Comments by "LRRPFco52" (@LRRPFco52) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics"
channel.
-
1
-
@frankpinter9508 Funny how Macron either isn't aware or purposely ignored the fact that much of the weaponry and supplies it sent to Ukraine were manufactured in the US, and sold to NATO and EU countries prior to, and during the war. Take Patriots, Javelins, Bradleys, Abrams, NASAMs, HIMARS, M777, and F-16s, for just a few examples.
I wouldn't expect Macron to be competent or well informed on this subject though.
1
-
@fridrekr7510 It’s Peter’s argument, not mine. I was merely explaining his perspective as I understand it, having followed his analyses since the 2000s. City States by definition operate autonomously for the most part, with their own economy, culture, and politics. You do see this in Finland, Sweden, and Norway, though it isn’t as pronounced as the ancient city states of Europe of course.
A better contrast would be to compare the Nordics to Central Europe. Central Europe is integrated with highways, the EU government, rail lines, and high volume air traffic. The Scandinavian Peninsula is geographically isolated, subject to more extreme cold weather, with limited connectivity between Norway, Sweden, and Finland, dotted with a few small population cities along the coasts.
That’s how I see Peter’s perspective, which does have some validity to it. The Nordic countries like to think of themselves as bigger powers than they are. Sweden is the most guilty of this, and Finland just wants to be recognized and accepted so that people will not make the same mistake again that was made in 1939, leaving her to deal with Russia alone.
Hopefully that makes sense.
1
-
1
-
@josephtorres3229 Actually Russia violated Minsk, since Ukraine gave up her nukes as part of that deal where her territorial integrity was off-limits.
Putin’s red line was crossed when Ukraine threw out his puppet in Kiev, Yanukovych, who signed onto the Russia-Eurasian Economic Pact, against the will of 79% of the Ukrainian people. They actually wanted to trade their goods and services for Euros, not Rubles.
Step outside of the Russian Pravda and into a more holistic assessment of the history and real events. Turn of Russia One TV, and build a timeline of events on your own, asking who, what, where, when, why.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gmw3083 Biden has been on Russian payroll since 1972. They literally financed his campaign into the Senate through Council for a Livable World. Yes, people under Biden continue to coordinate with Russia to subvert US interests.
Putin’s plan backfired horrendously on him in Ukraine, and likely eliminated his chances of going after Poland, the Baltics, eastern Romania, and Finland during his presidency. Now that Europe has seen how easy it is to curb-stomp Russian forces, it will be a potentially-volatile time, because they don’t want this spilling into Europe anymore, and Putin has to somehow continue to sell his image as a strong man to the Russian people.
The Russian tactic of throwing bodies at the problem doesn’t work against modern ISR networks and precision munitions, because they can find, fix, and attrit logistics nodes with impunity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's important to understand that Peter's reference for an optimally-functioning Presidency is that of George H.W. Bush, because he was the last one with an actual foreign policy.
Trump pulled off what nobody has been able to do in at least a century of Roosevelt-initiated Blue Blood control of the WH (and the crony relationship between Wall Street conglomerates and the political parties).
He circumvented the sell-out politician career path to the WH, bypassing Congressional, Gubernatorial, or cabinet positions (over a lifetime of fake public speaking and obedience to the financial interests who control both parties).
This is why Trump was hated and feared by both parties. There are dozens of Congressmen plugging away with the establishment system like good little conformists, eager to lick the boot of the financial interests who determine who makes it into the run-offs, who then not only got sidelined and politically eviscerated (especially Jeb Bush), but then faced a potential dynasty blocking them out.
Think about Cory Booker, Marco Rubio, Gavin Newsom, John Kennedy, Lisa Murkowski, Amy Klobuchar, etc.
There's a narrow window that opens at certain times, mainly determined by a combination of age, tenure, party affiliation relative to the cycle (RR, D, RR, D, RRR, DD, RR, DD, R, D), name recognition, previous campaign experience, Vice President, etc.
Trump threw all of that out of whack, which ruffled the feathers of dozens of career politicians in both parties.
Even worse for them, he commands such a groundswell of grassroots support, fomenting a rare populist cultural swing that hasn't happened since Reagan and FDR.
FDR's populism was created by crisis and mass control of the media. Trump's was created despite the established media, by leveraging the internet and his long career in business and entertainment.
The worst possible outcome for the establishment sell-outs in DC would have been a 2-term Trump, followed by whomever his VP would be in 2024 with his blessing.
This is why they threw everything at him possible, short of assassination like they did to Reagan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jlvandat69 ACA was a shake-down for insurance companies, pharmaceuticals, and medical device manufacturers. Medicare and Medicaid already covered uninsured and hospitals aren’t allowed to deny life-saving care.
The talking points used to sell ACA didn’t have basis in reality. Examples:
“Millions of Americans are going bankrupt because of medical costs!”
Reality: Anywhere between 738,000 down to 424,000 US bankruptcies are filed each year in total, including businesses, with bankruptcy rates falling each year, not increasing, even as the population increases. We just don’t have millions even filling each year. A smaller % of total bankruptcies are attributed to medical costs, but these were avoidable in most cases had the patients applied for Medicare, Medicaid, and even Social Security.
