Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. SpaceX has live cameras on every launch. DishTV ran a satellite camera channel for years. All that happens is that FE’ers increase the conditions. Why would it be necessary for a camera to go to the moon? 1970’s technology is incompatible with 2020’s. All the Apollo & Saturn V’s were single use and used. Put your brain in gear.
    3
  2. The video is missing about 3hrs during which the scientists produced an abundance of evidence.
    3
  3. We’ve had it nailed into us that the sun rises & sets?
    3
  4. Why would that be relevant to the discussion?
    3
  5.  @shawtytriffling7003  He claims in a horizontal circle parallel to the around. I’ve been badgering him fir over a year abd he still refusing to explain why it would only light a limited misshapen area. They all claim to know but they are incredibly reluctant to explain.
    3
  6.  @Globehoax  Yet again doofus, a sphere has no top or bottom and the tilt is 23.4 degrees.
    3
  7.  @bobbiunruh2554  The shape of Earth was deduced from the motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude & season, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses having a circular shadow; 2500 years on we are still waiting for FE’eds to explain how those observations are possible on a FE. You can check all the observations for yourself. Since then the surface of the Earth has been fully mapped and conforms only to a sphere. More recently we have put satellites in orbit, photographing Earth from every angle and taking increasingly accurate measurements.
    3
  8.  @bobbiunruh2554  Scientific theory: a comprehensive explanation for a natural phenomenon that is well-substantiated by extensive evidence from experimentation & observation. It is not a hunch or guess; that is the vernacular meaning of theory.
    3
  9.  @sweismutte  DishTV ran an Earth channel for several years with continuous video feed from the satellite in geostationary orbit. Apparently that isn’t enough. Blue Marble was shot in a single frame. DISCOVR, Himawari-8 & Elektro-L are collectively taking several full hemisphere shots per hour from L1 & geostationary orbits. No enough to qualify as valid shots for unspecified reasons. Blue Marble 2012 is a compisite of low orbit shots so apoarentky every photo ever ever ever EVER taken just has to be a composite because…well, because. What qualifies as a valid video or shot would you say and why?
    3
  10.  @sweismutte  they never take elevation & atmospheric refraction into account and insist on using the wrong maths. Not a mystery.
    3
  11.  @nazomius7033  Wanting to comment on something is a good incentive to create an account 😊
    3
  12. Yet you won’t accept scientific answers while you practice the rest in umpteen posts every day.
    3
  13. We make a career out of advancing knowledge; we state what the evidence indicates; we get paid because we have the same bills as you do.
    3
  14. Refraction, beam dispersion and levelling error.
    3
  15. Explain how the sun retains a constant angular velocity & diameter through the course of the day and rises & sets when FE predicts a variable angular velocity & diameter without coming within 20 degrees of the horizon.
    3
  16.  @Globehoax  Anybody can reproduce the experiment and get similar results.
    3
  17.  @KangenAlec  How does the sun maintain a constant angular diameter & angular velocity and ride &set when your idea of FE says it does something completely different?
    3
  18. What do you think we have labs for?
    3
  19. FE’ers have yet to put up a science-based case so you’ll be waiting a while. Prof Dave has everything covered; you could start from the original video in his astronomy section or just head into the debunking playlist.
    3
  20.  @Globehoax  Still waiting on you to disprove anything that we say...
    3
  21. Fo you realise that technology as a while has not stood still since the 1970’s?
    3
  22.  @Globeisahoax  Given your total inability to answer questions then, yes, education.
    3
  23. FE’ers are quite close minded.
    3
  24.  @TheBlackSun21  Because comments are visible in a comments section.
    3
  25.  @Globeisahoaxx  Still waiting on your evidence that it is small & local.
    3
  26. And change it back.
    3
  27.  @KangenAlec  If only any of you could answer the questions....
    3
  28. What do you perceive the opposing schools of thought to be in this case?
    3
  29. Law & theory are two quite different things. A scientific law is a description of a phenomenon; a theory is the explanation for how that phenomenon works. The Law of Gravity simply states that there is a relationship between mass, distance and attraction; the Theory of Gravity is why such attraction occurs. One does not become the other.
