Comments by "Aachoo Crony" (@aachoocrony5754) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1.  @bdd2195  I'm not a joke. You didn't mean that friend. Stop it right now!
    1
  2.  @bdd2195  rubber tanks? You must be out of your mind bud.
    1
  3.  @bdd2195  rubber tanks? Nuff said
    1
  4.  @bdd2195  Err no I don't have rubber ducks in my bathtub let alone rubber tanks and they don't help with the war effort. No Russians or Ukrainians will be using rubber bullets either. This war is real. Get that through your head. Whether you think rubber ducks will make a difference is up to you. Good luck.
    1
  5.  @bdd2195  Still talking about rubber tanks. I don't know what to say anymore. Goodbye.
    1
  6.  @bdd2195  I was not the one who brought up rubber tanks. And yes, its absolutely ridiculous! We both agree. Lets not talk about this anymore.
    1
  7.  @robertcras8151  I skimmed through it. But at least it seems you are enjoying yourself. I can respect at least that.
    1
  8.  @georget1304  careful pointing fingers. You couldn't possibly accept the possibility that the buffoon is yourself could you? Never. Because you don't think-at least not about this situation and evidently you haven't been thinking about this war or war in general. Just plenty of swallowing of propaganda. Buffoon
    1
  9.  @georget1304  I bet you believed without question the Bucha massacre. Yes, you are that gullible. Well its been exposed didn't you know? And this story is so much weaker yet here you are making an 4ss of yourself in fron of us who are 'ahead of the curve'. Take it easy and reflect a bit.
    1
  10.  @engineroom1670  Russia bombed directly at civilans? In response? What?
    1
  11.  @seanniemeyer5437  never mind math. You should learn to read. 1000 Mig 29's you said. Are you out of your mind?
    1
  12.    lol. Maybe for some artillery men it is interesting?
    1
  13.  @youareliedtobythemedia  Ukraine sources 1:6.5 Russian sources 1:7 to 1:10
    1
  14.  @marionschrotter7065  I got lost. Didn't know what was what although I did watch the films. I still found it funny. And what's your problem? Just digging in that hole. No fun. You know why? Because you're deluded-as far as this war is concerned.
    1
  15.  @adechapman.1132  Kkkk oh boy
    1
  16.  @Vedioviswritingservice  I think Russia wants to drag this out for the economic/political pressures on Europe. Eventually it will have to acknowledge the natural geopolitical partnership with Russia. This will take much longer than US objectives. According to the Rand report the US want the same for different reasons. Their target is German colonial empire/EU.
    1
  17.  @LuisAldamiz  not really. They have their own interests. Both have empirical ambitions. There are more players involved, a lot more. It can get real messy.
    1
  18.  @stantory1822  and how do you know this? You're 6th sense?
    1
  19.  @tommiddlefinger6188  they're neonazis. Very different. If they were nationalists, they would understand priorities easily. As it is, they prefer to leech off NATO against their kin-the Russians. No one likes traitors. Not even the enemy. They're more like communists. They've managed to destroy their own nation from within. The only thing holding it up before and now is foreign aid but they'll have to start paying it off at the end of 2024. In any case, Nazis/communists are handled by the same entities. They're lucky Russia doesn't put their destruction at the top of their list of priorities. They are literally orcs running the country, living barely for the next day. Raw party animals. Not even communists. I read somewhere that out if the blue, all these fancy cars started showing up in Lviv that were never there before.
    1
  20. He must've gotten it from something. What was his reasoning?
    1
  21.  @Ofasia777  he's no bot. He's also Algerian. ... ... Come on man!
    1
  22.  @joeyboi83  yes he's biased towards Russia like me. I also listen to Defense Politics Asia and Weeb Union. I trust them more when Russians are losing battles. But I always appreciate his analysis regardless. I don't see him too far off. I don't see the 3 of them so different actually.
    1
  23.  @rrsafety  yeah numbers are probably just estimates with a bit of tinkering.
