Comments by "Tim Shea" (@timshea4279) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. It's tough to get insurance on demolition companies who use fire when it destroys or damages 10 buildings in the surrounding area.
    1
  2. Because the buildings stood for 105 and 55 minutes, respectively. People evacuated with the plane strikes.
    1
  3. Or maybe you're just shitty at searching.
    1
  4. @jackdavid8355  Doubtful. "Work" is when you actually get paid for something. Excessive masturbation doesn't count as work. So pry yourself away from the porn and try a little harder at finding the stupid conspiracy videos since they seem so important to your miserable life. How has Scientology not snatched you up?
    1
  5. @jackdavid8355  Well, tell yourself whatever you need to to sleep at night, incel. I found this video by chance years ago. You had some sort of CTer epiphany a few days ago. If you feel that requires a degree then we're talking about a whole other conversation. One which involves you being "evaluated".
    1
  6. Joe Rogan must believe in magic Why?
    1
  7. Over 100 witnesses saw a plane hit the Pentagon. No one describes seeing a missile.
    1
  8. Search "Plasco Buiulding: Tehran" And no building collapsed fully at Free Fall Acceleration. There is no Free Fall Speed.
    1
  9. It was paint.
    1
  10.  @danw.7935  unable to find any peer review for it Neither was the Harrit/Jones paper. It was reviewed by Truther advocates. That's not peer review. And one isn't needed when their own paper shows they found paint. Kaolinite platelets on the XEDS. Endothermic reaction not exothermic. Ignites hundreds degrees lower than thermite. They lit a paint chip on fire and called it paint. And several years ago samples were sent to Mark Basile to verify the results. $5000 was raised for this procedure. Mark took the money and ran. The only reason NIST dissagreed with the finding was a lack of proper chain of custody procedures for the sample I imagine NIST could care less about their findings because even if it was thermite it still doesn't prove CD because there is absolutely no evidence to support WTCs 1,2 & 7 were anything but a natural collapse.
    1
  11. No. Because it wasn't said.
    1
  12.  @lizards7777  Where does Silverstein say quote "pull the building"? Do you not know your own claim?
    1
  13.  @lizards7777  No you didn't. Because this is the quote: "I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse." So again: where does he say, quote, "so we dicided to just pull the building."?
    1
  14.  @lizards7777  Are you having trouble understanding the question? Where does Silverstein state they "pulled the building"? We're 7 posts in now, I've asked the same question each time, and you've yet to address this. One more time: where does Silverstein state "so we dicided to just pull the building"? An acceptable answer is, he didn't.
    1
  15.  @lizards7777  The part I dont get is where he says "pull the building". As I've quoted and highlighted in several posts. I dont need you to quote me what I've already quoted to you. What I need is you to provide evidence of your claim: where he says "pull the building". I literally cannot make it any clearer than that
    1
  16.  @lizards7777  what do you think he meant So we're finally through the looking glass! Where you're not actually quoting what he said, but your interpretation of what he meant. Ok. So you believe by "pull it" he means the building because he follows with "and we watched the building collapse". Two things: when did they attach the cables to WTC7 to "pull it" down, which is the literal demolition definition of "pulling a building"? Oh, and what division in the FDNY is the "Demolition Division"? You remember that Silverstein was on the phone with a FDNY commander right? So if the building is "pulled" following this conversation, it was the FDNY that did it, right? This is your theory? I have more. Let's start there.
    1
  17.  @lizards7777  first off it's not cables You're missing the point Lizard. If you're making the claim that "pull it" is a term for demolishing a building, then you have to apply what that term means. In demolition terms, "pulling a building" means to literally attach cables to supports in a building and literally pull the building down. That's what it actually means. In fact, they actually did this for WTC6. If you are now arguing that that did not take place, then we are left with Silverstein meaning something else when he said "smartest thing to do is pull it". Which is it Lizard?
    1
  18.  @lizards7777  pull is what the boss would say to the worker bees to hit the button to bring down a building Where are you getting this? And again: which division in the FDNY is the Demo Division?
    1
  19.  @lizards7777  you do realize that there has never been another bld to collapse from fire of this size You do realize there has never been a building over 31 stories to have been brought down by CD. By your logic, that rules out controlled demolition. Amazing first time ever and he card it perfectly That's assuming by "pull it" he means CD. We aren't there yet.
