Comments by "Jay Dee Johnson" (@jaydeejohnson7) on "The New York Times" channel.

  1.  Brick Schitthouse  I dislike the canonization of false facts I could care less about Bill gates in this discussion... Please avoid deflecting
    1
  2.  Brick Schitthouse  I posted 4 peer reviewed studies. You have offered a movie producers opinion
    1
  3.  Brick Schitthouse  so why believe him over anyone else? Because what Del says fits your narrative? You are confirming your own biases!!
    1
  4.  Brick Schitthouse  you changed subjects illustrating your lack of scientific understanding I wonder if you believe the world is flat, evolution is a sham and gods exist The circular nature in your reasoning suggests intentionally ignoring logic and scientific understanding for an acute subjective view of reality
    1
  5.  Brick Schitthouse  you're on about Bill Gates now... What, pray tell, for?
    1
  6.  Brick Schitthouse  and?
    1
  7.  Brick Schitthouse  so you want to control who gives money to what organizations?
    1
  8.  Brick Schitthouse  because they help prevent disease. That's evident. So you just changed subjects? I do not rely upon Bill Gates to see that research has no evidence, no casual link, between vaccines and autism
    1
  9.  Brick Schitthouse  Del Bigtree has no medical or science degree. He spreads misinformation, just like you
    1
  10.  Brick Schitthouse  and yet the Wakefield study is still not good science. He ignored that central aspect of the study.
    1
  11.  Brick Schitthouse  and you could watch it 1,000 times. It does not mean the study was sound. It was retracted. You are appealing to a false authority. There really is no other way to be more direct with you.
    1
  12.  Brick Schitthouse thimerosal is not in childhood vaccines Testimony from parents is evidence... anecdotal, but evidence. Would be interesting to see a study done with similar experiences. But there are none
    1
  13.  Brick Schitthouse  which is only in 1/3 of flu vaccines.
    1
  14.  Brick Schitthouse  so can you admit there is no evidence of a causal link between vaccines and autism?
    1
  15.  Brick Schitthouse still does not mean the study was sound. You will take Dels conspiracy theory but not scientific evidence? I just gave you the reasons the study is not sound
    1
  16.  Brick Schitthouse  you say thimerosal is the causal link, yet you proclaim an MMR study as proof. You appear to refuse to acknowledge the fact there is no thimerosal in childhood vaccines. You are appealing to ignorance, a fallacious argument
    1
  17.  Brick Schitthouse  MMR does not and never has had thimerosal Only 1/3 of flu vaccines come in mulitidose vials. So thimerosal is NOT the factor in rising rates of ASD
    1
  18.  Brick Schitthouse  The study you posted is looking at data from the 80s. In the 90s, vaccines were beginning to be manufactured without thimerosal. By 2000, no childhood vaccines contained thimerosal. During this time and after, ASD rates increased. There is no reason to believe there is a causal link between vaccines and autism
    1
  19.  Brick Schitthouse  You don't have a leg to stand on, mate
    1
  20.  Brick Schitthouse  ????
    1
  21.  Brick Schitthouse  Well, you have not shown vaccines to cause autism, so not sure how you can then state it cannot
    1
  22.  Brick Schitthouse  And? There is no other evidence? Just one study looking at the gut?
    1
  23.  Brick Schitthouse  Appealing to a false authority is only going to get you deeper into that hole you're digging, mate
    1
  24.  Brick Schitthouse  Wakefield and his inaccurate and unsubstantiated claims https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/
    1
  25.  Brick Schitthouse  are you appealing to authority again? Why does Bigtree trump a full investigation? And even IF the wakefield study offered any insight, there is no evidence of causation between vaccines and autism
    1
  26.  Brick Schitthouse  It has taken this long in the conversation for you construct this appeal to fallacious reasoning, and it is becoming quite circular path around logical reasoning. I have not seen any other support for your assertions, and even though some of your premises may be true, little if any evidence is provided to substantiate your extraordinary conclusion.
