Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Jubilee" channel.

  1.  @KangenAlec  I have; where in the Treaty does it say that exactly?
    2
  2. The ancient Greeks deduced it around 500BC from the motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude and constellations changing with latitude. Since a flat earth was assumed prior to then some of the Old Testament phrasing reflects that but the NT does not.
    2
  3. "Why can he not prove it then?" You realise that the video was heavily edited? Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris matching latitude, constellations changing with latitude, two celestial poles and lunar eclipses all indicative that the Earth is a globe and disproves a FE. We are still waiting on the FE'er explanations for how they could be possible on a FE in direct contradiction to their predictions.
    2
  4.  @Globeisahoax  That’s never bothered you when dismissing the ISS as a weather balloon. Do you want to explain now or just continue dodging the question?
    2
  5.  @thecolonel6735  I meant precisely what I said: some of them think lenses can be designed to curve one particular counter out of the while visage.
    2
  6.  @KangenAlec  Provide some evidence.
    2
  7.  @KangenAlec  "injecting 300 million healthy people with lethal injections" And yet those people are still alive...
    2
  8. The boats pass beyond their visual acuity well before they reach the horizon. When an object actually does pass over the horizon it gradually disappears from the bottom up (eg the setting sun) but they never try zooming them back into view.
    2
  9.  @Globehoax  Still waiting on your evidence…
    2
  10.  @KangenAlec  Says the guy who quotes a rock band as evidence.
    2
  11.  @Globeisahoaxx  If you’re so sell educated then why won’t you answer questions or divulge evidence?
    2
  12.  @k.4625  They don't want to know.
    2
  13.  @Globeisahoax  Why cant you produce said proof?
    2
  14. The video has been edited to remove the one way flow of evidence from the scientists; don't blame them for Jubilee's actions. "globe earth still has problems at least by the math we are given today" Such as what?
    2
  15. Did you have practical science classes in school?
    2
  16. ​ @kashifmccracken1526  "I'm asserting that asking what are globe earther events is not sticking to the topic" You raised the notion. "Low orbit is 6213.712 miles" Maximum for LEO is seen as 1000km. Probes are routinely sent into HEO or to other bodies. Manned flights are currently limited to LEO. "Nasa admits we cannot get out of low orbit" The Apollo craft were all single use and have been used. Being single-use means they can't be used twice; the Saturn V launchers are largely burned up in the atmosphere or at the bottom of oceans, the Landing Modules are setting on the moon, the Ascent Modules smashed on the moon and what remains of the Command Modules are sitting in museums. None of it can be re-used. Since 1973 technology has advanced. Computers, materials, manufacturing practices have all advanced; building another Saturn V & Apollo craft would require serious regression in technology. The people who designed and largely hand-assembled the Apollo craft are retired & dead; their notes exists as do the blueprints but all refer to pre-1973 technology. If modern manned spacecraft need to leave LEO then they need to do so with modern, compatible technology, particularly with features that enable modern computer chips (far more sensitive circuitry than the crude microchips of pre-1973) to survive the radiation and the means to sustain a larger crew on longer missions than the 3 man, two week missions of the Apollo programme. Manned missions not being able to leave currently does not magically mean it has always been impossible.
    2
  17.  @Globeisahoax  Being disagreed with and having questions asked of you is not censorship. Wanting everybody you don’t like banned as trolls is censorship.
    2
  18. They believe the sun is visibly spherical which means it sends light in all directions while actually only sending it to a limited, very misshapen area (because it just does both) that poorly mimics half s globe bring illuminated. They have no explanation for longer days in the Southern Hemisphere since their predicts WiFi’s become markedly shorter in the summer.
    2
  19.  @KangenAlec  None of you have posted a FE map on Instagram. Why can’t you?
    2
  20. When any Tom, Dick or Harry can post a video on any subject regardless of how little they know or understand then YT is generally not a reliable source of information. There are genuinely informative channels but you need to apply some common sense when looking.
    2
  21. "rain formation" There's an endless supply of water in the heavens?
    2
  22.  @Globehoax  You’ve moved on from “density force” to spontaneous motion?
    2
  23. "intellect and reason is stable" Simplistic would be a better description. They have no notion of accurate calculations & measurements, multiple factors, multiple causes...
    2
  24.  @Globeisahoaxx  You still haven’t said how you determined the sun to ve small & close or explained why the FE sun would only light a limited misshapen area. Why cant the manwith the answers provide answers?
    2
  25.  @KangenAlec  You would however be able see hundreds of miles rather than the 10's actually visible, but, heck, FE'ers have no grasp of numbers.
    2
  26.  @somerandomdude4588  Dwarfed by his other account, Globe is a Hoax.
    2
  27.  @mattaugust4813  He asks the same questions repeatedly, I answer them repeatedly and he claims nobody gives him the answers. His head is blocked. Check Morton’s demon.
    2
  28.  @KangenAlec  NASA is irrelevant to what we determined millennia is ago.
    2
  29.  @Globeisahoax  Gleason is an a azimuthal projection of the globe.
    2
  30.  @Globeisahoaxx  Yet again doofus, 23.4 degrees.
    2
  31.  @KangenAlec  Yet the distances claimed by FE'ers wouldn't have it coming within 20 degrees of the horizon; can any of you actually handle maths?
    2
  32. You realise that the original version wasn't written in English?
    2
  33.  @KangenAlec  You’re saying you don’t see them rising & setting?
    2
  34.  @KangenAlec  Explain why the sun's observable motion differs from what you're claiming.
    2
  35. Numbers are important. The amount of oblation is tiny compared to the radius; for most intents and purposes the Earth is a perfect sphere. You’re making the usual mistake of assuming a value is either “nothing” or “huge” rather than considering “how much?”
    2
  36.  @shallnotprevail  That's the usual mistake disguised as pedanticism.
    2
  37.  @shallnotprevail  One picture is a composite. 1. I realise that some people have serious problems with numbers but 1 should not be difficult to comprehend. At the time we didn't have cameras above LEO. We currently have multiple cameras in geostationary orbit collectively taking several single-frame shots per hour but some people can't think beyond 1.
    2
  38. 1968 Earthrise.
    2
  39.  @Globehoax  Yet again dumbo, 23.4 degrees and there is no top & bottom.
    2
  40. @James Henry Smith Why have FE’ers never heard of telescopes?
    2
  41.  @KangenAlec  2500 years whether you like it or not and in months you have yet to answer the basic question asked; motive.
    2
  42.  @KangenAlec  It’s easy to demonstrate the distance through triangulation and its movement. You’re claiming observable reality is wrong; you need to produce evidence to back your claim.
    2
  43.  @karjay0428  His sole line of argument is “just gotta be a hoax therefore it’s flat”.
    2
  44.  @raimundematiusaityte9929  I’ve explained to him umpteen times but he just can’t grasp it.
    2
  45. A scientific theory is an explanation for how something happens; it is based on facts collated from experimentation and observation. Nothing outside maths can be proven absolutely; the theory can be assumed to be a fact for every day purposes but can never be absolutely proven to be such. The shape of the Earth is a fact.
    2
  46. You realise we are talking about the shape of the Earth, not its composition or origins? That the ancient Greeks deduced its shape from observation long before science existed?
    2
  47. Let me guess - it must be a fisheye lens because the horizon is curved?
    2
  48.  @KangenAlec  How high have you been to verify your FE model is correct?
    2
  49. And, as answered, you need to come up with reproducible evidence not conjecture.
    2
  50. Everything’s a conspiracy to them.
    2