    1
  20.  @lizards7777  he just meant it's time to bring it down So why is he also saying the FDNY did that? "...and they made that decision to pull". Are there any other interpretations you want to attribute to him? nist says it came down due to fire for the first time in history and you believe What do you find scientifically impossible with NIST's findings?
    1
  21.  @lizards7777  Liberty plaza ny, was 54 floors and was cd Ok. Mostly wrong and partially you got me on a technicality. Liberty Plaza was not Cd'd and stands today. It was, however, built on the spot of the Singer Tower; a 41 story building which was CD'd. So you got me on the technicality. But the Singer Tower was not brought down using explosives. It was demolished top down, floor by floor, manually, and took over a year to complete. The JL Hudson Building in Detroit, at 30 floors was the tallest building brought down with explosives (there was a 31 story tower in Las Vegas that was violently CD'd but was smaller by height than Hudson). I still don't get what your saying That you've provided a statement which doesn't mean CD-by-explosives given to an organization which doesn't do CD's! All given Silverstein's clarification: "As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building." If you're done you're done. But you're missing out on a valuable education.
    1
  22.  @lizards7777  no other building in history has ever collapse due to fire Search Plasco Building Tehran it fell at free fall speed For a small portion of its collapse. WTC7 collapsed fully 40% longer than Free Fall Acceleration. it's amazing the military was running terriost drills on the same day Were they? And why is this "amazing"? it's crazy it started a war with afganastan who had nothing to do with it Afghanistan was the country harboring UBL. Had they turned him over they would not have been invaded. says the lobby was full of them Again, why is this "crazy"? And the report of bodies in the lobby comes from Barry Jennings who was trapped in WTC7 for several hours. Even he says he didn't see bodies but felt like he was stepping over them. I just don't see how even if this is true it is evidence of an inside job. It's crazy how they say they could hear a explosions come from under there feet before the planes hit Ok let's unwrap this. You're talking about Willie Rodriguez. A janitor at WTC1 who helped firefighters unlock areas. First question: if he's in the basement, how does he know when the planes hit? And WR was interviewed on 9/11 by news outlets and never mentioned bombs in the building. He did an interview on CNN a year later and never mentioned bombs in the building. He was interviewed by NIST and gave testimony for a commission hearing. No mention of bombs in the building. It was only after 1004, having been out of work for 3 years, that he realizes he has an audience who want to hear there were bombs in the building.....and are willing to pay him for it. Only then does he start his "Bombs In The Building" tour. It's crazy how jet fuel will not create temp needed to melt steel beams Normal office fires reach temperatures of 1000C. Steel loses half its strength at 660C. it's crazy how Bush's was in charge of security's Jesus! No! I assume you're speaking of his brother, Marvin Bush. First off, the WTC property is owned by The New York Port Authority. The NYPA has its own police and provided their own security for the WTCs. Marvin Bush sat on the board for a company called Securacom. That company provided security equipment and software to the WTCs, but were in no way responsible for day to day security. And neither was Marvin Bush who left the board of Securacom in June 2000. how the month prior airplane insurance was pulled on the bldg I don't know what this means. It sounds like you're talking about the insurance taken out on the WTCs in June of 2001, which is when Silverstein won the contract. what have you offered me to improve my knowledge of the situation? If you read what I just wrote and honestly don't think I've answered that question, that all your claims are based on false information, then I couldn't possibly help you further.
    1
  23. The agency responsible for finding the missing 2 trillion was housed in building 7 No it wasn't. Which collapsed for no apparent reason You don't know anything about this subject, do you?
    1
  24. There's no evidence of this.
    1
  25. And you'd be right. Because none of that happened.
    1
  26.  @JCS1964-i7w  Yes you can forget about them because they were held for 70 days and released after finding no evidence tying them to the attacks nor any direct connections to Mossad.
    1
  27. I can't imagine how a plane can get that low to be able to strike at that angle What does this even mean? What is "impossible" about a plane crashing? you would think it would crash before Why? 'Just 'cause'?
    1
  28. No. And your bigotry is showing.
    1
  29. It was all done by George W Bush and Dick Chaney It was not. It was a Directed Energy Weapon It was not. That's not a thing. Directed Energy Weapons have been around since Nicola Tesla who invented them They have not. There has not been one demonstrable example of anything resembling what you're claiming here. The steel from the Towers turned to dust in the air It did not. and the only thing that could do that is high energy Since it did not happen this is false. Check out Dr. Judy Wood she is a scientist who can prove it was a Directed Energy Weapon Wood has not come close to demonstrating anything she is written has any basis in scientific fact, nor calculated the energy requirements for such a weapon. Oh. And spent 5 years in a coma from a severe brain injury.
