General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Iver biggun
LegalEagle
comments
Comments by "Iver biggun" (@daveoc5770) on "LegalEagle" channel.
Previous
1
Next
...
All
Because the results don't fit his left wing narrative after he gets them wrong
24
Kyle did eradicate 3 vigilantes, and no they shouldn't have been there armed and rioting
8
@PipBoykin well that's wrong, 2 were armed with a weapon of choices and the first guy was a threat to life.
7
He isn't a murderer as we are in the real world and it was self defence
6
@Ingu.z prove he went there with the intent to use his gun? We can prove that he never used until attacked by rioters giving him the right to defend his life
5
To be fair the kid walking around with a rifle wasn't the problem, the violent rioters were a problem. If you removed them from the scenario then none of this would have happened
5
You should always be prepared to defend yourself, but you can't premeditate an attack, just prepare for it
5
Without reasonable doubt it was self defence
5
So then you would have to die to not be convicted of murder in your fantasy world. You wouldn't be able to protect yourself, that sounds dumb and dangerous
5
Ak15 hahaha out of state hahahaha premeditated hahahaha
5
Not really but that never happened
5
He made all the effort by running away, it was them who gave chase, creating Kyle's right to defend himself. Rosenbaum and Ziminski must have had shoot able faces then 🤣🤣
5
That isn't true
5
Is that murder or self defense?
5
He isn't a murderer by definition
4
I know, especially when they were the attackers
4
Yeah, they wouldn't have taken him to court, the democrats would have brushed it under the carpet
4
@user-none-of-your-business666 haha so us a pistol an assault rifle now? 🤣🤣
4
Millions in the bank
4
@RenegadeVile it isn't vigilante even by definition. The kid was helping his community by cleaning graffiti and putting out fires, and then an armed violent mob of rioters tried to murder him but luckily he was able to protect himself from murder. This created his self defence which was all caught on video.
4
@Bru_Dog1 he dispatched people guilty of assault, them attacking him doesn't make them innocent, they are then guilty of assault, this is why Kyle was found innocent
4
@Bru_Dog1 what murderer?
4
@Bru_Dog1 correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the court trial a murder trial for which he was found "not guilty" by a jury. Therfore he wasn't found guilty of murder because it was self defence making him innocent of murder. Your opinion of the judge being "bias" is just that an opinion, I can easily say the judge wasn't bias making your claim defunct. You are innocent until proven guilty, so did the court find him guilty of murder?
4
@Bru_Dog1 the court didn't find him guilty of murder at all as it was self defence, he was found not guilty by a jury, as he has innocent until proven guilty then being found not guilty means he is innocent. For him to be guilty of murder then he would be classed as a murderer but he wasn't so therfore not a murderer by law and by definition
4
@spelix14 it's absolutely true, this was decided because of all the evidence, he was innocent until proven guilty and he was never proven guilty
4
@spelix14 but proven beyond reasonable doubt that it was self defence, a jury concluded that he wasnt guilty of the crimes he was charged with, therfore he is innocent as he hasn't been found guilty
4
So what was it before a Trump campaign song?
4
I cant believe you are still calling him a murderer, how indoctrinated are you
4
That isn't true though, I could say you're a groomer would you stand by that statement?
4
@OrangeHand it is when he is doing it from a false perspective
4
@OrangeHand yes it is
4
@wander9932 facts can be perspective, what this hack claims to be a "fact" could actually be false because he doesn't know the full case
4
@wander9932 this hack my think something is a fact and give his legal opinion on it but then it turns out its not a fact, can you not understand this? This hack does it all the time
4
You can also call him a defender or a hero then
4
You can when it's self defence, do you want to charge people for defending their lives?
4
@mystikmind2005 that's why none of the 3 shot can claim self defence, they went looking for trouble and found it with Kyle. Well then we are in agreement that Kyle had the right to self defence as he wasn't looking for trouble, trouble came and found him and forced him to defend himself. He was there for good that day which is clear while the rioters were there for trouble.
4
How about self defence hero or commie attackers ender. By the FBI definition it has to be 4 people or more so to call him a mass killer would also be incorrect
4
What made Kyle look bad at all?
4
Imagine being attacked by a violent mob and having to defend your life then bei g called a murderer, it's like a woman being raped and then called a whor
4
Who had an assault rifle? Gaige had an illegal weapon while Kyle had a legal firearm. Kyle was in the right
4
Here in Europe we have guns, what are you talking about? I go shooting all the time
4
It's not murder when it's self defence, and a jury found it to be self defence through evidence
4
But he isn't
3
@RenegadeVile yep, all is possible while carrying a rifle, people actually do a lot like farming with a rifle
3
Because to go against the far left view in any slight way is classed as "far right". Its a far left bullying tactic.
3
@tylerd1297 and the narrative that trumps party is anti-science, racist or anti-abortion was a false narrative created by the media in an act of division
3
@RamsayBolton13 who got away with murder?
3
@RamsayBolton13 obviously not, did you miss the court case where he was found not guilty of murder?
3
@OrangeHand spoken like a true indoctrinated cult member, well done
3
He isn't a murderer by definition, because it was self defence. Well he is welcome in Europe, we do t have the alt left problem that America has
3
Previous
1
Next
...
All