Comments by "Russell ward" (@russellward4624) on "Sky Sports News" channel.

  1. They weren't getting out of the group the old way anyway.
    2
  2. 1 cooperated the other didn't.
    2
  3. Never a penalty
    2
  4. ​ @doliniplanini2260 low impact? The teams success dropped 50% without him.
    2
  5.  @ForeverBlazed  Chelsea football club. Do you follow football?
    2
  6. When someone provides evidence.
    2
  7. Can't hit someone before you've proved your case.
    2
  8. @enes5917  no he had 200m on the bench the other day. But what difference does that make? Hes got all the best players right? Hes the best manager right? Players on the bench can't effect the game.
    2
  9. Because they failed the finacial sustainability and City havent.
    2
  10. @BritishRosie-es3zr  so tell me what the evidence is. Even Rob Harris admits he unaware of any evidence.
    2
  11. Past thier peak? Who?
    2
  12. What's points got to do with being attacking?
    2
  13. @frankblack1935  if 51 dope. His 1st post had nothing. To do with goals. His whole argument was they had the most points. Points doesn't = attacking football.
    2
  14. @JoaoPereira-jv2gm  you didn't mention goals though did you? You said points.
    2
  15. Because they think they'll have the same problems NUFC had last year.
    2
  16. I'd be shocked if Ajax spend 30m. They don't have that kind of money.
    2
  17. Can't invest in the squad? They spent 200m last summer. They've spent more than any other club.
    2
  18. @stuartm5166  but they don't have no money to invest. They just spent 200m. Or are you arguing utd should be able to spend 500m every year and buy success? You can't pretend they have no money to spend after spending big.
    2
  19. What's the evidence of either?
    2
  20. @user-rt7jn6oe2r  charges aren't evidence. They're the claim. Claims aren't evidence. When you're charged with a crime the prosecution doesn't say "we have 115 charges" and the jury says "well then guilty". What's the evidence?
    2
  21.  @SongofIceandTea  That's evidence that Real are a great team not the league. The other teams are awful. Look how poorly the 4th team from Spain does every year. They get destroyed.
    2
  22. This is the game to make a mistake. Copenhagen had no chance to win so it doesn't matter.
    2
  23.  @jarveyjaguar4395  no it isn't. They did exactly what Barca are doing. Spending money they didn't dint have depending on ucl qualification to bail them out. Come up short and lost ownership of the team. They've now been run efficiently and just won the league.
    2
  24. Theres no quota. You don't have to have any English players and they still have foreign spots open. Hes been injured. Rodri can't play every game.
    2
  25. Why?
    2
  26. They need a 6 that can pass and defend. Someone to shield the defense and link the attac. Get the ball to the forwards in a position they can take advantage of. It's not a coincidence that afc have become good since they finally found a 6.
    2
  27. The rules are clear. They can't have set point deductions because every situation is different.
    2
  28. But they bought lots of players and don't have UCL money to mitigate.
    2
  29.  @donandres10  no they don't. They can't hold playing time hostage to force players to give up money they're owed.
    2
  30. You're very confused. This has nothing to do with the 115 case. They signed a bunch of players in January because they didn't sign anyone in the summer and have had a plethora of long-term injuries. Plus they sold 100m worth of players for the 5th year in a row.
    2
  31. They'll never win another title.
    2
  32. @Valpo2004  I hear you but surely that's better than whatever qualification they used for Benfica, Dortmund etc.. they wanted to expand it so winners makes sense.
    2
  33. The problem is with PSR. If they loan him out and buy another 70m player to replace him and pay them big wages, because when you spend 70m they want big wages, you can't make it work financially. You have to offset at least some of that with a sale.
    2
  34. They don't kiss on the lips. You don't even kiss on the cheek. You kiss in the air next to the cheek. Nice try.
    2
  35. Had slowed down? They were in for the quad until last spring.
    2
  36. Bayern bottled it right?
    2
  37. Cheers
    2
  38.  @tlangelanishikwambana8596  yea if Stones, Diaz, Ake, & Walker weren't injured they could have.
    2
  39.  @worldclass1401  I'm with you. I've been asking g people for years to provide a single example and I'm still waiting. I can't even get a consistent definition of sports washing. I used to ask for that 1st to establish what were talking about and when I showed they didn't do that people started shifting the definition. As far as I can tell sports washing is when a Muslim owns a club.
    2
  40. Whats enacting illegal rules got to do with foreign?
    2
  41. This doesn't effect that in any way.
    2
  42. Yea so odd, the team that won the Treble earned a lot of revenue. Who'd have guessed? Lol
    2
  43.  @jc-16.  have you enjoyed the last 20 years with no PL titles?
    2
  44.  @Mac_Kymera  but the big clubs run the league, especially lfc, afc and utd. They pushed for ffp not bourmouth. They're the ones that pushed for the superleague. They're the ones that started the PL. They push for all the ucl changes that have happened. It's always the big clubs that move the needle.
    2
  45. ​ @danielca3 they literally didn't. He was paid to do consulting for another club. This isn't abnormal. But it's clear you've not looked into the claim at all because it happened 2 years before ffp even existed. So what do they have to gain by faking a payment to avoid ffp 2 years before it existed to save 1m? Why would they risk criminal prosecution for such a nothing burger?
    2
  46. How can UEFA take actions against the usa? They arent in eufa.
    2
  47. Did you forget the decision that weongle went in Uyds favor that gave them points they didn't deserve against wolves?
    2
  48.  @wisdomnzube2330  lol 3 weeks ago they had the most depth in the league. A manager that had Pep's number. The best English player, the world's best player, the best cb, the best goalkeeper, but now they're too weak to compete. Lol
    2
  49. Pep was able to play without a true striker because he had a team full of goal scorers in another positions. Arsenal dont have that.
    2
  50. But they aren't actualy getting much from those sales. Koulibally for example was sold for €23m but paid €38m so they've lost money on him and because he was only there 1 year most of the 38m counts against ffp this year. Chelsea have also lost a lot of revenue not qualifying for ucl. Not only missing out on 60 guarantee but another 20m in sponsorship because you get less if you don't qualify for ucl.
    2