    1
  27.  Brick Schitthouse  Your appeal to authority is that bigtree even has a leg to stand on with unsubstantiated claims of cover up, specious and hypocritical arguments concerning financial disclosures, and no other supportive evidence to justify wakefields assertions. Not sure you even read Deers investigation let alone the link I provided. You seem to believe I have not heard this argument Bigtree has knowledge no one else possess, and your logic that one should trust and not verify his claims, is steaming with hypocritical BS
    1
  28.  Brick Schitthouse  I am at my phone enjoying life. The question you present is also relevant to yourself. So what other fallacy would you like to build to support the faith you have in vaccines causing autism?
    1
  29.  Brick Schitthouse  and yet his study does not give support as evidence of causation
    1
  30.  Brick Schitthouse  And his opinion on the situation carries little water
    1
  31.  Brick Schitthouse    https://autismsciencefoundation.org/what-is-autism/autism-and-vaccines/ https://www.autismspeaks.org/science-news/no-mmr-autism-link-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/autism-studies.html https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908388/ https://autismcenter.org/discussing-vaccines-and-autism
    1
  32.  Brick Schitthouse  peanuts are dangerous. Water is dangerous. Oxygen is dangerous. Sodium Chloride 0.9% is dangerous. You flippin twit
    1
  33. @M M man are you full of homeopathic bs
    1
  34. @M M vaccinated kids are giving other kids who are vaccinated measles Which outbreak of measles was due vaccine shedding?
    1
  35. @M M and the outbreak was caused by shedding? Nice try, mate
    1
  36. @M M in the Samoa outbreak, 30% of the population were vaccinated. RFK Jr et al pushed the anti vaccine narrative with bad intent and caused death.
    1
  37. @M M "Among the 110 California patients, 49 (45%) were unvaccinated; five (5%) had 1 dose of measles-containing vaccine, seven (6%) had 2 doses, one (1%) had 3 doses, 47 (43%) had unknown or undocumented vaccination status, and one (1%) had immunoglobulin G seropositivity documented, which indicates prior vaccination or measles infection at an undetermined time. Twelve of the unvaccinated patients were infants too young to be vaccinated. Among the 37 remaining vaccine-eligible patients, 28 (67%) were intentionally unvaccinated because of personal beliefs, and one was on an alternative plan for vaccination. Among the 28 intentionally unvaccinated patients, 18 were children (aged <18 years), and 10 were adults. Patients range in age from 6 weeks to 70 years; the median age is 22 years. Among the 84 patients with known hospitalization status, 17 (20%) were hospitalized." https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6406a5.htm
    1
  38. Not needed because......?
    1
  39.  @dm.b7560  risk is too high?? Higher than 1 in 40,000??
    1
  40.  @dm.b7560  getting people to understand the natural world and to enjoy the awesomeness of discovery is how we appreciate our insignificance. You are providing misinformation and furthering the canonization of false facts. Just making the blanket statement of 'main stream media' is not evidence of science being dogmatic or a repressive institution.
    1
  41.  @dm.b7560  why vaccines are not needed... There are many other options already ready and tested. Alright, what reduces the spread and severity of measles other than vaccination? 2 year infection cycles? Dealing with 1 in 1000 children dead?
    1
  42.  @dm.b7560  how does THAT get people to think for themselves? By appealing to personal incredulity and ignorance? If you post misinformation, do not be insulted if someone calls out your bs. You verify, apologize and move on
    1
  43.  @dm.b7560  yes, the information IS there, you are correct. Yet your conclusions illustrate your incredulous attitude toward scientific inquiry and falsifiable hypotheses
    1
  44.  @dm.b7560  so you post your opinion, and wish others to listen to you, but when asked for demonstrable evidence of vaccines being high risk... You care not to elaborate... No need to STOP THIS NOW, is there?
    1
  45.  @dm.b7560  the youtube video? Dude, learn logic and reason, then you might understand scientific skepticism The plural of anecdote is NOT evidence
    1
  46.  @dm.b7560  yes. And?
    1
  47. 2020: Idiots like you
    1
  48.  @hummingbirdbumblebee4618  no, they do not
    1
  49. And this is a concern how?
    1
  50.  @AlessandroCardano  Most claims in nvicp are from administration of the vaccine and not from the vaccine ingredients What ingredient(s) are your concern?
    1