    1
  24. You can still take things out of it. Russians say 6,000 vs 80,000 Ukrainian losses. Some say 200,000 Ukrainian losses? Can't remember. I'd assume the Russians are exaggerating. Same with Ukrainians-forgot how much they say. Both are exaggerated and under-exaggerated. Tells you something. Even from the exaggerations, the Ukrainians have lost much more.
    1
  25.  @ziganda26  😂 you see what you want to see. Its called bias
    1
  26.  @More_Row  oh? how so? what did I demonstrate with my bias?
    1
  27. Everyone knows Ukrainian casualties are much higher than the Russian side. At least double. Estimates are double to quadruple. And everyone knows they've been doing this with 5:1 numerical disadvantage. THAT IS FACKING HISTORICAL VS A PEER TRAINED ARMY. But not quite, because the Russians have a lot more firepower. They can't make an offensive right now. The battlefront is too long. The 5:1 disadvantage is turning into a 2:1 disadvantage. Its going to be interesting.
    1
  28.  @Pedro-js5oq  Ukraine is not a soverign country-it lost it in 2014. It is destroyed, bankrupt before this war. It is being financially raped to the bone. On the night of the coup, 1.5 billion in gold disappeared. It wasn't the Russians. It was NATO. NATO wants Russia to destroy Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine intact. This is 2022, planet earth. Welcome
    1
  29.  @Pedro-js5oq  the clown laughs <-----I've never seen that before. We're all shocked.
    1
  30.  @Crosley-1520  'That's a Nazi lie' Russians aren't Nazis, its the Ukrainian Azovs and co. Putin didn't start this, the Orange Revolution started before Crimea. Georgia? I doubt it. Btw the ex-President is now mayor of some city in Ukraine. Gee makes you wonder. The conflict in 2014-2015 another lie-it has been non-stop until now with plenty of casualties. Minsk: Ukraine broke the Minsk agreement ehehee liar, you just inverted EVERYTHING. Does it work you think? It's so sad
    1
  31.  @Crosley-1520  Long live the British Empire. Keep going.
    1
  32.  @sigmasix3719  err you need help. Bye
    1
  33. No way, the HIMARS are game changers. Right after Wagner group recruited orisoners, HIMARS destroyed them. HIMARS are invincible. Don't ever question that again-never!
    1
  34.  @obikhgenri3262  No! No! Himars well follow them to the ends of the earth! They are GAMECHANGERS! DON'T EVER FORGET THAT! They destroyed Wagner group prisoners after they signed their contract! This is no coincidence! HIMARS just changed the game again!
    1
  35.  @marcojordan2839  learn to read. Thats what he said. Also read my last comment. What do you think?
    1
  36. Stop lying. You don't want to join Russia, you support the New World Order and agenda 2030. Norway will be integral. For the first time, Norways history will be interesting-for Norwegians.
    1
  37.  @HandleGF  go back to sleep bla bla bla? What point? Am I bothering you with something? Zzzzz you didn't get it. You're so lazy. Look it up. The stuff I wrote
    1
  38.  @edvsilas8281  are you a parrot or just used to nonsensical reasoning? Or maybe just a poser.
    1
  39. If they really need more men, they can get them lol.
    1
  40.  @Ks3N  imo the reason Russia isn't in a hurry to advance further is that it would get really complicated. It would have to be a cold-turkey decision because after that, there are other dimensions added to the war that make things more complicated. 1.The central area of Ukraine is the breadbasket. Does Russia really want to contest it? Because just the mere fact of fighting over it would destroy next year's harvest for Ukraine and its presumed destination-Europe. The Russians could at least save it as a card. It would also lead to a borderline humanitarian crisis which it seems so far, the Russians don't want to deal with. 2.Westward expansion goes into more foolhardy pro-Ukrainian territory (excluding their targets of Odessa and Tranistria). The propaganda war among the populace favors the Russians once the locals get a taste of both sides. And as the war drags on, the Ukrainian regime will become increasingly heavy-handed and desperate. This process is better for the Russians if its slow, giving time for the population to digest. 3.as a result of 1, Ukraine would be pretty close to capitulation and not only for the food but due to the destruction or vulnerability of other key infrastructure. As a result, capitulation leads to the most difficult phase of the war-the aftermath which involves dealing with CIA trained terrorist cells. It probably won't be as difficult for the Russians as it was for the U.S in Iraq but still quite a challenge. 4.Besides the strategic objectives, a complete victory would be quite a blow to NATO credibility as they've been dragging the populace into a rollercoaster distraction with this war. 5. On the world stage, it would further consolidate Russia's position and encourage more countries to join their economic and strategic alliances like SCO, BRICS, OPEC+, MIR system etc etc. 6. No rush for all this to happen so fast. It needs to be planned and timed carefully. Meanwhile, the economic impact of this war is arguably more crucial. Russia seems to be holding it well. Europe has some hard decisions to make as well and the US are laughing their asses off the longer this takes. They are the US target afterall while the Russians want the natural alliance between Russia/Europe with the US out of the way, to proceed sooner than later. But again, Europe needs time. Russia is pressuring them. The international liberals(globalists) control the EU governments. The people will lose it at same point and will revolt. What gives between the 2 I don't know.
