Comments by "Tim Shea" (@timshea4279) on "JRE Clips" channel.

  1. What the hell are you talking about?
    1
  2.  @percydevries  And exactly how many times should it have been shown that day?
    1
  3. Because Trump is a moron.
    1
  4. Wall O' Text. Worthless.
    1
  5. the b.s. Building 7 narrative Which is what?
    1
  6. No. Eddie doesn't know the facts at all. Just what he's read off conspiracy websites. And then dismisses any counter argument as a "smear campaign". The very definition of cognitive dissonance.
    1
  7. No they did not. The speech given by Rumsfeld never once referred to money lost or missing.
    1
  8. So?
    1
  9.  @joonpak  Again, so? Or so what? What importance does an insignificant building where no one died have to anyone?
    1
  10.  @joonpak  I don't remember the quote exactly but was he talking about 9/11 itself or specifically WTC7? Because I wouldn't be surprised if very few people know it collapsed. And again I say: so what?
    1
  11. Yes it did.
    1
  12. @asad-kc8zf  The evidence has been pretty well documented. You've just never bothered yourself to look for it. And what evidence do you have to state "most surveilled building"?
    1
  13. @asad-kc8zf  If you're legitimately asking that question then you are no where near ready for me. I've read most of the investigative reports on this subject: FBI's PENTTBOM, 9/11Commission, NTSB, NIST, FDNY and on and on. If you're seriously asking "documented where" then I can safely conclude all you know about this subject came from Loose Change.
    1
  14. Never before had a building been left to burn unfought for 7 hours.
    1
  15. It is common knowledge now that it was an inside job Still only with fringe groups on the internet. And every day less and less.
    1
  16. Why? Did you miss the plane strikes and subsequent fires?
    1
  17. The real problem is that practically all of the diesel fuel was found to have been pumped out of the tanks during clean up. WTC7 collapsed from normal office fires, which is all that was needed.
    1
  18. Ok Ivan.
    1
  19. There's no evidence of a missile and all the evidence is a plane.
    1
  20. just like our stolen elections That's not a thing.
    1
  21.  @cfb4208  Was that supposed to be a counterargument? More nonsense? Wake up? Stop listening to drug addicts who peddle crappy pillows.
    1
  22.  @cfb4208  What's hilariously sad is you actually believe that. When every other GQP recognizes they lost 3 elections in a row, all because of Trump. Hold on to your fantasy as long as you can.
    1
  23. What doesn't make sense to you?
    1
  24. diesel does not burn unless it is under extreme pressure Well, I have now heard it all. 'gas doesn't catch fire'. I have to get off YT.
    1
  25. Jane Standey stated WTC7 collapsed about 20 mins before it did. At that point it had been burning for almost 7 hours.
    1
  26. Financial group.
    1
  27. If this were in any way true the "criminals" wouldn't have to perform those crimes.
    1
  28. How?
    1
  29. 🤦‍♂ No. Not it wasn't Adolph.
    1
  30. No. The money was neither missing or lost.
    1
  31.  @nightnday6675  I think that's what I said. And no bombs were used at the WTCs.
    1
  32.  @marklewen9384  Oh great. Here I thought there wasn't going to be any proof. I'm so glad someone somewhere on the internet showed up because they heard something from someone who felt something 21 years ago. You are spouting lies and nonsense You may want to rethink who you are directing that at.
    1
  33.  @marklewen9384  i can go on all day If you mean throw nonsense at the wall for which I have no response to, you're correct. Numerologists see what they want to see and isn't worth addressing. Whenever you wish to discuss the facts of the case, I'm game. We saw how your first attempt went.
    1
  34.  @marklewen9384  OK this is either Poe's Law or you're too far down a rabbit hole of delusion for rational discussion. Good luck in life.
    1
  35.  @XxDanny80xX  I got the general gist of your post but you could you try it in more coherent t English next time? And two years on and you're no closer to proving any claims. When you're invoking two comedians for your information you're not even worth my time.
    1
  36.  @XxDanny80xX  It's all bells and whistles here. I'll try running that jumble of word salad through my moron to English decipher later.
    1
  37.  @deemiaan  Where?
    1
  38.  @deemiaan  Was I wrong? That's where the ad hominem border becomes legitimate criticism.
    1
  39.  @deemiaan  I can respond to any argument about 9/11. Except when it is nonsensical. So again: was I wrong? Because avoiding this question borders you on an ad hominem of your own.
    1
  40.  @deemiaan  Except when the response was directed specifically at what they wrote. Go read what you yourself quoted and tell me if I'm wrong. I haven't even begun to school you on 9/11 yet. And for the record: I'm not offended by your ad hominem attack.
    1
  41. 9/11 was controlled demolition No it wasn't. you can plainly see the explosions No you cannot. why did the third bldg go down Because it was left to burn and survived 4 hours past its fire rating. the pentagon with a14 ft hole The ASCE Report documents severed or damaged columns 90' across the first floor. made by a missile Over 100 eyewitnesses describe a plane hitting the Pentagon. No one describes a missile. there never was plane debris to be seen anywhere There was literally plane debris everywhere. this was the excuse to bomb IRAQ Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. again and lose again followed by Afghanistaqn 🤦‍♂ Unbelievable. The US invaded Afghanistan first because that was where bin Laden was being protected. And now Merica wants to go to UKRAINE The US has absolutely no intentions of entering Russia's illegal invasion of a sovereign country.
    1
  42. Only the true skeptic will change his mind when presented with appropriate evidence. Only the cultist will not.
    1
  43.  @onthelvl8291  How does NDT on Rogan make my comment "bullshit"? Rogan used to be a Moon Hoaxer. Upon discovering new information, or realizing his "evidence" was faulty, he changed his mind. How does NDT change that equation to a falsehood? This should be good.
    1
  44.  @onthelvl8291  You realize you're out of your mind, right? No. No you actually don't. And that's as far down the rabbit hole of delusion I intend to chase you. Good luck, if you ever make it out of your basement.
    1
  45.  @onthelvl8291  I present facts "you're talking about DeGrass the RAPIST" Has NDT been convicted of this crime or even brought to trial? "Neil(and bob the rapist) IS a cultist. A high priest cultist that presents nothing but some trippy speculation" 😳 "by that known astrophysicist Bergagina somethin" You presented an unqualified accusation, an ad hominem character assassination and an astrophysicist you can't remember the name of. Yeah. Facts. 🙄 That you don't know the difference is why you are still living in your parent's basement. Get your shots I have them. Ironically, living in your parent's basement, you won't need them. But hey, don't get them. I believe in Darwin.
    1
  46.  @onthelvl8291  Aw. I hope that gave you the huge woody you were hoping for. Always fun to watch the basement dwellers live out their WoW fantasies. Good luck. I have no need to "deal with you". I'm positive evolution will take care of that. Evolution, in short, means survival of the fittest. You're welcome.
    1
  47. What melted steel?
    1
  48. Eddie has no facts. He confuses it with wishful thinking.
    1
  49. You may have an argument, but it still doesn't make 9/11 an inside job.
    1
  50. @dotmatrix01  Awesome. Linking yourself in with the tin foil hat crowd. Simply awesome.
    1