General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jay Dee Johnson
The New York Times
comments
Comments by "Jay Dee Johnson" (@jaydeejohnson7) on "The New York Times" channel.
Previous
4
Next
...
All
Brick Schitthouse Oliver Stone could "vindicate" the Wakefield study. This fact would not change reality
1
Brick Schitthouse yet when ice cream consumption increases, drowning deaths also increase
1
Brick Schitthouse because ice cream has nothing to do with swimming.... And vaccines have nothing to do with autism
1
Brick Schitthouse Making claims based on spurious correlations and specious arguments alone is not a methodology used in science
1
Brick Schitthouse stop ignoring what decades of research and evidence have said about this no existent link
1
Brick Schitthouse i hope you realize putting full faith in a movie producer without evidence of causality is THE definiton of an appeal to authority.
1
Brick Schitthouse when ice cream sales increase, drowning deaths dramatically increase. Therefore, ice cream consumption CAUSES drownings PROVE ME WRONG
1
Brick Schitthouse show me death rates due to vaccines
1
Brick Schitthouse and?
1
Show me death rates due to vaccines
1
Brick Schitthouse stop ignoring what the great majority of research has to say: THERE IS NO LINK BETWEEN VACCINES AND AUTISM
1
Brick Schitthouse My claim I see no reason to believe there is a causal link between autism and vaccines. Evidence There is no evidence of a causal relationship
1
Brick Schitthouse argumentum ad insert?? Do You understand what these inserts are discussing???
1
Brick Schitthouse it could be Wakefield and Spielberg. Makes little difference. It is virtually impossible to prove the absence of a relationship with the same certainty that is possible in establishing the presence of one. Opinions are important, evidence of causality is paramount
1
Brick Schitthouse two words No Evidence
1
Brick Schitthouse https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452 https://www.texaschildrens.org/blog/2011/03/making-sense-dr-andrew-wakefield-now https://time.com/5175704/andrew-wakefield-vaccine-autism/
1
Brick Schitthouse not my fault you are committing fallacious reasoning
1
Brick Schitthouse https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority
1
Brick Schitthouse your appealing to Bigtrees view and synopsis. Hence, an appeal to authority and the claim is beginning to look a lot like you are arguing from incredulity
1
Brick Schitthouse honesty and validity are two very different things And you're still arguing from Authority
1
Brick Schitthouse some people are honest when they claim the earth is flat. Just because they are honest in their convictions does not mean they are factually correct
1
Brick Schitthouse again. He could say the moon is made of cheese in a very honest and clear way, and still be incorrect
1
Brick Schitthouse great, what's the link between vaccines and autism?
1
Brick Schitthouse he's also not a doctor
1
Brick Schitthouse @Brick Schitthouse https://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452 https://www.texaschildrens.org/blog/2011/03/making-sense-dr-andrew-wakefield-now https://time.com/5175704/andrew-wakefield-vaccine-autism/
1
Brick Schitthouse you seem to miss the fallacy in your argument. I'm sorry you do not see that Del is just like RFK Jr...an ambulance chaser and a carnival barker
1
Brick Schitthouse but you'll ignore all other medical professionals and researchers?
1
Brick Schitthouse what's the link between vaccines and autism???
1
Brick Schitthouse https://youtu.be/VMUQSMFGBDo
1
Brick Schitthouse he doesn't have to be a doctor Correct. But he should have some empirical evidence and not Wakefield's biased methodology
1
Brick Schitthouse https://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-gets-slammed-by-scientists-after-creating-dangerous-new-conspiracy-theory/
1
Brick Schitthouse not the next day, mate. What is the link between vaccines and autism??????
1
Brick Schitthouse and he doesn't have a link just speculation
1
Brick Schitthouse no mate. The girl you referenced was not paralyzed the next day. It was the next week What is the link between vaccines and autism? Should be an easy for you to answer. But then again, you appear to take Dels word over scientific standing. That is an appeal to authority
1
Brick Schitthouse and this AE proves vaccines cause autism!?!?
1
Brick Schitthouse Del explained the science. Stop acting stupid. It's a simple question. You say it is Thimerosal but this only exists in extremely small amounts in ONE option of a particular vaccine that is not often given to children...multi dose vials of the influenza vaccine. So how does this account for the CASUAL relationship (NOT CORRELATIVE) between vaccines and autism???
1
Brick Schitthouse An argument from authority, also called an appeal to authority, or argumentum ad verecundiam, is a form of defeasible argument in which the opinion of an authority on a topic is used as evidence to support an argument.
1
Brick Schitthouse this link you claim exists (but cannot identify) is no different than the relationship between ice cream consumption and drownings/forest fires/higher crime rates
1
Brick Schitthouse Reasoning is defeasible when the corresponding argument is rationally compelling but not deductively valid. The truth of the premises of a good defeasible argument provide support for the conclusion, even though it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false .
1
Brick Schitthouse why not support your claim instead of fallacious statements?
1
Brick Schitthouse prove his technicalities wrong? That's not how science works. This Wakefield study is just plain bad science Full Stop This article explains this concisely https://www.vox.com/2015/2/2/7965885/vaccine-autism-link-false-evidence-wakefield
1
Brick Schitthouse what in the MMR vaccine is the cause of autism? It's not Thimerosal. That has NEVER been in the MMR vaccine
1
Brick Schitthouse have you proven Del is right?
1
Brick Schitthouse and you fail to see this is not scientific evidence
1
Brick Schitthouse please read the article that was posted
1
Brick Schitthouse https://www.bmj.com/content/322/7284/460.short https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa021134 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/2/325?source=post_page----6df1b46c14cc--------------------- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2275444
1
Brick Schitthouse it appears arguing from ignorance is continuing to support false facts... It's dogmatic and without logic and reason
1
Brick Schitthouse John Smith explained how the study was biased in its methodology Now where does this get us? Nowhere, except both of us committing a logical fallacy I see no reason to believe there is a causal link between vaccines and autism
1
Brick Schitthouse this is not ignorance This is me trying to point out you are appealing to authority (false authority specifically) That is fallacious Insisting that a claim is true simply because a valid authority or expert on the issue said it was true, without any other supporting evidence offered. Also see the appeal to false authority.
1
Brick Schitthouse example Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and perhaps the foremost expert in the field, says that evolution is true. Therefore, it's true.
1
Previous
4
Next
...
All