Comments by "Tim Shea" (@timshea4279) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. Who collected the Insurance money after it collapsed Silverstein Properties. Which left them about $5 billion short to rebuild the complexes so they were dependent on public funds they have to repay.
    1
  2. He didn't. The bin Laden's did not fly either domestically or internationally until those restrictions were lifted for everyone.
    1
  3. No & Collapsed after burning 4 hours past its fire rating. Not a surprise.
    1
  4. @Hobojet  jet fuel created the molten metal No one claims this. that was running down the channel rails See if you can figure out in that sentence where your logic breaks down for it being molten steel. Learn about the mossad operation "documenting the event" I know it. The Israelis were only observed after the first plane strike and they "documented the event" along with thousands of Manhattanites. Maybe ask yourself why you only find it suspicious that Jews do it and not the thousands of white people. the insider trading prior to 9/11 90% of it was traced to one trader with no ties to anyone involved in the attacks and was based off months of documentation of a declining airline industry. Explain FBI removing all security camera footage from around the Pentagon SOP for any crime. Rob a convenience store and the first thing they ask for is the security footage. And it's all since been released, BTW. Explain the 2.3 trillion missing from Pentagon budget It was never missing and Rumsfeld never said so. It's never a good look when I know your claims better than you do. the missile hitting the budget analysts office Which was one of 18. The DoD doesn't keep its 50 year budget history on a few desktops in one office. But I will give you some credit: at least you weren't foolish enough to say that's why they destroyed WTC7.
    1
  5.  @Hobojet  where do you get this stuff From the gathered evidence. I understand why you wouldn't know about this. Famous footage of firefighters saying the molten metal was running down the channel rails I absolutely believe they saw molten metal. Can you understand why it most likely wasn't molten steel running down steel channels? Go on. Take a guess. See if you can figure it out. As well as pictures and videos Do you have a metallurgical report showing molten steel? There is still molten debries hot enough to melt concrete in the museums You mean the meteorite with steel rebar sticking out of it? How does concrete melt but not steel? Insider trading linked to the Bush family It was not. NORAD drills on the day Which had no effect on NEADS response. In fact, ranking officials said these drills allowed a quicker response because commanders were already at their stations for the drills. most secure building still no pictures of aircraft Secure how? Explain what cameras were in place to capture an incoming aircraft. What about the testemonony of Norman Mineta You mean when he testified he arrived at the WH as it was being evacuated which was at 9:45? In case you don't know, that's 7 minutes after the Pentagon was hit. Passport goes through exploding buildings Did it? Because it was probably already half way through the building before the wings with the fuel even entered the building. And most likely already out of the building before the fuel ignited. Nah, none of what you believe happened.
    1
  6. No money was lost.
    1
  7.  @W1HURI  Ok Boris. Tell me: what's the borscht like in St Petersburg?
    1
  8. Just no.
    1
  9. @alwilson3204  Yes they did. I don't think you even know what the claim is supposed to be which is "two planes flew after the attacks" which also didn't happen. And gee golly. An emergency response unit set up to train for a simulated emergency response in the largest city in the world!? I'm shocked. Shocked I tell you!
    1
  10. What "WOW"? The money was never missing.
    1
  11. There's no evidence of controlled demolition.
    1
  12. But I also don't think that planes alone destroyed 3 buildings They didn't. The Towers stood for 105 & 55 minutes after the impacts.
    1
  13.  @thiskraftworks  Operation Northwoods You understand that plan never called for the killing of American citizens, right?
    1
  14. Three letters: WTF?
    1
  15. @kessd369  You should stay out of international economics when you don't have a clue what you're talking about. The US dollar is used as the unit of measurement for value, but each country pays in their own currency. So Japan pays in Yen. Russia pays in Rubbles. Germany pays in Euros. Meaning Iraq switching to a Petro-Dollar has Zero effect on the US economy because they're still paying the value of the Petro-Dollar against the international value. Stay in the shallow end, child.
    1
  16. @W1HURI  And it took you a year to figure that out? Yeah. Not sweating your world economic opinion.
    1
  17.  @W1HURI  But i wont bother to correct you Well, those who can, do. Those who can't, brag about their ignorance on the internet.
    1
  18. im always gona believe it was an inside job Well, I can't reason you out of something you weren't reasoned into.
    1
  19. "I'll be the first to admit that our film definitely contains errors. It still does contain some dubious claims, and definitely does come to some conclusions that are not 100% backed up by the facts .....I'm just saying that Loose Change is really not a fair representation of the 9/11 Truth movement." -Loose Change director Dylan Avery YT - Loose Change Debate 9/11 Program 1 Part 1 6:55
    1
  20. How fast should it collapse?
    1
  21.  @anthonyquinn5927  You didn't answer my question. You're the one making a claim: how fast should a 47 story building collapse? And are you unaware that WTC7 was hit by hundreds of tons of steel and concrete when WTC1 collapsed?
