Comments by "Russell ward" (@russellward4624) on "Sky Sports News" channel.

  1. When was Ckty found guilty of cheating? I missed it.
    3
  2. How have the cheated? What's the evidence?
    3
  3. Unlikely. Finals are usually 1-0 or penalties.
    3
  4. ​@mr_specialist9253 it's not stupid. The buyback isn't until next year so they can get the same money plus an extra year to get them back to the PL
    3
  5. How is itmonly everton? Forrest were deducted points. Lcfc were charged.
    3
  6. Yea zero.
    3
  7.  @Shyne282  No. Pep just said this week only small teams are worried about selling to rivals.
    3
  8. You know they're not.
    3
  9. Only signed 1. Maybe you mean chelsea?
    3
  10. They may have a financial idea what they're doing but the players they're choosing there is nomclear idea. Buying Aubamayang for Tuechel and then fired him a week later. That's poor planning.
    3
  11. ​ @Mr.93.20  they loteraly increased the fee every time City made an offer. They started at 100m, then 130m, then 150m and I even heard claims of 200m. Spurs just weren't going to sell to City for any price.
    3
  12. Ronaldo isn't going to a team to be depth.
    3
  13. But they're clearly not making top 4 next year.
    2
  14. Real played a back 5 with 9 in the box. What are they supposed to do?
    2
  15. @msizingubane9861  he's saying this is the manager is lying. They need to sell Ghallager to meet PSR. Atletti can't buy him unless they sold Felix. Nobody wanted him so Chelsea, who didn't want him had to buy him to get the Ghallager sale through. So now they need to clear more wages to fit Felix in, so Sterling is the obvious candidate.
    2
  16. The same people that said Haaland wouldn't cut it?
    2
  17. On what basis? Did Italy invade Portugal when we werent looking?
    2
  18. ​@msatti3013 what's the evidence they're true?
    2
  19. ​ @investingtips2957 that's what people said with EUFA and CAS ruled 9xs there was "no evidence".
    2
  20. Because FDJ is a downgrade.
    2
  21. Depends on what you mean by big club. Win trophies regularly? Sure and City do that. Have loads of fans in Indonesia? Why would anyone care? Have 8 pot noodle sponsers? Don't care.
    2
  22. ​@greengrass811 The difference is those countries have leaders in the team, England doesn't. Leadership is a huge issue with the team.
    2
  23. 2011-12
    2
  24. ​@VR46314 yea totaly not Real, Utd etc.. breaking transfer record after transfer record the last 30m years. Lol
    2
  25. Then you're clueless. It still exists exactly has its always existed. You just don't understand how it works, what the rules are and what it's purpose is.
    2
  26.  @TomC8042  because they followed the rules. You want clubs punished for following the rules? City were cleared of any wrong doing. You want clubs punished with no evidence?
    2
  27.  @chaitanyagupta8902  yes they can sell him for 60m next year, get out ofnthe ucl group and qualify for the ucl next year by finishing top 4 with Haaland which =160m. Or they could sell him for 150m and not make top 4, not get out of the group. Gee which is better?
    2
  28. When isn't Rashford out of form? If he was from Ukraine nobody would speak about him. Great guy, average footballer.
    2
  29. ​ @dannyunderwood6066 they're literaly not. This rule only was made after NUFC takeover.
    2
  30. ​ @dannyunderwood6066 can you provide a single piece ofmevidence City have?
    2
  31. ​@StephenC1908this is a different case. The PL case will happen in november this is a separate situation where the PL passed a rule despite not meeting the minimum number of clubs approval to go into effect.
    2
  32. ​ @Aries_Alpha that's not how it works. Getting rid of the rule now doesn't change anything from 2014. If you get a ticket for speeding today and thencourt date is set for 2 months then the speed limit is changed a month before the case doesn't negate the ticket.
    2
  33.  @Aries_Alpha  why would I hope? This is how the court system works.
    2
  34.  @Aries_Alpha  no it is criminal law. The claim is the PL rule breaks english law. You can't implement any rules you want. They have to comply with the law.
    2
  35. Because they don't want to lose games and get fired. The public doesnt want to see the 25th player in the squad playing over the stars. Stars are why people watch.
    2
  36. And Stones.
    2
  37. Paul "I might be wrong" Merson should change his name to Paul "Im always wrong" Merson. Gknzalez is an 8 not a 6. So hes not Rodri's replacemnt. He will 100% play with him. Marmoush is 100xs better than Grealish. What is he smoking?
    2
  38. But the group staged sucked. The games were utterly pointless. Eveeyone knew who was going through.
    2
  39. ​ @kulhemhlongo winners of the UCL and their counterparts around the world.
    2
  40. Not Different rules you just don't understand ffp and psr.
    2
  41. @ianphillips9455  what's that got to do with being dishonest? Everton knew they were going to fail also. They'd been warned for several seasons.
    2
  42. Man Utd ruining football again.
    2
  43.  @deansmith2198  of course they do. They always do this with City. Include add ons, wages,... anything they can find to make headlines. Its 75m plus add one that could become 100m. But they never include add ons for anyone else.
    2
  44. ​ @ONEWAYLEEWAY utd have spent more. Where are they? We don't fear clubs spending money. We're not utd or lfc fans that want a system where they spend 100m and everyone else can only spend 10m. They're scared of competition. We arent. If you're run better you'll win and I'll tip my hat.
    2
  45. @ai5322  of course not. Arsenal dont lose sleep over losing because that's what they do. They're losers that celebrate "challenging" for trophies but never winning them.
    2
  46. He drew another game. Are they not supposed to cover that?
    2
  47.  @ThePickledOnion  and Fred.
    2
  48. Of course. But women don't do this.
    2
  49. Yea because Kane would totaly have trouble scoring goals in a weaker league on a team who's wage bill is 28xs the bottom club.
    2
  50. It's not. The league was weak and he took over a team that spent half of last season in 1st to win only 1 trophy. Pellegrini won 2 against tougher competition.
    2