Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "DW News"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ea-pb2tu Gripens have significantly reduced range once you load them with mission-relevant stores. Whatever sources you're using for performance metrics, they're way off. F-35A has dramatically-better range than the Gripen E or F-16C. Most of the payload on 4th Gen fighters is external fuel, not weapons.
When we talk about SEAD, we're discussing the ability to geolocate SAM and AAA threat guidance Radars, while countering and evading SAMs and AAA, and employing weapons against those Radars and AA weapon sites.
Gripens do not have the emitter locator sensors, nor do they have any anti-Radar missiles, nor do any Gripen operators train for this mission set.
The F/A-18C has been doing the SEAD mission profile since the late 1980s, and was an instrumental platform for executing it during many real-world missions with the HARM and MALD in Desert Storm over 30 years ago.
F-16CJ and now F-16CM Late Block Vipers are specifically equipped for the D/SEAD mission profile with the HARM Targeting System pod on station 5L, full HARM capability, LITENING or SNIPER advanced targeting FLIR pod, and pilot interface through the MFDs and HUD to execute SEAD mission sets.
Gripen Cs not only have none of that, but have never been advertised as being able to do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ea-pb2tu US has trained and equipped for this type of war in USAFE for generations. Dispersed basing, hot-rearming/refueling, planning, contingencies, logistics, force structure, OCA, DCA, Strike, SEAD, CSAR, EW, etc. are all core mission sets for USAFE.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1