Comments by "Bobr Kurwa" (@mr.purple1779) on "Celtic History Decoded" channel.

  1.  @LuisAldamiz  If you look globally at the map, as I understand it, this West Siberian hunter-gatherer was located between the Paleo-American in the east and the historical Okunev culture in the west, if more widely that intermediate link from the Upper Paleolithic between East Asian and Indo-European. Afonasyevo is certainly good, but in the Bronze Age there already lived Dzungarian pastoralists who were Afonsyevo + ANE + Baikal. And in the end, Andronovo still came there. For a complete mess. I try to read about autosomal data, because it is always interesting and nothing is clear.
    1
  2.  @عليياسر-ف4ن9ك  Go home Arab. Help yourself to raising IQ.
    1
  3.  @lineage13  not
    1
  4.  @lineage13  ANE means Ancient North Eurasian. It's not East Asian.
    1
  5.  @lineage13  This is Mongoloid, like a Native American.
    1
  6.  @alwaysright3943  They are sandy near-eastern Indo-gypsies. Nothing to do with nomads.
    1
  7. Maybe from other side like? Steppe ancestry in DNA admixtures Volga Tatars former nomadic ppl - Cimmerians, Karasuk _ BA, Zhevakinsky _ BA, Andronovo _ MLBA, Sinashta _ MLBA, Hun _ Early Arpad commoners, Alans, Sarmatians Ural. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-XZoVzu3LE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qB8_ro_moMc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpUxLBpEi6s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6Wri8odPaE
    1
  8. The last of their tribe 3:50 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nW0gKVDz9tc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8UPsOERtBM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k69R1PepXCo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThS9QRXByzc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joKmybML950 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-Uc_3k-eFs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sK0Tho0wgxw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNKSX-7raxY&t=3s
    1
  9.  @rb98769  Brown concept relative to something. We have paleo DNA from Karsuk culture - oldest metallurgical province in Siberia,mixture Yamna, Paleo-Siberian, ANE Then Zevakino-Chilikta, Cimmerians, Sarmatians etc who spread from Siberia. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnAhS-hKOic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCCr_rfmUXU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmh_VRgkgpo
    1
  10. Сheck dna presentation on Afonasievo and Yamnaya cultures. Determine the average statistical between Neolithic, Bronze Age and K13 grafs. Let's say the first three top encountered populations will have the closest relationship.
    1
  11.  @volkerr.  Non Slav Russians are the last of the Mohicans. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFPoLueqDN4&t=208s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJzJdEYRn2w Volga Tatars - European HG 45,4 %, Anatolian neolitic farmer 34 %, Amur River HG 10.8%, Caucasus HG 7.6%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 2.2%, - MDA_Cimmerian cim358, MDA_Cimmerian cim357, Karasuk_BA, Zevakinsky_BA Zevakino-Chilikta, Andronovo_MLBA_Potroshilovo, Andronovo_MLBA_Orak, Andronovo_MLBA_Ust-Bir, Sintashta_MLBA (contaminated), Sintashta_MLBA, Hun_early Arpadian commoner, Sintashta_MLBA_O2, Andronovo_MLBA_Orak_O, Steppe_Maykop, Kubano-Tersk_Late, Rus_Alans_MA, Rus_Anapa_MA, Sarmatian South Ural and close to early Hun Arpadian commoners, Volga (Iron Age), Cimmerians. Bashkirs - European HG 30%, Baikal HG 25.6%, Anatolian neolitic farmer 16.6%, East Siberian HG 9%, Caucasus HG 7.6%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 6.2%, Zagros Neolitic Farmer 5% - Onogundur, Saka (Central Steppe), Scythians (Pazyryk culture), Xionite, Western Turk (Central steppe), Sargat culture, Tocharian (Tarim basin) and close to Siberian Tatars Chuvashs - European HG 45%, Anatolian neolitic farmer 27.2%, East Siberian HG 17%, Caucasus HG 7.0%, Yellow River Neolitic Farmer 3.8% - Saami (Iron Age), Volga Finns (Iron Age), Tagar culture, Sargat culture, Karasuk culture, Cimmerian, Saka (Tian Shan), Wusun. and close to Besermyan, Udmurt.
