Comments by "Bobr Kurwa" (@mr.purple1779) on "Celtic History Decoded" channel.

  1. It is noteworthy that the samples of Malta MA1 on the graph of the main components are located close to the Udmurts, a little stretched to Mansi. And also the Tocharians were just ANE, or ANE + Paleo-Siberian. So the redhead is probably really from the Paleolithic.
    33
  2. he's a fraud
    5
  3. I have Hazel eyes closer to green. I have Tatar roots between the Volga and Western Siberia and northern Kazakhstan. And apparently I'm not alone. I also think that yamna pastoralists are not accidentally described as light/inermediate skin and variable aye color some with blonde hair.
    5
  4.  @patrickmcelligott5646  Chinese silk from Volga Bulgaria. Only nomads had valuable goods. 3:05
    5
  5.  @michaelfritts6249  At least a series of skulls of the Golden Horde population showed that in total they were closest to the Pazyryk Scythians (Asian Saka). And although the Tatars are not so much connected with the Golden Horde as with earlier cattle breeders, of course there were no blacks there, but at least Tom Hanks actually looks quite Tatar.
    4
  6. They do not descend from WHG as Western Europeans. In addition, the climate there is not damp, but cruel cold, where, on the contrary, narrow eyes are needed.
    4
  7.  @eponymousarchon7442  They have now included additional denominators. Pastoralists are the Lower Volga cline. The Middle Stack is the ancestor of Europeans, a mixture of local hunters and the Volga cline, which had or did not have a relationship with the Volga cline, to a greater or lesser extent. Thus, it is far from a fact that western Europeans are related to the original nomads.
    3
  8. You're basically a rape victim.
    3
  9. By the way, Eurasian nomads have very similar arts 12:30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2jHXL-VjfI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxzI5RVK59A https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC0jTqYguUI In a sense, there was a similar story in the Bulgar-Tatar (Kipchak) ornamental art. In the 9th century, they adopted Islam. In Islam, the image of animals was prohibited, so the style of the ornament began to be depersonalized. Animalistic motifs, as it were, began to be embedded in a floral ornament, uniting in a common meaning. Modern ornamental art can be like incoherent Scandinavian knit. But the general form and symbols preserve a very ancient archaic structure. In academic sources, you can find a description of triangles, circles, some lines and forms, so on, since for nomads each line, shape and flower had a sacred meaning.
    3
  10. This is a fifteen-year-old map from the eupedia website. When there was nothing else but homogeneous markers and shows Bashkirs. Now there are already professional maps and amateur of decent quality, when the main component is taken from the population and amplified in other populations.
    2
  11. Most directly related. The Scythians originated the Xiongnu, but the Xiongnu originated the Huns. Pazyryk culture (Asian Saka Scythians) was transformed into the culture of the Hunnic type Bulan Koba. And also the Huns moving westward met with the Sarmatians. They formed the Hunno-Sarmatian period. And then the modern Volga Tatar people. (Kipchak-speaking former nomads). And the small Altai peoples - Tubalar, Teleut and so on and especially the Siberian Tatars are close to Pazyrykians. The history of nomads is completely not about the Persians and other southern Middle Eastern Iranoid Arabic or Hindus Asians. They just never happened there.
    2
  12.  @LuisAldamiz  I mean new data on Altai hunter gatherers. Which seem to have never been published. I watched a detailed lecture on them. "Middle Holocene Siberian genomes reveal highly connected gene pools throughout North Asia" 2023 Kipchak-speaking peoples associated with the Scytho-Siberian world, Sarmatians and Western Huns are located on the slope between Altai HG and IE Steppe. And also on the network there is a new article on Tocharians. "The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies" 2021 These guys turned out to be almost 100% ANE people. So they were quite healthy at that time, at least. ANE played an important role for many - Okunev culture, Dzungaria_EBA, Botai. So in 2023 it was quite a good reference component. And it is also worth saying that modern Malta MA1 located on the Udmurts. So the ANE people are kind of still alive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhK5VNmyn9I
    2
  13.  @user-yt3xd2jl6d  Western Europeans have Middle Eastern Anatolian Caucasoid DNA. Steppe DNA in far-eastern Europeans associated with Siberia.
