Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1.  @seanniemeyer5437  The invaders are being defeated? wrong and wrong obviously. Are you alright? can you look at the map? also read up on Ukraine's recent history.
    2
  2.  @Macbrother  You always fantasize and make up all sorts of doo doo about your enemies. And why are the Russians your enemies? lol. So much hate. And for what? Are you ok?
    2
  3. Speak with substance. What's this bla bla bla?
    2
  4.  @gabrielantonio5907  becareful with wikipedia. And no, you're wrong. You're reasoning can be applied much better to your country for 2 reasons. The first obvious. The 2nd is from observing you. Congratulations 😂
    2
  5.  @everaimless  😂 I just read what you wrote. Your 2nd sentence is obviously bs. But so was your first. Shouldn't you be citing global warming stats?
    2
  6.  @Messa1980  👌
    2
  7.  @jefflengyel6431  they'renot concentrated there? They must be. Be flexible.
    2
  8. You realize you're mocking yourself with that statement don't you? Is shows its working.
    2
  9.  @MrVeryfrost  yes apparently thats what you're trying to do. You realize the victim of these Parthian tactics always think they're gaining the upperhand? Thats the key. I'm not sure the Ukrainian army is as dumb as the pro-Ukrainian followers, yet they will be prey to this strategy. The Russians suffered itvfrom the Mongols. They used it themselves on Poland/Kiev, Napoleon/Borodino, Germans/Moscow. In those encounters the bith sides had heavy casualties. Unlike here. <----Thats the red flag right there. I'm not saying its definite as I'm sure the NATO is weary of the incoming 300k troops and will prepare as much as possible. What can they do when the numerical ofds change from 5:1 to 2:1? Will be interesting esp in the winter.
    2
  10.  @morganodonnell1239  what have you been doing all this time since February? Zzzzzz and you still keep up to date daily? Ahahaha
    2
  11. ​ @MnemonicCarrier Why are you speaking of newks? As if they don't have a more upgraded arsenal than the US. Both sides have new clear deterrents ND it's no laughing matter. Russia is escalating by creating an intermediary deterrent one step above but 1 step below the tactical newk. It's 18x Kinzhal. Everyone knows they will succeed in implementing them. How will they be used?
    2
  12.  @13thmistral  huh? I was following along until the last sentence. Again HIMARS. You really took a bite out of that one. (Psst! The Russian version: Tornado-S has a higher payload, a faster delivery and about 25% longer range, and they have more of them than the Ukrainians do HIMARS notvto mention more ammunition.) Its not the gamechanger in the way they're telling you. It is a gamechanger though. Let me explain: Russians put out a piece about Wagner group recruiting prisoners. There's even a cannibal among them. Scary stuff huh? Well no worries. The Ukrainians put out a counterpiece literally days after about how they killed a Wagner group. Do you know how? Tou guessed it! HIMARS! It was the first word of the headlines! You see? You're absolutely right. It is a gamechanger.
    2
  13. 'So much land'? Thats a trick question. Yes? 😂
    2
  14.  @robm1392  thats not what he said. Again your bias betrays your senses. He said Blinken's remarks help the channel and it had nothing to do with Ukrainian/Russian successes. ;-)
    2
  15.  @bdd2195  huh? What da pock???? Don't do that
    2
  16.  @bdd2195  err my name isn't Igor.
    2
  17.  @bdd2195  man you're drunk! Ok bye
    2
  18.  @thedon7244  duuuude you used the word 'bot' followed by 3 emoji's. Do you know how to read? Try
    2
  19. ​ @MrAmhara they are concerned. These actions are done to convince us otherwise. What do these missile attacks do against Russia? It creates more friends. It helps the Russians calibrate their systems to render these weapons practically ineffective. They've become a cost effective disaster. Look past the drama. The Russian ground forces are a grade above Western counterparts. Our missiles are like stones thrown at a Roman legion.
    1
  20. ​ @BlackMan614 I think he does it first to troll, and it would be even more funny if it improved his YT ratings. No one from his viewer base believes the story. Russian humour I suppose. We in the liberal West don't share double meanings in narratives to mock authorities, or do we? Perhaps we'll learn one day, perhaps not. This is the type of confusion overlords hate.
    1
  21. Who's Steiner?
    1
  22.  @Myndir  they explained it well as is. Why does it have to be a shock? Biased much? Biased enough to lie?
    1
  23.  @Rigardoful  nope. Nothing has changed. Its just a micro level back and forth. More insignificant for Russians because generally they lose much less than the Ukrainians. I think they're trying to perfect a defensive tactic. They were probably caught off guard not thinking that the Ukrainians would actually attack there as it is not very significant and close to Russian borders. Perhaps the Ukrainians should have feinted there first and pushed into Kherson but maybe they didn't expect the Russians to react w a rotation in the north which further proves its lack of strategic importance? Just a guess I think the Russians as well as NATO are hesitant to show other aspects of military warfare, avoiding exposing the weaknesses in their military equipment. So Russia is just testing out a modern legion/phalanx structure. Ukrainians are poking at it for pr. I used to think Russiaight have interests to take all of Ukraine but probably its already being prepared to become a Iraq/Afghanistan by the CIA, meaning Ukraine (is already destroyed). Russia would have to gain enough to protect its regions, to be out of the range from artillery at least. The propaganda war could favor the Russians when they occupy the western half as the citizens will see for themselves the difference between the Zelensky regime and the Russians. This will be a delicate situation for both sides-esp Zelensky as the pressure will mount in all aspects. Usually too delicate for going the civilized route. But the CIA trained cells will be there. I heard thats where most of their training has gone to while the front lines are more cannon fodder. Russia will play this very slow, even slower than now after they take Odessa. It will be slow anyways. 'Denazification' is a very challenging goal. Its the Russian military/intel vs western intel-trained subversive cells. Can Russia stop Ukraine from becoming an Iraq? It will show what they are capable of head to head. This war in the front lines doesn't show that much in terms of a real hot war. I heard though that it has shown the Russians have some enemy/foe detection issues which must be pretty serious.
