveland Watkiss, for instance), seen Boris destroy a project trying to help, and set a path The Ezra Collective have followed, here in North London. They just won the Mercury Prize. David Byrne led in revalidating music of West African origins in 2015, they've taken it on. Drill is as much the fruit of white recording companies as any. But when you see Sunak talk about levelling up, on the ground, they're levelling down. The North sees none of it, so this seventeen year old knifeman is both responsible and a victim of London's cuts.
    1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1