    2
  14.  @serkankinden5150  Because Iranians and Indians are not Indo-Europeans. But, southern and Middle Eastern Asians who received an influx of sintashta. However, the Siberian Hunnic-Turkic are Europeans or Siberians.
    2
  15.  @carmenm.4091  Native Siberians, Ancient northern Eurasians in the modern sense are Americanoids. Even the Eastern hunter 0:55 should not be particularly considered Caucasoid. The Paleolithic of Siberia was closer to the Native Americans, Mongoloid features developed as a result of adaptation.
    2
  16. Early Scythians originated in Siberia as an amalgamation of steppe and Paleo-Siberian populations. The first notable was the Tagar culture 800 BC. on average 80/20% of west-east Eurasian origin. Then they invaded Europe.
    2
  17. the cheddar had blue eyes. I don't know where you got 10% in Europe from if western hunter-gatherers are responsible for colored eyes in Europe.
    2
  18. They probably mean a haplogroup, but full-genomic data will not say this.
    1
  19. steppes are not related to blue eyes.
    1
  20.  @celtichistorydecoded  Historically, the Scythians were destroyed by the Sarmatians. The Sarmatians destroyed nomadic sites, but they rarely attacked mixed Greek Black Sea settlements. So the Scythians in a sense existed after. But they were fishermen and traders. Then, in the end, they were absorbed into the Goths of Germanarich. (Chernyakhov culture). There was a separate paper on Moldovian samples. They mainly turned out to be from the Bronze Age Srubnaya culture, probably the early Saka assimilated the local population in Europe. In fact, modern Western Europeans do not so rarely have 10-20% DNA from the Scythians, but they will probably be associated with those Moldavians, but not with Asian pastoralists (aka Don-Altai), like the Tatar Bulgar-Kipchaks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVHYhSVMI8E
    1
  21. not Turkey, Tatars. Volga-Altai groups of Kipchak languages.
    1
  22.  @deniztatl9992  Not wrong. Turks belong to Turkey.
    1
  23.  @deniztatl9992  What nonsense?
    1
  24.  @erikheddergott5514  The paper "Yamnaya 2024" has been released. Proto-IE were specific South Volga horse breeders. Yamnaya formed when they mixed with Dnieper hunter-gatherers who had different degrees of kinship with them. However, the core in the east remained similar to the Volga. Probably the Afonasyevites who went to Siberia were true IE. 7:13 There, in Siberia, in contact with the Paleo-Siberian cultures, was formed oldest Karasuk metallurgical province. Which were able to influence both China and Europe on a significant part of the continent. If so, then the IE people were similar to the Volga-Altai Turkic peoples, not to the main Europeans. Who today are small and invisible.
    1
  25. Because without your genius 65 IQ points, no one could come to this conclusion before.
    1
  26. Why did they all go to this island? Such a herd of elephants was breaking into a miserable patch of land.
    1
  27.  @foxtrot4755  Tatars are not far-eastern Mongoloids, aka Buryats and Kalmyks. It is a Kipchak language group. Siberian Tatars and Bashkirs preserve the Saka anthropo-complex.Volga Tatars are Karasuk culture, Zevakino-Chilikta, Cimmerians and Sarmatians. They all always had Paleo-Siberian ancestry related to the Uralic. Slavs Russians are not related to the Caucasianism of the Volga-Ural-Altaic cluster of indigenous peoples. From the word in general.
    1
  28. Blue eyes are not IE related. The Black Sea IEs originated from the same proto-Europoids - Uraloids from the mammoth steppe. Which then mixed with Caucasoids from Georgia. And they were not Nordic, rather proto-Europeoid "Eastern Mediterranean".
    1
  29.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Both of them (Gimbutas and Russian archaeologists) never said anything like that. XD
    1
  30.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Blue eyes are not related to Indo-Europeans, from the word in general.