    1
  30. Lost 2.3 trilloonnn dollars Rumsfeld never used the word "lost". because they prosest a strange election result Ahhh! Now your comments are making sense. which is legal But breaking into a government building and assaulting police is not. That really needed to be explained to you?
    1
  31. Thermite can be used in this application Thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive.
    1
  32. It was not.
    1
  33. “transcription error led to the confusion, but conspiracy theorists latched onto Rumsfeld’s supposed admission and spread it over the Internet.” - Parade magazine
    1
  34. flat earth is dumb as shot, but to answer your question, they believe a tall ice wall surrounds the earth, keeping everything in. And everyone saying differently is "in on it". Don't ask me why. That's as far down a rabbit hole of lunacy I intend to dive on this idiocy.
    1
  35. everyone should watch LOOSE CHANGE Which version? Because the information presented was so bad and wrong they had to make 3 more watered down versions of it.
    1
  36. Maybe because there's nothing to debate. Truther claims do not survive minimal scrutiny therefore any "mainstream media speaker" could verify this for themselves. It would be pointless to have some conspiracy theorist on when all they're going to do is make wild, unsubstantiated claims they have no evidence of.
    1
  37. @Deemah  You know you just offered an example of "the government" rejecting a false flag event, right?
    1
  38.  @deemahalsanonah1944  So you do believe not all "government" is the same monolithic entity?
    1
  39.  @deemahalsanonah1944  You're using a 50 year old plan, never implemented, and rejected by "the government", as some sort of "proof" for today. Even though that plan never called for the murder of American citizens nor attacks on American soil. Do you not see the madness of this claim?
    1
  40.  @deemahalsanonah1944  what madness people accept Bush lied about WMD No, the madness is for a second time you've used a claim about something else as "proof" of a 9/11 inside job. Do you ever plan on offering actual evidence of your claim? By the way, WMDs were found in Iraq. You should try looking up own assertions sometime. walking away from Afghanistan after giving the Taliban Do you understand that the Taliban had nothing to do with 9/11? Of course you don't! even more sophisticated weapons including aircraft All military hardware left behind in Afghanistan was rendered inoperable. Cripes, stop branching out into subjects you know even less about.
    1
  41.  @deemahalsanonah1944  *American troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011, but their discoveries were kept secret by the U.S. government, the New York Times reports." -Yahoo News/2014 and Colin Powell had a vial of Iraqi WMD powder at the UN "Less than a teaspoon of dry anthrax, a little bit about this amount - this is just about the amount of a teaspoon - less than a teaspoon full of dry anthrax in an envelope shut down the United States Senate in the fall of 2001." -Powell
    1
  42.  @deemahalsanonah1944  Yahoo.....reporting a story that appeared in the NY Times. You would have known that had you read it instead of just reacted. And he was showing an example of the amount that was sent to the Senate and brought it to a halt. He wasn't saying it was actually anthrax. Cripes that should have been obvious!
    1
  43. No. Very few believe that nonsense.
    1
  44. Rumsfeld never once said the money was "missing".
    1
  45.  @mikemcalkich4576  he does say it is missing without saying the exact words missing Did you really just try to call me out while admitting I was right? Only in conspiracy world does that kind of logic make sense. Rumsfeld never once says the money is missing, lost or stolen. He was describing outdated accounting systems that couldn't speak to each other and correlate transactions. He does not imply the money went out the back door, but receipts could not be tracked for expenditures on such things as tanks and helicopters. This was reported on at least a dozen times dating back to the Clinton administration. So you may want to take your own advice there champ. Because this was as dumb and ill-informed reply I've come across.
    1
  46. @mikemcalkich4576  What happened Mike? Realized you didn't "research" enough? [mic drop]
    1
  47. I don't think 9/11 was an inside job. And I'm far from a moron. Try me.
    1
  48.  @themadhanna  I'd guess you don't try women either. Not by your choice. But you knew what I meant. Nice hand waving. Always good to recognize your limitations early.
    1
  49. And then the black orange hole opens up and destroys everything it touches.
    1
  50. How is this proof of an inside job?
    1