Comments by "Voryn Rosethorn" (@vorynrosethorn903) on "KaiserBauch" channel.

  1. He's talking about the slave trade, but given your origins your family were more likely the traders. Seems like you managed to attract a boomer.
    8
  2. My experience is that democracy has absolutely no legitimacy among young men already. Basically it splits Christian monarchists, secular authoritarians. Whatever happens Liberalism has grim prospects, the main alternative to a rightward swing (what women think is next to irrelevant in a conflict, especially when they aren't even married) is the Islamisation of Europe. This is one of the very few things that is a cause of optimism as to our prospects, that with liberalism's death we may be released of the force strangling our civilisation, and which has devolved us to this point already.
    7
  3. Depends who you marry and the social context, Amish for example are fine.
    7
  4. Tsar gave hard work and autocracy and it was at 7.
    7
  5. Not at all, the managerial regime is highly influenced by marx and the liberal thinkers. The opposition is just traditionalist in nature, meaning it is not very democratic or secular, but then both of those things are intrinsically liberal as expressed in our civilisation. Christianity and ethnic loyalties tend to be the most associated with the rejection of the current ruling system.
    6
  6.  @user-gc7pd3rg7f  It is alive in the hearts of it's believers and justified by the evils of the godless society in which we reside.
    6
  7. They can just force marriages or make baby farms, whatever the solution I'm sure it will be similarly horrific to the one child policy.
    6
  8.  @dasaauploads1143  I for one want Crusading back.
    6
  9. About 20% males in tribal societies die in war each generation, how many women die of child birth is highly dependent on diet but would usually be below that unless they are eating lead or get no vitamins. Of course the women will also likely have enough children for replacement before complications, modern women have a much higher rate of problems due to the pill, age, being fat, and very poor genetic health due to dysgenics. Of course there are lots of other factors and contexts but broadly the claim is false, I could probably point you to the specific exception that proves the rule, they are a small turkic people up in the mountains in central asia, they have the highest rate of childbirth mortality in the world, and thus a young woman shortage.
    6
  10. I imagine that it is a mix of strong traditional social institutions, like family and community, a cultural expectation of marriage and the political situation of coupling western investment with limited social influence due to the state basically being a Russian satellite. That said their are probably social reformers (or traditionalists) who are responsible for actually bringing the situation, and they deserve credit. While it would be somewhat harder we haven't seen Russian social institutions reformed back into a functional pre-soviet state, Putin stated that he wanted them to have more kids, but that is about it, it is fairly clear that the factors that are responsible for fertility are social far more than economic. Not only are social changes lacking, the response is changing the beneficiaries of taxes, not even something basic like going after abortion or contraception, something which would change dynamics without needing a vision of the society to be built.
    6
  11. I'm guessing the dislike of US servicemen is due to their low social prestige and bad reputation (for crime especially). The farmer thing is interesting and sounds like a major problem, I know that Tokyo is the socially prestigious place to be and they have major problems with the sex industry as that is how many women have to fund living there. I wonder what the solutions would be other than a campaign of national shame. Which is unlikely to happen given that western influence is starting to cause things to spiral.
    6
  12.  @nikitatrotsky6918  People would have said the same about serfdom in Poland in 1550, except we have a time limit, at current rates in 50 years europe won't be european, of course I don't think the current elite can hold power but if things take too long they will be toppled by a caliphate rather than the divided and shambolic opposition movements.
    5
  13.  @boatygatling4782  Why invade what you can buy. The Chinese have other priorities, so long as there is enough rail for transportation of food out from Russia Siberia is a low priority.
    5
  14. I am only implying because of this platform, significant disturbances are already taking place, it will be a long process but it will in no respect be peaceful. But some peace 's are unendurable, the one in South Africa for example.
    5
  15.  @chad1682  It's genetics.
    4
  16. The young are at different levels of diversity in different countries, but generally young women are left wing and young men are radically to the right. The minorities may look out for there own interests, but there are more than enough young people for a revolution, the state after all has the same demographics, it's the lack of support among the young that matters. How soon it manifests will be seen, but as the pot boils the pressure goes up rather than down.
    4
  17.  @cazwalt9013  I was memeing, they aren't even the mongol type of asians but from their own group along with the finns.
