Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1.  @Globeisahoax  Still waiting on FE’ers to explain where to; presumably you don’t want to try?
    3
  2. They’re about software for modelling aerodynamics. To simply the maths they made several assumptions like no loss of weight from fuel consumption, inflexibility of the airframe, no weather and no curvature. That’s it.
    3
  3.  @2right2bwrong49  YT deletes comments with links and website names.
    3
  4.  @oak3ns  There is no “middle ground” or even a debate at all; that the Earth is a sphere was determined 2500 years ago.
    3
  5.  @songsofhealing777  Your OP specifically referred to gender and biology. Gender is psychological, sex is biological and they aren’t synonymous.
    3
  6. Produce the evidence of an Arctic wall.
    3
  7. There’s 3hrs of evidence been removed to keep the video “balanced”.
    3
  8. You're posting this in multiple places? The question as it stands can refer to any number of situations. From the context you are referring to the atmosphere; that declines in pressure with increasing altitude and at no point is there is pressure difference that needs separating.
    3
  9.  @Jeff-iz9hn  Motion if the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses having a circular shadow. Have you tried dividing 360 degrees by 25,000 miles? Atmospheric pressure declines with increasing altitude; at no point is there pressure adjacent to a vacuum. Evidence for a dome other than “there just gotta be”?
    3
  10. Says whom other than the conspiracy mongers?
    3
  11. Perspective is the usual handwave but they never explain why the sun maintains a constant angular diameter or why it would disappear over the horizon without coming within 10-20 degrees of it or why it would disappear at all. They’re quite sure they have the answers though.
    3
  12. Scientific theory: a comprehensive explanation for a natural phenomenon that is eell substantiated by extensive observation and experimentation. It is not a guess or hunch; that is the vernacular meaning of theory.
    3
  13. He’s on a permanent spree; this is just his latest moniker.
    3
  14. They assume the limit of visual acuity is the only reason you can no longer see something. They zoom in one something that has yet to reach the horizon and declare they’ve disproved the horizon. None of them have brought back a “half-sunk” ship, much less the set sun.
    3
  15. "NASA has said in an article from 1988 about aerospace and aircrafts mentioning twice the earth is flat and stationary." Have you considered reading the whole sentence in those documents? They are quite explicit in stating that keeping maths to the basic aerodynamics and ignoring ignoring complicatory factors like flexibility in an airframe, a planes weight changing as it uses fuel, no weather and no compensation for curvature. "water proves a flat earth" Only if you insist level and flat are synonymous. Open a good dictionary and look at the multiple meanings of the word level. "airplanes prove the flat Earth" By flying routes that would be impossible on a F,E e.g., direct flights from Sydney to Santiago? "it was being taught in the USA school system in early 1900's" No, it was not. "We are Geocentric and we are the center" Evidence? "Just about every ancient culture also thought the earth was flat" They also thought lightning were gods hurling thunderbolts, trepanning was miracle cure, blood sacrifices were productive and metal couldn't float. How far do you want to take this? "The sphere is complete nonsense" WGS84. "we arent flying through space" Stellar parallax indicates otherwise. "Using logic and reasoning will show you the truth" Ignoring evidence you don't want to hear is not logical and relying on "just gotta be" arguments is not reasonable. "The technology of infrared lens and so on have outgrew their lies" The results support a globe. Garbled FE'er interpretations that ignore key factors and utilise incorrect maths don't change that. "the more I looked into it the more I realized we've been lied too folks" I just pointed out a long string of lies that FE'ers feed you.
    2
  16.  @KangenAlec  And yet all demonstrated and work together in a coherent model with contradictions and FE’ers can’t even explain why the sun moves differently to what they claim.
    2
  17.  @Globeisahoax  You forgot to stamp your foot.
    2
  18. Masks reduce the probability of transmission by catching most of the microdroplets you exhale. The biosuits are to keep transmission to zero while handling the worst viruses. Most viruses require only biosafety cabinets and appropriate vaccinations.
    2
  19.  @Globeisahoax  No answer to his question then. How difficult is it fir the nan with the answers to provide the answers is supposedly so eager to share?
    2
  20. FE’ers have difficulty thinking beyond the present.
    2
  21. They provided abundant evidence but it was cut to keep the discussion “balanced”.
    2
  22.  @Globeisahoax  Still waiting on your evidence, be it from you or Dubay.