    1
  12.  @x2y3a1j5  The author is not going to say that there are Celts in Russia. He wants to talk about the Udmurts, who are quite red. And investigate Celtic links to the Scythians. Since the Budins maybe were described as redheads. And also because studies have proven that the last real descendants of the Scythians and Sarmatians are a group of Kipchak (Tatar) languages. Which are also neighbors of the Udmurts of the steppe line. Slavs themselves are not very interesting. There are a million videos about them. But, the small nations behind this seem to never exist, although they have their own deep culture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bEPlbkPnD8&t=183s
    1
  13.  @patrickmcelligott5646  welcome.
    1
  14.  @michaelfritts6249  At least a series of skulls of the Golden Horde population showed that in total they were closest to the Pazyryk (Asian Saka). And although the Tatars are not so much connected with the Golden Horde as with earlier cattle breeders, of course there were no blacks there, but at least Tom Hanks actually looks quite Tatar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g
    1
  15.  @michaelfritts6249  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g&t=706s
    1
  16.  @michaelfritts6249  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osRscWKhu_g&t=706s
    1
  17.  @alfonsfalkhayn8950  Yes, white skin from Siberia is unlike Europeans. Siberians, Finno-Ugric, Turkic, as well as other far-eastern Asians like the Japanese and Koreans have this trait.
    1
  18. The combination of blonde hair and blue eyes is a post-Mesolithic phenomenon in northern Europe, when eastern HG from Siberia began to mate with western HGs. That is why the largest number of blondes in the world live in the region of Finland and Estonia.
    1
  19. Udmurts are closely related to ANE.
    1
  20.  @antoniotorcoli5740  Maybe 30% nomads in those days had shades of hair, obviously no more. Tatar phenotype is mainly specific southern steppe europoid 6:29 with a additional of the north, uralide and mongoloid influence. Although there are many multi-colored hair today, especially among the younger generation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UY1fq6Zm8eE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMebVyRk1v8
    1
  21.  @dude7127  I don't understand what this comment is for?
    1
  22.  @dude7127  That's not what I said. I said that the Tatar phenotype is southern Europeoid (information for those who write before reading 6:28) with various influences. In addition, I know without you what the Tatars look like.
    1
  23.  @dude7127  Well, at least now you know that the Tatars are southern Europoids, who by default are generally brunette, since you do not understand the context in which I said something, and then you could not return and understand this context.
    1
  24.  @dude7127  Tatars do not come from Europe, it is not the same as Scandinavians. Tatar appearance from time immemorial southern Europoids I twice explained why. You yourself took the last line and took my words out of context and now you yourself tell me how it seems to you. But I don't think so. I know what I mean without you.
    1
  25.  @hjrsoft  Tarim's mummies may disagree with you.
    1
  26.  @hjrsoft  And what was their hair color?
    1
  27.  @hjrsoft  They all had reddish, brown, auburn hair.
    1
  28.  @hjrsoft  no all reddish like hell.
    1
  29.  @hjrsoft  You can find paper in Nature magazine about Tocharians, but an easy way to go to the wiki Tarim mummies
    1
  30. Because the haplogroup, this is just a conditional name for the mutation of the sexual chromosome, it does not provide useful information. Haplogroup is only 2% of DNA, while modern research is carried out on 500 thousand markers. Having 89% is not good and does not mean that they are related to the yamnaya.
    1
  31.  @serkankinden5150  They are IE. Sintashta is not Indo-European, but Indo-Iranian.
    1
  32.  @serkankinden5150  But you are not engaged in linguistics, but you go through specialized channels and put forward crazy ideas.
