Comments by "Nattygsbord" (@nattygsbord) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. Russia did strangle their energy supply to Europe before this pipeline was blown. The plan was so put pressure on Berlin. Russia would still get some energy income while Germany would get less gas than normal so it would be unable to stock up gas for the next winter and be fearful of freezing to death the next winter unless it gave up its support for Ukraine. In order to do this did Russia blame "technical problems" with their pipeline that prevented them from sending all the energy they had agreed to in their contracts with Germany. So the Russians lied and made up a bullshit reason for not keeping their promise, while not saying it outright that they did not deliever to Germany what they promised simply because they didn't want to. It all reminds me of how Stalin tried to rob Berlin from the western world by blockading all road transports of food to the city. And they said that they had no bad intents then either.. the food could not reach Berlin because of "technical problems" back then too. And blowing up the pipeline and cutting off all gas to Germany was perhaps a signal to the leaders in Berlin and a way to try to scare Europe about a big coming energy crisis, while at the same time being careful to not looklike an aggressor in German eyes so that the German people who was still feeling 50%/50% divided over if they should support Ukraine or not, would not became angry on Russia if they refused to give Germany any gas. However this move was stupid. And it seems like Russia have managed to take the football and kick it into their own goal with this dumb move. The last dreams of getting Germany back on Russian gas dependence are now dead.
    1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30.  @jeffmorris5802  Your spelling is terrible for being an american. 1. I think you are mostly correct. 2. Nope. Hamas got 20K-25K members. While the russian military could probably field 1-2 million men or more if they wanted to. Russia got submarines, fighter jets, tanks and weapons of mass destruction while Hamas don't. Russia spams the west with corrosive propaganda, bribe politicians, media figures and Generals. They manipulate university research to prevent military bases and training for western armies for "enviromental reasons" and other BS. They do make cyber attacks and use their global influence to smear and spread lies about the west. That is what the 3rd largest oil producer in the world do with its income. Its not giving its population tap water, increasing wages for teachers or building libraries. It use its money on propaganda in foreign countries instead and wasting it on the military. 3. USA promised to help Ukraine secure its independence with the Budapest agreement. So it is obliged to help Ukraine. Breaking that promise will have far reaching negative consequences for trust in America and her allies for decades ahead. And as I sees it can both Ukraine and Israel be helped. Israel will mostly need bombs dropped from airplanes, and not so much artillery shells. While the opposite will be the case for Ukraine. 4. Ukraine have a close cooperation with western militaries. And they have won battle after battle in this war so far: Hostomel, Kyiv, Sumy, the 4 battles at Siverskyi Donets, Charkiv, Snake island, Khersun, Vuhledar, Avdiivka and so on. Ukrainian troops do get too little weapons and too late, but still have they managed to kick russian ass in battle after battle. So your comment is simply based on complete ignorance and is towing a false russian narrative. And that is another reason I do not think you are an american. Because americans do not like to listen to losers. Russians are losers 😂😂
    1
  31. 1
  32. "we don't wanna meet the slightest Russian demands in order to obtain peace" Did giving Crimea to Russia in 2014 give us peace? No it didn't. Can the Putin clowns stop being so historically ignorant? You are tiresome. We should not give anything to a criminal terrorist state. Crimes and terrorism should be punished, and not rewarded. If you reward this behaviour, then you will only get more of it. Russia have invaded neighbour after neighbour the last 20 years. Its time for this to stop. And I prefer Zelensky and Boris Johnson over Putin any day. Putin commits genocide in Bucha, Irpin and other places. He deliberatly bombs kindergardens schools, maternity hospitals, and civilian homes. He let his troops get away with rape, torture, murder, and looting. His troops kidnap civilians and use them as human shields. He steals 500 aircrafts from other countries and threatens to steal buildings and machines from foreign companies. He threatens innocent people with nuclear weapons. He tries to starve 800 million people to death in his game of blackmailing the world to lift the sanctions on Russia. And he starts unprovoced, unjustified, illegal wars. He kidnaps Ukrainian women and children and transport them to concentration camps in Siberia. He commits genocide. He spread lies. He pay for internet trolls that spread lies and tries to poison the public in foreign countries. He have utter contempt for democracy and throws people in jail for barely calling the conflict in Ukraine for a war - something that a hypocrite like himself does not have to go to jail for. And Putin ignores promise after promise and treaty after treaty that Russia have signed in the past... everything from the Budapest agreement to the promise to not use nuclear weapons as a way to disturb world peace, or when he fired missiles on Ukrainian cargo ships the day after the naval blockade in the black sea was lifted. I think that you should just leave the western world. You simply does not belong here. Go to Ukraine and fight in the mud for your genocidal Russian Hitler. I happily pay for the ammunition that the Ukrainians will send in your way.