    2
  23.  @KangenAlec  Which does not answer the question. What keeps it up, what makes it move, what makes it change direction?
    2
  24. What does NASA have to do with it? The Earth was deduced to be a globe 2000 years before they came into existence.
    2
  25. Looking vertically the atmosphere thins out quickly; look horizontally and it's atmosphere all the way between you & the viewed object. While on a globe the horizon limits out view of distant objects, on a FE you would be able to see an unlimited distance; the moisture & dirt would gradually reduce how clearly you could see until everything disappears into a haze several hundred miles away. No explanation ever forthcoming from FE'ers how you can confuse a near horizon and distant haze.
    2
  26. He means you can't cherry pick what you wish to accept. What gets taught most people is very basic science; it is very well-established. If you think it wrong then you need to demonstrate that; simply refusing to accept something does not invalidate it.
    2
  27.  @firebanner6424  He never supplies evidence or answers questions.
    2
  28.  @Globeishoaxx  Yet again doofus, a sphere has no top & bottom.
    2
  29. Earth was deduced to be a sphere c. 500BC.
    2
  30.  @Globeisahoaxx  Yet again doofus, the Gleason projection is a map of the globe.
    2
  31.  @wakey4286  That's lunar eclipses, something which couldn't happen on a FE when both sun & moon are always above a FE. Lunar phases are due to the moon's orbit changing the relative positions of the Earth, sun & moon and thus how much of the sunlit side of the moon we can see. The whole world sees the same phase but on a FE the phase would dependent on each observer's location.
    2
  32.  @KangenAlec  "Legally nasa has to say it’s flat" Under what legislation?
    2
  33. The Koran was written a millenium after it was deduced the Earth was a globe.
    2
  34.  @papihuey  That would we cherry-picking and selective interpretation to support their predetermined conclusions, not Christian doctrine.
    2
  35. Scientific theory, not the vernacular meaning of theory.
    2
  36.  @KangenAlec  Which one? You've had it explained to you umpteen times why the one you keep referring to is inaccurate.
    2
  37. The rotation is detectable using gyroscopes and the Foucault pendulum. That you can't sense it is simply because one rotation per day is too slow for your cochlear to sense.
    2
  38.  @tx865  Good luck; his only measurement for the distance to the sun is “I can see it”.
    2
  39.  @KangenAlec  Because you are quoting gibberish from a yoga teacher.
    2
  40.  @Globeishoax  yet again doofus, the Gleason projection is a globe map.
    2
  41.  @mayoiko  Preferably trying to navigate themselves.
    2
  42.  @KangenAlec  "enslavement by injecting people with lethal poisons" How could someone be enslaved when they're dead?
    2
  43. Find some intelligent people who have no concept of measurement and you might find intelligent FE’ers.
    2
  44.  @tbrown3356  Which doesn’t explain time zones or the sun rising & setting or the sun maintaining a constant angular diameter & velocity throughout the day.
    2
  45.  @tbrown3356  how does atmospheric pressure decrease with increasing altitude when you predict constant pressure?
    2
  46.  @tbrown3356  "The globe model has gas pressure next to a vacuum" Atmospheric pressure declines with increasing altitude, eventually reaching 0 atm. At what point are you saying there is 1 atm immediately adjacent to 0 atm? "Can you demonstrate gas pressure next to a vacuum and not filling the available space?" Planetary atmospheres: Venus, Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune. Which are you saying has high pressure adjacent to a vacuum? "That violates entropy and gas laws" Gases are matter and, like all matter, responds to all forces acting upon it. "Gas pressure requires containment." Describing the relationship between pressure, temperature & volume requires a container. Gas itself does not require a physical container to exist. Produce your evidence of this container.
    2
  47.  @tbrown3356  I just pointed out twice that air pressure declines with increasing altitude. Are you having difficulty understanding?
    2
  48. Someone promptly claims the windows are monitors…
    2
  49.  @Globeisahoax  Those would be artist's impressions; why do you think they are accurate when you frequently deride photos as artist's impressions?
    2
  50.  @Globeisahoax  Says the guy who insists a telescope can zoom in on people from even further away.
    2