General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Flook D
Jubilee
comments
Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.
Previous
18
Next
...
All
1st: they usually produce the Gleason azimuthal projection of the globe with no understanding of scale or just allude to the Real Map they supposedly possess but never oriduce. 2nd: close eyes, insert fingers in ears and start chanting.
2
@KangenAlec If you find it all obvious then why can’t you answer any questions?
2
They caught on that that would mean everybody had the same time. These days they claim it moves in a horizontal circle above the FE equator but provide no explanation how that would work, how it defies their beloved perspective, how it rises & sets, how it lights the area it does….
2
@Globeisahoax Undersea cables handle 95% of transoceanic traffic; the remainder goes by satellite link. Still waiting on the FE'ers to support their assertion that 95% = 100%. Still waiting on the FE'er explanation for how signals are obtained in the absence of cables & towers. All you've suggested so for are hordes of invisible balloons that don't need any form of maintenance.
2
A scientific theory is not a guess or hunch; that is the vernacular meaning of theory. In science a theory is the comprehensive explanation for a natural phenomenon that is well substantiated by extensive experimentation and observation.
2
@0rangebanana "A scientific theory is not a guess or hunch; that is the vernacular meaning of theory." What's difficult to understand? Do you know what a dictionary is?
2
How do they fiddle with the motion of the sun & stars?
2
@KangenAlec For the 100th time, blockhead; motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris, two celestial poles...
2
@KangenAlec And has been debunked countless times since. You still haven’t explained how density can act as a force, just took his word for it.
2
@KangenAlec If you think he explained how density acts s force then say what that explanation is. I’m banned from his channel for asking. Why don’t you try reading through the debunkings?
2
@milliegriffin8402 Already told him why people see "flickering lights"; he's not interested in facts.
2
Eyes closed, fingers in ears and speaking loudly.
2
You’e assuming they respond to rational argument.
2
They are citing it in the, er, original English.
2
That was in this video but the editors took it out.
2
Example?
2
They have and there are external cameras too taking such live feed.
2
Still waiting on FE’ers to come up with a plausible reason much less explain the logistics of a millenia-long conspiracy involving millions.
2
The Earth was deduced to be a sphere by the ancient Greeks around 500BC. A spherical Earth was the centrepoint of the Ptolemaic universe from 100AD. Explain how an organisation formed around 1300AD influenced those events.
2
@yesno4989 Cut & paste.
2
How many have lost their lives be because they refused a jab?
2
Free speech means I have the right to question them. There is no obligation on me to listen to them, not laugh at them or not criticise them; they do not fall under censorship.
2
Still waiting for the FE’er explanation for circumpolar navigations.
2
You should have used some quote marks. 😊
2
Evidence?
2
@Globeisahoax Measurably 93 million mikes away but the concept of measurement does seem beyond your comprehension.
2
@KangenAlec We measure the distance to the sun while you pull a number out of your arse.
2
@Matuse For the effort he puts in he’s more likely delusional.
2
Ships appearing over the horizon is an effect of curvature over variable distance from the observer. The horizon is equidistant; to see a left-ti-right curve in that you would need to go far higher than a skydiver.
2
@KangenAlec Still no evidence if a dome or any explanation why objects fall if not by gravity or why has pressure decreases with altitude. Come on man, you claim to have all these answers! Start producing them!
2
People ask them questions they can't answer (and sometimes can't even understand) when we are supposed to unquestioningly swallow what they are saying.
2
@KangenAlec It nicely demonstrates FE'ers self-deception.
2
@Globehoax Says the guy who can’t answer or explain anything…
2
Challenging a hypothesis is expected in gathering data and understanding. Something is accepted as a scientific theory because it has stood up to all attempts to disprove it; to put further effort into trying to disprove it would be a waste of time & resources. Looking out for anything that contradicts an accepted theory remains worthwhile.
2
You're open to the idea that the sun doesn't rise & set as observed every day? That you can never see the moon during daytime like we can half the month?
2
Apparently for these reasons: 1. <silence> (the most common explanation). 2. They're fooling us just to fool us. 3. To hide an omnipotent, omniscient god by...means... 4. Believing the Earth is a globe means "They" have total mind control over you. 5. To take economic advantage of the inaccessible lands beyond the unsurmountable ice-wall and impenetrable dome.
2
@UpNorthBeats The ancient Greeks determined the Earth was a globe from the movement of the sun, lunar eclipse and horizons. You can do it yourself with sticks & shadows (with travel), how the angle to Polaris changes with latitude and noting that there are two celestial poles. That you can readily travel the long distances to do any of that indicates that we have accurate maps.
2
@KangenAlec Once again, blockhead: there's these things called telescopes...
2
If you want accurate maps enabling long distance travel then yes.
2
@GuardianSoulkeeper I’ve been bending his ear for over a year
2
We've looked at it. FE'ers insist on making predictions using the wrong maths that ignores elevation & atmospheric refraction and think they're on to something when they get the wrong answers. It's explained to you over and over and over and over that all factors have to be accounted for but you aren't interested. "The argument is this you can see all ( including the bottom! ) of the Chicago skyline from across lake Michigan" Occasionally there is a mirage that enable the upper part (and only the upper parts) of the Chciagoe skyscrapers to be briefly visible from inside Michigan state. That it is considered newsworthy should be a clue to FE'ers that there is something unusual is occurring, not the mundane, but that seems beyond you. "y'all reading this won't make your own observation confirming the curvature isn't there" FE'ers don't; you just keeping quoting the news so why the complaint? "No curvature." Only when you use the wrong maths....
2
@KangenAlec Yet again for the blockhead: motion of the sun, angle to Polaris, horizons, two celestial poles, all of which you can check for yourself.
2
@Globeisahoaxx Yet again doofus, motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses.
2
Which you promptly deny...
2
"why does SpaceX turn off the Camera when they drop the boosters" The cameras are part of SpaceX monitoring the boosters; when they're gone there's no reason to keep filming. "why do they only show cartoon graphics for their missions" What kind of graphics do you want and why? " the only view the SpaceX Dragon pilots get" They aren't sightseers; they're there to monitor what is occurring and take control if necessary and that can't be done by peering out of a window. Building in a window adds to cost and structural complexity if you're going to suggest they do that. The camera on the outside of the launch rocket records Earth in the background throughout the launch. The one inside monitors the release of the launch. The cameras on the outside of the Dragon have side views of the booster and thus some view of Earth. If you check the view of the booster before ignition you can clearly see the booster has a double black line along it's edge; that's what you are looking after the booster is ignited. How exactly are they hiding Earth when the launch rocket camera captures it nicely?
2
@Globehoax You need to explain how the direct flights are possible on a FE. What’s taking you so long?
2
@AnonymousAnonymous-oc1ry Why would that work? What would the sun appear like?
2
Oblate spheroid not oval; the difference between major and minor radii is about 10 miles.
2
To be accurate: training pool (water turns the ambient light blue) , out of focus objects (bubbles don’t drift slowly sideways) and video compression.
2
No need to shout.
2
Previous
18
Next
...
All