    1
  22.  @anthonyquinn5927  If you dont know how long it should take to fall how can you conclude 7 seconds doesnt make sense? Think about your answer before responding.
    1
  23. There's no evidence of your claims.
    1
  24.  @mckcpaul1  What the goddamn does any of that have to do with 9/11? Hussein was an ally with the West when he was fighting Iran. Until he became he wasn't by invading Kuwait. Learn some friggin history before posting!
    1
  25.  @mckcpaul1  some guy in the mountains of Afghanistan UBL lived comfortably in a compound outside of Jalalabad. His mountain retreat was simply a ruse to project an image to his followers. orchestrated two commercial jets to bring down two 110 story skyscrapers with a SAT phone UBL had very little to do with the logistical operation beyond allowing it to proceed. Khalid Sheik Muhammed was the mastermind of the plot and Mohammed Atta ran the operation state side. and a handful of boxcutters Ok Marky Wahlberg but the terrorists also used the threat of bombs. Up until that moment people on the planes believed it would play out like all other hijackings: they'll land and negotiations would start. The best thing to do, with the unknown, was to sit back and let it happen. Thank God Rumsfeld and who ever else in the US government helped Hussein get these chemical weapons You keep saying that but like all conspiracy theories you simply make a leap of faith without once considering other aspects. Like the head of a chemical company meeting the head of state of a country simply so he could sell his products there. Where you lack any sort of evidence is providing something showing they knowingly sold WMDs. You believe because you want to believe. Do you actually believe the governments version of 911 I believe what the evidence has shown. And this evidence exists elsewhere than in a press release from the White House. the only reasons for invading iraq was oil Most of the Iraqi oil contracts went to British and Russian companies. You don't know much about this subject, do you?
    1
  26. @mckcpaul1  Gee. With the big bad US doing all these dastardly deeds someone might get really mad about it. And do something. Like attack them on their own soil. But I'm just spitballin' here. from the people who actually design and build these steel framed skyscapers You mean like WTC Structual Engineer of record Leslie Robertson who full endorses NIST'S conclusions of a fire induced progressive collapse? People like that?
    1
  27.  @mckcpaul1  No threat to anyone? 3000 civilians murdered on their shores, and that isn't a threat? Are you at all capable of independent thought?
    1
  28.  @mckcpaul1  You skipped over my previous point: you said you take the opinion of people who actually build skyscrapers. Leslie Robertson actually built the buildings we're talking about and he fully endorses the NIST Report. Do you accept his opinion? The mental gymnastics should be good here.
    1
  29. @mckcpaul1  And yet here is your comment without anything about WTC builder Leslie Robertson. Maybe Free Speech exist when it's actually used.
    1
  30.  @mckcpaul1  I mention a certain website which has over 3000 signatures from architects and engineers Which A & E's? Was it the computer engineer? The electrical engineer? The elevator engineer? Maybe it's the landscape engineer? You say you listen to people who actually build these skyscrapers yet you offer a list of people, most of who posses neither the education, knowledge or experience to discuss complex high rise buildings. There are less than that 250 people with the qualifications to offer any opinion. But you don't know that and don't care because you have your appeal to authority which goes over well in the echo chamber. Yet when faced with the knowledge that the person who actually built the WTCs fully agrees with the NIST findings, you suddenly go silent. And I haven't even gotten into the multiple other engineering groups who also agree with NIST nor the 2 independent FEA analyses supporting their conclusions. Tell yourself what you need to. There is nothing rational or scientific in your beliefs.
    1
  31. @mckcpaul1  And I addressed AE911T's list and how it is made up of unqualified professionals to comment on high rise collapses. So the real question is: why do you believe these non-builders over actual WTC builder Leslie Robertson?
    1
  32.  @mckcpaul1  You ARE avoiding my question! What do you say about Leslie Robertson. Do not add anything other than this.
    1
  33.  @mckcpaul1  and how he blamed himself for their failure Which has exactly what to do with NIST's collapse explanation? Stop the waffling! The lead Structural Engineer of the very buildings under discussion, regarded one of the top SE's in the US when he was alive, states the NIST Report is accurate in it's collapse progression conclusions. He was the only one alive of the architects and engineers who worked on the project to witness the conditions the buildings were subjected to. Not theoretical but real world. Do you believe him or not?
    1
  34. @mckcpaul1  Peter Ketcham was a software designer employeed to review apps. He was never involved even remotely with the WTC Reports and has absolutely no qualifications to comment on structural engineering or complex collapses. Yes we can absolutely see who you are choosing to believe and why. You are not entitled to your own opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one has the right to make up their own facts.
    1
  35. @mckcpaul1  What's sad is you started by saying you believe people who actually build these skyscrapers and what see is you actually believe those who don't build skyscrapers but simply tell you what you want to hear! And you don't believe those who actually do because they don't. And what's really sad is you don't see a problem with that.