ACA is one of the biggest scams hefted onto the US, but was a windfall in money for the corporate interests who control DC.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thomasdonovan3580 Putin was planning on invading Finland anyway. One of his foreign ministry secretaries was running his mouth about the new plans already in the 2000s.
Russia didn’t invade Ukraine over possible NATO membership, but because Putin lost his puppet, Yanukovych, and Putin had been using Ukraine for a personal bank through embezzlement of Ukrainian revenue through various companies, including Burisma. As long as Yanukovych was in power, Putin was happy, along with Biden, Obama, and all the other stooges who were on Putin’s payroll. Look at the Panama papers for further evidence of what I’m talking about.
Finns know that without a mutual defense pact, they would be seriously damaged by Russia at a minimum, with a giant loss of population. The Ukrainian refugee crisis is 2x the Finnish population, for example.
The US didn’t drive a wedge between Russia and EU. EU nations got in front of that on their own, outside of the influence of puppet Biden or Obama. The US has been in strategic withdrawal from Europe since 1992, after Desert Storm and the collapse of the Soviet Empire.
Eastern Europe came begging to join NATO because, unlike the comfortable Germans, French, and UK, they didn’t buy into “the end of history” silliness that was being spewed from Brussels, London, New York, and DC.
The Eastern Europeans’ instinct was of course correct, and all the talking heads and academics in the US and Western Europe who thought we were done with the old ways were wrong. This should have been clear already with Yugoslavia. When Russia invaded Georgia in 2008, most knew the gig was up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevinsutube1p528 Biden openly credits Council for a Livable World for getting him elected in 1972, same organization that helped lift the campaign of "a community organizer" into the Illinois Senate, who then became President in 2008.
Council for a Livable World is a Soviet era front group started by Leo Szilard in 1962, helping 420+ Congressmen, Senators, Governors, and Presidents into office.
Biden was a no-name pedophile with zero political history in 1972.
After Ukrainians threw Yanukovych out in March 2014, Elena Baturina (human/sex trafficker/former 1st lady of Moscow) wired $3.5 million to Hunter Biden.
Hunter Biden then joined the board of Burisma, which triggered an email from John Kerry's son-in-law, Chris Heinz, a front company business partner with Hunter in Rosemont Capital.
In Sep that year, Obama flew to UK to ask David Cameron to shut down MI5/MI6's investigation into Burisma.
Then VP Biden demanded that the new President Proshenko not only shut down the investigation into Burisma, but fire Viktor Shokin, otherwise Ukraine wouldn't get $1 Billion in foreign aid from the US.
Biden, Clintons, Obamas, Kerrys, and numerous US Senators and Congressmen have been invested in the embezzlement scheme in Ukraine for many years, as an insurance policy for Putin/Russia.
1
-
@kevinsutube1p528 The former Soviet officer, Pavel Sudoplatov, who managed Council for a Livable World as part of the NKVD and KGB's "Administration for Special Tasks", revealed its true purpose in a book after the collapse, co-written with his University of Moscow Economics Professor son, Anatoli.
Szilard was about to be arrested back in the early 1960s because he had been passing nuclear secrets to the Soviets all along.
The Soviets had so many moles in the FBI, they were able to steer their assets in advance to prevent them from being arrested, or sacrifice them to bolster the credibility of new high-level moles.
Zsilard's value was enormous if they could have him switch gears from technical espionage, to political activism based on nuclear alarmism.
That is why they directed him to found a front group called The Council for a Livable World. Their strategy was to first focus CFALW money on Senatorial elections in States with tiny populations where their campaign donations and bundling could have more influence on the outcome.
Enter a young pedophile named Joe Biden in 1972, and the State of Delaware.
What was Biden's first conspicuous action in office in 1973? He traveled to Leningrad to meet with Senior Soviet leadership so they could talk about policy, while showing off their new trophy to each other.
Biden returned to the US and immediately began cheerleading against the B-1A, which was supposed to replace the B-52 fleet.
After he, Admiral Stansfield Turner (DCI under Carter who had been recruited into CIA by one of the original NKVD double agents in CIA), other closet CPUSA Congressmen, and Carter cancelled the B-1A in 1977, Joe was then tasked with getting the US to reduce its nuclear arsenal while the Soviets built theirs up under Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. He returned to USSR, that time to Moscow in 1979 for this purpose. You can see photos of this yourself with an image search.
Joe Biden has literally been working for the Soviets his entire career.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah, the thing he said about Trump “clearly failing” couldn’t be more wrong. How many politicians in US History could have ever done the amount of campaign rallies and planning sessions that Donald Trump did, even if they were in their 30s? Trump Jr. said he can’t keep up with him at age 46. Trump did all those events up through election night, didn’t go to sleep, then went straight into the cabinet formation meetings with a lot of people half his age that were wanting to take a break. Then if what Peter projects will be true, it’s as if Trump didn’t pick probability the greatest VP pick of all time, JD Vance. On top of that, he literally built his cabinet with a core of former Presidential candidates, including RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and Vivek Ramaswamy. So Peter is orders of magnitude erroneous here on this alarmist forecast of a Constitutional crisis. In reality, it’s a Constitutional stabilizing movement, the likes of which have never been seen before in US Presidential history. No Republican President would ever surround themselves with former Democrat Presidential candidates like this, because Trump is an American President, not a partisan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1