    1
  41.  @bdd2195  so tired of you. Don't bother me w nonsense. Do you have anything to do besides being a clown?
    1
  42.  @bdd2195  huh?
    1
  43.  @bdd2195  You're just a buzzy little fly. But somehow you seem to enjoy it. Could you explain it? Otherwise don't bother me anymore. Or I'll start bothering you. I've been nice until now.
    1
  44.  @bdd2195  I saw your page. Does that make you useful? Yeah I changed my opinion of you a little
    1
  45.  @bdd2195  what? Why are you talking to me again?does the Russian what? 2000 trolls? So what?
    1
  46.  @robm1392  its not ironic at all. What he says about pro-Ukrainian supporters is true. After all he is mirroring pro-Orcranians supporters in jest, not the Ukrainians themselves. The ones mocking the Ukrainians are 'pro-Ukrainians'. THAT'S ironic. Its worse actually. They're synonymous to being the enemies of Ukraine. Don't you find it ignominious to fund a country w weapons after launching a coup d'etat, bombing its civilians, in order that they can kill each other and further destroy their country? Anyways, its also how I easily find out which is the more right side. Thank god for dumbfacks like you-the lowest common denominator being as low as you are. Because you know, they have to cater to you. Thankful for the emojis too. Helps to figure things out at a glance. What are you going to pretend? That we're the same? Haha don't joke around kid.
    1
  47.  @frapseddatsht  You sound like a cnn parrot.
    1
  48.  @l1mi13  oh dam😄you got me there!
    1
  49.  @thesmogo  the ncasualty ratio from the first year are from Pent/agon/ian leaks. Since then, it has gotten steadily worse. The Russians are no longer outnumbered, or are on equal terms but outnumber their foe. Other interesting thing to note is the disparity in equipment available. In the first year, the disparity in artillery fired was also 7:1. It has also increased since. Not saying it is a direct parallel but roughly reliable. The disparities are not just in artillery bit everything including drones, missiles, armor etc. They exceed 10:1. It's more in the vicinity of 15 or 20:1.
    1
  50.  @thesmogo  the difference in number of equipment used in the battlefield is attested to by soldiers from both sides throughout the course of the war. The ratio of kia and wounded is traditionally about 1:3 or 1:4. Unfortunately I lost the source that gave a quote for this war but I remember it being unusual and revealing for the state of current modern warfare. On the other hand I see soldiers quote the usual numbers so nothing definitive. Modern warfare is a nightmare. Remember that this is an SMO and not a real conventional war. If it were real w the objective of taking out the opponent, every target would be gone within the first hour. Targets include military, energy, supply lines and depots, communications etc as the US did in Iraq 25 years ago. It's called shock and awe. It's worse now. The US achieved similar ratios in that war if not better imo. We're talking 15, 20:1. But the Russians did this against a 1st or (2nd rate depending on your classification) military. That miyary was more powerful than any military of the EU and has gone through 4? 5? new mobilizations. The overall casualties are well over 2 million and closer to 3 million. Over 2k kia everyday and climbing. Tbf those numbers are understated. They are only confirmed numbers. The real number is probably closer to double that.
    1