    1
  33.  @serkankinden5150  So, you started with misconceptions when you decided that haplogroups have some meaning. Moreover, began to attribute them to some ethnic groups when they formed, for example, 20 thousand years ago.
    1
  34.  @serkankinden5150  therefore, autosomes are used.
    1
  35.  @kevinmcniff487  What failure? If European HG lived in a rainy and grey climate but Paleo-North Asian lived in permafrost?
    1
  36. Their horse was a descendant of the ancient Tarpans. Small as a pony. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKTUOtOyyLE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnaAF5GYnwk
    1
  37. white skin from East Asia. it's a common condition there.
    1
  38. A delightful story.
    1
  39.  @LawrenceMclean  For horse lords, was used term Turan. Turan not Iran. Aryans are Iranian farmers who were raided.
    1
  40. ​@Leontemplar-yt6ff "Iranian stock" are a near-eastern arabic populations. And here, at best, "Iranic" spoke the pra-proto-language. There is no special relationship here.
    1
  41. @Leontemplar-yt6ff I did not say that the dates aligh with the Bell Beaker. I said that the Scyths shared a common ancestry with Euro, not Persians.
    1
  42. @Leontemplar-yt6ffI have no problem with Britannica. Pastoralists were in Siberia long before the existence of bell beaker. 3700-2500 BC 1:12. In at least half of the pedigree, the Scythians already had proto-europoid anthropology.
    1
  43. No. Native Urals and steppes have fairly light skin.
    1
  44. they never did.
    1
  45.  @joeuoe1998  nonsense. they were never even there.
    1
  46.  @joeuoe1998  There is not a single paper that would prove any mass movement. There is not a single study where there would be any data that one of them is related to sarmatians. Moreover, sarmatians are well known. They're not even blonde.
    1
  47.  @joeuoe1998  There is not a single paper that would prove any mass movement. There is not a single study where there would be any data that one of them is related to sarmatians. Moreover, sarmatians are well known. They're not even blonde.
    1
  48.  @nicholaskazan275  You were just illegally given a certificate, that's the problem. But, the spread of the Kipchak language is perfectly traced. What a historian, such a certificate. LOL Typical of the Pazyrykites, the craniological complex of characters has a certain resemblance to the modern South Siberian race, but is more Caucasoid. It is characterized by a mesobrachicrous, medium-sized braincase and a tall, broad, medium-sized face with a medium-protruding nose. The formation of this type occurs on the territory of Gorny Altai in the Bronze Age, as a result of a mixture of two morphological variants - dolichocrane Caucasoid, with a high and wide face, and brachicran, with moderately pronounced Mongoloid features and a low face. The ratio of initial components in different local groups of the Pazyryk population varies - the Caucasian type in an unmixed form is most often found in the regions of the South-West and Central Altai, and the proportion of the brachican Mongoloid component with a relatively low face is higher among the population of the northern, peripheral, part of the Pazyryk range. Summarizing the results of the study, the following conclusions can be drawn: modern populations of the North Altai anthropological type, which include the northern Altai, Teleuts, mountain Shors, as well as the late Baraba Tatars, are descendants of the carriers of the Pazyryk culture. In its most "pure" form, the craniological complex characteristic of the descendants of the Pazyryks is preserved among the Teleuts and Baraba Tatars (Khakanate of Sibir). The Bashkirs of Mavlyutovo also have a similar craniotype. Moreover, the western Tatars (Bulgar-Kipchak, Bulgar and Kazan Khakanates) have the first place of the Neolithic Indo-Europeans 60-80% of the DNA of the Bronze Age of the steppe + 20-30% of the Altai Bulan-Koba/Pazyryk.
    1
  49.  @nicholaskazan275  All Scythian cultures of the eastern horizon, such as Tagar and Pazyryk, came from the amolgamation of IE and the Paleo-Siberian population. At least 20%, and the Pazyryk 40-50% DNA. Go get an education.
    1
  50.  @nicholaskazan275  Yakuts are not Kipchak language and even not Altayans. You're a liar.
    1