    1
  31.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Your favorite Reich, also did not say anything like that. In fact, no western european population, in direct comparison, will show close results. Not even in the top ten, perhaps.
    1
  32.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  You give a book that you probably haven't read. Even Wikipedia says that European populations arose as a result of mixing. Reich has never said that you are Indo-European, or that you are especially close to them.
    1
  33.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Author and intellectual Jared Diamond, in the New York Times, notes that geneticists can now go far beyond studying the personal ancestries of participants in National Geographic's Genographic Project, which looked at small sections of their parents' DNA, namely their mother's mitochondrial DNA and their father's Y chromosome. By looking at DNA from ancient bones, Reich can recover whole genomes. Diamond warns readers not to expect an oversimplified story:[7] Population genetics is a complicated, fast-moving field with many uncertainties of interpretation. To tell that story to the broad public, and not just to scientists reading specialty journals, is a big challenge. Reich explains these complications as well as any geneticist could; others rarely even try.[7] Peter Forbes, in The Guardian, calls the book "thrilling in its clarity and its scope."[4] In Forbes's view, Reich handles racist abuses of human origin stories, such as Nazi ideology, "commendably". Forbes writes that Reich explains how ancient DNA teaches a single general lesson, that the human population of any particular place has repeatedly changed since the last ice age. Any supposed "mystical, longstanding" link between some people and a place based on some kind of racial purity (as reflected in the Nazi slogan of "blood and soil"), is in Reich's words "flying in the face of hard science".[4]
    1
  34.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  Much of the work has focused on Western Eurasia, where in 1786 Sir William Jones discovered that Sanskrit and ancient Greek were related languages. Linguists came to recognise the Indo-European family of languages, spanning Germanic, Celtic, Italic, Iranian and northern Indian languages, but without explaining how these came to be. Reich showed that modern populations in Europe and north India derive from mixing of native populations with Yamnaya people from the steppes north of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea some 5,000 years ago, in separate migrations to the west and the east.[4][9] Corded ware culture described by archaeology corresponds to a stage in the WESTWARD migration. map 0:10
    1
  35.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  If we make a direct comparison, Western Europeans are unlikely to be even in the top ten in proximity to the Yamnaya culture, as I said.
    1
  36.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  I don't need to believe, I tell you 100%. Even trite due to the fact that in Eastern Europe there are populations that never came from Corded ceramics.
    1
  37.  @Non_auro_sed_ferro_recuperanda  It's even funny when you turn to Reich and then give up what he was talking about.
    1
  38.  @fcolucero8867  Yes, from literature fifteen years ago.
    1
  39. Alexander Blok - The Scythians. He also said that a ferocious Hun awaits you in the Urals. And today it is known that both are either one people or have formed their own identity.
    1
  40.  @peymannorouzi4165  So what? A linguistic connection does not mean that they are from the same ethnic, cultural or racial group.
    1
  41.  @peymannorouzi4165  I have bad news for you.
    1
  42. ​ @user-yt3xd2jl6d  Mostly classic brunettes and brown hair. In the atlas of the Russian Empire by Robert Sears says that Italian, or Greek artists could draw inspiration for their sculptures there. True, he did not praise women, because they were forbidden to work, they dressed up in many fabrics, jewelry, etc., and led a relaxed destructive lifestyle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bEPlbkPnD8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmh_VRgkgpo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va5ImPuq6wg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTXrO7C1OWs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE_7HeBZgYE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpSzK3Rbk_o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTnWRdaksfE
    1
  43. hogweed is a mistake of Soviet biologists of breeders who calculated to get cheap feed for cows, but received poisonous ivy. nothing to do with the Scythians. and the Scythians are the proto-Tatar people.