    4
  18. He's getting it from the Frenchman he cited, and yeah it's pretty wrong, inheritance laws and family structure shifted over time and was different in different classes and ethnic groups. Very often it was explicit laws rather than social traditions that shaped them. For example Tsarist Russia has very extensive laws around personal and family honour as well as succession and practically everything else, likewise they had many groups who did things differently, or didn't care about the law unless they were made to, usually they had their own legal structures. In Britain the Nobility continued Norman attitudes but the rest of the population was much more mixed. It's like trying to use latitude to predict urbanisation, maybe there's a correlation but it's basically a fluke, other factors lead to it happening.
    4
  19. How?
    4
  20. Appeal to wig history. Also there has been a resurgence of Christianity among the zoomers, it's main flaw is that it's almost entirely male.
    4
  21. They have an overly corporate business sector, but rents, living costs and the availability of work are actually much better than in the west. The main thing eating them away is despondency (most expected a corporate job and a standard of living they will never get) and the insistence that work hours equate to productivity. However in most regards they are in a much better situation, notably their elite culture is much better (for Japan, South Korea makes eastern Europe look above board) and most of the problems are caused by them importing western fashions in the same way as they used to Chinese ones without really understanding the underlying logic or motivations.
    4
  22. The child of such a union is more genetically distant from you than a random person from your people. If east Asian you are getting into a Celt being more related to an eastern slav than them territory. You are basically fabricating new races of men as the same applies on the other side, they are not of one group but rather of their own. In other words it's a terrible idea, shortsighted and exacerbates this problem in other countries. The only solution is to put your foot down and reject the current social norms of western society. Whether that is through Christianity or the political disenfranchisment of socially irresponsible groups and their interests.
    3
  23. Best I can do is a Hapsburg, one based out of Budapest.
    3
  24. Being an Englishman I see is as a repeat of the migration period (also known as the dark ages), but that period was a lot worse for Britain than the rest of Europe, with the Romano-British being wiped out in genocide by the Anglo-Saxons. We already have some truly horrific stuff happening with Rotherham and the like. I'm in the Christian camp, as far as I'm concerned it is the basis and only future for western civilisation. But liberalism must be utterly expunged, while if possible restoring the English liberties that formed the basis of it's justification for a parliamentary oligarchy usurping power from the anointed monarch and by it God. I recommend Robert Filmer by Imperium Press. As I see it we are in for very hard times, and we should start collaborating and building organisational structures now so that we aren't vulnerable to groups who are better organised and more cohesive. Really the trouble has already started.
    3
  25. Places without state pensions or with very low ones still have low birthrates, notably China, though also Russia to a certain extent.
    3
  26. I'm going to go out on a limb and say that people should watch an old anime called Shiki, I'm seeing a lot of people in the comments who seem to think paradigms don't shift much. That is not part of human psychology, changes easily happen in an exponential manner, a paradigm shift is radical, so long as power shifts then with that shift will come a totally different stance towards these things. Read here was like reading French liberals who thought that the King would oversee the revolution prior to it. If the current order loses power then we will not be thinking about things within the perview of their system, if they don't lose power then nothing with change at all.
    3
  27. There are notable outliers, especially among women who live in parallel societies (like communal religious groups) or frankly autistic ones (which women involved in this scene very often are, not to disparage them, they come out with a lot of valuable contributions).
    3
  28. Convert to Islam as you might as well be a Muslim. The heritage of the West is Christian.
    3
  29. Yes, many of these classes were themselves ethnic in origin, in a sense this is even taken into right to rule, almost all British nobility claim Norman ancestry, most have more recent (by that I mean medieval or early modern, most of the actual new ones have clear family trees so aren't able to make it up as much, that said the merchant family I was talking about claimed to have broken into Charles the First's prison and been personally conferred nobility for offering to break him out, supposedly the evidence was eaten by mice and the family were whig Methodists who were burnt in effigy for supporting the America revolution, the likelihood is faintly ridiculous in other words, there actual place in the imperial hierarchy was based on being a very prominent business family in the colonies). The loyalties were also religious, non-conformists, Catholics and Anglicans all have very different political and social sympathies. On top of this personal characteristics passed down through family lines, certainly liberteanism can be traced through family trees very easily, those who acted a certain way it one generation were often related to those who did so in another. In other words nations and countries are complicated things, they aren't run on a single software but off a confluence of groups, people's and idea's. This is why liberal reform in Russia never went the same as it did in England and never went how it was meant to at all. Personally one of the things I heavily dislike about the revival of late 19th century and early 20th century progressives is that racial science is very largely bunk, quite apart from the degree of relevance they very often are talking utter nonsense when trying to define these groups. It's like astrology for men.