    3
  30. As scientific theory is a comprehensive explanation for a natural phenomenon, well-substantiated by extensive experimentation & observation. It is not a guess or hunch; that is the vernacular meaning of theory. "you have a better argument proving mass, density, and buoyancy" Then why can't any of you provide it? All you come up with is cries of "mass just wants to move" and "density just gotta be a force" and no explanation for how buoyancy would exist in the absence of gravity. Why is it so difficult for the people who reckon they have Real Physics figured to actually produce something coherent?
    3
  31.  @BigPiscesEnergy  Gravity has been measure countless times but that isn't enough for you to be satisfied that it has been measured. I'm asking you how many times by how many people in how many ways does something have to be measured to satisfy you that it has indeed been measured?
    3
  32.  @KangenAlec  Still no evidence of an ice barrier. Come up with it.
    3
  33. They don't really have one. Apparently not only does the sun remain aloft by unspecified means and move in a circle by unspecified means but the circle expands & contracts by unspecified means over the course of the year. When it has contracted the Northern hemisphere receives more sunlight and thus has summer. When it expands then supposedly the Southern Hemisphere benefits but because of the FE southern hemisphere being so much bigger than the north this would actually result in less sunlight for any given area and would cast them into a deeper winter that the southern winter. FE'ers don't think anything through.
    3
  34. You limit your knowledge to what is the Bible?
    3
  35.  @breakdown2878  He can’t explain anything; he just lives in his own reality.
    3
  36. There were 6 Apollo landings intotal. They were extremely expensive and put people on the moon for a few hours work. It was far more economical to send probes.
    3
  37.  @KangenAlec  Someone told you that the sun doesn’t rise & set and you believed it.
    3
  38. There is no limit; the eye is a passive receptor and detects whatever light reaches it regardless of how far it has travelled.
    3
  39.  @juliemunro76  How do you think the eye works? Any book is going to explain to you how the light enters the eye and activates cells in the retina. At what stage do you think the eye or brain cuts out light that has travelled greater than 30 miles and how would either eye or brain know the distance?
    3
  40.  @juliemunro76  I’m a research scientist; I work on the eye. It’s a passive receptor; the retina detects whatever light reaches it regardless of how far it has is travelled. You mean the limit of visual acuity, which means a limit on the apparent size of an object that you can perceive. Other than apparent size diminishing with distance, there is no connection between the two; there is no magic distance beyond which you can not see. If you think there is a filtering mechanism then you need to come up with evidence such exists and an explanation for how it works.
    3
  41. What do you think we do in labs?
    3
  42. Two celestial poles, motion of the sun, horizons and lunar eclipses all indicate that Earth is a sphere.
    3
  43.  @Globeisahoax  Asks the guy who can’t provide his explanations?
    3
  44.  @-redranger-  The tilt in Earth's axis means that as the Earth orbits the sun one hemisphere or the other is favoured with more sunlight according to the time of year, leading to prolonged warming or cooling. FE explanation is that the FE sun somehow moves in a horizontal circle parallel to the FE surface, somehow staying up and somehow only lighting a limited area; the radius of the circle somehow varies so when it is smaller the northern hemisphere has longer days and when it wider the northern hemisphere has shorter days while in contrast the southern hemisphere has shorter days and then even shorter days that are some how longer. Basically they haven't thought it through.
    3
  45. Nothing to stop you looking in that direction. Pollution & weather aside you would be able to see several hundred miles if the Earth was flat, the view disappearing into a gradual haze rather than a horizon.
    3
  46. Nobody is born with knowledge and there is a range of intelligence in the populace, Einstein being in the top percentile. There is always somebody who is first to have a particular idea and the idea is dependent on what has been deduced before, hence the expression of standing on the shoulders of giants.
    3
  47.  @KangenAlec  Not querying “the Bible says so” is thinking for yourself?
    3
  48. The water man would be happy to tell you that he has done the research. All FE'ers say that.
    3
  49.  @KangenAlec  He would see the same. Why can’t any of you zoom the set sun back into view? You all keep saying how easy-peasy it is so why not do it?
    3
  50. ​ @syamnakmuay89  Your senses are very limited. Your eyes see only a narrow range of wavelength, your ears a limited range of frequencies and your sense of smell is negligible. You can't detect motion (just deduce it form vision and acceleration) and don't have the sensitivity to detect one revolution per day. You are probably using Wi-fi while making your post but your senses can't detect the radio waves. Do they exist?
    3