    1
  44. You are not a descendant of the hallstatt, but a degenerate from the trash heap.
    1
  45. Proto IE is a prehistoric South Volga horse breeders. Then they mixed with the Dnieper locals and formed IE. These groups were or were not connected with IE because the dna is distributed unevenly. That's where the Europeans came from. Volga core horse breeders spread to Siberia, where they mixed with ANE and Paleo-Siberian ancestry and by the Iron Age formed classic nomadic cultures aka proto-Tatar - Scythians, Sarmatians, Huns.
    1
  46.  @mikakev1  It's not. Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk is the far-west of Ukraine. Former Polish lands under their Polish panas. They are not related to the east of Ukraine. In reality, they look like Romanian gypsies. Google Hutsuls and other vuiki. There is no relation to the Udmurts and other Finno-Ugric peoples. In addition, they are the most cruel Russophobes. In addition, there in the west of Ukraine was the Jewish Pale of Settlement in the Russian Empire. They were forbidden to settle east. It is there that the roots of ukro-nationalism sprout. They use the names of the Udmurts or Mordvinians as a kind of lower race in relation to them. They call them Androphages - cannibals. From this mixture of hatred of Russophobia, Polish domination and Jews comes their current banderites tribe. However, the skin lightness index is higher in the east. The Volga-Finnic peoples are beautiful people with their own culture, cousins ​ ​ of the Volga-Altaic nomads. No Galizia. Tatar traditional festival in Mordovia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayzOz2hHhuA&t=9s
    1
  47. t's not. Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk is the far-west of Ukraine. Former Polish lands under their Polish panas. They are not related to the east of Ukraine. In reality, they look like Romanian gypsies. Google Hutsuls and other vuiki. There is no relation to the Udmurts and other Finno-Ugric peoples. In addition, they are the most cruel Russophobes. In addition, there in the west of Ukraine was the Jewish Pale of Settlement in the Russian Empire. They were forbidden to settle east. It is there that the roots of ukro-nationalism sprout. They use the names of the Udmurts or Mordvinians as a kind of lower race in relation to them. They call them Androphages. From this mixture of hatred, Russophobia, Polish domination and Jews comes their current banderites tribe. However, the skin lightness index is higher in the east. The Volga-Finnic peoples are beautiful people with their own culture, cousins ​ ​ of the Volga-Altaic nomads. No Galizia. Tatar traditional festival in Mordovia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayzOz2hHhuA&t=9s
    1
  48.  @LuisAldamiz  You're wrong. Early western Xiongnu are descended from the same sources as their neighbors, i.e. Paleo-Siberian-Eurasian. Eastern Xiongnu from Slab Grave. But closer to the Avar period, the Slab Grave component began to prevail, which replaced the Siberians. That is why the Pazyryk Scythians were Turkic-speaking.
    1
  49.  @LuisAldamiz  And if you have been reading magazines and blogging for ten years, then you should understand that three haplogroup samples say nothing about the population. Even 100 samples are not enough to say anything about the population. Moreover, if three are published, then this does not mean that there were no others. Simply, for modern autosomal data is no longer required. So you wasted ten years? Why then did I newcomer take care of what to find out? They are not mixed, early Scythians evolved from the amalgamation of early pastoralists and the Paleo-Siberian population. On the Asian pedigree, they are close to the Baikal and Yenisei hunter-gatherers, not far-eastern Amur hunter-gatherers as modern Turks and Mongols. Xiongnu is a separate big topic. In addition, I did not say anything about the Central Asian Turks, I spoke about the Volga-Altaic cluster, which of course is related to the Uralic. Even the author of the channel did not say anything about them in his lecture.
    1
  50.  @LuisAldamiz  If you look globally at the map, as I understand it, this West Siberian hunter-gatherer was located between the Paleo-American in the east and the historical Okunev culture in the west, if more widely that intermediate link from the Upper Paleolithic between East Asian and Indo-European. Afonasyevo is certainly good, but in the Bronze Age there already lived Dzungarian pastoralists who were Afonsyevo + ANE + Baikal. And in the end, Andronovo still came there. For a complete mess. I try to read about autosomal data, because it is always interesting and nothing is clear.
    1