Comments by "Iver biggun" (@daveoc5770) on "LegalEagle" channel.

  1.  @jaymiddleton1782  he never "committed murder" it was self defence so it doesn't even fit the definition of murder
    2
  2.  @jaymiddleton1782  so all people who now defend themselves are classed as "vigilantes" in your world hahaha He fits neither definition of vigilante or murderer. He should have been there as he was doing good, the violent rioters shouldn't have been there by every definition in the book. Can you state 1 law where its legal to riot and attack people?
    2
  3.  @johnsmith-de3tl  you talking about proud boys the patriot people who live their country and come in all different races?
    2
  4. Who did he murder?
    2
  5. ​@roseanne1466 that isn't a "fact". He has pictures taken but it doesn't mean he is one
    2
  6. Just use it, the people who think it's terrible are the problem
    2
  7.  @richards5855  oh wow that went right over your smooth brain didn't it, i suppose you don't think this hack cherry picks either 🤣🤣🤣🍒🤡
    2
  8.  @havefaith4382  ok fascist what would you like me to change it to? Would you like your fascist symbol up there?
    2
  9.  @havefaith4382  "yes" I love it when you Incels agree that you're fascist 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  10.  @uthinkiamhot  by his actions of self defence from the violent rioters attacking him, as explained earlier, he took out a child abuser, that's an automatic hero status in anyone's book unless they support child abuse
    2
  11.  @uthinkiamhot  Hero A person noted for feats of courage or nobility of purpose, especially one who has risked or sacrificed his or her life. His life was on the line when he was attacked by violent rioters, his courage kept him alive. And he took out a child abuser to top it off.
    2
  12.  @uthinkiamhot  it seems that you are seeing as it was used in the right context. This is your defense to divert from the fact that you defend the child abuser
    2
  13.  @uthinkiamhot  he shot a child abuser who was attacking him at a riot not a protest. Well he didn't just show up and shoot people, that would make him a murderer which he isn't, he showed up with his gun then shot in self defence, that can't be argued as its a fact. You can shoot someone in self defence then find out that person abused children and become a hero, its may be subjective but given who he shot automatically makes him a hero. I'm not judging you for your opinion but you believing you're right deserves judgment
    2
  14.  @uthinkiamhot  oh wow you're catching on, what he was called in court was "not guilty" so you calling him a murderer isn't even subjective, it's just outright untrue. But him being a hero is true.
    2
  15.  @uthinkiamhot  if his intent was to kill then how come he didn't just kill, why did it take him being attacked to then kill? He could have easily done it before they attacked him. Where as it did take courage to keep composure under imminent threat from violent rioters. See how mine actually happened but yours is just a fantasy. Deluted hahaha
    2
  16. @Major Tom "nartsee boy" hahaha OK fascist
    2
  17. @Major Tom "cleaned your clock" with a fantasy scenario hahaha where mine is factual
    2
  18.  @uthinkiamhot  Deluted.......... You wanna double check that?
    2
  19.  @uthinkiamhot  ahh you accuse me of that yet fabricated a scenario so you can call him a murderer and then fabricated a word hahaha. Hey wasn't it awesome that Kyle wasn't found guilty for manslaughter because of all the evidence
    2
  20.  @uthinkiamhot  now you have changed the word haha well in your delusion you think Kyle went out there to commit murder so you think he is a murderer. Your delusion was destroyed in court when through evidence it was proven that he acted in self defence. Who has delusions again? "Deluted" haha and you even tried to give an explanation 🤣🤣🤣🤡 Hey don't forget to get yourself checked out or some therapy
    2
  21. The actual reason someone died was because they thought it was a good idea to attack a law abiding citizen. If the violent rioters hadn't attacked then they wouldn't have forced someone to use self defence
    2
  22. Hopefully he sues everyone that classes him as a "murderer" because he isn't, he will start with the media, hopefully make his millions then doesn't care what peasants like you thinks, the billions know he used self defence
    2
  23. Fair 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  24.  @jaymiddleton1782  you can't legally get away with murder when it's self defence because then the act isn't murder, it's self defence like in Kyle's case
    2
  25. Well thanks to all the evidence its no suprise he is a free man
    2
  26. That just makes you an incel
    2
  27. Nothing
    2
  28. Open carry law states otherwise, this is why you're not a lawyer. The rioters were wrong on all counts
    2
  29. The exploded in the barrel right into the attackers
    2
  30. He never though, everything you just said is misinformation
    2
  31. Black privilege
    2
  32.  @inny74  we can say Kyle isn't a murderer because all the video evidence shows he never murdered anyone, we don't see OJ having this much evidence to back him up do we, so we can just chalk that down to black privilege
    2
  33. The rioters should have been there period. Kyle was invited, they weren't
    2
  34. @Exculpatory Shōgun they're so racist that they don't even research on black people using self defence
    2
  35. This isn't the place for education. That's clear from your rhetoric
    2
  36. That doesn't fit the definition of murder does it
    2
  37. Ooh now do BLK people
    2
  38. In my opinion you're a groomer
    2
  39. Michael White and Da Baby prove you're ignorant
    2
  40.  @promethaus5116  he did go to a state with a gun the gun was already there, he can go yo any state he likes, that's called "freedom" it isn't illegal to cross state lines. He made the choice to pull the trigger because he was forced to defend his life, the rioters made the choice to attack someone with a gun, not a great choice. If the violent rioters had stayed home then Kyle wouldn't have gone out to help the community
    2
  41. No he never, you have to murder someone first
    1
  42.  @marthahammond1561  and with that response we can see why Kyle wants to sue
    1
  43.  @marthahammond1561  he isn't murderer, you must ha e missed the whole trial. He defended himself so therfore isn't a murderer
    1
  44.  @marthahammond1561  clearly you didn't, murder would be premeditated, Kyle couldn't have predicted then violent rioters would attack just him
    1
  45. That's misinformation
    1
  46.  @ZiggyAir  that doesn't make it factual though
    1
  47.  @ZiggyAir  so you think the earth is flat?
    1
  48.  @ZiggyAir  that explains it
    1
  49. ​ @Xbox360mIRC that's very true
    1
  50. We he also using his right to self defence from a violent mob of rioters like Kyle?
    1