General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Flook D
Jubilee
comments
Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.
Previous
14
Next
...
All
Satellites are not limited to one altitude. The images for Blue Marble 2012 were accumulated from low orbit satellites (around 200mph high). Himawari-8 & Elektro-L are in geostationary orbit, about 35,000 miles up, and capture almost an entire hemisphere in each shot. EPIC is in the L1 position (about 1.5 million miles up) and essentially does capture full hemisphere shots in each frame. Blue Marble (1972) was taken from Apollo 17 in a single frame, analogue shot from about 18,000 miles. FE'ers conflate Blue Marble (1972) and Blue Marble 2012.
3
@Globeisahoax Then why don’t you provide answers & explanations if you want people to listen to them?
3
@KangenAlec Motion of the sun, angle to Polaris, horizons, two celestial poles....
3
@muffin2760 Just gotta be and just does are the foundation stones of their reasoning.
3
There is a profound difference between requesting evidence & explanations and presuming wholesale fraud.
3
Evidence? By travelling at speed through the weaker periphery in a shielded craft. Not difficult to look up.
3
How do you think you can get rocks from the moon without going to the moon?
3
@flatearthisahoax4030 Presumably since it was on TV all the people there are just actors :-)
3
How does the FE sun rise & set without coming within 20 degrees of the horizon?
3
@KangenAlec Yet we observe the sun rising & setting every day in defiance of the FE models.
3
You still haven’t supplied your evidence for aether’s existence. Why can you never answer questions or supply evidence?
3
What are the gaping holes in the globe?
3
Motion if the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude and two celestial poles - all verifiable by anybody and all indicative that the Earth is a sphere.
3
Check what Byrd & the Treaty actually say rather than the conspiracy whisperers.
3
@Globeisahoax We can see the ISS passing overhead. Still waiting on your explanation for how a weather balloon could emulate it.
3
Science is evidence-based.
3
@KangenAlec And yet your gurus can’t provide evidence either, just sell snake oil.
3
How difficult is it for a FE’er to read & comprehend a whole sentence? Why do The Thinker’s thoughts all shut down when they encounter certain words?
3
You’re clueless. Do you think we should spend our time checking 2+2 really does equal 4?
3
@DSunlisted193 Traceable signal to, on & from the moon, detectable equipment left there and verifiable material brought back.
3
@KangenAlec Obviously the point about JPEG compression went over your head.
3
@Globehoax Yet again, it was a common assumption not common knowledge.
3
I take it you are referring to the $10,000 steak?
3
I think many people watched this in stages.
3
@KangenAlec Observable reality contradicts FE; you need to explain how the sun behaving differently to what FE predicts would support the prediction it contradicts.
3
@KangenAlec Still waiting on any evidence for all that....
3
The evidence exists whether we have discovered it or not. While nothing can be proved absolutely in science, something can be disproved absolutely; if a hypothesis contradicts the evidence then the hypothesis is wrong. Once we have the evidence that disproves something, it's not going to become correct. The motion of the sun, horizons, two celestial poles all disprove a FE, something that was deduced over 2000 years ago.
3
@Globeisahoax You still haven't explained how the sun maintains a constant angular diameter & velocity through the day. Could it be that you have no idea?
3
@joshcameron2571 Motion if the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses. That’s how the ancient Greeks deduced it was a sphere. Still waiting on FE’ers to explain any of that. Do you want to try?
3
It doesn’t as such. There is a small bunch of people obsessed with being feeling special.
3
They sound typical. It’s always “just gotta be X” and “how could this be possible?” and screw the answers.
3
@KangenAlec If someone is claiming that no evidence and no reasoning means they know the truth then they are certainly exposing something.
3
Traceable signal to, on and from the moon, detectable equipment left there and verifiable material brought back.
3
@KangenAlec Why not start with simple facts before getting into the “bigger picture”? His dues the sun maintain a constant angular diameter and angular velocity through the course of the day and rise & set?
3
What do you think we do in labs?
3
Where dud the verifiable lunar rocks come from? Black & white digital cameras have higher resolution. By taking shots through a series of wavelength filters you can get multiple high res shots for the price of one camera. By overlaying shots taken through red, green & blue filters you can compile a full-colour image; that’s the editing referred to. Like the Polar Satellite it launched?
3
@KangenAlec Still waiting on your explanation how a sun observably retaining a constant angular diameter & velocity and rising & setting is in agreement with a FE that says angular diameter & velocity change and it doesn't approach within 20 degrees of the horizon. You profess to be the man with the answers on how it all really works so what's so difficult to explain? Get your finger out.
3
@Globeisahoaxx Still waiting on your evidence…
3
Indeed someone can lie or be mistaken but when what they’re saying is in agreement with millions of other experts either they have solid reason or there is an implausibly large conspiracy.
3
Why is it not arguable?
3
They claim satellites are all balloons though they cant explain how they stay up, how they aren't affected by the weather or why triangulation demonstrates them to be in orbit.
3
@fiat2496 You take the trouble to zoom in a ship that is beyond the range of visual acuity but can't be arsed to follow it further away? Why haven't any of you tried zooming the set sun back into view? It's not as if it shrinks in apparent angular diameter to need enlarging to see.
3
@fiat2496 "The scientists agree that it is possible and do not have an answer for it" I would note that the video has been heavily edited; the camera angle chops & changes frequently at that point. The scientists don't agree or disagree in what we can see.
3
@fiat2496 We get impatient because we have explained over and over and over and over and over again and FE’ers still keep whining that we haven’t explained. Your OP started by saying that we’ve never explained it.
3
@fiat2496 Your eyes are passive receptors; they detect the light that teaches them regardless of how far it has travelled. There is no mystic distance beyond which the eye can not see.
3
@Globehoax Yet again dumbo - 23.4 degrees and there is top & bottom to a sphere.
3
@Globeisahoaxx Still waiting on your evidence….
3
@Michaelhehe Then be novel and provide them.
3
Abrahamic religion doesn't teach it either; this is people selectively interpreting bible verses to back their preconceptions.
3
@KangenAlec So how do they get the sun to move in the wrong pattern?
3
Previous
14
Next
...
All