    3
  30. Contraceptives means that people only have a higher fertility rate with higher sexual contact if stupid (literally, the sub-80 iq people are typically the only ones who have above replacement as they can't work out how to use contraceptives properly and are too lazy to do anything once they are pregnant, also children are less of a bother if you just don't look after them), the higher rates of sex does lead to more pregnancies outside of marriage (because contraceptives don't work 100%) but this is then want abortion is used for. The higher rates of sex only matter among the people who want children (as in are trying for them, most people who won't have children do want them but will never get round to it) or if contraceptives or abortion are banned (and well, contraceptives lead to a sickening social context and abortion is baby murder). Our options are encourage people to marry young (probably through a traditional religion) or force the circumstances into a state where they have to (which would basically turn this whole thing around tomorrow but would have to be enforced). Frankly we might as well do both.
    3
  31. They are Mediterranean or South European. Western Europe is sometimes considered more broadly, but usually it means Scandinavia, German, France, the UK and states in the middle when people.remember they exist. Switzerland is probably both western and northern European, but Spain exists in the same plane of existence to most northern Europeans as Greece or Cyprus, they are hot, by the sea and the economy is bad.
    3
  32.  @samalaimukhametova7290  Yes, I'm British, this manga is about central asia, her old one was about Britain, it was called emma, this one is a Brides tale. Emma is a competently done romance story about a maid. A brides tale is a masterpiece in the way of art, historical research and storytelling.
    3
  33. J. D. Vance is intellectually influenced by many of the thinkers talking about these problems. That is why those on the intellectual right were pleasantly surprised by his pick, he wasn't a neo-con so the future of the American right might well be something that actually wants to do stuff for the country and not just lower taxes and bomb strangers.
    2
  34. Give it time.
    2
  35. Same birthrate as Europe, it's basically liberal cultural values and social organisation.
    2
  36. To understand the actual value of these things one should consider Poland and Russia, Poland had a powerful nobility who exercised considerable freedom and power, Russia had the same but was also autocratic and religious. The Polish nobility failed to guard the interests of the nation, and lost everything as the price of their freedom, Russia was in many respects a miserable country, but there tenacity, high birth rate, and willingness to sacrifice meant that they became dominant. The current elite are not economically very productive, they are basically selling of the nation bit by bit in return for the industrial production of the outwardly poorer nations. They are selling the family silver in order to live the high life for a single generation. They also have no higher loyalties and few children. They are the dead walking. The populace has been debauched and is not in a good state at all, they have no real leadership and follow on in the mistakes of their betters. But they can feel the knife in their back even they can't form a proper vanguard. They are angry. The future is for young people willing to form a new elite and lead a revival, as part of this is the total rejection of enlightenment liberalism and loyalty to God and people. Such a vanguard will in a sense be both reactionary and revolutionary. It is clear that this will come from non-university educated young men, and that they shall be defined by a willingness to use force. Questions like what a certain demographic wants are a question of democracy, something which is increasingly not a moral question at all, but merely one of a few vestiges of legitimacy. You ask what will happen with college educated women, they will either become married mothers or else have the social safety net cut from beneath them. We are looking either at the death of a civilisation and people, or else at the death of liberalism and liberal democracy. There is not solution to fix the status quo, the status quo is itself the Gordian knot, and problem such that it has decided on its own solution, past that it is an issue of power and resolve.
    2
  37. Women are not to be taken very seriously at all, they usually don't know the first thing of what they are talking about, men stand by causes, women use them against other women, either to status signal, sabotage or force uniformity, if you treat them like serious people they will think less of you. The trick is to have their best intentions for them, that is you forward their actual interests (feeling secure, having lots of babies and being able to one up other women) on their behalf, all the ideological stuff would be windowdressing if not given hard power by the legal system and the resentful advice of other women. People who demand respect are pathetic, and should be treated as such, otherwise they are emboldened.
    2
  38. Also the Irish were made to split lands between sons by law, a cause of the famine, the whole thing is pretty wrong. It seems like the theory came before the categorisation.