    1
  33. Some points that I think are interesting regarding this topic are: 1. Russian missile attacks against hydroelectric powerplants, which could signify a repeat of of the Novo Kahovka dam collapse. That was a defensive action, but perhaps is it also a move russia want to make to save troops in one are to move to another area for an attack. 2. Russia do not care about training, or smart use of their resources. They rather just wanna create a flow that they hope somehow would push the Ukrianians back and make them lose ground and manpower. This is of course not a smart way of using resources. But Putin doesn't seem to care. Trading land for lives is something that he is willing to do. He do not value the lives of convicts, ethnic minorities, mercenaries, and Ukrainians forcefully conscripted into DPR and LPR amies. So he happily continues to make meatwaves. 3. Putins strategy is winning the war by Trump. And if Trump wins, then he hopes that Europe just gives up and throws in the towel as well. And that is possible, and especially so if rightwing populists wins seats in the EU election. Putin is therefore not hoping the counter-offensive to break the Ukrainian defensive lines. But rather just to keep the pressure up to show the world that he holds the iniative to demoralize people in the west that are sitting on the fence, and to give a morale boost to the pro-russians around the world. Russias real offensive will not come now. It will come after the west have given up their support for Ukraine. And when Ukraine lose their access to patriot missiles and 155mm artillery shells, then will russia attack with full force and force Ukraine to sign a catastrophically bad peace deal.
    1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. As much as he dares to use. The limiting factor is how much pain the Russian people or the political opposition can endure, or how much that he suspect that they can endure before they revolt or try to kill him. With that obstacle out of the way, I don't think Putin will hesitate to use every available resource at his disposal to win this war. If he lose this war, then it will mean the end of Putin. And it is hard to find a greater motivating factor than that. Its victory or death for Putin. He cannot afford to lose this war. He need some kind of win. At least a small one so he can save face. But personally I think that it is too late for that. And I don't think the west should try to save this mini-Hitler from going down. He got no one else to blame for this mess that he created for himself. I do not feel sorry for him. He already had enough chances. And the idiot was offer generous peace terms earlier this year. Indeed, he was offered way too generous peace terms. But even that was not good enough for him. And his greed became his downfall. And when the doves failed, did the hawks in the west take over and started to pump in weapons into Ukraine, and Russia then started to lose the war. And now Putin is stuck in a war that he is about to lose. He have painted himself into a corner. He have shot himself in the foot. He have burned all bridges. The idiot have screwed up royally beyond the point of all return. Macron's proposal to throw out a lifebuoy to save Putin is just insane. If was on a ship and an axeman was swinging his axe and tried to kill you and then accidentally fell into the water. Would you try to pick this guy up when you know that he would be more likely to try to kill you again rather than being grateful for you saved his life? I would leave this guy to freeze and drown in the water. It would be his own fault for putting himself into this situation when he was chasing around people and tried to kill them. And I do not owe him anything. Indeed, I think the world be a better place without people like him. And that is my view of Putin as well.
    1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. Germany and France recently voted for pro-russian nazis in the EU election. Southern Europe (Spain and Italy) does not care much about Ukraine. Slovakia, Hungary and Austria are pro-Russian. Belgium is also pretty pro-russian like France and Germany. Sweden, Denmark and the Baltics have already given away all what they have to Ukraine. Poland have become more half-assed in supporting Ukraine and do very little to stop the truckers from blocking the road. And Britain no longer got any Boris Johnson to help Ukraine. So I not expect any large aid packages from Europe. At best might they get more artillery ammunition in the future, and perhaps Poland could give a few of those thousands of vehicles they have bought. Norway and Finland could perhaps give a little more. While Spain, Turkey and Greece could give a few armored vehicles since they already have so many, and those they have are already so old that it could be sensible to replace them with something newer. Leopard1, M-60 Patton and Leopard2A4 are not exactly what I consider brand new tanks. So if the political will exist, then I believe that trading those vehicles for money, and then sending them to Ukraine would be possible. Then could those countries buy something more modern to replace them. However organising anything revolutionary that could tip the scale in Ukraine seems very unlikely to me. Even more unlikely now when Macron and Scholz are weaker than ever. I hope this does not lead to a permanent block of the shipments of Taurus to Ukraine and some well needed French weapons such as Caesar, Scalp and Mirage 2000.
    1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1