    1
  36. @mckcpaul1  I hope you liked writing that rant. Good to get it out if your system. It wasn't worth anything beyond therapeutic. Do you not understand that your "Robertson blames himself" doesn't help you? That he he wished he built a building more robust to survive the attacks? But he didn't. And they collapsed because of the conditions they endured. Not explosives. You believe people without expertise. You don't believe those who do. That's your bottom line.
    1
  37. is in no way shape or form a conspiracy, its a fucking fact It is not. No money was "missing" and it didn't go out the door on 9/10/01. Rumsfeld was giving an update on a routine audit; something he had done 3 times previously. The date is no more suspicious that those other 3 times when nothing happened. And in his speech he never once uses the words "missing", "lost" or "stolen". You should try reading it some time.
    1
  38. are the same people who tell you what happen 9/11 doesn't exist in a press release from the White House. they never had an invesigation 9/11 was the most investigated crime in US history. And literally started at 8:47 am, September 11, 2001 when the FBI called office SAC's to their stations to begin gathering evidence.
    1
  39.  @arlichar11  the problem is they told us what happened either the same day or the next I simply don't get this. It wasn't held secret that hijackers commandeered planes and used them as missiles. And it wasn't a huge leap of imagination that the number one terrorist in the world, who vowed to attack America, was the quick and obvious suspect. Lots more got fleshed out but at it's core it wasn't a difficult story to find out. the buildings were quickly cleaned up and disposed of.. there was no reports of evidence It took almost a year to completely clear the site. All of the debris was taken to Fresh Kills Landfill where everything was swabbed by hundreds of NYPD detectives and forensic officers. This task continued for 10 years. I'd very much like your definitions of "quickly", "disposed" and "no...evidence". the problem is so many things dont add up, and are extremely suspicious Like what else? It's pretty clear your first claims are not based on facts.
    1
  40.  @rastiga9196  Like wreckage from the site starting to be shipped to China in the first two weeks The first steel didn't leave for China until Jan/02 after American companies wouldn't touch it because of the emotional connection. The last steel was removed from The Pil until May/02. All of the debris was taken to Fresh Kills Landfill where all of it was swabbed by hundreds of NYPD detectives and forensic experts. They did this for 10 years. Or how ALL 7 buildings of the world trade center being demolished No buildings were demolished until well after the attacks. How about the suspicious amount of put options placed on the twin tower Cripes. You all can't even keep your false claims straight. It wasn't the Towers. It was the Airline industry. And they were mostly traced to a single investor who had been following an industry in decline for several months. of the 700+ that were confiscated by the FBI Evidence there was more than one camera that caught the incoming aircraft. How about the dancing Israelis Held and vetted for 70 days and released after finding no evidence they were involved. saying they were there to record the event The translation is "document the event" which they did along with about 1000 other Manhattanites with cameras and camcorders. How about the broadcaster in Britain saying world trade 7 has collapsed 15 minutes before it actually collapsed Jane Standey was actually in NYC when she stated this. And so what? Do you know why she made the mistake she did? Much, much more Please. Keep going.
    1
  41. So you respect paid government shills? Let's see how long it takes you to figure that out.
    1
  42. The day Trump stops claiming he's the best at every single thing ever.
    1
  43. Eddie is not right about anything.
    1
  44. What would you like to know about it.
    1
  45. The only thing dumber than 9/11 inside job theories is numerology.
    1
  46. @Chad03Cobra  And that's simply your ego talking. Convincing yourself you're the smartest guy in the room. When all you did was add some numbers together and then divided and made up the rest. Honestly if you don't see the stupidity in that then call Scientology because I'm sure they'll take you
    1
  47. @Chad03Cobra  You can literally come up with any outcome you want as long as you keep dividing/multiplying/adding/subtracting for how ever long it takes! There's nothing dumber than numerology but Nostradamus predictions come pretty damn close.
    1
  48.  @Chad03Cobra  Enjoy your delusion. It must make dealing with the world easier.
    1
  49. 911 was an inside job It was not. they found traces of thermite and nano thermite They did not. in the dust that once was 110 story skyscraper That's stupid. bldg 7 fell into its own footprint WTC7 collapsed into neighboring Verizon Building. along with all of the evidences against Enron 🤦‍♂ Enron executives were convicted of fraud and went to jail. and that gold disappeared It did not. There was early evidence an attempted break in happened so guards were posted. what brought down those towers was a direct energy weapon Which has never been demonstrated to exist before, during and after 9/11. changed the molecular structure of the concrete which powdered and the thermite was so hot it melted the steel Why didn't the DEW work on the steel? Theres no way an aluminum plane could pierce through steel and concrete F=M x A that hole in the ground at Shanksville was already there It was not. And Cheney said "ofcourse it still stands have you heard any different" So what? which just happened to be what? a mock attack on the twin towers It was not. It was standard hijacking with the plane landing and issuing demands. You literally got everything wrong. Id say that was surprising but par for the course with truthers.
    1
  50. No report claims the final global release of WTC7 perimeter columns was due to heat induced failure.
    1