    2
  39. Yeah, that doesn't exist in Britain.
    2
  40. Doomerism like this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. People who are demotivated are much less active. I was unlucky enough the other day to hear about research into the survival instincts of rats, if a rat was dropped it water it would drown in about 20 minutes, if it had previously been saved from drowning they would hold on for 7 hours. Hope is a hell of a drug. Also single young men predicts political instability far more than old people, the tension in places like Britain could be lit up with a match, they only thing holding them back is that they don't know how to revolt, why or when, they are all waiting for someone else to make the first move so if it fails they go down for it instead, if there is a moment of weakness from the state things here will go nuclear. And every year it doesn't happen the opposition is getting better organised, more radical and far more mainstream.
    2
  41. The Russians simply wouldn't let them leave. Also Europe is in way worse straits, they are economically doomed and are looking at the mass scale replacement of their populations by hostile Muslim migrants. Hopefully things will change, but if the current ruling class remains in place we are looking at the death of europe.
    2
  42.  @prohacker5086  By is that capitalism, or is it social causes and thus a counterpoint to the op.
    2
  43. Who said any of us were democrats or cared about democracy. In talking about these issues their are higher loyalties involved, those to family, ethnos and God. What is happening is not a refinement of liberalism but a rejection of it.
    2
  44. They won't, the western elite believe everyone is the same and they can use immigration to bring in a serf class, the reality is a repeat of what happened to Anatolia, 1000 years ago it was Greek now it is Turkey. Unfortunately many Indian nationalists seem to mostly enjoy the shoe being on the other foot rather than offering solidarity. Internally Europe is very weak, Christianity is almost extinct and the liberal ideologies don't even understand religious motivation and thin the Muslims are allies because they also want to deconstruct western civilisation. Here in Britain the government sides with them against the population, look up Rotherham, what happens is not fit for the youtube bots.
    2
  45.  @CruWiT  That is an old tactic in war, but the Chechens are a power block, not an existential threat being incubated within Russia.
    2
  46.  @VR36030  The free democratic method is mass importation, if the current regime isn't overturned by the native population it will be once the new population take over, our options are basically an end to liberalism, or a Islamisation of Europe happening under the logic of keeping the pensions paid up. terrifying and unnatural than the past. The 20th century was way worse than anything that happened in medieval Europe short of the Mongols (which only the Hungarians, Poles and Russians really had to deal with). But medieval times weren't really authoritarian, centralised power wasn't that strong, they ran on very strong social institutions. Many different communities lived in relative peace, bound only by faith and oaths of loyalty (under nationalism the deportation or forced integration minority groups was necessary as the idea of popular sovereignty made them potential nodes of power). A state education system is way more authoritarian on it's own than anything they had, it also meant that the values and skills passed down to children were subject to evolutionary logic, today we manage to retain utterly bizarre values only by the indoctrination of the youth into a dominant system of belief, one which is probably behind the fertility problems. abortion are banned and the parties invested in them are purged from the elite class then most of these issue will have nowhere to go but resolution, the majority of the population as ever will form their sense of morality around the law and tell themselves that they always supported what they are compelled to do.
    2
  47. Hmmm, I wonder why you would advocate this. In other news as a Brit I think everyone should summit to the rule of the British Empire, we have the most experience after all.
    2
  48. Rape capital of the northern hemisphere, and given the cultural enrichment of so much of the rest of it, there is some stiff competition.
    2
  49. That doesn't matter, what does is that the social norms promoted by religion include large families, a positive attitude towards children and a hatred of contraceptives. At least within Christianity.
    2
  50. The slaveholding is literally just an American import, it really doesn't graft well onto European experiences at all, also we have a very small black population who are recent and can't claim oppression as much for the reason they are so criminal and dysfunctional (most of it is probably influence from American black culture and the facilitation of the welfare state). In terms of colonisation the big one is Germany despite not really having that history before WW2, it is very much a deliberate policy by American intelligence working with the Frankfurt school to neuter potential rivals and create vassal states and the correct mindset nationally. This is especially targeted at the elite, the population are actually better informed. How progressive a country is is in truth how atheist they are and their proximity to US foreign policy and specific campaigns and client networks set up in the past. Progressivism really is the imperial ideology of America.
    2