Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1. The geocentric model uses a globe, not a flat earth. Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses having a circular shadow - still waiting in the FE’er explanations. Do you want to try? The ancient Greeks deduced the Earth was a sphere while assuming it was totally stationary, not rotating.
    3
  2. The independent variable does not need to be manipulated by the scientist, ie, it’s a fallacy that direct experimentation is necessary as opposed to predicting the outcome of observations. Curvature of spacetime is predictable from the mass of the object causing the curvature; that is the independent variable
    3
  3. Still waiting in the FE’er explanation for atmospheric pressure decreasjng with altitude or any evidence of a succession of impenetrable barriers to enable such.
    3
  4.  @Globeisahoax  You still haven’t grasped geometry then?
    3
  5. The system says 2+2=4 and that B follows A in the alphabet. Is it wise to dismiss anything & everything out of hand?
    3
  6.  @flyinggoose1445  I've never had any explanation as to how they think NASA was influencing the ancient Greeks but they're quite sure their ideas came from NASA.
    3
  7.  @alec6651  They’re Thinkers; they have a lot to say about how much they’ve cogitated but actually thinking ceases early on.
    3
  8.  @KangenAlec  Then why do t you try explaining how the sun maintains a constant angular diameter and angular velocity through the course of the day? It’s an easy peasy questions for someone educated in FE.
    3
  9. One picture in particular (openly declared to be a composite) not every picture ever ever EVER taken.
    3
  10.  @Globeisahoax  Whst camera resolution and magnification do you think are needed for the shot? Why don’t you answer since you claim you have it all thought out?
    3
  11.  @Globeisahoax  All the evidence sats otherwise.
    3
  12. That it is a fact that beliefs exist does not make any of those beliefs a fact.
    3
  13. There are no FE scientists.
    3
  14.  @BigPeter1313  They cut out the one-way flow of evidence. When its in the “middle ground” series you can’t have an unbalanced discussion. The FE was disproved 2500 years ago; there is no dispute over its shape and wishing to be inclusive will not change that.
    3
  15.  @Globeisahoax  You still haven’t said what magnification & resolution is required.
    3
  16.  @KangenAlec  Look through a focussed telescope and they are quite clearly planets.
    3
  17.  @darthtenebra5910  He's been doing this for weeks; I've explained at least twice the view through a telescope says otherwise.
    3
  18.  @mohdadeeb1829  He doesn’t realise that his gurus make their living from their videos.
    3
  19. The ancient Greeks deduced the Earth was a sphere from the motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses. We’ve since mapped the surface (only one shape fits the measurements)
    3
  20. It’s been heavily edited sincr there was s one way flow of evidence.
    3
  21.  Evan Mauger  As I said, the video has been edited to remove the one way flow of evidence and maintain the appearance of “middle ground”. You can’t criticise the scientists for not saying what Jubilee took out.
    3
  22. Scientific theory =/= vernacular theory.
    3
  23. Still waiting on any FE’er to provide a plausible motive.
    3
  24. FE’ers don’t realise that they need to use the correct maths when calculating the distance to the horizon, ie, 8”/mile^2 doesn’t work because it is the wrong maths, not because the globe is wrong.
    3
  25. The Earth is a measurable object; its shape is a fact, not an opinion.
    3
  26. That's why FE'er deny gravity but they can't come up with a plausible explanation for why objects would fall without gravity.
    3
  27.  @KangenAlec  He drove his snowmobile to a research station after his support ship sank in a storm. He’s not a FE’er and was not looking for a dome.
    3
  28.  @Nekokettle0  He denies telescopes exist.
    3
  29. The “aware and awakened” are not renowned for questioning anything, just parroting their own dogma.
    3
  30. Scientism is the belief that science can explain what lies outside science. Science relies on data & methodology to reach conclusions; it is not unsupported ideas.
    3
  31.  @Globeisahoax  And we are still waiting on m any evidence from you. Whats the problem?
    3
  32.  @Globeisahoax  Why is asking to provide you evidence bullying or harassment?
    3
  33. A dismissive and insulting assertion that does nothing to present any actual FE evidence or refute what has been said.
    3
  34. WGS84. Laser gyroscopes. Stellar parallax.
    3
  35.  @Globeisahoax  Then produce the evidence to back your claim.
    3
  36. He’s not open to reason.
    3
  37.  @anodrewsanabria6343  The video has been heavily edited; you don’t know what was in the missing sections.
    3
  38. Varies between individuals though they insist that they are agreed.
    3
  39.  @Globeisahoax  There is no Antarctica Treaty Pact; if you think there is then you need to come up with the evidence. If you're going to claim it's top secret the you need to explain how you would know it existed and what it said.
    3
  40.  @Jeff-iz9hn  Try dividing 360 degrees by 25,000 for degrees per mile. The distance to the horizon is determine by curvature, elevation and atmospheric refraction, not by curvature alone. An effect can have more than one cause; too small to perceive and blocked from view are both valid reasons you can’t see something. Why can’t FE’ers zoom the set sun back into view?
    3
  41. The producers chose what snippets they used.
    3
  42. They may well have done; there appears to be a lot of editing, with each question cut very short.
    3
  43. They’re fooling you to fool you is the only plausible motive suggested so far.
    3
  44. Explain how that applies to the shape of the Earth.
    3
  45.  @mombojom3  Don't expect answers from Dubay; he deals in smoke & mirrors.
    3
  46.  @TheBullet51  "I know nothing about the occult " If you know nothing about science then you have no basis for referring to it as the occult.
    3
  47. Evidence?
    3
  48. Is he saying watching this video makes you an expert on a subject?
    3
  49.  @Globehoax  We can produce evidence & explanations and you can’t.
    3
  50. "I do not currently have the technology to see for myself" Look up. The motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles - observable by any Tom, Dick or Harry, indicative of a globe and impossible on a FE. "I do not trust all science as there are too many contradictions" Such as? "Not one actual photograph" Says whom and why? Why can't any of the people claiming they can tell fakes explain what they find wrong and how? "Compartmentalization is definitely an issue in the scientific society" Specialisation, not compartmentalisation. There's plenty of interaction between specialists of different disciplines and specialisation does not mean we know nothing of other subjects. "I live 100ft from the Pacific Ocean. It looks flat flat flat." Given a 25,000 mile circumference, how many degrees curvature per mile would you expect to observe? "The evidence for both is out there" So FE'ers keep claiming but they never produce it.
    3