Comments by "" (@neutronalchemist3241) on "Kanal13" channel.

  1. Tulpans are particularly vulnerable. They must be placed within 6 miles from the frontline, and are as big as a tank (but much less protected), so they are MUCH more visible than a standard 120mm mortar (that has a range of 4.5 miles, but it's practically invisible since it's soldier-sized), and are as visible as mobile artillery, that can be placed much farther from the frontline.
    2
  2. Russia needed to invade Ukraine? No. Had benefited from it? No. Did it anyway? Yes. Sometimes, people miscalculate.
    2
  3.  @Ravenarh  In 2014 Russia invaded Ukraine absolutely unprovoked.
    2
  4.  @Ravenarh  Yeah, there is no point in telling me the Russian propaganda bullshit you bought. Unfortunately to you, and contrary to you, I KNOW what I'm talking about and I don't live to lick the boots of a dictator.
    2
  5. Russians should stop shooting down drones. The falling debris are evidently more effective than the drone itself.
    2
  6. The hopes of Lukashenko are to not be dragged into this war.
    2
  7. Shit happens.
    2
  8. You are Russian, what do you expect?
    2
  9. Not really. The ones they use for parades, they actually bought them from Cambodia some years ago.
    2
  10. It must be two to tango...
    2
  11. Oto Melara M56 105/14 It has a quite short range (10.600m, due to the barrel lenght being only 14 times the 105mm caliber) but it's lighweight, and can be easily dismantled in 12 packs for transport (originally by mule), with the heaviest one of them weighting 132kg.
    2
  12. To attack Sweden, Russia has to pass through Finland, that's a NATO member already, so no.
    2
  13. Has he checked his conditions? No. So how does he know his comrade is not going to bleed to death in the next 10 minutes, when a simple tourniquet would have saved him? He don't care.
    2
  14. They didn't fool it that much it seems. Nice for the one able to move to leave his comrade agonizing on the ground.
    2
  15. It slows down on the final stage to not disintegrate due to the friction with thick, low altitude, air.
    2
  16. Crimea has several southern/eastern ports (IE Feodosyia) that can be used to resupply it. By ship you can transport huge quantities of anything (huge WWII armies had been entirely supplied by ship) If the Ukrainians are not able to enforce a real naval blockade around it (and they aren't) the Russians are not going to leave it without a fight.
    2
  17.  @карума-к7ъ  Not my fault if they are ridiculous. They don't liking it makes them even funnier.
    2
  18. Not in the Russian army. There injured soldiers are just left where they fell.
    2
  19. Yeah. It's not like a fragmentation grenade exploded between two rats, turning them in minced Russian meat.
    2
  20. кто-то должен проинструктировать россиян, что: 1) если подразделение сдается, никто из них не должен открывать огонь. Если один из них все еще сражается, то все подразделение является вражескими комбатантами, и солдаты должны вести огонь по вражеским комбатантам. 2) симулировать капитуляцию - военное преступление, поэтому убитые умерли как преступники, а не как солдаты (не то, чтобы на данный момент еще существует русский в Украине, который не является военным преступником).
    2
  21. He's probably the best of the bunch.
    2
  22. And Russians are even capable to believe it!😂
    2
  23. Bad days to be a Russian colonel. Free Russians kill you... Wagner capture you...
    2
  24. No infra red sights, no stabilizer, no reactive or composite armor. Any RPG-7, M72 or SPG-9 is going to penetrate their armor like butter.
    2
  25. They became airborne.
    2
  26.  @zeroone3804  Your master told you that "Russia is demilitarizing Ukraine" and you bought it!😂 Ukraine is better armed now that at the start of the war. The best Russian aircrafts and helicopters (ok, they were crap, but Russia had no better) are scrap metal in Ukrainian fields, and Russan aviation doesn't even sortie any more in Ukrainian sky, but your master told you that "Russia is demilitarizing Ukraine" and you bought it!😂
    2
  27. Making the video longer than a minute, and not ending up in the shorts.
    2
  28. Well, no. The Russians didn't repeat the same mistake. They learned that their big armored units inevitably end clogged somewhere, and destroyed by artillery and ATGMs, so they repeatedly attacked with small units this time. That had been destroyed one after the other.
    2
  29. The fall of the 57th city of Ukraine after 11 months of siege should change something? After the Ukrainians liberated the second one?
    2
  30. Much roofing panels available would be pierced easily, and adding splinters (see the "tree bursts" of the battle of Hurtgen Forest). The most resistant ones, can be pierced by AT grenades.
    2
  31.  @detroit313vlogs7  It's happening that those malnourished lads are going to be used as cannon fodder in place of national Russians due to an agreement between dictators. It's who compares those to Vietcongs that's delusional.
    1
  32.  @lettheflamestakeover7374  That's what Putin told you? It's incredible what the Russians can buy.
    1
  33. Crime: too smart to be a Russian. The others have not this problem.
    1
  34.  @GilaMonster971  Infact. "None but you thinks about the political stance of the Turkish government when sending aids."
    1
  35. They didn't. Many of those ships, altough listed as active units, are not really able to take sea. They had not been moved in years, and are low on manteinance. In case of a Ukrainian successful advance in Crimea, the Russian should only try to tug them, or scuttle them to avoid them being captured in port.
    1
  36. Without close air support, WWI rules. That's why you see trench warfare in eastern Ukraine. No party can use close air support, because MANPADS, and unavailability of precision guided bombs (that allows bombers to hit form above the range of MANPADS), make it suicidal. Close air support and Napalm end trench warfare.
    1
  37. Didn't you hear? They'll sell weapons to nuts. So... business as usual.
    1
  38. It was a tunnel. Only the closest person had been hit. It would have been the same with any frag grenade. Anyway that was an F-1 grenade. Practically identical, in structure, weight of the cast iron shell and tnt filling (the F-1 has a little more actually), to the American Mk2 "pineapple" that you see in countless WWII movies.
    1
  39. "Badly"? To be disguised as civilians qualifies them as spies, not war prisoners. Geneva conventions don't even apply to them. And, to you, the Ukrainians are acting "badly" for a little mocking? I'm more concerned for the fate of the REAL civilians those two robbed of the clothes.
    1
  40. What's cute about all of those "protesters" is that they still believe someone cares about them. Or the Governor, or someone in Moskov, or Putin himself.
    1
  41. Alternative explanation. Flat tire due to previous explosions.
    1
  42. An RPG-7 or M72.
    1
  43. Why? They have tons of ex-Soviet equipment, and they would use it regardless the number of guns the west gives them, because a working gun more is better anyway.
    1
  44. It seems like a standard case of Vodka.
    1
  45. Actually to be disguised as civilians qualifies them as spies, not war prisoners.
    1
  46. A killer of civilians then.
    1
  47.  @mikemann2053  The Moskva had been hit by a missile. This factory, not likely.
    1
  48. Using war prisoners to do any kind of work directly related to the war effort is a war crime, Art. 50 of the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, adopted 12 August 1949.
    1
  49.  Russians are the new Nazis.  It only needs 1m of water to stop a .223 Rem bullet. Grenade fragments are less penetrant than that.
    1
  50.  @nevisstkitts8264  Maybe in some bad SF novel. Not in this universe, sorry.
    1