    1
  24.  @Rigardoful  xd kkkkkk cope behehehe. I see words don't mean much too you.
    1
  25.  @Rigardoful  i keep forgetting that I have to constanyly remind people like:look at the gdneral map. Cope? Smh. You should remind yourself everyday. Instead of telling others to cope and making a fool of yourself ;- 'cope' is a lower than 90iq word.
    1
  26.  @Rigardoful  yes that what they do (at least on planet earth) test weapons and tactics. XD funny isn't it. Maybe strange?
    1
  27.  @VIKING1379  🤔 vodka keeps you warm in the winter. Who's going to drink more, the Ukrainians or Russians?
    1
  28.  @VIKING1379  You actually believe that crap? interesting
    1
  29.  @VIKING1379  yeah yeah bla bla bla. You're very gullible. Russia lies the most? kkkk You have no idea about lies.
    1
  30.  @kurtwicklund8901  do you know anything about Borodino? Let me explain. It was the bloodiest battle of the Napoleonic war. Napoleon admitted that battles gave him a rush. This one gave him nightmares. The Russians withdrew with reasonably heavier losses than the French so it was considered a French victory. Why did the Russians offer this pitched battle out of the blue? It was to ensure Napoleon comitted himself all the way to Moscow. At the end of the battle, he was in a real pickle. Advance and lose his army to the winter wasting precious months? Or retreat which would make him look weak to Europe, to his troops, basically signalling the war was lost. The difference with this and Borodino? The Russians are losing much less troops with a much smaller army. Do you smell anything? The Russians did the same to the Germans at the battle of Moscow. The Germans thought they had a chance to take it. The Russians ked them on but made them fight for every inch providing just enough reinforcements for the Germans to slowly grind forward. When the arrived to Moscow, in the nick of time, a contingent of fresh special forces finally halted their advance. While the Germans had high hopes to take Moscow, the Russians all along the German approach knew the Germans lost the war. The Germans would learn not much later. This was in winter of 1941-1942 and the war would go on for another 3.5 years.
    1
  31.  @henrysaari1891  it's the EU and the Ukrainians which are blocking grain to Africa atm.
    1
  32.  @kodakberry2231  Russians have comventional nukes with no fallout.
    1
  33. ​ @imapimplykindapimp  You mean Ukraine isn't a stepping stone towards Russian conquest? You have been plugging your ears everytime they say break Russia apart. Better yet, read some reports from think tanks well before 2022. Can read books written about it decades before that.
    1
  34.  @beba5865  yes, they 'bought' it with printed money. The hedge funds are among their last bastions. Wonder how things will be negotiated if Russia takes those areas. Just like any other war or?
    1
  35.  @imapimplykindapimp  yes genius, they have gone through that scenario on both sides. Unfortunately you are still in the dark. You realize that if Russia were ever stabilized, you would be ..vaporised? Yes, literally. That's not even the half of it.
    1
  36.  @imapimplykindapimp  that is the absolute worst case scenario for you. If they would win such an exchange.
    1
  37.  @imapimplykindapimp  the next worst is if no one wins.
    1
  38.  @imapimplykindapimp  after that it is the fact that Russia and friends are winning economically, militarily and politically. Yes, that means our side is losing.
    1
  39.  @imapimplykindapimp  that means our options are diminishing while theirs is increasing by the day.
    1
  40.  @imapimplykindapimp  for example, their list of proxies against us is seemingly endless. In the future they could even incorporate a very willing Europe. They can use Mexico.
    1
  41.  @imapimplykindapimp  the US military is 5th in capabilities btw. NATO's is 4th, Russia's 3rd. Care to know the first 2?
    1
  42.  @imapimplykindapimp  look up the Sampson option. Btw Russians have anti-missile defense that actually works. We don't. The Patriot, SM missiles, Aegis is all nonsense. And the Russians can shelter half it's population in underground cities.
    1
  43.  @imapimplykindapimp  it is why the US is the aggressor. Did you look up the Thucydides trap? Yes? No? Because if the US just sits there, Russia and China will continue to grow as the US grows weaker.
    1
  44.  @imapimplykindapimp  I don't know if you realize this isn't 80 years ago. It isn't 1944. The US doesn't control the world anymore. It isn't the most powerful State. It just lost that to China. And the differences between the 2 are only going to increase drastically.
    1
  45.  @imapimplykindapimp  We are the baddies. That's what most of the world thinks....including our allies. What does that mean long term? What does that mean when you're far from being the world hegemon? Maybe refer to a Mafia movie.
    1
  46.  @candykane4271  when you comment like that no one takes you seriously. Btw. It doesn't even spark their curiosity.
    1
  47.  @candykane4271  I did what? Make sense
    1
  48.  @candykane4271  I don't care about your rubber. No one cares about your rubber. Have you noticed?
    1
  49.  @candykane4271  I can't take you seriously. You should elaborate. Why did they put rubber there? Shortage of materials? Specific purpose? I couldn't be bothered to research it either.
    1
  50.  @bdd2195  stfu! of course I know what flame thrower is! I've know since the 4th grade!
    1